oi1v7 Case No. 14-0^ And IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2014 State Ex Rel. Javier Humberto, Relator, ORIGINAL ACTION

Similar documents
12PREM;^O ^, Q^0 APR CLERK OFCOURT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2013 RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS RELATOR'S ACTION IN MANDAMUS

CLERK OF COURT SURREME COURTOFOHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. [State ex. rel.] Jenkins Smith, Case No Original Action in Mandamus

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed March 18, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

p L DD 0q^^/41, CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO State ex rel., McGRATH Case No

THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO WRIT OF PROCEDENDO. 2. I, William D. Boyles was convicted in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas Court of:

. I..i'ML OCT IZ CLERK OF GOURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, SHAUGHN C. BOONE, Defendant-Appellant

APR CLERK OF COURT REIVIE COURT OF OHIO. APR Lr^^^ ^^* ^a^.:,e^ ^LIMItML coufii JF onio IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed March 16, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2015

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

F L= JUL CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Case No.:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Now comes the Respondent, the Honorable James M. Burge, Judge of the Lorain

IMM FED 13 Z013 CLERK OF COURT SUPR^ME COURT F 0H1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. FRANCESCA STEINHART, et al., CASE NO

STATE EX REL. ROBERT HARSH, Respondent. IN TI-IE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Relator, Case No Original Action in Mandamus

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed May 01, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

[Cite as State v. Abrams, 2011-Ohio-103.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA. JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Judge John A. Connor, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) D E C I S I O N. Rendered on June 8, 2006

***Please see Nunc Pro Tunc Entry at 2003-Ohio-826.*** IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY APPEARANCES

with one count of Aggravated Murder, O.R.C (B), and two counts of

COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MERCER COUNTY. v. O P I N I O N. v. O P I N I O N

^LERn Uf COURT 'RERE COURT O F OHIO 6.^^^^ ^ STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. ROBERT E. CARPENTER, Case No

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

CLERK OF COURT I SUPREME COURT OF ^ CASE NO. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2007 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS FOR

Court of Appeals of Ohio

, INAt. M.Au tlet.200.g CLFRK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF 0 HI0 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. DAVID J. PISHOK, Case No

COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

11'i^i,y 4! APP 0 12fl^3 APP CO URT SUPR EME C O U RT OF O HIO. ^k d^^ ^ AL CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CASE NO.

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY : : : : : : : : : :... O P I N I O N

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Ohio Adult Parole Authority, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) O P I N I O N. Rendered on August 2, 2005

HU AU. GLEM t$^ (A0Rf SUPREfWE COUR10F OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE EX REL. CLEOTTIS GILCREAST, Case No

STATE OF OHIO MYRON SPEARS

GDE G"E.^V ED. 0*q G/^^4 MAR QB 2091 CLERK OF COURT ISUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Case No vs-

STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. ANTONIO PETERSON CUYAHOGA COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT JUDGE AND PROSECUTOR

COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

RULE CHANGE 2018(05) COLORADO RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Court of Appeals of Ohio

SEALING OF RECORD OF CONVICTION (General Information)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO MOTION TO DISMISS OF RESPONDENTS JUDGE CLAIR E. DICKINSON AND COURT ADMINISTRATOR C. MICHAEL WALSH

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : : JOURNAL ENTRY. For Plaintiff-Appellee: : and -vs- : : OPINION. For Defendant-Appellant:

CLERK OF COURT PREME COURT OF C

ELIGIBILITY AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR SEALING OF CRIMINAL RECORDS Based upon Ohio Revised Code

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Court of Appeals of Ohio

AUG CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS University of Cincinnati and The Ohio State University

t;i 4:liK OF COURT SUPREUIL yc7urt l7f OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Case No Appellant

CLL-REA 01, aaollr SUPREME CtlURs-" 01"OHI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

CASE NO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO COLUMBUS, OHIO STATE OF OHIO9. Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. DOUGLAS EDWARD HADDIX, Defendant-Appellant.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. Case Nos and 20314

[Cite as Upper Scioto Valley Local School Dist Bd. of Edn. v. Crowe, Ohio-1394.] COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HARDIN COUNTY

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed February 10, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

The Ohio Court of Appeals Fifth District

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

STATE OF OHIO ALLEN RICHARDSON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. : O P I N I O N - vs - 12/13/2010 :

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO RESPONDENT OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Appellee, : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO. 09CR3403

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Doss v. State, Slip Opinion No Ohio-5678.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY APPEARANCES:

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO

Court of Appeals of Ohio

JUN $ 0 M06 CLERK CF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellant. vs. Counsel for Defendant-Appellee

STATE OF OHIO ANDRE CONNER

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO

Court of Appeals of Ohio

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No Plaintiff-Appellee : JOURNAL ENTRY. vs. : AND

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio

ORIGINAL SEP CLERK OF COURT SEP CLERK OF COURT SUPREME CUURT OF OHIO SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. (App. No A-0049) Appellant.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Kenneth L. Collier, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) O P I N I O N. Rendered on May 25, 2006

O1.tKK OF COURT ^EK COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2012 ^46. Case No STATE OF OHIO,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT

LAW FIRM ATTORNEY NAME (Atty. Reg. No.) ATTORNEY NAME (Atty. Reg. No.) ADDRESS LINE 1 ADDRESS LINE 2 CITY, STATE ZIP PHONE NO. FAX NO.

AL Case IvO: 3f-%^ RESPON1JENT. Mathias H. Heck Jr. Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney PO Box 972 Dayton, Ohio Appellee. 1 F t.,.

STATE OF OHIO, Case No. Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. LESLIE LONG, Defendant-Appellant. OFFICE OF THE OHIO PUBLIC DEFENDER

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

STATE OF OHIO CHARLES WHITE

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

STATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

In The SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT VINTON COUNTY APPEARANCES:

Court of Appeals of Ohio

[Cite as State ex rel. Johnson v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 2004-Ohio-2648.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Transcription:

P% ^%ar2isj^^ State Ex Rel. Javier Humberto, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2014 oi1v7 Case No. 14-0^ -vs- Relator, ORIGINAL ACTION Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Respondents. Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08CR - 8395 RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS RELATOR'S ACTION IN MANDAMUS RON O'BRIEN 0017245 Frazlklin County Prosecuting Attorney 373 South High Street-13"' Fl. Columbus, Ohio 43215 614/525-3555 And JEFFREY C. ROGERS 0069399 (Counsel of Record) Assistant Prosecuting Attorziey jcrogers,,jf.^franklincountyohio.gov COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS Javier Humberto #A 628-315 Ross County t::orrectional Institute P.O. Box 7010, 16149 SR 104 Chillicothe, Ohio 45601 f, y?., s < 41 201C PRO SE RELATOR,,s f.s%...y`.k 0 % C 0;j P ^^+.^ ^ ft.. Y^'^.i1r.1 131Pi^^^jS^t^^.4.. ^^O^jS. i./ '4f f 5 Respondent Franklin Courity Court of Common Pleas, moves this Court to dismiss this actiozi pursuant to Civ. R. 12(B)(6) on grounds that Relator has not complied with the statutory

requirements of R.C. 2969.25 and Relator has failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted or, in the alternative, a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Civ: R, 56(C) as there exist no genuine issues of material fact and Respondent is entitled to jtrdgment as a matter of law. In addition, Respondent is not suz juris.. Support for this motion is set forth in the accompanying Memorandum In Support, which is incorporated herein by reference. Respectfi.7lly submitted, RON O'BRIEN PROSECUTING ATTORNEY FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO ey ^. kogers 006939. Assistant Prosecuting A 373 South High Street, 13th Floor Coluinbus. Ohio 43215 614-525-3520 (Phone); 614-525-6012 (Fax) ' crogers(c} t:ranklincountyohio.gov Counse.l for Respondent MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT STATEMENT OF TI-IE CASE On April 28, 2010, in case 08CR- 8395, ajury found Relator Javier Humberto guilty of two counts of Murder in violation of R.C. 2903.02, Attempt Murder in violation of R.C. 2923.12 as applied to R.C. 2903.02, and one count of Felonious Assault in violation of R.C. 2903.11, with gun specifications on all cou.nts. On May 12, 2010, Relator was given a total sentence, including guns specifications, of 25 years to life. 2

On June 3, 2010, Relator's counsel in the criminal case ordered a copy of the transcript of the trial proceedings to be prepared and filed. The transcript of the trial was filed on August 30, 2010 and is viewable online. The Court paid half the cost of the transcript due to Relator's indigence. Relator appealed his convictions to the 10"' District in case loa.p --- 527. His three assignments of error were rejected and the trial cotirt verdicts were affirzned on June 23, 2011. The Ohio Supreme Court declined jurisdiction on December 6, 2011 case #2011-1340. On A:pri12, 2013, the Court of Common Pleas detued Relator'spro-se Motion To Vacate Conviction And Void Conviction. Relator sought to file another pro-se appeal in the 100' District Court of Appeals. That appeal, 13AP - 353, was denied as tintimely. O11 March 21, 2014, Relator filed a"complaint For A Writ of Mandamus" in the Supreme Court of Ohio, case 2014-0447. ARGUMENT A. Relator has not complied with R.C. 2969.25. Relator has not complied with the statutory requirements of R.C. 2969.25 since he did not provide "a statement that sets forth the balance in the inmate account of the inmate for each of the preceding six months, as cei-tified by the institutional cashier." Compliance with R.C. 2969.25 is mandatory and failure to complyj Mth its recluirernents is grounds for dismissal. 9ate ex rel. Masliington v. Ohio Paf ole Auth. (1999), 87 Ohio St. 3d 258, State ex rel. Zanders v. Ohio Parole Bd. (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 421. The pertinent Code section isrc2969.25(c)(1): (C) If an iiunate who files a civil action or appeal against a govertuiient entity or employee seeks a waiver of the prepayment 3

of the full filing fees assessed by the court in which the action or appeal is filed, the inmate shall file with the coinplaint or notice of appeal an affidavit that the iznnate is seeking a waiver of the prepayment of the court's full filing fees and an affidavit of indigency. The affidavit of waiver and the affidavit of indigency shall contain all of the following: (1) A statement that sets forth the balance in the inmate account of the iiunate for each of the preceding six months, as certified by the institutional cashier; (enzphaszs added) A review of the petition iiidicates that Relator did include an affidavit of indigency, but has not provided either (1) a statement of his account as certified by the institutional cashier, or (2) a statement of all things of value. Accordingly, this matter must be dismissed. B. Relator has not stated a claim upon which relief can be granted. In considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the Court must construe all material allegations in the Complaint and all inferences that may be reasonably drawn there from in favor of the nonmoving party. Fahnhulleh v. Strahan (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 666. In order for a court to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, it must appear beyond doubt from the complaint that plaintiff can prove no set of facts warranting relief. State ex rel. Jennings v. 11-'ur Ye (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 596; Yor k v. Ohio State Ilighway Patrol (1991), 60 Ohio St.3d 143. Relator, through his attorney, already received one copy of the transcript of the trial court proceedings. The transcript was 678 pages in length and cost the court $1695.00 (Exhibit A). The transcript has been filed and is available for view online. Having already preformed this action once, the court is under no obligation to do so again without payment in full. C. The Franklin County Court of Common Pleas is not a legal entity subject to suit. 4

Under Ohio law, the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas is not a legal entity capable of being sued separately from the county government. Petty v. Cnty. of Franklin, Ohio, 478 )i.3d 341, 347 (6th Cir. 2007), The Ohio Revised Code delegates the task of local governance to geographic "political subdivisions," such as counties. `A political subdivision of the state is a geographic or territorial division of the state rather than a functional division of the state. Almost invariably the statutory definitions of "political subdivision" involve a geographic area of the state Nvhich has been empowered to perform certain functions of local government within such geographic area. Accordingly, a "political subdivision of the state" is a geographic or territorial portion of the state to which there has been delegated certain local governn-iental functions to perfornl within such geographic area.' Fair v. School Eynp. Retirement Systern of C)hio, 44 Ohio App.2d 115, 119, 335 N.E.2d 868. (10th Dist.1975), as cited in Rieger v. Marsh, 2011 WL 6930159 (Ohio App. 2 Dist.), 2011 -Ohio- 6808. See generalzy R.C. Title 3. Within the County, the Ohio Revised Code specifically dictates who is capable of suing and being sued. TheBoard of County Comn.-iissioners, as the representative of the political subdivision, is specifically authorized to sue or be sued under the Ohio Revised Code. R.C. 305.12. However, the Court of Common Pleas is not separately authorized to sue or be sued on behalf of the "office" itself, because it is not a separate legal entity fton7 the County govenunent. Accordingly, the only proper organizational defendant is the Board of County Commissioners, as established in R.C. 305,12. Therefore, the Franklin County Court of Con-imon Pleas (Respondent) is not,suijuris. CONCLUSION Respondent respectfully requests the Court g-rant this motion and that Relator's petition for a Writ of Mandamus be dismissed. Respectfully submitted, RON O'BRIEN PROSECUTING ATTORNEY FRANK.LIN COUNTY, OHIO

Jeff ^. ^fogers. (006.93^ nk County Prosecutor's Office, Civil Division 373 S. High St., 13"' Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614-525-3520 (Phone); 614-525-6012 (Fax) j crogers@franklincountyohio.gov Counsel.for Respondent CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion and Memorandum in Support has been forwarded this 13th day of March 31, 2014 by regular LT.S. Mail to: ;favier Huznberto #A 628-315 Ross County Correctional Institute P.O. Box 7010, 16149SR 104 Chillicothe, Ohio 45601 693 ounty ProsecuWs Office, Civil Division 6

CLERK'SlAUDITt3R'S TRANSCRIPT FEE FOR AN INDIt;ENT DEFENDANT 7579 I^ 18 In the^m rsncan p Court of - ^ u yl*1j ^Clfaio. PIainGff: 1! Case Nra.....^, v. j m1*e-d um bgr"b _..._._._,..,,. efendan&party Reprosented In re: CLERK OF COURTS CERTIFICATION Attorney(s) far the DefendantlParty Represented: L. ra Q s..... 1. the Clerk of Courts, hereby certify that i!'1': ro I_ A. d lit y1 Pe '^ ^ ^/ 2 7 7,is (Court Repar#er's Name (C,owl 17eporters Tex ID) hereby an official stenographer of said court and is entitled to the following fees for making transcxipt(s) of. Clerk's signa u Date The transcript is ordered by the court for use by the Defendant or the DefendanYs attorney 8n the folkavqitg type of proceeding: o w Felony, misdemeanor, or juvenile proceeding Capital Offense trial proceedini - ; ^ Appeais proceeding Capital Offense appealsp "ing -2 Postconvictaan proceeding ' 'Capital Offense postconviction proce ecnv Other (explain) Date which above checked proceeding terminated: Original transcript of k`1$ pages or foiio at the rate of$2.50 per page or folio, =^- < i OR Still Pending (check if pending) Copy of transcript of pages or folio at the rate of $.` 0 per page or folio, = $ -' CG TOTAL NOTE: A COPY OF THE COtlRTREPOFZ'TER'S BILUNG MtlST 8E A7't'ACNED JUD+GMENT ENTR.IP The court finds that the transcript was ordered for use in the case of an Indigent person, that all rules and standards of the Ohio Pubiic Defender Commission and State Public Defender have been met and that an Affidavit of indigency! Financial Disclosure for the above referenced ciieat has been sent to the Office of the Ohio Public Defender or Is attached to this document. IT dj T REFORi= ORDERED that the transcript fees be, and are hereby approved In the amount of $ r^ ^^S' It is further ordered that the said amount be, and her y is, certified by the Court to the County Auditor for payment. Ri l ho L-d A ` ^f tf or AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATION The County Auditor in executing this certificate attests that the transcript was a true and accurate expense of said county's couat. County Number Warrant Number Warrant Date '-