Failure to adhere to the above can result to the irrevocable lapsing of a patent application.

Similar documents
COMPANIES AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMMISSION (CIPC) (SOUTH AFRICA)

CORPORATE AFFAIRS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (BARBADOS)

EGYPTIAN PATENT OFFICE

PATENT. 1. Procedures for Granting a Patent

INVENTION OFFICE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF KOREA

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA PATENTS ACT, 1978 APPLICATION FOR A PATENT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT (Section 30 (1) Regulation 22)

CANADIAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE

of Laws for Electronic Access ARIPO

AFRICAN REGIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION (ARIPO) REGULATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTING THE HARARE PROTOCOL

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE, MINISTRY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND LEGAL AFFAIRS (TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO)

BELIZE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

AFRICAN REGIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION (ARIPO)

exclusively in electronic form (no paper notifications will be sent). address: State (that is, country) of nationality:

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (PHILIPPINES)

Force majeure patent relief in New Zealand

MEXICAN INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY

UGANDA REGISTRATION SERVICES BUREAU (URSB)

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

BELIZE PATENTS ACT CHAPTER 253 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSIDIARY LAWS AS AT 31ST MAY, 2003

PCT/GL/ISPE/1 Page 194 PART VIII CLERICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES. Chapter 22 Clerical and Administrative Procedures

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF SINGAPORE

Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents

Regulations to the Norwegian Patents Act (The Patent Regulations)

NATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CENTER OF GEORGIA (SAKPATENTI)

Chapter 1800 Patent Cooperation Treaty

REGISTRATION DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS (SEYCHELLES)

Regulation relating to payments etc. to the Norwegian Industrial Property Office and the Board of Appeal for Industrial Property Rights

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF NEW ZEALAND (IPONZ)

FINLAND Patents Decree No. 669 of September 26, 1980 as last amended by Decree No. 580 of 18 July 2013 Enter into force on 1 September 2013

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF MONGOLIA

PART I IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS TO PART I OF THE CONVENTION

PCT/GL/ISPE/1 Page 154 PART V WRITTEN OPINION/INTERNATIONAL PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION REPORT

3. TITLE OF INVENTION (Must agree with the PCT publication document if applicable.)

LALL & SETHI ADVOCATES

Chapter 2 Internal Priority

Functions of the receiving Office

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF SINGAPORE

REGISTRAR GENERAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT (SUDAN)

PCT DEMAND. For International Preliminary Examining Authority use only. International filing date (day/month/year)

Regulations under the Patent Cooperation Treaty. (as in force from July 1, 2018)

Annex 2 DEFINITIONS FOR TERMS AND FOR STATISTICS ON PROCEDURES

AUSTRALIA Patents Act 1990 Compilation date: 24 February 2017 Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, 2016 Registered: 27 February 2017

NIGERIA Patent Rules under section 30, L.N. 96 of 1971 Commencement: 1st December, 1971

UNITED KINGDOM Patent Rules 2007 as amended up to and including October 1, 2014

Bangladesh Trade Marks Rules Amended on September 10, 1963

New Zealand. Information on the filing of Patents, Designs and. Trademarks in New Zealand COMANAS CORP. IP Management Service Group

Agreement. (as in force from July 1, 2012)*

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (SERBIA)

HONG KONG Patents (General) Rules as amended by L.N. 40 of 2004 ENTRY INTO FORCE: May 7, 2004 Chapter: 514C

Forms: paragraph 31 Positive determination (requirements of Article 11(1) fulfilled): paragraph 49

History of the PCT Regulations

Order on Patents and Supplementary Protection Certificates

DENMARK Patents Regulations Order No. 25 of 18 January, 2013 ENTRY INTO FORCE: 1 February, 2013

PATENT COOPERATION TREATY. Non-establishment of opinion with regard to novelty, inventive step and industrial applicability

CZECH REPUBLIC Utility Model Act

Shahid & Alliance Advocates I ntellec tua l Property & Leg al Affairs INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND LEGAL REQUIREMENTS IN BANGLADESH

Compilation date: 24 February Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, Registered: 27 February 2017

C. PCT 1548 November 5, 2018

Government of Bangladesh MINISTRY OF COMMERCE

DRAFT PATENT LAW TREATY AND DRAFT REGULATIONS *

TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER 1: THIS GUIDE AND ITS ANNEXES Introduction CHAPTER 2: WHAT IS THE PCT?

BELIZE INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS ACT CHAPTER 254 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSIDIARY LAWS AS AT 31ST MAY, 2003

AGREEMENT. (as in force from January 1, 2018)*

PATENTS ACT NO. 57 OF 1978 [ASSENTED TO 26 APRIL, 1978] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 1 JANUARY, 1979]

EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (EPO)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (LUXEMBOURG)

AUSTRALIA - Standard Patents - Schedule of Charges

Part VIII International Patent Application

EXPLANATORY NOTES ON THE PATENT LAW TREATY AND REGULATIONS UNDER THE PATENT LAW TREATY * prepared by the International Bureau

Part I PPH using the national work products from the JPO

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY (PORTUGAL)

Information for Associates

DECISION 486 Common Intellectual Property Regime (Non official translation)

ASSEMBLY. Thirty-Fourth (15 th Ordinary) Session Geneva, September 26 to October 5, 2005

Chapter 16 of the above-mentioned Agreement establishes provisions relating to the need to respect and safeguard intellectual property rights;

Prosecuting an Israel Patent Application and Beyond

Editorial and minor drafting changes are not mentioned here.

CHINA Patent Regulations as amended on June 15, 2001 ENTRY INTO FORCE: July 1, 2001

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION GENEVA PATENT LAW TREATY (PLT) ASSEMBLY. Fifth (3 rd Extraordinary) Session Geneva, September 22 to 30, 2008

Agreement. between the Nordic Patent Institute and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization

Table of Contents I INTERNATIONAL PHASE BEFORE THE RECEIVING OFFICE AND INTERNATIONAL BUREAU.. 14

PROMOTION OF ACCESS TO INFORMATION ACT MANUAL

Rksassociate Advocates & Legal Consultants ebook

NEW ZEALAND - Patents - Schedule of Charges

Patent Cooperation Treaty

BANJUL PROTOCOL ON MARKS

AGREEMENT. (as in force from January 1, 2018)*

AMENDMENTS TO THE SINGAPORE PATENTS ACT AND RULES

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Working Group

EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (EPO)

MALAYSIA IP HANDBOOK

SWEDEN PATENTS ACT No.837 of 1967 in the version in force from July 1, 2014

AGREEMENT. between the Spanish Patent and Trademark Office and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization

PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: HOW TO USE THE NATIONAL PHASE OF THE PCT APPLICANT S GUIDE

Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer s Copyright Authority No dated 02 February 1998 NOTICE 1038 OF 2012

Table 1: General overview of the PCT procedure Legend:

NEW ZEALAND Patent Regulations SR 1954/211 as at 3 September 2007 as amended by Supreme Court Act (2003 No. 53) ENTRY INTO FORCE: January 1, 2004

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION GENEVA PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTIONS UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY

Transcription:

Postal Address P O Box 13575 Hatfield 0028 Republic of South Africa Docex 219 Pretoria Physical Address Hahn Forum 222 Richard Street Hatfield Pretoria 0083 Republic of South Africa Email: hahn@hahn.co.za http://www.hahn.co.za Tel: (27) (12) 342 1774 Fax: (27) (12) 342 3027 April 2012 MEMORANDUM ON PROSECUTING A PCT NATIONAL PHASE APPLICATION IN SOUTH AFRICA (REVISED April 2012 Ruling by Court in U P case on extensions of time) IMPORTANT NOTICE ON PRESCRIBED DUE DATES In a recent Judgment of the Commissioner of Patents in the case of University of Pretoria v The Registrar of Patents and others, the Court ruled that the granting of extensions of time could in most cases only be considered valid where the extension of time is applied for prior to reaching the deadline which is to be extended and then only if a formal application is made and the reasons for requiring the extension are presented, and these reasons must be true and good reasons. As obtaining extensions incurs costs and, in most cases we would require the full true reasons for the need for the extension, please ensure we are provided with all documents well ahead of the due dates or provide us with instructions to apply for an extension beforehand. Failure to adhere to the above can result to the irrevocable lapsing of a patent application. Documentary Requirements 1. In terms of Section 43E of the South African Patents Act, commencement of the PCT National Phase must take place before the expiration of 31 months from the priority date regardless whether a Chapter II demand was filed as long as South Africa is elected. The applicant in respect of an international application designating or electing the Republic shall- (a) pay the prescribed national fee to the patent office; and (b) if the international application has not been lodged or published in terms of the Patent Cooperation Treaty in English, lodge at the patent office within the prescribed period (viz. 31 months from the priority date) a translation of the international application, containing the prescribed contents, in an official language of the Republic. (English is an official language) 1

A maximum three month extension is possible for the lodging of the translation and if the applicant does not provide the verified translation of the application within 3 months of entering the national phase the international application concerned shall be deemed to have been abandoned. PLEASE NOTE: In accordance with the latest Judgment of the Court of the Commissioner of Patents, failure to comply with this deadline will lead to lapsing of the Patent Application. Please ensure we are in receipt of the translation well in advance of the deadline. 2. The Registrar also requires satisfactory evidence that the applicant is entitled to apply for the South African patent, and to this end the standard Assignment is acceptable, although other means of satisfying the Registrar, such as excerpts from employment contracts and Affidavits by employers are also acceptable. This document may be filed within 6 months of the filing date. 3. A Power of Attorney, on South African Patents Form P3 (the standard Declaration and Power of Attorney), is also required to be lodged within 6 months of the filing date although extensions of this period are available. 4. A Statement on the Use of Indigenous Biological Resource, Genetic Resource, Traditional Knowledge or Use on South African Patents Form P26 is also required to be lodged within 6 months of the filing date although extensions of this period are available. We believe this to be limited to South African resources, knowledge or use. 5. Where the Form P26 contains a statement that the invention for which protection is claimed is based on or derived from an indigenous biological resource, a genetic resource, or traditional knowledge or use, the applicant shall, before acceptance of the application furnish the registrar with proof of his or her title or authority to make use of the indigenous biological resource, the genetic resource, or the traditional knowledge or use, by lodging with the registrar one or more of the following: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) a copy of the permit issued in terms of Chapter 7 of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004; if applicable, proof that prior consent had been obtained as contemplated in section 82(2)(a) or 82(3)(a) of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004; if applicable, proof of a material transfer agreement as contemplated in section 82(2)(b)(i) of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004; if applicable, proof of a benefit-sharing agreement as contemplated in section 82(2)(b) of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004; if applicable, proof of co-ownership of the invention for which protection is claimed; 2

(f) any other proof to the satisfaction of the registrar. Notes on 2 to 5 above: ASSIGNMENTS Please do not alter any assignment forms which we have provided for signature or use your own forms without first confirming with us that your forms would be suitable for filing in South Africa. Please ensure that the effective date of the Assignment of Invention is prior to the date of signature of the patent forms P3 (Power of Attorney and Declaration) and P26 (Declaration as to Indigenous Knowledge or Resources). In the event that the priority application was filed in the name of an applicant other than the applicant appearing on the WO publication, please let us know as an Assignment of Priority will be required. Where there are two co-applicants and the employees of each co-applicant have contributed parts of the invention as claimed, a cross assignment by all of the inventors to both co-applicants is required. It is not sufficient that the employees of a co-applicant only assign their invention to that co-applicant because under South African law each co-applicant owns an undivided share in the invention. FORM P26 Please be advised that the Form P26 is required for all the inventions filed in South Africa regardless of technical area to which an invention belongs. In the event that the invention is NOT based on or derived from a South African indigenous biological resource or genetic resource, please cross out 3(a), 4(a) and 5(a). In the event that the invention IS based on or derived from a South African indigenous biological resource or genetic resource, please cross out 3(b), 4(b) and 5(b). The meaning of the invention for which protection is claimed is based on or derived from traditional knowledge or use is that such traditional knowledge or use is claimed as an essential element of the invention. Specification Requirements 6. The South African Patent Office will obtain a copy of the International Application, with Article 19 and Article 34 amendments directly from WIPO and copies of the specification, claims, drawings, and abstract are not receivable from the applicant. 3

7. Where either or both Article 19 and Article 34 amendments have been made during the International Phase, then such amendments will automatically form part of the South African application, however where said amendments were not made in English then a verified translation thereof into English must be provided within 3 months. PLEASE NOTE: Our cautious view is that in accordance with the latest Judgment of the Court of the Commissioner of Patents, failure to comply with this deadline will lead to lapsing of the Patent Application. Please ensure we are in receipt of the translation well in advance of the deadline. 8. South Africa is a non-examining country and thus the only examination is to form and not as to substance. It is the duty of the applicant to ensure that the application is valid as to novelty and inventive step. 8.1 South Africa s novelty requirements are very similar to those of most of the developed world including Europe, Australia, USA and Japan, and thus any amendments made to overcome novelty objections before these examining offices should be incorporated into the South African application, preferably prior to grant of the patent. 8.2 South Africa s inventive step requirements differ from some of the above jurisdictions and thus a South African application should be scrutinised in the light of the International Search Report and/or the International Preliminary Examination Report to decide to what extent the PCT International Specification as filed and/or as published should be amended when filing a South African application to reduce the risk of invalidity on the grounds of lack of inventive step of any South African patent which may be granted on the application. 8.3 We usually recommend that amendments made before examining offices solely to overcome inventive step objections are considered carefully before being incorporated in the South African application. This course of action prevents the unnecessary limitation of the scope of the claims of the South African patent. Only a court can decide on the question of inventive step. 8.4 It may thus in some instances be preferable not to be limited by the amendments annexed to the International Preliminary Examination Report but rather to selectivley amend the South African patent application prior to acceptance of the patent. This can be undertaken at the same time as the omnibus claims are added (see 9. below) by amending the application to reverse the amendments made during the International Phase, where possible. 8.5 In terms of South African patent practice, omnibus claims are usually included in a South African application prior to grant of the patent. These omnibus claims must be introduced by way of amendment as set out in 9. below. 4

9. Amendments 9.1 Omnibus claims, claims not allowable in South Africa, such as method of treatment claims, and any other claims usually added according to South African practice, and which are not annexed to the International Application, must be added, deleted, or corrected after filing but prior to grant of the patent application (about 8 months); 9.2 Unless we hear from you to the contrary within 2 months from the date of entry into the National Phase in South Africa, we will formally apply for amendment of the application to bring it into conformance with South African patent practice and legal requirements, as set out in 8.1 above. At the same time we can also attend to any other amendments and corrections, for example, in the light of prior art which has become known to the applicant as explained in 8. above. 10. Priority Document. a. If the applicant complies with rule 17.1 of the PCT then neither the priority document nor a translation thereof need be lodged. b. If the applicant does not comply with rule 17.1 of the PCT then a priority document, together with a verified translation thereof, must be lodged with the Patent Office within 6 months of entering the South African National phase. This time limit may be extended at the discretion of the Registrar on application for extension being made. 11. Renewal fees are payable from 36 months after the International Filing date, but may be paid within 6 months of the grant of a patent if a patent is granted more than 33 months after the International Filing date. 5