APR CLERK OF COURT REIVIE COURT OF OHIO. APR Lr^^^ ^^* ^a^.:,e^ ^LIMItML coufii JF onio IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Similar documents
Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO CLERMONT COUNTY. : O P I N I O N - vs - 3/3/2014 :

COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY : : : : : : : : : :... O P I N I O N

COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DARKE COUNTY : : : : : : : : :... O P I N I O N...

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

CASE NO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO COLUMBUS, OHIO STATE OF OHIO9. Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. DOUGLAS EDWARD HADDIX, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2013 RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS RELATOR'S ACTION IN MANDAMUS

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

MAY MARCIA J MEII4GEL, CLERK SUPREME COUR'f OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Appellee, KEVIN JOHNSON

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee * On Appeal from the Third District Court of Appeals, v. * Shelby County

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Appellee, : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO. 09CR3403

with one count of Aggravated Murder, O.R.C (B), and two counts of

. I..i'ML OCT IZ CLERK OF GOURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, SHAUGHN C. BOONE, Defendant-Appellant

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY INTRODUCTION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Appellee, : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO. 06 CR 5114/2

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY : : : : : : : : : :... O P I N I O N

[Cite as State v. Abrams, 2011-Ohio-103.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA. JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT VINTON COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO ALLEN RICHARDSON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. : O P I N I O N - vs - 12/13/2010 :

[Cite as State v. Hill, 2010-Ohio-1670.] Court of Appeals of Ohio. vs. MILTON HILL JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

12PREM;^O ^, Q^0 APR CLERK OFCOURT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MERCER COUNTY. v. O P I N I O N. v. O P I N I O N

Court of Appeals of Ohio

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY. Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA

t;i 4:liK OF COURT SUPREUIL yc7urt l7f OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Case No Appellant

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT,

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L Trial Court No.

CLERK OF COURT PREME COURT OF C

STATE OF OHIO JOANNE SCHNEIDER

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY

Court of Appeals of Ohio

COURT OF APPEALS LAKE COUNTY, OHIO J U D G E S

[Cite as State ex rel. Johnson v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 2004-Ohio-2648.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

BY: KIRSTEN PSCHOLKA-GARTNER Suite South Park Street Mansfield, OH Mansfield, OH 44902

J^^N '14 7U(lq CLERK OF COURT SUPREME 9pURT OF' ph10 CLERK OF COURT SUPREME C URT FOHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO SUPREME COURT CASE NO.

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY INTRODUCTION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO. 12CR684

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO O P I N I O N...

Court of Appeals of Ohio

p L DD 0q^^/41, CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO State ex rel., McGRATH Case No

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY LEWIS WASHINGTON NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

JUN $ 0 M06 CLERK CF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellant. vs. Counsel for Defendant-Appellee

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed January 18, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

JAN2±2011 JAN CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF HI. CLERK OF COURT I SUPREME COURT OF 9Hlp IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

ORIGINAL SEP CLERK OF COURT SEP CLERK OF COURT SUPREME CUURT OF OHIO SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. (App. No A-0049) Appellant.

VE D. su^'a i 8 2ai? JUN 18 EUi2 CLESK OF CCURT SUPSEME CUURTOF ONIO J CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COUR7 OF OHIO. S. Ct. No. Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Ohio

[Cite as State v. Horch, 154 Ohio App.3d 537, 2003-Ohio-5135.] COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT UNION COUNTY. v.

SEALING OF RECORD OF CONVICTION (General Information)

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

STATE OF OHIO RICO COX

SYLLABUS OF THE COURT A demand for discovery or a bill of particulars is a tolling event pursuant to R.C (E).

^^ JUNI CI.kRK OF COURT SUpRRME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. IN THE MATTER OF: A.R.R., Case No.

***Please see Nunc Pro Tunc Entry at 2003-Ohio-826.*** IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY APPEARANCES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO MOTION TO DISMISS OF RESPONDENTS JUDGE CLAIR E. DICKINSON AND COURT ADMINISTRATOR C. MICHAEL WALSH

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO NOTICE OF APPEAL OF APPELLANT ANDREW BEVINS JR.

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. Petitioner-Appellant, : CASE NO. CA : O P I N I O N - vs - 4/20/2009 :

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CASE NO MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO JURISDICTION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. CHRISTOPHER A. MOBLEY : T.C. Case No. 01-CR-3064

Court of Appeals of Ohio

I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

CLERK OF COURT SURREME COURTOFOHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. [State ex. rel.] Jenkins Smith, Case No Original Action in Mandamus

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Sentence Vacated; Case Remanded for Resentencing.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 05AP-588 v. : (C.P.C. No. 97CR )

[Cite as State ex rel. Culgan v. Medina Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 119 Ohio St.3d 535, Ohio-4609.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : : JOURNAL ENTRY. For Plaintiff-Appellee: : and -vs- : : OPINION. For Defendant-Appellant:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

O.R.C. Section (F)(2). The state has opposed the motion. This entry follows. offenses ranged from June 1 through September 30, 2004.

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY. : O P I N I O N - vs - 7/15/2013 :

STATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L Appellee Trial Court No.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY. Petitioner-Appellant, : CASE NO. CA

COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE: Robert Junk, Pike County Prosecutor, 108 North Market Street, Waverly, Ohio 45690

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. For defendant-appellant: : : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION : FEBRUARY 10, 2005

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff : CASE NO CR 722

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO. HENNIS, : (Criminal Appeal from Common Pleas Court) Appellant. :

Transcription:

14 ^^ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO, V. Appellee, On appeal from the Clermont County Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District Supreme Court No. 2013-0540 JAMIE LEE NAEGELE, Court of Appeals Case No. 2012CA07055 Appellant. MEMORANDUM IN RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF JURISDICTION Jamie Lee Naegele Inmate No. 457-454 Marion Correctional Institution P.O. Box 57 Marion, Ohio 43302 Appellant, Pro Se pa APR 16 2013 D D. Vincent Faris (0001163) Clermont County Prosecutor Judith Brant (0066243) 76 S. Riverside Dr., 2nd floor Batavia, Ohio 45103 Phone: (513)732-7313 Fax: (513)732-7592 ibrant@clermontcountyohio.gov Counsel for Appellee State of Ohio su CLERK OF COURT REIVIE COURT OF OHIO rs APR 1 2013 Lr^^^ ^^* ^a^.:,e^ ^LIMItML coufii JF onio

TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF APPELLEE'S POSITION...1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE...1 ARG U M E NT...1 Proposition of Law I: Did the Trial Court error (sic) in not advising of the right to appeal pursuant to Ohio Criminal Rule 32(B)?... 1 Proposition of Law II: Did the Trial Court error (sic) when convicting of charges that were to be merged as allied offenses of similar import pursuant to O.R.C. 2941.25 without a hearing?...2 Proposition of Law III: Did the Trial Court error (sic) by not allowing a fair and full considerate hearing on motion to vacate and set aside sentence?...2 CONCLUSION...2 CERTIFICATE,OF SERVICE.:...3 TABLE OF CASES State v. Becker, 2002-Ohio-5509 (Ohio App. 12 Dist., 2002)...2 State v. Jackson, 2012-Ohio-993 (Ohio App. 12 Dist., 2012)... 2 12 th Dist. No. CA92-06-068, 1993 WL 38146 (1993)...1 84 Ohio St.3d 19, 701 N.E.2d 693 (1998)...1 (Ohio App. 12 Dist., Dec., 2012)...1 i

STATEMENT OF APPELLEE'S POSITION THIS COURT SHOULD NOT GRANT APPELLANT LEAVE TO FILE A DISCRETIONARY APPEAL IN THIS FELONY CASE. THIS CASE DOES NOT INVOLVE PUBLIC OR GREAT GENERAL INTEREST AND DOES NOT INVOLVE A SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION. Appellant seeks to appeal to the Supreme Court the judgment of the Twelfth District Court of Appeal's affirmation of the denial of his claim for post-conviction relief in the trial court. He should not be granted leave to file the appeal. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellant Naegele was convicted of rape and kidnapping following a trial by jury. (T.d. 54). He appealed his conviction, which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. 12 th Dist. No. CA92-06-068, 1993 WL 38146 (1993). In 1996, he petitioned for post-conviction relief. (T.d. 69). The petition was overruled. (T.d. 73). He was found to be a sexual offender. (T.d. 77). The finding was affirmed on appeal to the Supreme Court of Ohio. 84 Ohio St.3d 19, 701 N.E.2d 693 (1998). On May 31, 2012, Appellant filed a "motion to vacate and void sentence" in the Clermont County Court of Common Pleas. (T.d. 90). The motion was considered a successive petition for post-conviction relief and denied for want of jurisdiction. (T.d. 92). The 12th District Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment. State v. Jamie L. Naegele, (Ohio App. 12 Dist., Dec., 2012). ARGUMENT Proposition of Law I: The Trial Court Failed to Advise Appellant of his Right to Appeal. This proposition lacks merit and there is no reversible error because Appellant did actually appeal his original conviction. State v. Jamie L. Naegele, (Ohio App. 12 Dist., Dec., 2012). 1.

Proposition of Law II: The Trial Court Failed to Merge Appellant's Convictions for Kidnapping and Rape. Appellant failed to raise the issue of merger and allied offenses in his direct appeal, and is now barred by resjudicata. Naegele, supra; State v. Jackson, 2012-Ohio-993 (Ohio App. 12 Dist., 2012). Proposition of Law III: The Trial Court Erred in Not Conducting A Hearing on the Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Sentence. The trial court was not required to conduct such a hearing. Naegele, supra; State v. Becker, 2002-Ohio-5509 (Ohio App. 12 Dist., 2002). CONCLUSION Appellant asks the court to accept his discretionary appeal. The State requests the Court deny review. Respectfully submitted, D. Vincent Faris (0001163) Clermont County Prosecutor JuBrant (0066243) 76 S. Riverside Dr., 2nd floor Batavia, Ohio 45103 Phone: (513)732-7313 Fax: (513)732-7592 'brant c{ermontcount ohio. ov Counsel for Appeilee STATE OF OHIO 2.

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THIS RESPONSE WAS DELIVERED TO THE FOLLOWING PERSON BY REGULAR U.S. MAIL ON THIS DAY OF APRIL, 2013. Jamie Lee Naegele #457-454 Marion Correctional Camp P.O. Box 57 Marion, Ohio 43301-0057 Appellant, Pro Se Ju i Brant (0066243) Clermont County, Ohio 3.