UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES MOTION IN SUPPORT OF STATUTORY MOIETY PAYMENTS

Similar documents
Case 8:10-cr RAL-TGW Document 10 Filed 05/18/10 Page 1 of 8 PageID 89 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 2:08-cr GPS Document 20 Filed 05/08/08 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:165

Case 2:09-cr SRD-SS Document 18 Filed 12/02/09 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 3:11-cr JW Document 11 Filed 11/15/11 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:17-cr NT Document 46 Filed 01/22/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 492 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:11-cr MJG Document 1 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:04-cr KI Document 10 Filed 02/03/05 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 28

32 the Act to Prevent Pollution on Ships ( APPS ) by failing to maintain an oil record book while

Agenda for Presentation

Official Journal of the European Union

Marine Pollution Act 2012

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No

MARINE POLLUTION ACT 1987 No. 299

AM I GOING TO JAIL? John D. Kimball Blank Rome LLP

Florida Senate (Reformatted) SB 326 By Senator Constantine

SHIPPING (MARPOL) (JERSEY) REGULATIONS 2012

HELCOM RECOMMENDATION 19/14 ON A HARMONIZED SYSTEM OF FINES IN CASE A SHIP VIOLATES ANTI-POLLUTION REGULATIONS. Note by the European Union SUMMARY

THE MARINE POLLUTION MANAGEMENT ACT, 2002 ST. CHRISTOPHER AND NEVIS PART II - MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTES

International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution of the Sea by Oil, 1954.

Pacific Ocean Resources Compact. The provisions of the Pacific Ocean Resources Compact are as follows:

NEGARA BRUNEI DARUSSALAM TAMBAHAN KEPADA WARTA KERAJAAN BAHAGIAN I1. Disiarkan dengan Kebenaran SUPPLEMENT TO GOVERNMENT GAZETTE PART I1

Chapter 371. Prevention of Pollution of the Sea Act Certified on: / /20.

TITLE 42, CHAPTER 103 COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY ACT (CERCLA) EMERGENCY RESPONSE & NOTIFICATION PROVISIONS

Pollution of Waters by Oil and Noxious Substances (Amendment) Act 1991

ak Search this collection of releases I or search all news releases

EnviroLeg cc MARINE POLLUTION (PREVENTION OF POLLUTION FROM SHIPS) Reg p 1

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO A-ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL 2233

US Code (Unofficial compilation from the Legal Information Institute)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. 8:13-cv-2428-T-33TBM ORDER

THE STATE OF ALABAMA S RESPONSE TO BP S MEMO IN SUPPORT OF FINAL APPROVAL

Marine Pollution Control Law. Decree No.34 of The Sultanate of Oman MARINE POLLUTION CONTROL LAW CHAPTER ONE

United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD. UNITED STATES COAST GUARD Complainant. vs.

Natural Resources Journal

Date: 05 Nov2015. Background. BohaiBay. garbage or to Marine. was. and issue ports security. crewmembers

Marine Pollution Prevention Act 2008

2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

ANTARCTIC TREATIES ACT NO. 60 OF 1996

Case 2:08-cv RTH-PJH Document 1 Filed 06/24/08 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

RE: Docket ID Number OMB OMB MARITIME REGULATORY REFORM CONSULTATION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI)

The International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters: Finalization, Adoption and Law of the Sea Implications

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Centre for Oceans Law & Policy Global Challenges and Freedom of Navigation. Panel VI: Balancing Marine Environment and Freedom of Navigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW. Robert Munroe Deputy Counsel, Maryland Port Administration AAPA Seminar, February 13, 2007

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WATER CODE CHAPTER 7. ENFORCEMENT

Case 2:09-at Document 1 Filed 04/27/2009 Page 1 of 15

OREGON BOARD OF MARITIME PILOTS MINUTES #501

SHIPPING LAWS AMENDMENT ACT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE BLACK SEA REGION

Case 3:04-cr JAH Document 309 Filed 01/17/13 PageID.1104 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:15-cr FMO Document 52 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:295

Protocol Concerning Cooperation in Combating Pollution of the Mediterranean Sea by Oil and other Harmful Substances in Cases of Emergency 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

This report is published and distributed by America s Survival, Inc. Cliff Kincaid, President

Case Document 3 Filed in TXSB on 06/20/13 Page 1 of 7

Guidelines on fair treatment of seafarers in the event of a maritime accident

U.S. v. Edward Hanousek, Jr. 176 F.3d 1116 (9 th Cir.1999)

Routing the Alaska Pipeline Project through the Tetlin National Wildlife Refuge What responsibilities do agencies have under ANILCA?

If you are applying for a government-issued license, certificate, or permit, you must disclose your conviction and expungement.

==-f=-pl u- DEPARTMENT OF MARINE ADMINISTRATION MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS

ARGUMENTS FOR PROSECUTORS OF ENVIRONMENTAL

You are here: Water Laws & Regulations Policy & Guidance Wetlands Clean Water Act, Section 402: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

Commonwealth of Dominica CDP102Rev02-1- International Maritime Regulations

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF INDUSTRY AND SECURITY WASHINGTON, D.C ORDER RELATING TO GLS SOLUTIONS. INC.

ENRD Deputy Assistant Attorneys General and Section Chiefs. Jeffrey H. Wood, Acting Assistant Attorney General

Case 7:10-cv ART Document 1 Filed 03/10/10 Page 1 of 12

Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act: Enforcement Mechanisms. Jennifer Simon Lento. Associate Nixon Peabody, LLP

KENYA MARITIME AUTHORITY ACT

Marshall Decl. Ex B, p.1

Case 8:06-cr DOC Document 43 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 5. United States District Court Central District of California

Technical Information

CORPORATIONS AND ASSOCIATIONS

INTERTANKO ANNUAL TANKER EVENT Tokyo, Japan

Case 8:07-cr CJC Document 50 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:213. United States District Court Central District of California

Marine Pollution Prevention

Sewage Disposal ARTICLE II SEWAGE RETAINING TANKS

Chapter 18. Sewers and Sewage Disposal

CME Provisions in BWM Convention

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF INDUSTRY AND SECURITY WASHINGTON, D.C ORDER RELATING TO GREGORIO L. SALAZAR

AGO Environmental Crime Unit Factsheet

Multi-Jurisdictional and Successive Prosecution of Environmental Crimes: The Case for a Consistent Approach

THE SHIP SAFETY LAW. Law No. 11, March 15, 1933 as amended by Law No. 87, July 16, 1999

Resolution A.1056(27) Adopted on 30 November 2011 (Agenda item 10)

IMPLICATIONS OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA FOR THE INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION

DOJ s and OSHA s Worker Endangerment Initiative. Civil and Criminal Enforcement Update

Official Journal of the European Communities. (Acts whose publication is obligatory)

Case 1:18-cv JGK Document 26 Filed 02/21/19 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

MARINE POLLUTION (CONTROL AND CIVIL LIABILITY) ACT 1981 (Act 6 of 1981)

Case 2:08-cr DDP Document 37 Filed 10/19/2009 Page 1 of 5. United States District Court Central District of California

AT SEA TILE. The United States of America, by and through John McKay, United States Attorney 16

ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMES BUREAU ANNUAL REPORT relating to the environment. In 2000, the Environmental Crimes Bureau obtained twelve (12)

STORMWATER DISCHARGE Town of Brunswick. Table of Contents

PETROLEUM ACT Revised Edition CAP

False Claims Act. Definitions:

ACT ON AMENDMENTS TO THE MARITIME CODE

Case 3:16-cr K Document 4 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for all navigable

Transcription:

!aaassseee 444:::111222- - -cccrrr- - -000000555444999 DDDooocccuuummmeeennnttt 111111 FFFiiillleeeddd iiinnn TTTXXXSSSDDD ooonnn 111000///000555///111222 PPPaaagggeee 111 ooofff 777 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRIMINAL NO. 4:12-CR-549 Nimmrich und Prahm Bereederung GmbH & Co. KG and Nimmrich und Prahhm Reederei GmbH & Co. KG MS Sonja UNITED STATES MOTION IN SUPPORT OF STATUTORY MOIETY PAYMENTS Pursuant to the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships ( APPS ), the United States of America files its motion in support of a whistleblower award and hereby moves this Court to order a total award of $200,000 which is two-fifths of the total criminal fine paid by defendants Nimmrich und Prahm Bereederung GmbH & Co. KG and Nimmrich und Prahm Reederei GmbH & Co. KG MS Sonja for Count One of the Information filed in the Southern District of Texas, to be split equally between Ryan Almora, Jonas Legista, and Aljohn Ramos, whose assistance led to the successful prosecution of this case. In support of its motion, the United States submits the following: I. The Defendants Fine and the Court s Award Authority On November 2, 2012, the defendants are scheduled to plead guilty to a two-count Information filed in the Southern District of Texas and a one-count Information transferred from the District of Alaska pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 20. Pursuant to the plea agreement, the Defendants are to pay a total criminal fine of $1,000,000. Count One of the

!aaassseee 444:::111222- - -cccrrr- - -000000555444999 DDDooocccuuummmeeennnttt 111111 FFFiiillleeeddd iiinnn TTTXXXSSSDDD ooonnn 111000///000555///111222 PPPaaagggeee 222 ooofff 777 Information filed in the Southern District of Texas charges the Defendants with violating the APPS, 33 U.S.C. 1901 et seq. ECF Doc. 25. Specifically, the defendants are pleading guilty to knowingly failing to maintain an Oil Record Book ( ORB ) for the M/V Susan K in which all overboard discharges and disposals of bilge water from machinery space operations, were fully recorded. The plea agreement allocates $500,000 of the total criminal penalty to the APPS violation. Pursuant to the plea agreement, the defendants first payment of $200,000 is due at sentencing. 1 APPS is designed to implement an international treaty known as the MARPOL protocol, which sets forth international standards to protect the marine environment. In order to further this purpose, APPS grants this Court the discretionary authority to issue a monetary award for up 1 The MARPOL Protocol ( MARPOL ) is an international treaty that sets forth the international standards for the maximum concentration of oil in water permitted to be discharged overboard from vessels. This standard is 15 parts per million ( ppm ) of oil. MARPOL Annex I, Reg. 9. MARPOL requires vessels to have and maintain an oil sensing device, such as that which would be found on an Oily Water Separator, to prevent the discharge of a mixture containing more than 15 ppm of oil. MARPOL Annex I, Reg. 16. When such a sensor detects more than 15 ppm of oil, it redirects the effluent to a storage tank on board a vessel. The purpose of an Oil Water Separator is to treat oily waste water by separating the oil from the water. MARPOL was implemented in the United States by APPS, 33 U.S.C. 1901 et seq. With regard to foreign vessels such as the M/V Susan K, the APPS regulations governing oil pollution and Oil Record Books provide jurisdiction only when these vessels are operating in the navigable waters of the United States (within 12 navigable miles) or while at a port or terminal under the jurisdiction of the United States. 33 C.F.R. 151.09. Consistent with the requirements contained in MARPOL, the APPS regulations require that each vessel, other than tankers, of more than 400 gross tons maintain a record known as an Oil Record Book. In this Oil Record Book, transfers of oil, the disposal of sludge and waste oil, and overboard discharges of bilge water that have accumulated in machinery spaces, and thus are contaminated with oil, must be fully and accurately recorded by the person in charge of the operations. 33 C.F.R. 151.25(d). The Oil Record Book must also record any emergency, accidental, or other exceptional discharges of oil or mixtures. 33 C.F.R. 151.25(g). The Oil Record Book must be maintained on board the vessel for not less than three years, and be readily available for inspection at all reasonable times. 33 C.F.R. 151.25(k). 2

!aaassseee 444:::111222- - -cccrrr- - -000000555444999 DDDooocccuuummmeeennnttt 111111 FFFiiillleeeddd iiinnn TTTXXXSSSDDD ooonnn 111000///000555///111222 PPPaaagggeee 333 ooofff 777 to one half (moiety) of any criminal fine imposed on the defendant to those individuals who 2 provide information that leads to a conviction under the Act. Specifically, section 1908(a) of APPS provides that: A person who knowingly violates the MARPOL Protocol, this chapter, or the regulations issued thereunder commits a class D felony. In the discretion of the Court, an amount equal to not more than ½ of such fine may be paid to the person giving information leading to conviction. 33 U.S.C. 1908(a). The APPS whistleblower award provision serves a valuable law enforcement purpose by encouraging those most likely to know of the illegal conduct, in this case three crew members, to report it and be forthright with information leading to a conviction. Because the discharge of oily bilge water typically takes place in the middle of the ocean in international waters, the only persons likely to know about the conduct and the falsification of the ORB are crew members. Absent crew members with firsthand knowledge of the illegal conduct coming forward, APPS violations can be difficult to uncover. The government s success in detecting the illegal activity and obtaining sufficient evidence to support investigations and prosecutions is often dependent upon the willingness of both a crew member to step forward initially and for other crew members to be brave enough to discuss whathappened on the ship. In turn, a crew member must assess the risks associated with coming forward, such as the possibility that the crew member will lose relatively lucrative employment and be blacklisted and barred from working in the marine 2 The regulations implementing APPS contain the same provision. 33 C.F.R. 151.04(c). The Rivers and Harbors Act contains a similar award provision. 33 U.S.C. 411. A more recent enactment pertaining to the operation of cruise ships in Alaska also has a similar provision, demonstrating continued Congressional interest in creating incentives to reward those who assist the government in bringing criminal prosecutions. Pub.L. 106-554, 1(a)(4) [Div. B, Title XIV, 1409(e)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763a-315, enacting provisions set out as Historical and Statutory Notes to 33 U.S.C. 1901. 3

!aaassseee 444:::111222- - -cccrrr- - -000000555444999 DDDooocccuuummmeeennnttt 111111 FFFiiillleeeddd iiinnn TTTXXXSSSDDD ooonnn 111000///000555///111222 PPPaaagggeee 444 ooofff 777 shipping industry in the future. A substantial monetary award, as provided by APPS, rewards the crew member for taking those risks and provides an incentive for other crew members to come forward and report illegal conduct on vessels in the future. II. The Assistance Provided by Ryan Almora, Jonas Legista, and Aljohn Ramos On or about March 6, 2012, the United States Coast Guard sector office in Houston, Texas received a call from an inspector for the Seafarers International Union informing the Coast Guard that a crew member of the M/V Susan K that had just arrived at port in Houston wanted to report about a magic pipe used to illegally discharge oily bilge water into the ocean. The Coast Guard was provided the telephone number of the crew member, Ordinary Seaman Ryan Almora, and called him. Mr. Almora told the Coast Guard that he wanted to report the illegal acts and had video and pictures of the illegal activity. The Coast Guard then boarded the vessel and met Mr. Almora, who told the Coast Guard that the vessel s Chief Engineer Rudolf Hofer, was discharging oil by putting a hose down the sounding tube of the vessel s oily bilge water tank. Mr. Almora told the Coast Guard that he knew that this act was illegal and wanted to report it but was afraid of losing his job. Mr. Almora then provided the Coast Guard with a USB flash drive. On the drive was a video showing oily bilge water being discharged from the M/V Susan K on February 6, 2012. The video was taken by Mr. Almora and the vessel s Cadet, Aljohn Ramos. The flash drive also contained a video dated February 17, 2012, showing the hose in place in the engine room of the M/V Susan K drawing oily bilge water from the vessel s oily bilge tank and dumping the oily water overboard via the vessel s ballast water system. The video in the engine room was taken by the vessel s Oiler, Jonas Legista. When interviewed during the vessel inspection by the Coast 4

!aaassseee 444:::111222- - -cccrrr- - -000000555444999 DDDooocccuuummmeeennnttt 111111 FFFiiillleeeddd iiinnn TTTXXXSSSDDD ooonnn 111000///000555///111222 PPPaaagggeee 555 ooofff 777 Guard, Mr. Legista confirmed the illegal dumping by the vessel s Chief Engineer, provided the Coast Guard with the hose, and demonstrated how it was used to dump the oil overboard. These three crew members remained in the United States throughout the investigation and were interviewed several times. These interviews provided critical information leading to the conviction of the defendants, as well as Chief Engineer Rudolf Hofer. Even though Mr. Almora provided the information in the role of a whistleblower, the other two crew members provided critical information and assistance leading to the convictions. Thus the United States views each of their contributions equally and recommends the award be split evenly. III. The History of Awards As set forth below, there have been many other vessel cases in which an award has been issued pursuant to Section 1908 of APPS:! United States v. Styga Compania Naviera, S.A., No. 4:09-CR-00572 (S.D. Tex. 2010): award of $62,500 awarded to each of five vessel crew members.! United States v. Aksay Denizcilik Ve Ticaret A.S., No. 8:10-Cr-116-T-26TGW (M.D. Fla. April 2010): award of $125,000 each to the Ship s two motorman.! United States v. Accord Ship Management, PVT. LTD, No. 3:07-CR-00390 (D.P.R. 2007): award of $250,000 split equally between vessel s five engine room crew members.! United States v. Sun Ace Shipping Company et al., No. 2:06-CR-00599 (D.N.J. December 2006): award of $200,000 split evenly among three engine room crew members.! United States v. MK Shipmanagement Co., Ltd., Criminal Docket No. 2:06-cr-00307-WHW (D.N.J., Aug 7, 2006): award of one half of the $200,000 fine to two crew members.! United States v. Wallenius Ship Management PTE. Ltd, Criminal Docket No. 2:06-cr-00213-JAG-ALL (D.N.J., Aug. 3, 2006): award of one half of the $5 million fine to four crew members. 5

!aaassseee 444:::111222- - -cccrrr- - -000000555444999 DDDooocccuuummmeeennnttt 111111 FFFiiillleeeddd iiinnn TTTXXXSSSDDD ooonnn 111000///000555///111222 PPPaaagggeee 666 ooofff 777 IV. Conclusion This Court has discretion to award an amount up to one-half of the criminal fine imposed in connection with Count One of the Information to Ryan Almora, Jonas Legista, and Aljohn Ramos, who provided critical evidence leading to the defendants convictions. In light of the information provided by the witnesses, the United States respectfully moves this Court to find that an award in this matter would be consistent with the law enforcement purpose of the statute by encouraging those with information to come forward and disclose that information to appropriate authorities. The United States therefore respectfully requests that the Court award the $200,000 evenly among the three witnesses in recognition of their contribution to the successful prosecution of this matter. Should the Court grant this motion, the United States requests that the Clerk of Court issue checks made out to each individual witness. In order to ensure their safe delivery, the United States will make arrangements with the United States embassy in Manila, Phillipines, to take delivery of the checks, from where the witnesses may retrieve them safely. All of the witnesses are citizens of the Philippines and reside there. Therefore, the United States requests the checks be issued in the name of the witness and then sent via Federal Express to: U.S. Department of Justice Embassy of the United States of America Room 1038/1040 Chancery Annex 1201 Roxas Blvd., Ermita 0930 Manila, Philippines Attention: Robert E. Courtney III DOJ Attaché. 6

!aaassseee 444:::111222- - -cccrrr- - -000000555444999 DDDooocccuuummmeeennnttt 111111 FFFiiillleeeddd iiinnn TTTXXXSSSDDD ooonnn 111000///000555///111222 PPPaaagggeee 777 ooofff 777 October 5, 2012 Respectfully Submitted, KENNETH MAGIDSON United States Attorney Southern District of Texas GARY COBE Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of Texas IGNACIO S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division U.S. Department of Justice DAVID P. KEHOE Senior Trial Attorney

!aaassseee 444:::111222- - -cccrrr- - -000000555444999 DDDooocccuuummmeeennnttt 111111- - -111 FFFiiillleeeddd iiinnn TTTXXXSSSDDD ooonnn 111000///000555///111222 PPPaaagggeee 111 ooofff 222 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRIMINAL NO. 4:12-CR-549 Nimmrich und Prahm Bereederung GmbH & Co. KG and Nimmrich und Prahhm Reederei GmbH & Co. KG MS Sonja O R D E R ON UNITED STATES MOTION I N SUPPORT OF STATUTORY MOIETY PAYMENTS Came on for consideration in the above-captioned matter, the United States Motion in Support of Moiety Payments. After considering the Motion, the Court: CONSIDERING the information provided by the below names witnesses led to the successful conviction in this matter; Orders that Statutory Moiety payments, in accordance with the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships, Title 33 United States Code Section 1908(e), be distributed to the witnesses and in the amounts indicated below. WITNESS RYAN ALMORA $66,667.00 JONAS LEGISTA $66,667.00 PAYMENT AMOUNT

!aaassseee 444:::111222- - -cccrrr- - -000000555444999 DDDooocccuuummmeeennnttt 111111- - -111 FFFiiillleeeddd iiinnn TTTXXXSSSDDD ooonnn 111000///000555///111222 PPPaaagggeee 222 ooofff 222 ALJOHN RAMOS $66,666.00 DONE in Houston, Texas on the Second day of November 2012. GRAY H. MILLER UNITED STATES JUDGE