A-level LAW. Paper 2 SPECIMEN MATERIAL

Similar documents
Time allowed: 1 hour 30 minutes

A-level LAW. Paper 1 SPECIMEN MATERIAL

A-level LAW COMPONENT CODE

A-level LAW. Paper 3 Contract SPECIMEN MATERIAL

Time allowed: 1 hour 30 minutes

General Certificate of Education Advanced Subsidiary Examination June 2014

General Certificate of Education Advanced Subsidiary Examination January 2012

General Certificate of Education Advanced Subsidiary Examination January 2011

General Certificate of Education Advanced Subsidiary Examination

General Certificate of Education Advanced Subsidiary Examination

Friday 19 May 2017 Afternoon Time allowed: 1 hour 30 minutes

General Certificate of Secondary Education June 2011

Surname. Other Names. Candidate Signature

Case study OLA Why was his claim under OLA 1957 rejected? 2. What was the alternative claim? 3. What did the first court decide?

Tuesday 16 May 2017 Afternoon Time allowed: 1 hour 30 minutes

Friday 20 May 2016 Afternoon Time allowed: 1 hour 30 minutes

AS POLITICS. Government and Politics of the UK. Time allowed: 3 hours SPECIMEN MATERIAL

AS LAW COMPONENT CODE

THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES UNIT 13 LAW OF TORT *

POST-STANDARDISATION. Version 1.0: General Certificate of Education. Law. Mark Scheme examination January series

Question 1. On what theory or theories might damages be recovered, and what defenses might reasonably be raised in actions by:

THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES UNIT 13 LAW OF TORT *

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level. Published

THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES UNIT 5 LAW OF TORT *

AS HISTORY. Paper 1G Challenge and Transformation: Britain, c Mark scheme

(Jan11GEOG201) General Certificate of Education Advanced Subsidiary Examination January Geographical Skills TOTAL. Time allowed 1 hour

Specimen Mark Scheme

(Specification B) 40353F (JUN F01) General Certificate of Secondary Education Foundation Tier June Investigating the Shrinking World

MEDIA STATEMENT CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH

AS HISTORY Paper 1D Stuart Britain and the Crisis of Monarchy, Mark scheme

Question 1. Under what theory or theories might Paul recover, and what is his likelihood of success, against: a. Charlie? b. KiddieRides-R-Us?

Chapter 2: Negligence: The Duty of Care General Principles and Public Policy

DATED LICENCE. Between WELD ENTERPRISES LTD LICENSOR. and [ ] LICENSEE

General Certificate of Secondary Education Foundation Tier Specimen Paper

Answer A to Question 4

FALL 2001 December 15, 2001 FALL SEMESTER SAMPLE ANSWER

Citizenship Studies *P44687A0124* Pearson Edexcel GCSE P44687A. Unit 1: Citizenship Today. Monday 11 May 2015 Afternoon Time: 1 hour.

Summary of Investigation SiRT File # Referral from Cape Breton Regional Police January 1, 2017

AS HISTORY Paper 2L Italy and Fascism, c Mark scheme

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN CURT GOMES AND RANDY LALLA RODDY LALLA. Mr Abdel Ashraph instructed by Mr Mahendra Dhaniram for the Defendant

General Certificate of Secondary Education Higher Tier Specimen Paper

Stepping Out of Line

ANSWER A TO QUESTION 3

III.2 Model Written Statement November 2006

SAMPLE QUESTIONS FOR LEVEL 4 DIPLOMA IN PARALEGAL STUDIES

klm Report on the Examination Law examination - June series General Certificate of Education

The right of action was taken away since the parties were in the course of employment at the time of the accident. [10 pages]

Police Use of Force during Arrest

DAY CAMP SUPERVISOR LIABLE FOR LOG ROLLING FATALITY IN CITY PARK

THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW *

GCSE CITIZENSHIP STUDIES

PAPER: LAW MARK AWARDED: 73% The overriding objective was recently modified in the Jackson reforms and recites as follows.

(Specification B) 40351H (JAN H01) General Certificate of Secondary Education Higher Tier January 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG

Mock Trial Competition Case Materials 2019 Round 1

Retail Crime Evidential Pack

Government and Politics

ANTHONY ROMANAHENG MODIKOE MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY J U D G M E N T

General Certificate of Education January Criminal Law (Offences against the Person) or Contract Unit 3. Mark Scheme

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between ANDY MARCELLE. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO

/ V. ,~ o w,i DATE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA. (1) REPORTABLE: NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHEJ;i,,,,;tQPti,1;..

KEY ASPECTS OF THE LAW OF CONTRACT

Guidance on filling in the complaint form

Neal v Ambulance Service of New South Wales: a postscript to (2007) 5 e Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care Article number

FIM Courts &Tribunals Service

General Certificate of Secondary Education Foundation Tier June 2014

PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS

General Certificate of Secondary Education Foundation Tier June 2013

BETWEEN: ADOLPH LUPP GmbH+CoKG CLAIMANT BELIZE 1. YOLANDA RECTOR DEFENDANTS 2. RUDY GALLEGO

PLAINTIFF S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPOSITION TO DEFENDANT S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF A DEMURRER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA DURBAN AND COAST LOCAL DIVISION CASE NO. 3305/2003. In the matter between: and JUDGMENT LUTHULI AJ

Neal v Ambulance Service of New South Wales: a postscript to (2007) 5 e Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care Article number

Consultation Guideline

Cambridge Assessment International Education Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level. Published

Right to sue; In the course of employment (proceeding to and from work).

Civil Liability Amendment (Personal Responsibility) Act 2002 No 92

Department for Communities and Local Government

PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS

Case 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

IOSH Legal Update November John Mitchell Partner, Risk & Compliance

OCTOBER 2012 LAW REVIEW OBVIOUS TREE HAZARD ON PARK SLEDDING HILL

Strict Liability for Dangerous Animals. Compass Aberdeen Conference 23 rd March 2018

9084 LAW 9084/41 Paper 41 (Law of Tort), maximum raw mark 75

General Certificate of Education June Criminal Law (Offences against the Person) or Contract Unit 3. Mark Scheme

Contents. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases. General Principles of Liability

TORTS SPECIFIC TORTS NEGLIGENCE

A-level SOCIOLOGY Unit 3 Beliefs in Society; Global Development; Mass Media; Power and Politics

Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11, [2009] 1 AC 874, [2009] 2 WLR 481, [2009] 3 All ER 205 HL

NUISANCE (PRIVATE) ENGLAND AND WALES

In the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court Building in the City of Richmond on Friday the 30th day of October, 2009.

Duties of Roads Authorities recent cases. Robert Milligan QC

History Specification B 40451

Rylands v Fletcher - Water escaped from a reservoir on the defendant s land causing the flooding of a mine on neighbouring land.

Before : HIS HONOUR JUDGE ROBINSON Between :

GRADER S GUIDE *** QUESTION NO. 1 *** SUBJECT: TORTS. Pat will assert claims for assault and battery and trespass to property.

THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) VIKINGS TRADERS LIMITED. and (1) DAVID HIPPOLYTE (2) JOHNNY SADOO.

Negligence: Criminals, Drivers, Professionals, and the average Joe What everyone should know RAKEEBA MAHOMED 6 NOVEMBER 2014

Written evidence submitted by DAC Beachcroft Claims Limited (PCB 17) The Prisons and Courts Bill Part 5: Whiplash

Transcription:

SPECIMEN MATERIAL Please write clearly, in block capitals. Centre number Candidate number Surname Forename(s) Candidate signature A-level LAW Paper 2 Specimen 2016 Time allowed: 2 hours Instructions Use black ink or black ball-point pen. Fill in the boxes at the top of this page. Answer all questions. You must answer the questions in the spaces provided. Do not write on blank pages. Do all rough work in this book. Cross through any work you do not want to be marked. Questions should be answered in continuous prose. Give reasoned answers. Where appropriate, make reference to cases, statutes and examples. Information The marks for questions are shown in brackets. The maximum mark for this paper is 100.

2 Only one answer per question is allowed. For each answer completely fill in the circle alongside the appropriate answer. CORRECT METHOD WRONG METHODS If you want to change your answer you must cross out your original answer as shown. If you wish to return to an answer previously crossed out, ring the answer you now wish to select as shown. 0 1 Rik, a claimant, has a duty to mitigate his losses when seeking damages in negligence. Which one of the following is the most accurate explanation of Rik s duty to mitigate? A Rik can only claim for losses which are foreseeable B Rik cannot claim for pure economic loss C Rik should establish a link between the negligence and the loss suffered D Rik should take reasonable steps to minimise his losses [1 mark] 0 2 If established by the defendant, the defence of contributory negligence has the following effect on a claim brought by the claimant: A Damages are reduced according to the level of fault demonstrated by the claimant B Damages are reduced by half C Damages are reduced without taking account of the level of fault demonstrated by the claimant D No damages will be awarded [1 mark]

3 0 3 Select the one true statement. Proposed new legislation affecting the whole of the Country but which is promoted by a minority interest group is most likely to be brought to Parliament as a: A Government Bill B Private Bill C Private Member s Bill D White Paper 0 4 Which one of these statements about tribunals is correct? [1 mark] A Most administrative tribunals are set up by professional bodies like the General Medical Council B Most administrative tribunals are set up under common law C Most tribunal panels consist of three members, a legally qualified chair and two others D The appeal from a tribunal decision is to the Supreme Court [1 mark] 0 5 The Law Commission s role includes codification of specific areas of law. Choose the best definition of codification. A Integrating all relevant laws in a new Act of Parliament B Combining two Acts of Parliament C Repealing obsolete and old-fashioned laws D Reviewing all the relevant law from every source [1 mark] Turn over

4 0 6 Explain three differences between the resolution of civil law disputes in courts on the one hand, and through alternative dispute resolution mechanisms on the other. [5 marks]

5 0 7 Amina s property was damaged by Ben s negligence. Most of the damage was of a kind that might have been expected but some of the damage was much more extensive than might have been expected. If the remoteness of damage principles are applied to Amina s claim against Ben for compensation in an action in negligence, suggest why she is likely to recover compensation for some, but perhaps not for all, of the damage. [5 marks] Turn over

6 0 8 Claire bought a detached house in a quiet residential area. Dan, the owner of the neighbouring house, ran a small welding business at weekends in the shed in his back garden. Claire became increasingly annoyed by the noise, despite the fact that a local estate agent had warned her of Dan s activities before Claire bought her house. When Claire complained to Dan, he started welding on Fridays as well. Advise Claire as to her rights and remedies against Dan in connection with the noise. [10 marks]

7 In question 9 you are required to provide an extended answer which shows a clear, logical and sustained line of reasoning leading to a valid conclusion. 0 9 Examine the meaning and significance of fault as a basis for liability in English law. Discuss the extent to which liability is based on fault in the tort in Rylands v Fletcher. [15 marks] Turn over

8

9 In question 10 you are required to provide an extended answer which shows a clear, logical and sustained line of reasoning leading to a valid conclusion. 1 0 Ella and her three years old son, Finley, were walking along the pavement of a busy road. Ella was answering a text on her mobile phone and did not notice that Finley had wandered off the pavement and into the road. Gavin was driving his motorbike along the road. As he came around a bend, he suddenly saw Finley immediately in front of him in the middle of the road. In swerving to avoid Finley, Gavin lost control of the motorbike and narrowly missed Hana, who was also walking along the pavement. The motorbike then struck a lamppost and the collision threw Gavin high into the air and some distance along the road. Gavin was obviously very badly injured and in considerable pain. Despite being very shaken herself, Hana rang for an ambulance and tried to comfort Gavin. By the time the ambulance arrived, Gavin s wife, Isabel, had also been contacted. She arrived at the scene shortly after the ambulance had left but she saw Gavin s badly mangled motorbike, along with bloodstains and bits of clothing strewn along the road. Gavin survived, though he was left with permanent physical disability. Both Hana and Isabel subsequently suffered from severe depression and personality changes. Consider the rights and remedies of Gavin, Hana and Isabel against Ella. [30 marks] Turn over

10

11 Extra space Turn over

12 In question 11 you are required to provide an extended answer which shows a clear, logical and sustained line of reasoning leading to a valid conclusion. 1 1 Jackson Ltd owned a warehouse and yard fenced off from the public. Large empty wooden crates were frequently stacked in the yard to await collection by a road haulage company. Recently, a section of the fence had been vandalised and youths, including Karl, aged 15, had been entering the yard and damaging vehicles and equipment. Whilst waiting for the fencing to be renewed, Jackson Ltd made a temporary repair and put up notices stating, Danger! Keep out!. One night, Karl easily broke through the repaired fence, climbed one of the stacks of crates and began jumping about at the top. When the stack moved under his weight, he lost his balance, fell and broke his arm. In jumping about on the crates, Karl had caused the stack to become unstable. The next morning, Lech, a driver for the road haulage company, began to inspect the stack before loading the crates onto his lorry. The stack collapsed onto him and caused injuries to his back which were made much worse by a pre-existing physical weakness. Consider the rights and remedies of Karl and of Lech against Jackson Ltd in connection with the incidents involving the stack of crates. Assuming that Karl has a small income and no savings, assess the options that may be open to him to pursue legal action against Jackson Limited. [30 marks]

13 Turn over

14 Extra space END OF QUESTIONS

15 There are no questions printed on this page DO NOT WRITE ON THIS PAGE ANSWER IN THE SPACES PROVIDED aqa.org.uk Copyright 2016 AQA and its licensors. All rights reserved. AQA Education (AQA) is a registered charity (registered charity number 1073334) and a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales (company number 3644723). Registered address: AQA, Devas Street, Manchester M15 6EX 24 January 2017 Turn over