COURSE OUTLINE AND ASSIGNMENTS

Similar documents
Why? Test Specific Knowledge Course Coverage Test Critical Reading Objective Grading

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018

Index. Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, Administrative Rules Judicial notice,

Contents. Dedication... v. About the Author... xvii. Acknowledgments... xix. Foreword... xxi. Preface... xxv A Note about Primary Sources...

PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION LAW 101 March 1, 2012, 4:00p.m. Courtroom M1404 ASK A PROPER QUESTION - FACTUAL AND EXPERT WITNESSES

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence

SIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: EVIDENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Rule 101. Scope

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07)

EFFECTIVE CROSS-EXAMINATION TIPS LAWRENCE J. WHITNEY, ATTORNEY AT LAW

TIPS ON OFFERING EVIDENCE RELEVANCE

What s Your Theory of Admissibility: Character Evidence, Habit, and Prior Conduct

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section)

New Jersey Rules of Evidence Article VI - Witnesses

TRIAL OBJECTIONS. Considerations Effect on the jury Scrutinous Judiciously Effective/Disruptive

Case 1:17-cr KBF Document 819 Filed 06/11/18 Page ORDERED. 1 of 8 GUIDELINES REGARDING APPROPRIATE USE OF 302 FORMS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)

RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2019

Character or Impeachment? PRESENTED BY JUDGE KATE HUFFMAN

LIST OF CHAPTERS. Joseph J. Mellon, Esq. Thomas J. Tomazin, Esq. Lorraine E. Parker, Esq. Lauren E. Sykes, Esq. Krista Maher, Esq.

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

EVIDENCE CALIFORNIA DISTINCTIONS Bar Exam Outline

Rules of Evidence (Abridged)

DELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE

2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)

Evidence for Delaware Criminal Defense

Federal Rules of Evidence ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS

2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE

elias ch00 fmt auto 1/27/03 12:45 PM Page i Federal Rules of Evidence Handbook

Methods of impeachment. Contradiction Inconsistent statement Bad character for truthfulness Bias Lack of capacity or opportunity to observe

FULL OUTLINE. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM. EVIDENCE

No. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County. Don H. Lester, Judge. August 30, 2018

Rule 613: That s not what you said before! By: Andy Moorman Assistant U.S. Attorney

California Bar Examination

J. Max Wawrik Nancy Rosado Colon Law 16 Spring 2017

EMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE

SUPPLEMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL UNITED STATES MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE (2012 EDITION)

Case Preparation and Presentation: A Guide for Arbitration Advocates and Arbitrators

MINNESOTA JUDICIAL TRAINING UPDATE

Serving the Law Enforcement Community and the Citizens of Washington

Character and Prior Conduct. What is Character? 8/2/2010. John Rubin School of Government April Who can put character in issue?

How to Testify. Qualifications for Testimony. Hugo A. Holland, Jr., J.D., CFE Prosecutor, State of Louisiana

Thinking Evidentially

Keith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC

Rule 605. Competency of judge as witness. NC General Statutes - Chapter 8C Article 6 1

I. GENERAL PROVISIONS FRE

Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq.

American Criminal Law and Procedure Vocabulary

Impeachment in Administrative Cases

Evidence Update. ISBA Criminal Law Seminar. April 17, 2015

Impeachment by attack on character for truthfulness. 608(a) opinion and reputation evidence 608(b) specific acts -- prior convictions

Evidence Prof. Jane Aiken Spring 2004

American Mock Trial Association MIDLANDS RULES OF EVIDENCE

TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Effective June 14, Title, Scope, and Applicability of the Rules; Definitions

Federal Rules Of Evidence (2012)

6.17. Impeachment by Instances of Misconduct

DISTRICT COURT EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO 885 E. Chambers Road P.O. Box 597 Eagle, Colorado Plaintiff: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO.

EVIDENCE Kuhns Fall 2006

I. Overview A. Basic Questions 1. What is the applicable rule/principle of evidence? 2. What is the relevance/significance of the advisory committee

Impeachment in Louisiana State Courts:

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1983 SESSION CHAPTER 701 HOUSE BILL 96 AN ACT TO SIMPLIFY AND CODIFY THE RULES OF EVIDENCE.

Chapter 8C. Evidence Code. 8C-1. Rules of Evidence. The North Carolina Rules of Evidence are as follows:

EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS. Laurie Vahey, Esq.

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE

California Bar Examination

CROSS AND TAPPER ON EVIDENCE

Overview of Trial Proceedings Role of Judge/Jury, Markman Hearings, and Introduction to Evidence

Canadian Judicial Council Final Instructions. (Revised June 2012)

CRIMINAL PRE-TRIAL BEST PRACTICES

Evidence. An Overview of Relevance and Hearsay: A Nine Step Analytical Guide

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Evidence 213B Professor Schroeder (Fall 2015) Reading List / Course Assignments (Rev. 08/08/2015) Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Witnesses and Impeachment Penny J. White

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Examination, Cross-Examination, and Redirect Examination. Penny J. White May 2015

USALSA Report U.S. Army Legal Services Agency. Trial Judiciary Note. Claiming Privilege Against Self-Incrimination During Cross-Examination

Case 3:07-cr EDL Document 49 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 8

THE EVIDENCE ACT OF BHUTAN, 2005

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL PENALTY ADVOCATE TRAINING

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR LAKE COUNTY. CASE No CR

Witness testimony The question and answer method (Jack Ruby essay, p. 485) 1. Free narratives are usually not permitted.

Non-Scientific Expert Testimony in Child Abuse Trials

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

MAINE RULES OF EVIDENCE

ABOTA MOTIONS IN LIMINE SEMINAR

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Where did the law of evidence come from/why have the law of evidence? Check on the power of executive government (Guantanamo Bay).

Example: (1) Your honor, (2) I object (3) to that question (4) because it is a compound question.

Admissibility of Electronic Writings: Some Questions and Answers*

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).

Evidence Lessons. Center for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR LAKE COUNTY

Examination, Cross-Examination, and Redirect Examination Penny J. White

TOP TEN NEW EVIDENCE RULES

Transcription:

EVIDENCE: COURSE OUTLINE AND ASSIGNMENTS Topic 1: Introduction to the Law of Evidence Read: Text pages 1 9 Rules 101, 102, 1101 A. Addressing Societal Conflicts/Disputes 1. Name various ways we address societal conflicts and disputes. 2. In all of these, what are we trying to achieve? B. Trials/Evidentiary Proceedings 1. Two key features 2. Purpose 3. Do trials C. Law of Evidence a. resolve disputes? b. achieve fairness? c. uncover the truth? 4. What are some obstacles to discovering the truth through trials? 5. As a citizen, what do you want trials to do with respect to the truth? Why? 1. Definition 2. Two keys D. Rules of Evidence 1. Four purposes 102 2. Four implications 3. Regulatory function four reasons

4. Applicability a. 101 b. 1101 c. Jury trials/bench trials E. Interpreting Evidence Rules 1. Plain meaning 2. Legislative history 3. Case law 4. Commentaries Topic 2: Core Evidentiary Concepts Read: Text pages 9 24, 124-125, 384 387 Rules 103, 104, 201, 611 Prepare Problems 1 3 and 1 4 A. Evidence/Proof B. Vehicles of Proof C. Types of Evidence 1. Real, representative, testimonial 2. Direct/circumstantial D. Substantive/Impeachment Evidence E. Functions of Judge, Jury, Lawyers 1. Admissibility/weight 2. Judicial discretion/abuse F. Error/Waiver G. Plain Error/Harmless Error H. Record 2

Topic 3: Evidentiary Procedural Devices Read: Text pages 9 24 Rules 103(a)(1), 103(a)(2) A. Objection 103(a)(1) B. Motion to strike 103(a)(1) C. Offer of proof 103(a)(2) D. Motion in limine E. Cautionary/limiting instruction F. Limited admissibility 105 G. Curative admissibility Topic 4: Foundation Read: Text page 17 Rules 104(a), 602, 702, 803(2), 901(b)(6) A. Definition B. Evidentiary link C. Examples 1. Lay witness 602 2. Expert witness 702 3. Hearsay exception 803(2) 4. Telephone conversation 901(b)(6) 3

Topic 5: Relevancy Read: Text pages 25 41 Rules 401, 402 Prepare Problems 3 1 3 23 A. Importance of Relevance B. Two definitive propositions 402 C. Definition (??) 401 1. some tendency 2. some fact 3. makes some difference 4. more likely/less likely 5. than without D. Incomplete definition What else do we need? 1. Substantive law 2. Claims 3. Defenses 4. Issues E. Three categories of facts 1. Consequential 2. Context 3. Credibility F. Probability assessment 1. Purpose of offer 2. Technical rule 3. Logic 4. Precedent 5. Common experience 4

6. Common sense 7. Expert help G. Not inherent characteristic H. Exists in relationship I. No weighing of believability J. Conditional relevancy 104(b) K. Text problems: 3-2, 3-3, 3-4, 3-5, 3-6, 3-7, 3-8, 3-10, 3-11, 3-12, 3-13, 3-14, 3-16, 3-18, 3-21, 3-23 Topic 6: Exclusion of Relevant Evidence Read: Text pages 43 63 Rule 403 Prepare Problems 4 1 4 20 A. The Master Rule 403 B. Applicability C. Assumption of Relevancy D. Important Features 1. Exclusionary 2. Balancing 3. Substantiality E. Critical Adverbs and Adjectives 1. Substantially 2. Unfair 3. Undue 4. Needless a. Cumulative evidence b. Repetitious evidence 5

F. Concept of Unfair Prejudice 1. Prejudice the adversarial objective 2 Unfair prejudice two guidelines G. Confusing/Misleading 1. Collateral matters 2. Technical/scientific/ official H. Convenience/Expeditiousness Topic 7: Character Evidence Read: Text pages 65 73, 78 83 Rules 404(a), 405, 412 415, 608 Prepare Problems 5 1 5 14 A. Propensity Evidence B. Basic Rule 404(a) 1. Inadmissibility 2. Character defined C. Exceptions 1. Essential element 2. Circumstantial evidence a. Trait of accused 404(a)(1) b. Trait of victim 404(a)(2) 3. Credibility 404(a)(3) 4. Sex offenses 412-415 D. Proving Character 1. Three considerations 2. Three methods of proof 6

3. General rules as to use of methods of proof Topic 8: Other Crimes, Wrongs, Acts Read: Text pages 73 78, 84 96 Prepare Problems 5 15 5 29 Rule 404(b) A. General Rule and Exceptions B. Rule 404(b) C. Other Purposes 1. Intrinsic/extrinsic distinction 2. Rules of thumb D. Illustrative Analysis E. Proof Methods F. Procedural Requirements G. Minnesota Law: Spreigl Rule H. Additional 404(b) Points Topic 9: Habit and Routine Practice Read: Text pages 98 100, 91[g] Rule 406 Prepare Problems 5 34 5 37 A. Rule 406 B. Distinctions 1. Habit/routine practice 2. Character 3. Reputation C. Three keys 7

D. Admissibility E. Not Propensity Evidence Topic 10: Specialized Exclusions of Relevant Evidence Read: Text pages 101 122 Rules 407-415 Prepare Problems 6-2, 6-6, 6-7, 6-8, 6-11, 6-12, 6-13, 6-15, 6-18, 6-19 A. Probable Relevance B. Social Policy Considerations 1. Remedies 407 2. Settlement 408 3. Payments 409 4. Plea bargains 410 5. Financial responsibility 411 6. Bad sex 412 415 Topic 11: Lay Witnesses Read: Text pages 157 170, 175 179 Rules 601, 602, 603, 701 Prepare Problems 8-1, 8-2, 8-3, 8-8, 8-10, 9-1 9-7 A. Lay Witness - Definition B. Competency Rule 602 1. Oath/affirmation 2. Personal knowledge 3. Proof of personal knowledge 4. Problems with lack of personal knowledge 5. Minn. Stat. 595.02 8

C. Disqualification 1. Lack of competency 2. Privileges 3. Conflict of interest D. Lay Opinion/Inference Rule 701 1. General rule 2. Exception Topic 12: Expert Witnesses Read: Text pages 179 220 Rules 702 705 Prepare Problems 9 8 9 28 A. Four Requirements 702 1. Subject matter 2. Helpfulness 3. Qualifications 4. Testimonial basis B. Form of Testimony 702 C. Bases 703 1. Three means of acquiring 2. Inadmissible facts/ reasonable reliance rule 3. Disclosure D. Disclosure of Underlying Facts/Data 705 E. Ultimate Issue 704 1. Fact issue 2. Legal conclusion 9

Topic 13: Examining Witnesses and Challenging Credibility Read: Text pages 123 155 Rules 611, 603, 607, 609, 610, 612, 613 Prepare Problems 7 1 7 27 U.S. v. Abel, 469 U.S. 45 (1984) A. Examining Witnesses 1. Form of question 2. Direct examination 3. Cross-examination 4. Control 611 a. Court b. Scope of cross-examination c. Leading questions 5. Testimonial capacities 6. Refreshing recollection 612 B. Challenging Credibility 1. Aim of credibility rules 2. Credibility in issue 603 3. Truthfulness Testimonial capacities a. Accuracy issues know, remember, relate b. Sincerity issues impeachment c. Jury Instruction Guide 4. Impeachment 5. Extrinsic vs. intrinsic impeachment a. Extrinsic collateral issue/matter 10

b. Intrinsic impeachment (1) Bias (2) Incapacity (3) Contradiction (4) Prior inconsistent statement (5) Character for untruthfulness (6) Prior untruthful conduct (7) Prior criminal conviction 6. Who may impeach a. Common-law rule b. Rule 607 7. Religious beliefs/opinions 610 8. Bias a. Federal rule U.S. v. Abel Minnesota rule 616 (Bias as an impeachment vehicle) (1) Relationships/circumstances (2) Extrinsic evidence (3) Circumstantial evidence (4) Limitations on proof 9. Character and conduct 608 a. Whose? b. What character/conduct? c. Bolstering/rehabilitating d. Foundations (1) Reputation (2) Opinion e. Expert opinion f. Conduct 11

(1) When? (2) Limitations 10. Criminal conviction 609 a Whose? b. Meaning of conviction c. Two categories (1) Felonies (2) Dishonesty crimes d. Balancing tests (1) Witness 403 (2) Accused 609(a)(1) e. Time limit/exception f. Proof of conviction 11. Prior inconsistent statement 613 a. Meaning and scope b. Rationale and effect c. Impeachment vs. substantive evidence d. Degree of inconsistency e. Collateral matters f. Rule in Queen Caroline s Case g. Extrinsic evidence 12

Topic 14: Hearsay Read: Text pages 225 300 Rules 801 806 Prepare all problems in text, Chapter 10 A. Introduction to Hearsay 1. What is it? 2. Practical overview 3. Reliability factor B. Exclusionary Rule - 802 C. Formal Definition - 801 D. Hearsay Look-A-Likes But Not 1. Prior statements 801(d)(1) 2. Party statements 801(d)(2) E. Exceptions 1. Overview 2. Application 3. 803 and 804 4. Residual exception - 807 F. Multiple Hearsay 805 G. Declarant s Credibility 806 Topic 15: Confrontation Clause Read: Text pages 301 327 Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S. Ct. 1354 (2004) 13

A. Historical Overview B. Interaction Between Hearsay Rules and Confrontation Clause C. The Crawford Rule 1. Testimonial/non-testimonial statements 2. Examples of testimonial statements 3. Examples of non-testimonial statements 4. Objective test for Crawford statements 5. Declarant available and subject to cross-examination Topic 16: Non-Testimonial Evidence Read: Text pages 361 375 Rules 901, 902, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1006 Prepare Problems 13 1 13 8 A. Exhibits - Definition 1. Real evidence 2. Representative evidence B. Authentication/Identification 901 1. Identification 2. Authentication 3. Foundation rule 4. Self-authentication - 902 C. Best Evidence Rule - 1002 D. Duplicates Rule 1003 E. Admissibility of Secondary Evidence 1004 F. Summaries - 1006 14