GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

Similar documents
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

Justice and Public Safety Subcommittee Fiscal Year Budget Highlights

MISDEMEANOR SENTENCING STEPS FOR SENTENCING A MISDEMEANOR UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING

Objectives. A very brief history 1/26/18. Jamie Markham. Grid fluency Handbook and form familiarity Avoid common errors

A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SENTENCING

A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SENTENCING

Sentencing, Corrections, Prisons, and Jails

SENTENCING IN SUPERIOR COURT. Jamie Markham (919) STEPS FOR SENTENCING A FELONY UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING

2014 Kansas Statutes

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2005 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note (G.S )

Special Topic Seminar for District Court Judges February 2012 JUSTICE REINVESTMENT EXERCISES. Answers and Explanations

Conditions of probation; evaluation and treatment; fees; effect of failure to abide by conditions; modification.

The Justice System Judicial Branch, Adult Corrections, and Youth Corrections

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2007 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 1003

The Simple Yet Confusing Matter of Sentencing (1 hour) Gary M. Gavenus Materials

Session of HOUSE BILL No By Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice 1-18

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 642

Overview. Justice Reinvestment: Big Picture 1/26/18

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 82 1

New Mexico Sentencing Commission

REVISOR XX/BR

REDUCING RECIDIVISM STATES DELIVER RESULTS

Sentencing Chronic Offenders

Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction

Felony Offenses Committed on or after October 1, 2013

Session Law Creating the New Mexico Sentencing Commission, 2003 New Mexico Laws ch. 75

ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 81B 1

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT S.2371, AN ACT RELATIVE TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM

Department of Corrections

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 46 1

CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

Glossary of Criminal Justice Sentencing Terms

Jurisdiction Profile: Massachusetts

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEN COUNTY, OHIO

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 2 HOUSE BILL 369 Committee Substitute Favorable 4/11/17

Raise the Age Presentation: 2017 NYSAC Fall Seminar. September 21, 2017

Massachusetts Sentencing Commission Current Statutes Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 211E 1-4 (2018)

Title 204. Judicial System General Provisions Part VIII Criminal Sentencing Chapter 303. Sentencing Guidelines

New Felony Defender Training: SENTENCING IN SUPERIOR COURT

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF SENATE BILL NO. 18

15A Conditions of probation. (a) In General. The court may impose conditions of probation reasonably necessary to insure that the defendant

Criminal Justice Reform and Reinvestment In Georgia

Nonpartisan Services for Colorado's Legislature. Date: Bill Status: Fiscal Analyst: CONCEALED HANDGUN CARRY WITH NO PERMIT

S 2934 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Frequently Asked Questions: Sentencing Guidelines (6 th Edition & 6 th Edition, Revised) and General Sentencing Issues

AN ANALYSIS OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE CASE PROCESSING AND SENTENCING USING NIBRS DATA, ADJUDICATION DATA AND CORRECTIONS DATA

Jurisdiction Profile: Alabama

Louisiana Justice Reinvestment Package

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 2448

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2018

Overview of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Correctional Population Projections, Recidivism Rates, and Costs Per Day

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2017

Justice Reinvestment in Oklahoma Initial Work Group Meeting

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY GREENLEAF, LEACH, HUGHES, SCHWANK, YUDICHAK, BROWNE AND STREET, MARCH 12, 2018 AN ACT

Chapter 148. State Prison System. Article 1. Organization and Management Repealed by Session Laws 1973, c. 1262, s. 10.

SENATE BILL NO. 34 IN THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE - FIRST SESSION A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON CRIME PREVENTION, CORRECTIONS & SAFETY ANALYSIS

Probation Reform Common Sentencing Errors

Assembly Bill No. 25 Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0094. Sponsored by: Joint Judiciary Interim Committee A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to criminal justice; amending provisions

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION REPORT ON PROPOSED LEGISLATION PURSUANT TO G.S

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR

Sentencing, Corrections, Prisons, and Jails

State Issue 1 The Neighborhood Safety, Drug Treatment, and Rehabilitation Amendment

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 49

23 Sentencing, Corrections, Prisons, and Jails

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 HOUSE BILL 494 RATIFIED BILL

Testimony before the: Senate Judiciary Criminal Justice Committee

Legislative Impact on State Responsible Bed Space. Tama S. Celi, Ph.D. Statistical Analysis & Forecast Manager Virginia Department of Corrections

IN 2009, GOVERNOR BEVERLY PERDUE

(1) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant;

PART C IMPRISONMENT. If the applicable guideline range is in Zone B of the Sentencing Table, the minimum term may be satisfied by

Courtroom Terminology

IC Chapter 9. Sealing and Expunging Conviction Records

JOINT LEGISLATIVE CORRECTIONS, CRIME CONTROL, AND JUVENILE JUSTICE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE

Jurisdiction Profile: North Carolina

Sentencing hearing after conviction for impaired driving; determination of grossly aggravating and aggravating and mitigating factors;

SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION {Indicate if analysis is on an original bill, amendment, substitute or a correction of a previous bill}

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS

Euthanasia Methods Approved by the AVMA, AHA, and HSUS

Virginia s Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment

Session Law Creating the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission and Abolishing Parole, 1978 Minn. Laws ch. 723

Adult Prison and Parole Population Projections Juvenile Commitment and Parole Population Projections

Determinate Sentencing: Time Served December 30, 2015

Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 56 1

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS

Supreme Court of Virginia CHART OF ALLOWANCES

HOUSE BILL 299 A BILL ENTITLED

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 228

FELONY SENTENCING AFTER REALIGNMENT

Part 1 Rules for the Continued Delivery of Services in Non- Capital Criminal and Non-Criminal Cases at the Trial Level

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE

Only Mostly Dead? The Continued Vitality of Simmons in the Wake of North Carolina s Justice Reinvestment Act of 2011

MINNESOTA. Chapter Title: DOMESTIC ABUSE Section: 518B.01. As used in this section, the following terms shall have the meanings given them:

Superior Court of Washington For Pierce County

Transcription:

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note BILL NUMBER: House Bill 181 (First Edition) SHORT TITLE: First Responders Act of 2017. SPONSOR(S): Representatives Warren, Clampitt, Ford, and Potts FISCAL IMPACT ($ in millions) Yes No No Estimate Available State Impact General Fund Revenues: General Fund Expenditures: FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 State Positions: NET STATE IMPACT Likely budget cost. See Assumptions & Methodology section for additional details. PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT(S) & PROGRAM(S) AFFECTED: Administrative Office of the Courts; Indigent Defense Services; Department of Public Safety EFFECTIVE DATE: December 1, 2017 TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS: None The proposed bill may have a fiscal impact to address a new chargeable offense being enforced, adjudicated, and having penalties applied to those convicted of the new offense. However, given that there is no historical data on this new offense or similar offenses to use as a proxy for predicting the total number of new offenses, the Fiscal Research Division cannot reasonably estimate the total additional costs that may be incurred. The following costs may be incurred for every one person charged and convicted of this crime: Administrative Office of the Courts: $625 to $2,017 per disposition Indigent Defense Services: $392 to $586 per indigent defendant Department of Public Safety (DPS) - Prisons: $5,027 to $12,339 per active sentence DPS - Community Corrections: Minimum of $1,332 to $1,776 per conviction Please see the Assumptions and Methodology section for additional information. BILL SUMMARY: The bill creates three new felony offenses. First, subsection (b) of new G.S. 14-401.14A, Hate crime against emergency personnel, makes it a Class H felony for anyone to assault another inflicting serious bodily injury because the person is emergency personnel, unless the conduct is covered by another provision of law providing greater punishment. Currently, it is a Class F felony for anyone to assault another person and House Bill 181 (First Edition) 1

inflict serious bodily injury, regardless of the motivation behind the assault (G.S. 14-32.4). Additionally, this conduct may be punished under other provisions that cover assaults on various emergency personnel: it is a Class F felony to assault a law enforcement officer and inflict serious bodily injury (G.S. 14-34.7) and it is a Class H felony to assault a firefighter, emergency medical technician, medical responder, or hospital personnel and inflict serious bodily injury (G.S. 14-34.6). Second, subsection (c) of new G.S. 14-401.14A makes it a Class F felony for anyone to assault another person with a firearm because the person is emergency personnel. This conduct may be punished under other provisions that cover assaults on various emergency personnel: under existing G.S. 14-34.6(c), it is a Class F felony to commit an assault or affray with a firearm on an emergency medical technician, ambulance attendant, emergency department nurse, or hospital personnel. Also, under existing G.S. 14-288.9, it is a Class F felony to assault emergency personnel with a dangerous weapon or substance if it is committed in an area in which a declared state of emergency exists; or within the immediate vicinity of which a riot is occurring or is imminent. Finally, subsection (d) makes it a Class E felony for anyone who, with the intent of harming a person who is emergency personnel, lures the person to a location by falsely reporting or having another individual falsely report that emergency services are needed and then assaults that person because the person is emergency personnel. Some of this conduct may be covered under existing G.S. 14-288.9(c), assault on emergency personnel that causes physical injury or other general assault provisions. ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODOLOGY: General The Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission prepares prison population projections for each bill containing a criminal penalty. The Commission assumes for such bills that expanding existing or creating new criminal offenses produces no deterrent or incapacitative effect on crime. Therefore, the Fiscal Research Division does not assume deterrent effects for any criminal penalty bill. S.L. 2011-192 (H.B. 642), the Justice Reinvestment Act (JRA), made changes to North Carolina s court system, corrections system (both to prisons and probation), and to post-release supervision. All active sentences for felony offenses now result in a minimum of twelve months of post-release supervision (PRS) for B1-E level offenses and a minimum of nine months of PRS for F-I level offenses. JRA also created the Statewide Misdemeanant Confinement Program (SMCP) for housing misdemeanants with sentences between 90 and 180 days in county jails (misdemeanants with shorter sentences were already the responsibility of the counties). County participation in the program is voluntary. The SMCP pays participating counties for misdemeanants housing, transportation, and medical costs. In 2014, the program was expanded to include all misdemeanants with sentences longer than 90 days. The Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission does not track county jail capacity, so it is not possible to estimate the impact of new or increased misdemeanor penalties on county jails. Judicial Branch The Administrative Office of the Courts provides Fiscal Research with a fiscal impact analysis for most criminal penalty bills. For such bills, fiscal impact is typically based on the assumption that court time will increase due to anticipated increases in trials and corresponding increases in workload for judges, clerks, and prosecutors. This increased court time is also expected to result in greater expenditures for jury fees and indigent defense. House Bill 181 (First Edition) 2

The bill creates three new felony offenses. Because these are new offenses, AOC does not have historical data upon which to estimate the number of charges that might occur. AOC provides estimates of the average cost to the court for a charge by offense class. The following chart shows the cost for AOC for each of the new offense levels. AOC Cost for New Offense Levels FY 2016-17 Offense Level AOC Cost Class H felony $625 Class F felony $1,137 Class E felony $2,017 The Office of Indigent Defense Services (IDS) has provided Fiscal Research with the frequency and cost of indigent defense services for each level of crime, including the cost differentials for district and superior court with and without a trial and the percentage of cases handled in each category. Fiscal Research used this data to calculate a weighted average of IDS costs. The table below shows the percent using IDS services and the IDS cost at each new offense level included in this bill. IDS Cost for New Offense Levels FY 2016-17 Offense Level % Using IDS IDS Cost Class H felony 78% $392 Class F felony 74% $569 Class E felony 79% $586 These estimates assume the appointment of a PAC attorney. In districts that have Public Defender offices, cases may be handled by those offices. In those instances, these costs may not be incurred. Department of Public Safety Prisons The chart below depicts the projected inmate population relative to available prison bed capacity systemwide. Capacity projections assume operation at Expanded Operating Capacity, 1 and represent the total number of beds in operation, or authorized for construction or operation as of December 2016. Based on the most recent population projections and estimated bed capacity, there are surplus prison beds available for the five-year fiscal note horizon and beyond. Therefore, no additional beds will be required unless the projected number of additional inmates resulting from a bill (row four) exceeds the projected number of beds under the inmate population (row three). 1 Expanded Operating Capacity (EOC) is: 1) the number of single cells housing one inmate, 2) the number of single cells housing two inmates, and 3) the number of beds in dormitories, allowing between 35 (130% of Standard Operating Capacity) and 50 (SOC) square feet per inmate. House Bill 181 (First Edition) 3

Population Projections and Bed Capacity Five Year Impact June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 1. Inmates 2 37,304 37,601 37,367 37,385 37,642 2. Prison Beds (Expanded Capacity) 38,373 38,373 38,373 38,373 38,373 3. Beds Over/(Under) Inmate Population 1,069 772 1,006 988 731 4. Additional Inmates Due to this Bill 3 No estimate available 5. Additional Beds Required Since the bill creates three new offenses, the Sentencing Commission does not have any historical data from which to estimate the impact of this bill on the prison population. A threshold analysis is provided when it is not known how many offenders might be convicted and sentenced as a result of the proposed change. For each offense class, the threshold estimate is the number of convictions that result in the need for one prison bed in the first year. In FY 2015-16, 35% of Class H felony convictions resulted in active sentences, with an average estimated time served of 11 months. Nine months of post-release supervision is required upon release from prison following an active sentence or revocation of probation. The following table shows the estimated annual bed impact if there were four convictions (the threshold) or 20 convictions for this proposed offense per year. The five year estimate takes into account the combination of active sentences and probation and postrelease supervision violations resulting in confinement, as well as growth rates adopted by the Sentencing Commission s Forecasting Technical Advisory Group. Estimated Prison Bed Impact Using Threshold Convictions and 20 Convictions Class H Felony Convictions Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 4 (Threshold) 1 2 2 2 2 20 7 10 10 10 10 In addition to the capital costs that may be associated with additional bed needs, there are also per diem costs for housing inmates. The cost to add one additional inmate to the prison system is $15.02 per day, or $457 per month, which includes the cost of food, clothing, and health care. In FY 2015-16, 35% of Class H felony offenders received active sentences averaging 11 months. For every one Class H felony offender receiving an active sentence, the cost to the prison section will be $5,027 ($457 monthly cost times 11 months). In FY 2015-16, 50% of Class F felony convictions resulted in active sentences, with an average estimated time served of 17 months. Nine months of post-release supervision is required upon release from prison following an active sentence or revocation of probation. The following table shows the estimated annual 2 The Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission prepares inmate population projections annually. These projections are derived from: historical information on incarceration and release rates under Structured Sentencing; crime rate forecasts by a technical advisory group; probation and offender revocation rates; and the decline (parole and max-outs) of the stock prison population sentenced under prior sentencing acts. Projections were updated in February 2017. 3 Criminal penalty bills effective December 1, 2017 should not affect prison population and bed needs until FY 2018-19 due to the lag time between offense charge and sentencing - six months on average. No delayed effect is presumed for the Court System. House Bill 181 (First Edition) 4

impact if there were two convictions (the threshold) or 20 convictions for this proposed offense per year. The five year estimate takes into account the combination of active sentences and probation and postrelease supervision violations resulting in confinement, as well as growth rates adopted by the Sentencing Commission s Forecasting Technical Advisory Group. Estimated Prison Bed Impact Using Threshold Convictions and 20 Convictions Class F Felony Convictions Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 2 (Threshold) 1 2 2 2 2 20 10 18 19 19 19 For every one Class F felony offender receiving an active sentence, the per diem cost to the prison section will be $7,259 ($457 monthly cost times 17 months). In FY 2015-16, 63% of Class E felony convictions resulted in active sentences, with an average estimated time served of 27 months. Twelve months of post-release supervision is required upon release from prison following an active sentence or revocation of probation. The following table shows the estimated annual impact if there were two convictions (the threshold) or 20 convictions for this proposed offense per year. The five year estimate takes into account the combination of active sentences and probation and postrelease supervision violations resulting in confinement, as well as growth rates adopted by the Sentencing Commission s Forecasting Technical Advisory Group. Estimated Prison Bed Impact Using Threshold Convictions and 20 Convictions Class E Felony Convictions Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 2 (Threshold) 1 3 3 3 3 20 13 28 34 34 35 For every one Class E felony offender receiving an active sentence, the per diem cost to the prison section will be $12,339 ($457 monthly cost times 27 months). Department of Public Safety Community Corrections All active sentences for felony offenses now result in a minimum of twelve months of post-release supervision (PRS) for B1-E level offenses and a minimum of nine months of PRS for F-I level offenses. Additionally, for felony offense classes F through I offenders may be given non-active (intermediate or community) sentences exclusively, or in conjunction with imprisonment (split-sentence). Sanctions include electronic house arrest, community service, substance abuse treatment, participation in educational or vocational skills development, payment of court costs, fines, and restitution, and short-term jail sentences not exceeding six days per month. JRA essentially eliminated the distinction between community and intermediate supervision. Under structured sentencing, the two types of supervision were each defined by a set of specific sanctions. Under JRA, both community and intermediate probation may now include electronic monitoring, short-term periods of confinement, substance abuse assessment, monitoring, and treatment, participation in educational programs or vocational skills development. Whether a probationer is subject to more stringent conditions is determined by the results of a risk-needs assessment administered by the Department of Public Safety. House Bill 181 (First Edition) 5

All types of post-release supervision are supervised by the Community Corrections Section (CCS); CCS also oversees community service. Supervision by a probation officer costs $148 per offender, per month; no cost is assumed for those receiving unsupervised probation, or who are only ordered to pay fines, fees, or restitution. Total costs are based on average supervision length and the percentage of offenders (per offense class) sentenced to active sentences requiring post-release supervision and supervised probations. In FY 2015-16, 35% of Class H felony offenders received active sentences. All active sentences for Class F through I felonies result in nine months of post-release supervision (PRS). The average length of probation imposed for this offense class was 27 months. Therefore, at a minimum, one conviction resulting from this bill will require at least nine months of supervision. The cost of nine months of supervision is $1,332 per offender ($148 per month times nine months). 4 For every offender sentenced to probation, the average cost would be $3,996 ($148 per month times 27 months). In FY 2015-16, 50% of Class F felony offenders received active sentences. All active sentences for Class F through I felonies result in nine months of post-release supervision (PRS). The average length of probation imposed for this offense class was 32 months. Therefore, at a minimum, one conviction resulting from this bill will require at least nine months of supervision. The cost of nine months of supervision is $1,332 per offender ($148 per month times nine months). 4 For every offender sentenced to probation, the average cost would be $4,736 ($148 per month times 32 months). In FY 2015-16, 63% of Class E felony offenders received active sentences. All active sentences for Class E felonies result in 12 months of post-release supervision (PRS). The average length of probation imposed for this offense class was 33 months. Therefore, at a minimum, one conviction resulting from this bill will require at least 12 months of supervision. The cost of 12 months of supervision is $1,776 per offender ($148 per month times 12 months). 4 For every offender sentenced to probation, the average cost would be $4,884 ($148 per month times 33 months). SOURCES OF DATA: Department of Public Safety; Administrative Office of the Courts; North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission; Office of Indigent Defense Services. TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS: None FISCAL RESEARCH DIVISION: (919) 733-4910 PREPARED BY: Kristine Leggett APPROVED BY: Mark Trogdon, Director Fiscal Research Division DATE: March 29, 2017 Signed Copy Located in the NCGA Principal Clerk's Offices 4 Due to the effective date of December 1, 2017 and the typical lag time between charge and conviction (6 months), little impact is assumed for CCS in FY 2017-18. Though some offenders may come under CCS supervision during this time, this note assumes an even entry over the course of FY 2018-19. House Bill 181 (First Edition) 6