A SPECIAL REPORT ON STUDENT VOTING HABITS FROM 2012 AND 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

Similar documents
Democratic Engagement Plan

We are the Student Democracy Coalition.

Cultivating Engaged Citizens & Thriving Communities

PORTUGUESE SOCIAL CLUB PAWTUCKET, RHODE ISLAND EVALUATION OF THE 2006 ELECTIONS July 23, 2007

AMIGOS DE TERCEIRA STATE OF RHODE ISLAND EVALUATION OF THE 2006 ELECTIONS

Engaging New Voters: The Impact of Nonprofit Voter Outreach on Client and Community Turnout

ST. ANTHONY PARISH TAUNTON, MA EVALUATION OF THE 2006 ELECTIONS

THE PORTUGUESE-AMERICAN FORUM SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CA EVALUATION OF THE 2006 ELECTIONS

25% Percent of General Voters 20% 15% 10%

THE 2004 YOUTH VOTE MEDIA COVERAGE. Select Newspaper Reports and Commentary

Latino Voter Registration and Participation Rates in the November 2016 Presidential Election

Arizona State University s Commitment to Active Participation in Our Democracy

Voter Turnout by Income 2012

IMMACULATE CONCEPTION PARISH NEW BEDFORD, MA EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

SOCIEDADE ESPIRITO SANTO CORP. SANTA CLARA, CA EVALUATION OF THE 2006 ELECTIONS

Iowa Voting Series, Paper 4: An Examination of Iowa Turnout Statistics Since 2000 by Party and Age Group

Civic Engagement Action Plan

Iowa Voting Series, Paper 6: An Examination of Iowa Absentee Voting Since 2000

2018 University of Oklahoma Voter Engagement Campus Plan

A New America A New Majority A New Challenge

Democratic Engagement

Political participation by young women in the 2018 elections: Post-election report

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement

The Latino Electorate in 2010: More Voters, More Non-Voters

PORTUGUESE SOCIAL CLUB PAWTUCKET, RHODE ISLAND EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS February 25, 2010

1: HOW DID YOUTH VOTER TURNOUT DIFFER FROM THE REST OF THE 2012 ELECTORATE?

Who is registered to vote in Illinois?

Nonvoters in America 2012

2018 University of Texas at Austin Voter Engagement Campus Plan

Campus Action Plan for Democratic Engagement: Simpson College. 2018/19 Academic Year

POLITICAL LEADERSHIP AND THE LATINO VOTE By NALEO Educational Fund

ESPIRITO SANTO PARISH FALL RIVER, MA. EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

THE WMUR GRANITE STATE POLL

ST. FRANCIS XAVIER PARISH EAST PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

AP PHOTO/MATT VOLZ. Voter Trends in A Final Examination. By Rob Griffin, Ruy Teixeira, and John Halpin November 2017

Truman Policy Research Harry S Truman School of Public Affairs

Democratic Engagement Plan University of Nevada, Reno

MEREDITH COLLEGE POLL September 18-22, 2016

ST. ANTHONY PARISH PAWTUCKET, RHODE ISLAND EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

THE PORTUGUESE ORGANIZATION FOR SOCIAL SERVICES AND OPPORTUNITIES SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

Unpacking California Voter Registration and Turnout Trends:

The Rising American Electorate

The Youth Vote in 2008 By Emily Hoban Kirby and Kei Kawashima-Ginsberg 1 Updated August 17, 2009

FREE THE VOTE. A Progressive Agenda to Protect and Expand the Right to Vote. presented at the 2013 Progressive Mass Policy Conference.

UNIAO PORTUGUESA DO ESTADO DE CALIFORNIA STANISLAUS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

1. A Republican edge in terms of self-described interest in the election. 2. Lower levels of self-described interest among younger and Latino

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Youth Voting in the 2004 Battleground States

Statewide Survey on Job Approval of President Donald Trump

The Rising American Electorate

Same-Day Registration (SDR) allows eligible

Thinking back to the Presidential Election in 2016, do you recall if you supported ROTATE FIRST TWO, or someone else?

Deliberative Polling for Summit Public Schools. Voting Rights and Being Informed REPORT 1

Kansas Speaks Fall 2018 Statewide Public Opinion Survey

Every Eligible Voter Counts: Correctly Measuring American Turnout Rates

Demographic, Economic and Social Transformations in Bronx Community District 4: High Bridge, Concourse and Mount Eden,

Opinion about North Carolina Political Leaders: One Year after Election 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS

NEVADA: CLINTON LEADS TRUMP IN TIGHT RACE

INTRODUCING. Wednesday, March 9th 1871

Case Study: Get out the Vote

PRESS RELEASE October 15, 2008

The California Civic Engagement Project Issue Brief

Minnesota Public Radio News and Humphrey Institute Poll

92% of alumni reported voting in November 2000, in contrast to 78% of those surveyed in the NES study


University of Nebraska-Lincoln Husker Vote Coalition Strategic Plan

MORE SPANISH- SURNAMED VOTERS PARTICIPATED IN THE 2016 ELECTION THAN EVER IN THE 3RD LARGEST COUNTY IN THE NATION

Election Day Voter Registration

Presentation to WTS NC Triangle Chapter Brenda H. Rogers League of Women Voters US October 18,

ST. ANTHONY PARISH TAUNTON, MA EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

Same Day Voter Registration in

Percentages of Support for Hillary Clinton by Party ID


2016 NCSU N=879

Latinos and the 2008 Presidential Election: A Visual Database

1615 L Street, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC (main) (fax)

Decline in Voter Turnout: Causes and Potential Remedies. The voter turnout for this year s midterm elections was approximately 35.

Unit 2: Political Beliefs and Behaviors Session 2: Political Participation

Kansas Speaks 2015 Statewide Public Opinion Survey

NextGen Climate ran the largest independent young

Franklin Pierce / WBZ Poll

FOR RELEASE NOVEMBER 07, 2017

Job approval in North Carolina N=770 / +/-3.53%

Latino Attitudes on the War in Iraq, the Economy and the 2004 Election

California Civic Engagement Project

Latinos in the 2016 Election:

Demographic, Economic, and Social Transformations in Queens Community District 3: East Elmhurst, Jackson Heights, and North Corona,

AP US GOVERNMENT & POLITICS UNIT 2 REVIEW

CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS AND IMMIGRATION POLITICS IN COLORADO. June 25, 2014

States of Change. Demographic Change, Representation Gaps, and Challenges to Democracy,

Youth Voter Turnout has Declined, by Any Measure By Peter Levine and Mark Hugo Lopez 1 September 2002

ENGAGING NEW VOTERS. The Impact of Nonprofit Voter Outreach on Client and Community Turnout.

SHOULD VOTING BE COMPULSORY IN LOCAL AND NATIONAL ELECTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES?

CLINTON NARROWLY LEADS TRUMP IN FLORIDA -- GOP THIRD PARTY DEFECTIONS & HISPANIC VOTERS CREATING THE CURRENT GAP

REPORT ON POLITICAL ATTITUDES & ENGAGEMENT

The People, The Press & Politics. Campaign '92:

November 15-18, 2013 Open Government Survey

Illustrating voter behavior and sentiments of registered Muslim voters in the swing states of Florida, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.

Minority Student Caucus Constitution

THE STAKES IS HIGH: CONTEXTUALIZING BLACK POLITICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE TRUMP ERA

Transcription:

A SPECIAL REPORT ON STUDENT VOTING HABITS FROM 2012 AND 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

A Special Report on Student Voting Habits from 2012 and 2016 Presidential Elections Western Carolina University s (WCU) passion and purpose for student development and community engagement are manifested in our community-engaged research, pedagogy, and partnerships, which are designed to connect institutional and regional resources. In this report you will find the following sections: Valuing Active Student Citizenship Development at WCU WCU/National Study of Learning, Voting, & Engagement Data and Associated Observations Commentary from Steed Distinguished Professor and Director of the WCU Public Policy Institute, Todd Collins, PhD, JD Next Steps: WCU Civic Action Plan Contact Information Valuing Active Student Citizenship Development at WCU WCU s mission is focused on enhancing economic, student, and community development in collaboration with, and respect for, our communities and partners. While WCU engages in this work through myriad ways, the focus of this report is on students engagement with voter registration and voting specifically. It is important to note that this specific type of studentcentered civic engagement is clearly guided by the 2020 Strategic Plan: Goal 2.2. Foster active citizenship among WCU students. Initiative 2.2.5. Create a culture of participating in the democratic process as demonstrated by large percentages of students who are registered to vote and who vote. Through the achievement of this goal and the implementation of this initiative, students are expected to comprehend and practice active citizenship. At WCU, this type of work is not completed singlehandedly as it is a responsibility of our campus as a whole to develop the ideals of civic participation in our students. The monumental effort in 2015-2016 to engage our students was simply a reflection of our institution s mission. To this end, the work conducted at WCU included many partners and advocates both internal and external to campus. This effort required commitments from multiple constituencies including local government (the Jackson County Board of Elections), university leadership (Chancellor s Executive Council), and wide campus support (Student Affairs, Undergraduate Studies, Center for Service Learning (CSL), etc.). Funding and other resources were provided by external agencies (Andrew Goodman Foundation, Campus Compact, Campus Vote Project, etc.) as well as internal support from the Provost s Office, the CSL, and the Department of Campus Activities. Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs Dr. Sam Miller stated that, civic engagement is one of the core elements included in what we think defines a successful student experience. WCU wants our students to be informed, educated citizens prepared to participate in the civic life of our university, region, state, and world. WCU focuses on preparing and supporting students on their independent journeys towards a brighter, richer, more inclusive democracy. We believe that the sun is setting on the era of apathy and rising boldly on a future of informed, passionate, and steady democracy. 2

WCU/National Study of Learning, Voting, and Engagement Data and Associated Observations The National Study of Learning, Voting, and Engagement (NSLVE) is a program housed at Tufts University s Tisch College s Institute for Democracy & Higher Education and is a study of US college and university student voting. This study helps match participating institutions student enrollment records with publically available voter registration and turnout records. Each participating institution receives de-identified data that indicates whether a student is registered to vote and if they voted. This data helps institutions determine their students registration and voter rates for both presidential and mid-term elections. Additionally, this data can be used to inform civic engagement practices within institutions (https://idhe.tufts.edu/ nslve/frequently-asked-questions). Table 1: Total Eligible and Registered Student Voters at WCU Western Carolina University 2012 2016 DIFFERENCE From 2012-2016 Total Eligible Voters 8,945 10,462 +1,517 (+18%) Number & Percentage of Registered Students Number & Percentage of Registered Students Who Voted 6,741 (75%) 6,935 (66%) +194 ( 9%) 4,565 (68%) 4,830 (70%) +265 (+2%) Our campus s unprecedented enrollment growth made for a great opportunity to engage more students, but made it difficult in 2016 to break even or exceed the registration and voting habits from 2012. For example, we needed to register 1,157 more students in 2016 vs. 2012 to keep the same registration rate that we obtained in 2012 (75%). We only registered 194 more students in 2016 than in 2012; therefore, we were off by roughly 1,000 registered students. We needed to have 787 more students vote in 2016 vs. 2012 to equal the voting rate that we obtained in 2012 (51%). We only had 265 more students vote in 2016 than in 2012; therefore we were off by roughly 500 student voters. Again, these figures were to break even with the 2012 registration and voting habits of our student body. This is due to an 18% increase, or 1,517 students, in our eligible student voter figures between 2012 and 2016. Growth in student enrollments in the 18-24 year old category resulted in 1,337 more students in 2016 than in 2012. Compare this to the growth in student enrollments across the 25-50+ demographic categories, which was 229 more students in 2016 than in 2012. This demonstrates that the increased enrollments in the WCU student body over the past four years has had an impact on both registration and voting rates. Perhaps most telling in these data is the voting rate of 18-21 year olds on campus. In 2012 this age demographic of students voted at a 44% voting rate and in 2016 this same age demographic voted at a 36% voting rate while increasing by 1,072 in this same age demographic (18-21 year olds). All things considered with regard to registered individuals, in 2016 WCU students outvoted the North Carolina general population by 1.5% (WCU student population 70% vs. NC general population 68.5%). Interestingly, in 2012 the NC general population outvoted WCU by roughly 1% (WCU student population 67.7% vs. NC general population 68.3%). Promisingly, this suggests a higher level of student voter engagement of those who were registered in 2016 vs. 2012. 3

Table 2: WCU Student Voter Turnout as a Percentage of All Students Western Carolina University 2012 2016 DIFFERENCE From 2012-2016 Number & Percentage of All Students Who Voted Number & Percentage of All Females Who Voted Number & Percentage of All Males Who Voted Number & Percentage of All Minorities Who Voted Number & Percentage of All Whites Who Voted 4,565 (51%) 4,830 (46%) +265 ( 5%) 2,715 (54%) 2,852 (47%) +137 ( 7%) 1,850 (46%) 1,978 (43%) +128 ( 3%) 601 (45%) 752 (37%) +151 ( 8%) 3,908 (52%) 4,028 (48%) +120 ( 4%) The decline in female voters from 2012 to 2016 was also significant. The interesting caveat here is that this was the first time that a female candidate was in the running for president as the candidate for a major party (Democrat, Hillary Clinton). Yet, there was still a 7% decrease in female voting rates from 2012 to 2016 (note: the voting rate does not consider who the student voted for, only if they voted). Interestingly, due to the dramatic increase in the size of WCU s student body, while there was a 7% decline is voting rates, there were still 137 more females who voted in 2016 than in 2012. The decline in minority populations (non-white) voting from 2012 to 2016 was also significant. Collectively, minorities saw an 8% decrease in their voting rates from 2012 to 2016 (note: the voting rate does not consider who the student voted for, only if they voted). Again, like female voters, the minority voters saw an increase of 151 more voters at the polls, but with the dramatic increase in the size of WCU s student body, the increased number of minority voters still resulted in an 8% decline. 4

Table 3: How WCU Students Voted Western Carolina University 2012 2016 DIFFERENCE From 2012-2016 Number & Percentage Who Early Voted Number & Percentage Who Voted In-Person, Election Day 2,664 (58%) 3,429 (71%) +765 ( +13%) 1,434 (31%) 922 (20%) 512 ( 11%) The on-campus polling place was extremely valuable and had a direct impact on the number of students who early voted. WCU experienced a 13% increase from 2012-2016 in the number of students who voted early. Of the 3,429 students who early voted roughly 2,500 of them voted at our on-campus early voting polling place. Alternatively, WCU saw an 11% decrease in Election Day, In-Person voting engagement from 2012 to 2016. This 11% decrease represented a decline of 512 students. This decrease in Election Day voting engagement can be attributed to the on-campus early voting polling place. 5

Commentary from Steed Distinguished Professor and Director of the WCU Public Policy Institute, Todd Collins, PhD, JD The efforts surrounding Western Carolina University s initiatives were indeed noteworthy. One of the key reasons why these endeavors were significant is that they were almost entirely initiated, organized, and conducted by the students themselves. While faculty and staff provided administrative support, the ideas and programing were largely student generated, including the advocacy and execution of a new early voting location on campus. Further, while the focus of this report concerns voter turnout trends, the many other types of civic engagement activities in which WCU students participated should not be ignored, including political debates, civil discussions, election information sessions, and guest speakers on campus. Aside from fostering civic engagement on campus, these activities greatly increased the organizational and leadership skills of the many student coordinators and volunteers. As to fostering campus engagement, the trends concerning student voter turnout for the WCU campus largely mirrored general voting trends for 2016, particularly concerning those of WCU s largest voting-age group, those 18-24 years-old. Analysis from the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that 39.4% of those 18-24 across the United States voted in the 2016 election, up slightly from 38% in 2012. However, the Census Bureau estimated a decline in young voter turnout in North Carolina, down from 45.1% of the voting-age population in 2012 to 44.8% in 2016. Western Carolina University also showed a slight drop according to the NSLVE data when examining all potential voters of this age group from 2012 to (44%) to 2016 (38%). However, a more telling story stems from examination of registered voters. Again, North Carolina witnessed a decrease in turnout of registered voters ages 18-25, based on N.C. State Board of Elections data analysis by Democracy North Carolina. In 2012, 55.1% of registered voters ages 18 to 25 showed up at the polls, while in 2016 this voting rate dropped to 52.9% for this age group. While the NSLVE data provided do not include information on registered voter turnout by age groups, it is worth noting that WCU s overall turnout of registered voters increased from 68% in 2012 to 70% in 2016. While we cannot be sure about turnout rates for younger registered student voters at WCU, it is safe to presume that WCU s turnout for this age group likely outpaced North Carolina as a whole. And while the data provided by NSLVE do not allow direct comparisons to other universities in the state, an estimate by Common Cause NC rated Western Carolina as having the second highest voter turnout among North Carolina universities. While Common Cause NC s data is not as robust as that provided by NSLVE, it again reinforces that the efforts to increase student participation were extraordinary Next Steps: WCU Civic Action Plan https://www.wcu.edu/webfiles/wcucivicactionplan.pdf Reference Common Cause NC. 2017. Study Finds NC Universities with Highest Student Turnout for the 2016 Election. Retrieved from http://commoncausenc.org/ articles/2017/5_1_17_student_turnout.php Democracy North Carolina. 2017. Analysis: Who Voted in 2016 & Who Didn t. Retrieved from https://democracync.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ WhoVoted2016.pdf NSLVE (August, 2017). 2012 & 2016 campus report: Student voting rates for Western Carolina University. Tufts University: Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life. Western Carolina University (2012). 2020 vision: Focusing our future. Cullowhee, NC: Western Carolina University. United States Census Bureau. (2017). Voting and Registration in the Election of November 2016 [Data file]. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/data/ tables/time-series/demo/voting-and-registration/p20-580.html United States Census Bureau. (2013). Voting and Registration in the Election of November 2012 [Data file]. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/data/ tables/2012/demo/voting-and-registration/p20-568.html 6

Contact Information Lane Perry, PhD Director, Center for Service Learning Western Carolina University laneperry@wcu.edu Todd Collins, PhD, JD Steed Distinguished Professor Director Public Policy Institute Western Carolina University tcollins@wcu.edu Wyatt Jones, student Bachelors of Political Science Student Democracy Coalition Leader wajones5@catamount.wcu.edu Carol Burton, EdD Associate Provost Undergraduate Studies Western Carolina University burton@wcu.edu 7