Pre-PC 1368 Competency Assessments. Sonoma Superior Court

Similar documents
First Regular Session Seventy-second General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED. Bill Summary

MEMORANDUM RE: MENTAL HEALTH DIVERSION (PENAL CODE )(AB 1810)

Lubbock District and County Courts Indigent Defense Plan. Preamble

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership

AB 109 and Prop 47 County Public Planning

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 56 1

IC Chapter 16. Problem Solving Courts

Raise the Age Presentation: 2017 NYSAC Fall Seminar. September 21, 2017

NC General Statutes - Chapter 122C Article 5 1

Department of Corrections

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 439

Work Group to Re-envision the Jail Replacement Project Report Release & Next Steps. Board of Supervisors June 13, 2017

Justice-Involved Veterans 1 : A decision map of Penal Code section

11/03/11 CHAPTER 122C - Article 5 - Part 7 Page 1

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO ALACHUA COUNTY DRUG COURT

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session H. B. No

Rule 16. Appointed Counsel

Juvenile Justice Process. Overview of Nevada

32A-4 through 32A-7. Reserved for future codification purposes.

COMMITMENT ISSUES FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT

NOTICE OF DEMAND FOR TRIAL OR DISPOSITION PURUSANT TO PENAL CODE SECTION 1381 OR

Local Rules Governing Juvenile Delinquency and Undisciplined Proceedings In The 26 th Judicial District. November 2011

Due Process Grievance and Appeal

Types of Programs Fall Conference. Dispute Resolution Center (DRC)

Section 1 - Are You Eligible?

STATUTORY COMPILATION PRESENCE OF VICTIM ADVOCATE IN SEXUAL ASSAULT EXAM CURRENT AS OF MARCH 2011

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 522

FORENSIC MENTAL HEALTH LEGAL ISSUES (IST)

County Parole Board Report of the San Francisco Civil Grand Jury SUMMARY The Civil Grand Jury (CGJ) reviewed the County Parole Board, a

Juvenile Certification

IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) CASE NO. Defendant hereby ordered to have psychiatric evaluation with Dr. on at as follows (check one):

NC General Statutes - Chapter 50 Article 2 1

HOUSE BILL No December 14, 2005, Introduced by Rep. Condino and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

State of North Carolina Department of Public Safety Prisons

CITY of ALBUQUERQUE SEVENTEENTH COUNCIL

State of North Carolina Department of Public Safety Prisons

MISDEMEANOR SENTENCING STEPS FOR SENTENCING A MISDEMEANOR UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING

ALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

NO TALLAHASSEE, September 11, Mental Health/Substance Abuse

WHAT IS OBJECTIVE JAIL CLASSIFICATION? GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF OBJECTIVE JAIL CLASSIFICATION

No An act relating to jurisdiction of delinquency proceedings. (H.751) It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont:

Let others know about the FREE legal resources available at LA Law Library. #ProBonoWeek #LALawLibrary

Court Support Agencies Organization Department Summary

POLICY AND OPERATING PROCEDURE

For Informational Purposes (916) July 15, 2011

Office Of The District Attorney

Part 1 Rules for the Continued Delivery of Services in Non- Capital Criminal and Non-Criminal Cases at the Trial Level

MENTAL HEALTH ADVANCE DIRECTIVES - GUIDE FOR AGENTS

(1) Correctional facility means a facility operated by or under contract with the department.

SENATE BILL NO. 33 IN THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE - FIRST SESSION A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED

Number August 31, 2017 IMMEDIATE POLICY CHANGE GJ-14, VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS DO-1, INTAKE PROCESS

County of Santa Clara Office of the District Attorney

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE A106090

TEXAS COUNCIL Board Training: Trustee Roles and Responsibilities

Expunging Adult Criminal Records in Santa Clara County

MENTAL HEALTH ADVANCE DIRECTIVES

OPERATIONS ORDER. Releases

The Rights of Crime Victims in New York State

This outline and attachments are available at [insert website]

COUNTY OF OTTAWA CIRCUIT COURT PROBATION AND PAROLE 2016 YEAR END REPORT. Administrative Offices: Grand Haven, Holland, Hudsonville

SEALING OF CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORDS (General Information) July 1, 2017

Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT): Summaries of Procedures & Services

Have you ever been a victim or a witness to a crime? If so, you may be entitled to certain rights under Louisiana's Crime Victim Bill of Rights.

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1308

The Children s Initiative

Special Report October 2, 2018

Determining Eligibility for Expungements & Penal Code 17(B) Reductions. Expungements and Prop 47 Clinic Training Training Module 1

Assembly Bill No. 510 Select Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

Appendix A. Humboldt County Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Membership Roster Humboldt County AB 109 Implementation Progress Report

18 USC 3006A. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

SECTION 1 LAW ENFORCEMENT EMERGENCY SERVICES AND

CHAPTER 4. ADJUDICATORY HEARING

Most Common Firearms Law Questions

ARIZONA STATE SENATE Fifty-Third Legislature, First Regular Session

2.3 Involuntary Commitment: Prehearing Procedures

Corrections Division Policy and Procedure Manual Mendocino County Sheriff's Office

JUVENILE LITIGATION PARALEGAL

Assembly Bill No. 579 Select Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

Justice Reinvestment in Oklahoma Initial Work Group Meeting

CITY OF TITUSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT 1100 John Glenn Boulevard Titusville, Florida (321)

REVISOR ACF/EP A

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

A Victim s Guide to Understanding the Criminal Justice System

Family Court Rules. Judicial District 19B. Domestic

Marion County Juvenile Department Overview

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT S.2371, AN ACT RELATIVE TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM

OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES BULLETIN

NO TALLAHASSEE, June 30, Mental Health/Substance Abuse

20 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF COLORADO ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER SUBJECT: County Court Reorganization COUNTY COURT MEMORANDUM OF OPERATION

MEDICAL PAROLE I. ELIGIBILITY

CALIFORNIA YOUTH OFFENDER PAROLE HEARINGS SB 260

Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs MODEL POLICY OFFICER-INVOLVED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. Statute of Limitations and Speedy Trial CPL ARTICLE 30 2/28/13 3 EVENTS THAT ARE ESSENTIAL IN ANALYZING TIMELINESS

THE VOTING RIGHTS OF PEOPLE WITH CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS IN NEW YORK

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN

Transcription:

Pre-PC 1368 Competency Assessments Sonoma Superior Court

Program Description Originally, the Court and County provided a wrap-around program that included the pre-1368 forensic assessments, liaison between all justice partners and was shared funding between Sheriff, Health Services and the Court. This collaborative approach was meant to reduce jail beds, provide prompt diagnosis of mental health needs, coordinate a continuum of incustody and community based services to stabilize and restore mental health The early resolution of cases and averting protracted PC 1368 proceedings reduced costs for all criminal justice partners when defendants could be restored at the local level. To continue to minimize the level of formal PC 1368 Forensic Evaluations the Court began in July 2011, contracting with a Psychologist to provide prescreening of criminal defendants or early 1368 forensic assessments. The Psychologist evaluates individuals with a pending criminal charge pursuant to PC 1368. The evaluation includes a face to face interview with defendant, file review, including crime reports and the mental health file, consults with attorneys, may talk to collateral individuals and then provides an oral report to the Court with a recommendation.

Program Description cont. Generally within two days the court is notified of the recommendation by the Psychologist. 90% of referrals are deemed competent and recommended to continue their criminal process Approximately 10% are referred under PC 1368. By pre-filtering out 90% of potential PC 1368 proceedings, the serious actual incompetent defendants are moved more expeditiously through the forensic evaluation, focusing the resources on the greatest need and reducing additional delays for all cases referred Approximately 50 referrals are received a month, which is an increase of 20% over last year. Based on the same principle as ECR, early case resolution, by reviewing within 2 days, cases are allowed to continue through the criminal process, rather than incur weeks and months of delays pending a formal PC 1368 evaluation, only to be found competent.

Summary of Sidebar Report People v. SCR- SUMMARY OF SIDEBAR REPORT FROM DR. RANISH DATE OF ORAL REPORT: 1. No further evaluation is recommended. Proceedings should be reinstated. (For Dr. s consideration: Insert boxes in this area that would include summary reasons for demonstrated behavior that are not based on incompetence. i.e. Substance Abuse, Lack of Maturity, etc.) Summary of initial assessment: 2. A further evaluation and report should be prepared. The defendant should be referred to: Dr. If a second opinion is requested, the defendant should be referred to: Dr. Defendant has a history of the following: Diagnosis of Previous mental health hospitalization. Prescribed psychotropic medications. Commitment pursuant to P.C. 1370. Conservatorship in county. Summary of initial assessment:

Need and Population The target population are felony and misdemeanor in-custody defendants with competency issues. The competence of a defendant is usually called into question in one of two ways: the defendant's attorney alerts the judge or the judge personally notices that the defendant may not be competent. The court initiates competence proceedings by declaring a doubt" about the defendant's competence on the record. At that time the Psychologist is ordered to assess the individual and provide a recommendation within two days. Ultimately, if recommended by the Psychologist a competency hearing will be ordered under Penal Code Section 1368(a). As noted, the current population of referrals is about 600, which has increased from the prior year, close to 20%. As confirmed by the Sheriff and Health Services, we continue to see increased mental health issues in both the general jail population and realignment-eligible defendants. This condition is anticipated to worsen with parole violations, effective July 1, 2013. Given the large percentage who are determined to be competent after their initial assessment, this process is vital to the expedition of pending cases by providing in-custody defendants with appropriate medications and mental health services. This also results in substantial cost-avoidance to the Sheriff by reducing use of jail beds and the DA and Defense by reducing the number of continuances and unnecessary litigation.

System Impact Early pre-1368 PC assessments screen out approximately 540 (90% of 600) in-custody defendants that can be restored/stabilized without a formal and lengthy incompetency evaluation and hearing. The formal evaluation process averages 21 days and therefore this early assessment saves approximately 11,340 jail days annually. Investment by CCP in this early assessment will free up jail beds to house 1170(h) sentenced defendants. Court will continue to pay for the formal 1368 evaluations (averages $350 per case). Assuming a scenario where the Court would more closely scrutinize 1368 referrals and as a result that number is reduced by 50% of the current non-referred population (540 defendants), the Court would incur a cost of $94,500 (270 defendants X $350 per case); consequently, these referrals would take longer and increase jail days by 5,670 annually (270 defendants X average of 21 days to complete 1368 evaluations). Defendants are provided needed mental health services at an early stage, resulting in the timely disposition of the case, ensuring due process, and cost-avoidance to the jail system and criminal justice partners.