Health Information Technology Provisions in the Recovery Act

Similar documents
Increasing HIT through the Economic Stimulus Bill

Health Reform Law - Advisory Panels, Boards, Commissions, & Stakeholder Involvement

Health Policy Briefing

American Hospital Association Federal Update November 11, 2014

Washington Update: Health Care Reform Top of the List For Next Congress 1 November 5, 2008

President Trump Signs Executive Order Instructing Agencies to Minimize Burdens of the ACA

Update on the SGR fix

Effective Communications with Congressional Staff

Debt Ceiling Legislation: The Budget Control Act of 2011

Tuesday, February 10, :45 AM Mountain

Health Policy Briefing

Federal Affairs. Public Policy Event Calendar

LEGISLATIVE GLOSSARY

Washington Speak A Glossary of Commonly Used and Confused Terms

Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB)

AMERICAN RECOVERY & REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 TITLE XIII HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS OF PRIVACY AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS (SUBPART D)

FY2015 Omnibus or CRomnibus Appropriations December 16, 2014

FILED 11/02/2017 1:21 PM ARCHIVES DIVISION SECRETARY OF STATE

American Nephrology Nurses Association. Weekly Capitol Hill Update Tuesday, December 15, Congressional Schedule

2017 TSGAC Consultation Conference Recovering and Spending Third-Party Revenue

Health Reform 2.0. The Issues, People, and Events That Will Define Regulatory Reforms. Repeal. Replace. The issues. Top Issues for 2017

21st Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference

Overview of GAO work on Nonemergency Medical Transportation

2016 FEDERAL ELECTION INSIGHTS AND LEGISLATIVE UPDATES. Chad Mulvany, FHFMA Director, Healthcare Finance Policy, Strategy and Development HFMA

NEST Coordinating Center (NESTcc) Charter. Article I: Name, Preamble, Mission, and Vision

October 10, Re: Proposed Changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dear Judge Sutton:

Medicare Cuts, the Nursing Shortage,

Health Care: What to Expect from the Obama Presidency and the Next Congress

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2016-FY2018)

Health Care Fraud and Abuse Laws Affecting Medicare and Medicaid: An Overview

Status of Health Reform Bills Moving Through Congress

Budget Deal or In Your Face House Action?

Contract Reporting and Oversight at the Health and Human Services Commission

Washington Update. HFMA Region 8 MidAmerica Summer Institute August 2017

Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and Funding (FY2015-FY2017)

Medicare Provisions In The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act (ppaca) Summary And Timeline

Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB)

Older Americans Act: FY2015 Appropriations Overview

National Research Council Canada (NRC)

ASC QUALITY REPORT. (a) Outpatient Hospital Services.

LEGISLATING HEALTH CARE REFORM

2011 SINE DIE REPORT MARYLAND GENERAL ASSEMBLY Julia P. Worcester Legislative Consultant The Law Office of J. William Pitcher

Health Policy Briefing

IN THE WAKE OF THE SCOTUS'S AFFORDABLE CARE ACT DECISION: WHAT'S NEXT FOR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS? [OBER KALER]

Subtitle F Medical Device Innovations

The U.S. Supreme Court Decision & Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: What It Means for Clinical Gastroenterology

FIRST COAST HEALTH ALLIANCE, LLC CHARTER AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE

HITECH Answers Overview 2012

A Spring Cheat Sheet

Use of the Annual Appropriations Process to Block Implementation of the Affordable Care Act (FY2011-FY2017)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 372

p ublic p olicy g roup Polsinelli Shughart

February 24 FAL Call Minutes February 24, :00 P.M., EST

SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is making technical amendments

What is Next for Health Care Reform?

UPDATE FROM THE HILL 2011 FINAL AGREEMENT

A Review of the Current Health Care Fraud Enforcement Environment Brian McEvoy & Ellen Persons

This presentation is the third in DPH s post election series of presentation on the postelection

Policy and Legislative Affairs Update

Federal Public Policy Issues Update: A New Year and A Clean Slate. CNM DPG Symposium 2017 March 21, :00 10:00 a.m.

Patient Privacy and Security: Data Breach Reporting and other HIPAA Changes

Summary The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA, as amended) was signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, As is often

POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF THE CENTER DIRECTOR. Drug Safety Oversight Board (DSB) Table of Contents

SAFE IMPORTATION OF MEDICAL PRODUCTS AND OTHER RX THERAPIES ACT OF 2004 (SAFE IMPORT ACT) SECTION-BY-SECTION SEC. 1. SHORT TITLE.

2010 Education Appropriations Guide

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Spring 2013 Unified Agenda

At Polsinelli Shughart Your Goals Are our objectives What Makes Polsinelli Shughart different?

New Federal Initiatives Project

Update on Federal Issues

Kimberly Brandt, Chief Oversight Counsel, U.S. Senate Committee on Finance

4/21/2015. Today s Presentation. Disclaimer & Fine Print. Prescription for Change: Congressional Actions Impacting Physician Practices

GROUP PURCHASING CODE OF CONDUCT

HITECH Answers Overview 2012

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 2679 SUMMARY

Chapter 2 How Does Federal Health Policy Work?

Use of the Annual Appropriations Process to Block Implementation of the Affordable Care Act (FY2011-FY2016)

Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act Privacy and Security Provisions

The Budget Control Act of 2011: Implications for Medicare

The First Attempt at Healthcare Reform

Establishment of the National Clinical Care Commission and Solicitation of Nominations

A Change is Gonna Come: How Will the New HHS and FDA Affect Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Companies?

Potential Effects of 2016 Elections on Medical Device Industry

Key ethical principles for Personalized/ Precision Medicine. Health Ethics and Policy

*Approved* GOVERNANCE AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE November 15, 2018 TO THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Part I: Background and Regulatory Framework. Part II: MDUFMA, 510(k) and Validation

Health Reform Update Week of October 31, 2011

NH State Medicaid HIT Plan

Inside. House Passes FY 2011 CR with $61 Billion in New Cuts; Obama FY 2012 Budget Slammed

Health Information Exchange Coordinating Committee Meeting Minutes

PPACA's Impact: The Election, 2013 and Beyond

Medicare Program; Public Meeting on June 25, 2018 Regarding New and Reconsidered

The U.S. Conference of Mayors Workforce Development Council (WDC) Board Meeting. Legislative Update. April 25-26, 2013 Seattle, WA

ESG Investment Philosophy

The Public Voice in Health Care Reform: The Rulemaking Process

Submitted to: Healthcare Supply Chain Association 2025 M Street, NW, Suite 800 Washington DC Prepared by:

If searched for a ebook Amend title XVIII of Social Security Act with for access to community hospitals, rural transition grant program, regional

Government shutdown primer

Facilitated By: Stephney Allen Director of U.S. Repatriation Program and Internal Operations

SENATE BILL By Hensley BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE:

TRICARE and VA Health Care: Impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L )

Transcription:

HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROVISIONS IN THE RECOVERY ACT Driving Business Advantage Health Information Technology Provisions in the Recovery Act by Brian P. Carey & Paul T. Kim April 2009

The following is an overview of the health information technology (HIT) provisions in H.R. 1, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA, or Recovery Act), which President Obama signed into law on February 17, 2009. This document reviews potential funding sources and key decision makers for HIT at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its agencies. This overview highlights the HIT incentive payments, which are the largest piece of HIT funding in the Recovery Act, how various provisions of the HIT provisions are to be implemented, when they are required or expected to happen, and who the key players will be in the process. Background on the Recovery Act The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act establishes a national framework for developing a nationwide electronic exchange and the development of uniform, interoperable standards for the use of HIT. The HIT provisions of ARRA are found primarily in Division A, the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH), and in Title IV of Division B, Medicare and Medicaid Health Information Technology. From the total $19.2 billion devoted to HIT adoption, the Office of National Coordinator for HIT (ONCHIT) will receive $2 billion and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will receive approximately $17 billion. Other ARRA funds distributed among the HHS agencies which may impact HIT infrastructure include: $10 billion to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for biomedical research and to improve facilities, $2.5 billion to the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), $1.1 billion to the Agency for Health Research and Quality (AHRQ) for comparative effectiveness research, $1 billion to the Public Health Service for prevention and wellness, and $85 million to the Indian Health Services (IHS). 1

HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROVISIONS IN THE RECOVERY ACT Additionally, the Veterans Administration, the Department of Defense, and the Social Security Administration will receive funds that could involve and impact the implementation of HIT. Incentive Payments A major component of the new national HIT strategy enacted by ARRA, and one of the most significant efforts being made to change the health care system, is the estimated $17 billion in incentive payments created for the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs). These incentive payments may include investments in hospital, physician practices, public health infrastructure for EHRs, and telemedicine to ensure interoperability of the new technologies. The $17 billion in incentive payment funds directed to CMS are particularly for certified meaningful EHR users and are to begin in 2011. Key to the distribution of these incentive payments will be the way in which regulations further define and clarify the meaningful user requirements. Medicare payment rules for fiscal year 2011 will start being drafted in February of 2010 (for the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System) and April of 2010 (for physicians). ARRA also imposes penalties on those who do not meet the requirements by the required dates. Physicians lacking certified HIT systems face -1% in 2015, -2% in 2016, and -3% in 2017 penalties, with Secretarial authority for beyond 2019. For hospitals, the market basket update is reduced for any eligible hospital that does not meaningfully use EHRs by FY2015. The Secretary may provide a time-limited exemption from the payment reduction to professionals who demonstrate a significant hardship in meeting the meaningful use criteria. 2

Implementation of HIT Recovery Act Provisions Another major component of ARRA s HIT provisions is the restructuring and expansion of the federal role in promoting and implementing HIT. In particular, ARRA codifies the Office of National Coordinator for HIT (ONCHIT), establishes the federal role in HIT policy development through federal advisory committees, and it creates the structure and process for developing and implementing official HIT standards and specifications. ONCHIT is to develop a nationwide HIT infrastructure through the development of standards and certification criteria and coordination of HIT policies through a federal HIT strategic plan. In addition, ONCHIT is required to coordinate with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to develop a program to certify HIT as being compliant with the endorsed standards. The HIT Policy Committee will be established as a federal advisory committee and will make recommendations to the National Coordinator relating to the implementation of a nationwide HIT infrastructure. The Policy Committee will recommend areas in which standards, implementation specifications and certification criteria are needed for the electronic exchange and use of HIT. The GAO is required to appoint 13 of 20 members to the HIT Policy Committee no later than April 3, 2009, and appointments are to be made in a variety of categories to ensure diverse representation. 1 HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROVISIONS IN THE RECOVERY ACT The HIT Standards Committee will be established as a second federal advisory committee to recommend standards, implementation specifications and certification criteria for the electronic exchange and use of HIT in accordance with policies developed by the HIT Policy Committee. The Secretary will 1 Members are required to represent the following: patients or consumers; health care providers, one of whom is a physician; labor organization representing health care workers; expertise in health information privacy and security; expertise in improving the health of vulnerable populations; research community; health plans or other third-party payers; information technology vendors; purchasers or employers; and expertise in health care quality measurement and reporting. 3

HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROVISIONS IN THE RECOVERY ACT appoint members to this committee to reflect designated stakeholders. 2 The Standards Committee is required to conduct open public meetings and to develop a process for public comment. Both the HIT Policy and HIT Standards Committees are to serve as forums for stakeholders to participate and provide input on the development, harmonization and recognition of standards necessary for the development and adoption of HIT nationwide. Certification is a critical component to the implementation of ARRA s HIT provisions. Certified EHR technology means that it qualifies as meeting standards adopted for that particular record. See timeline below for further explanation of the dates and process for adoption of HIT standards and recommendations. Timeline for Implementation ARRA sets out a number of dates and deadlines for the HIT provisions, such as the establishment of programs and standards, appointment of committee members and officers, publishing of rules, implementation of regulations, and submission of reports to Congress. Some key dates and deadlines are listed below. By April 3, 2009, HIT Policy Committee members are to be appointed by specified officials authorized under ARRA. If after this date, the officials have not appointed the full number of members, the Secretary may appoint such members to the Committee. By May 18, 2009, HIT Standards Committee is to develop a schedule for the assessment of policy recommendations received from the HIT Policy Committee. 2 These stakeholder areas include: providers, ancillary healthcare workers, consumers, purchasers, health plans, technology vendors, researchers, relevant Federal agencies, and individuals with technical expertise on health care quality, privacy and security, and on the electronic exchange and use of health information. 4

By Dec. 31, 2009, HHS must adopt an initial set of standards through the notice and comment rule-making process regarding the areas that the HIT Policy Committee should address. Already approved standards, such as those established by the Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology (CCHIT) or by the Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP), may be used to meet the requirement. Within 90 days of the receipt of standards, the HHS Secretary, in consultation with representatives of other relevant Federal agencies, shall jointly review such standards, implementation specifications, or certification criteria and shall determine whether or not to propose adoption of such standards, implementation specifications, or certification criteria. January 1, 2010 is the earliest date on which the Secretary may make an award to eligible entities under Sec. 3014, Competitive Grants to States and Indian Tribes for the Development of Loan Programs to Facilitate the Widespread Adoption of Certified EHR Technology. HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROVISIONS IN THE RECOVERY ACT By February 16, 2010, the national coordinator is to submit a report to Congress regarding the need for any additional funding or authority for the National Coordinator, HIT Policy and HIT Standards Committees. 5

HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROVISIONS IN THE RECOVERY ACT Key Players There will be key players in each of the agencies of HHS overseeing the process of implementing these HIT provisions. Below is a brief summary of several key players and positions. Office of the Secretary: Current advisors include Rima Cohen and Dr. Dora Hughes. Additional appointments and decisions on how to utilize advisors, however, will likely be made by Governor Sebelius after her confirmation as HHS Secretary. The Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation is likely to play an important role as will the Assistant Secretary for Resources and Technology (ASRT), who is responsible for the budget for the Department and for spending Agency funds. Richard Turman is currently the Acting ASRT. Office of the National Coordinator for HIT (ONCHIT): David Blumenthal, M.D. was recently named the National Coordinator of HIT. Current key career staff includes Jodi Daniel. ONCHIT will play a lead role in the Department in terms of the HIT initiative as it will oversee interoperability standards. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): Charlene Frizzera is the Acting Administrator. The Administrator and Deputy Administrator are expected to be announced in April. About Foley Hoag LLP 6

Foley Hoag LL P is a leading national law firm in the areas of dispute resolution, intellectual property, and corporate transactions for emerging, middle-market, and large-cap companies. With a deep understanding of clients strategic priorities, operational imperatives, and marketplace realities, the firm helps companies in the biopharma, high technology, energy technology, financial services and manufacturing sectors gain competitive advantage. The firm s 225 lawyers located in Boston, Washington, and the Emerging Enterprise Center in Waltham, Massachusetts join with a network of Lex Mundi law firms to provide global support for clients largest challenges and opportunities. For more information visit foleyhoag.com. Brian P. Carey Brian Carey s law practice focuses on advising life sciences companies, health care providers and private equity investors on federal legislative and regulatory issues. His work with biotechnology, pharmaceutical and medical device companies includes advice and counsel on legislative aspects of the Medicare prescription drug coverage, Medicare coverage and reimbursement, and food and drug issues. He also represents health care provider clients before the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on National Coverage Decisions, reimbursement under the Hospital Outpatient and Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems and in Medicare Coverage Advisory Committee proceedings. Click the image below for a full biography. HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROVISIONS IN THE RECOVERY ACT Brian P. Carey Paul T. Kim Regarded as one of the top food and drug lawyers in Washington, Paul Kim draws on his extensive governmental experience to advise clients on legal, legislative and regulatory issues in food, drug and device law, Medicare and Medicaid coverage and reimbursement, and the conduct of clinical research. He represents leading biotechnology, pharmaceutical and medical device companies before the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), and Congress. Click the image below for a full biography. Paul T. Kim 7

HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROVISIONS IN THE RECOVERY ACT Foley Hoag ebook Library Sample other free titles from the Foley Hoag ebook library, sign-up for industryspecific alerts and updates from Foley Hoag, or visit our Web site. Visit our Web site Sign up for industry-specific alerts and updates You may also be interested in our ebook series. Simply click on an image to download or visit foleyhoag.com for our library. 8

Driving Business Advantage BOSTON WASHINGTON EMERGING ENTERPRISE CENTER FOLEYHOAG.COM Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. 2009 Foley Hoag LLP. All rights reserved.