Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

Similar documents
INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN

LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007

Filed & Entered: 03/14/2016

Case 9:01-cv MHS-KFG Document 72 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1935

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE DEBORAH A. BATTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS [MARSHALL / TYLER / TEXARKANA] DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNIFORM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Civil No. 1:13-CV-1211 vs. GLS/TWD Andrew Cuomo, et al.

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL CASES. Lorna G. Schofield United States District Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

1. CIVIL RULES GENERAL PROVISIONS ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL LITIGATION MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT - UNIFORM LOCAL RULES

CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

Case 4:04-cv RAS Document 41 Filed 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRE-TRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Civ

ONONDAGA COUNTY JUSTICES AND LOCAL RULES

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

THE HONORABLE MEL DICKSTEIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT PRACTICE POINTERS & PREFERENCES

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

Case 2:18-cv KOB Document 49 Filed 02/12/19 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant/s.

Case 5:16-cv CAR Document 19 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND DIRECTING PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT LAW DIVISION JUDGE RAYMOND W. MITCHELL STANDING ORDER.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

Case 2:16-cv JAK-AS Document 29 Filed 10/15/16 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:190

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE. JUDGE MELISSA R. McCORMICK DEPARTMENT C13. CLERK: Alma Bovard COURT ATTENDANT: As Assigned

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/27/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/27/2018

Practices for Part 3

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

9:30 a.m. MOTION CALL, CASE MANAGEMENT, STATUS DATES 10:00 a.m. 2:30 p.m. MATTERS SET BY THE COURT

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

PART RULES HONORABLE MARIA G. ROSA New York State Supreme Court Dutchess County Supreme Court 10 Market Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51-

FORM 4. RULE 26(f) REPORT (PATENT CASES) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

JUSTICE JEFFREY K. OING PART 48 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET CONTROL ORDER STEP ACTION RULE DATE DUE 1

Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil/Section 11

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : :

COURT RULES OF THE HONORABLE RICHARD MOTT, J.S.C. 401 Union Street Columbia County Courthouse (Temporary)

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2011 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 6:01-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO

Judicial Assistant s > ALWAYS copy opposing counsel(s) on correspondence to the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

MONTANA UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CHARLOTTE COUNTY,

CASE 0:15-cv JRT Document 17 Filed 02/12/16 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE LOUIS L. STANTON

COMPLEX BUSINESS LITIGATION DIVISION PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

THERE ARE NO SUBMITTED MOTIONS IN THIS PART AND ALL MOTIONS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, MUST BE ORALLY ARGUED.

Honorable Judge Thomas Ramsberger 545 First Avenue North, Room 200 St. Petersburg, FL JURY TRIAL WEEKS * ALL ONE (1) WEEK DOCKETS *

Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018

LOCAL RULES of the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CLARION COUNTY

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

CIVIL DIVISION I PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case: 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 460 Filed: 09/25/15 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 15864

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA

Judge Mary L. Mikva CALENDAR 6 - ROOM 2508 Telephone: 312/ Fax: 312/

19 th Judicial Circuit Court Judge Janet Croom Guidelines and Procedures. Circuit Civil Jury Division (Updated: September, 2017)

LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT. [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

Cislo & Thomas LLP Litigation Cost Control (LCC ) Stages of Litigation and Expected Fees and Costs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. MC JFW(SKx)

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ADAMS COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE BUSINESS OF COURTS

(845) (845) CONFERENCES

Dodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER (JURY TRIAL) for Plaintiff.

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. No. CV JH/DJS NOTICE

vs. OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS DISCOVERY AND DOCKET CONTROL PLAN FOR LEVEL 3 CASE ( PLAN )

Transcription:

Case 1:15-cv-08240-LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK QUANTUM STREAM INC., Plaintiff(s), No. 15CV8240-LTS-FM PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER DIRECTV, LLC, -against- Defendant(s). LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, DISTRICT JUDGE: A pre-trial conference was last held in this matter on March 11, 2016. The Court hereby makes the following provisions for scheduling and trial in this matter. To the extent copies of this Order were not distributed to all parties in open court or posted on ECF in an ECF case, Plaintiff's counsel 1 must serve a copy of this Pre-Trial Scheduling Order on counsel for each other party and on each unrepresented party within fourteen (14) days from the date hereof. A copy of this Pre-Trial Scheduling Order shall be served with any subsequent process that brings in additional parties. Proof of such service must be filed promptly with the Court. The S.D.N.Y. Local Patent Rules apply in this case, except as otherwise specified in this or another Order of the Court. 1. Amendments to Pleadings, Additional Parties All applications to amend pleadings or join parties, or amendments or joinders as of right, must be made by August 1, 2016. 2. Discovery a. All non-expert witness discovery in this matter must be completed by October 28, 2016. b. Each party must make its expert witness disclosures described in Rule 26(a)(2) of the 1 As used in this Pre-Trial Scheduling Order, the term "counsel" means, in the case of an individual party who is proceeding Pro-se, such party. formc3pat.wpd version 6/25/14 1

Case 1:15-cv-08240-LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 2 of 7 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure concerning expert(s), if any, to be offered on issues as to which such party has the burden of proof or otherwise in support of the party's case, no later than 90 days before the date set forth in paragraph 2.c. below. Rebuttal disclosures must be made no later than 48 days before the date set forth in paragraph 2.c. below. Reply disclosures must be made no later than 28 days before the date set forth in paragraph 2.c. below. Such disclosures must be made in writing, signed and served, but must not be filed with the Court. c. All expert witness discovery must be completed by May 26, 2017. The parties may seek modification of the deadline if claim construction issues have not been resolved by January 20, 2017. 4. Modification and Supplementation of Certain Patent Local Rules The parties must make their disclosures and file claim construction briefing in accordance with the S.D.N.Y. Local Patent Rules ("LPR"). Plaintiff's disclosure pursuant to LPR 6 must be filed within 45 days after the date of this Order, must include the information specified in Rule 3-1 of the Patent Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (November 1, 2014) (the "NDCLPR") Rules"), and must be accompanied by the document disclosure described in NDCLPR 3-2. Defendant's invalidity contentions pursuant to LPR 7 must be filed within 45 days after service of the Plaintiff's LPR 6 disclosure, must include the information described in NDCLPR 3-3, and must be accompanied by the document diclosure described in NDCLPR 3-4. NDCLPR 3-6 also applies. The disclosures pursuant to LPR 6 and 7 must be filed with the Court at the time of service. The Joint Claim Terms Chart pursuant to LPR 11 must be filed within 60 days after service of Defendant's LPR 7 disclosure. If the parties believe that a Markman hearing will be required, the Joint Claims Term Chart must be accompanied by a request that the Court schedule a Markman hearing and an estimate of the amount of time that should be allocated for such a hearing. Markman issues shall be briefed in accordance with the schedule set forth in LPR 12. Courtesy copies of the filings pursuant to LPR 6, 7, 11, and 12 must be provided for Chambers at the time of filing. Disclosure pursuant to LPR 10 must be filed no later than 30 days after entry of an order on claim construction. 5. Dispositive Pre-Trial Motions Dispositive motions, if any, seeking resolution, in whole or in part, of the issues to be raised at trial must be served and filed on or before June 30, 2017. No pre-motion conference is required, but the parties must comply with the consultation and certification requirements of Paragraph A.2.b. of the Individual Practices Rules of the undersigned. If the movant believes the motion, if granted, would obviate entirely the necessity of a trial in this matter, the movant may so state in a separate MOTION FOR STAY, which must be served and filed with the moving papers, and may in such stay motion request that the Court defer the remaining requirements of this Order pending its decision on the dispositive motion. Unless formc3pat.wpd version 6/25/14 2

Case 1:15-cv-08240-LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 3 of 7 the Court grants such stay motion, the filing of a dispositive motion does not affect the parties' obligations under this Order. 5. Other Pre-Trial Motions a. Any Daubert motion practice must be initiated no later than sixty (60) days before the date set forth in paragraph 10 below. b. Other motions, including but not limited to non-daubert motions in limine relating to evidentiary issues, must be filed and served no later than thirty (30) days before the date set forth in paragraph 10 below. 6. Preliminary Conference Counsel for the parties must confer preliminarily at least forty-five (45) days before the date set forth in paragraph 10 below. At or prior to this preliminary conference, counsel shall provide copies of each proposed exhibit for inspection by opposing counsel and for waiver or noting of objection and shall make the disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3). At the preliminary conference, counsel must discuss (a) settlement, (b) any anticipated further motion practice, including motions in limine, and (c) the matters required to be addressed in their Joint Pre-Trial Statement, as set forth in paragraph 6 below. 7. Joint Pre-Trial Statement Counsel for all parties shall confer and shall prepare, execute and file with the Court, with one courtesy copy provided to chambers of the undersigned, no later than seven (7) days before the date set forth in paragraph 10 below, a single document captioned JOINT PRE- TRIAL STATEMENT, which shall include: a. A concise statement of the legal issues to be decided. b. A concise statement of the material facts not in dispute. c. A witness list containing the names, addresses and a brief summary of the testimony of each witness each party will call. A person not identified on this list may not be called during a party s case in chief. d. A final exhibit list in tabular form containing the following information for all exhibits to be offered at trial. Exhibits not identified on this list may not be offered during a party's case in chief. The format shall be substantially as illustrated below. Exhibit Number or Letter Description Objection(s), if any Status formc3pat.wpd version 6/25/14 3

Case 1:15-cv-08240-LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 4 of 7 i. Plaintiff's exhibits shall be identified by numbers (e.g., Plaintiff's Exhibit 1, Plaintiff's Exhibit 2) and Defendant's Exhibits shall be identified by letters (e.g., Defendant's Exhibit A, Defendant's Exhibit B). If there is more than one Plaintiff or Defendant, the parties shall coordinate their designations so as to avoid duplication. ii. iii. In the "Objection(s)" column of the table, one asterisk should be entered to indicate exhibits to which no party objects on grounds of authenticity, and two asterisks should be entered to indicate exhibits to which no party objects on any ground. Any objections must be explained briefly, with citation to the relevant Federal Rule of Evidence or other legal authority. The "Status" column should be left blank, for later use by the Court. e. A list of the depositions, if any, to be offered at trial, with designations and notation and explanation (including citation to the relevant legal authority) of any objections to the designations. f. Stipulations, if any, as to the admissibility of exhibits and depositions. g. Each party's statement as to whether the case is to tried before a jury. h. A statement as to whether or not all parties consent to trial of the case by a magistrate judge (without identifying which parties have or have not so consented). i. Each party s estimate of the time required for presentation of its case. When feasible, the Joint Pre-Trial Statement should also be submitted to Chambers on a CD- Rom in WordPerfect version 6 or higher format. The following documents must be annexed to, or submitted to Chambers concurrently with, the Joint Pre-Trial Statement: One copy of each documentary exhibit to be offered at trial. Such exhibits must be pre-marked. In the event that a party intends to offer more than 15 documentary exhibits at the trial, the exhibits should be tabbed and included in a binder for easy reference. On the day of trial, counsel shall bring additional pre-marked copies for use by witnesses, the courtroom deputy, the court reporter, opposing parties and (if applicable) the jury. 8. Proposed Voir Dire, Requests to Charge and Verdict Form a. In a case to be tried before a jury, and no later than seven (7) days before the Final Pre-Trial Conference date set forth in paragraph 9 below: formc3pat.wpd version 6/25/14 4

Case 1:15-cv-08240-LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 5 of 7 i. each party shall serve on each other party and file with the Court its proposed voir dire and verdict form. Prior to service and filing of the proposed voir dire and verdict form, counsel shall provide copies to opposing counsel for inspection and noting of objection; and ii. The parties must file a single document captioned JOINT REQUESTS TO CHARGE, which must include the full text of all of their proposed jury instructions, with source citations. If the parties are not in agreement on a particular charge, the disputed language must be highlighted and any counterproposal(s) presented together with the disputed section. Disputed language must be accompanied by a brief explanation of the objection(s), with citations to the relevant legal authority. b. When feasible, proposed voir dire, requests to charge and verdict forms shall also be submitted to Chambers on a CD-Rom in WordPerfect or Microsoft Word format. 9. Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law If the case is not to be tried before a jury, each party shall serve on each other party and file with the Court its proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, which shall be broken down into separately enumerated paragraphs, no later than seven (7) days before the Final Pre-Trial Conference date set forth in the following paragraph. When feasible, the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law should also be submitted on a CD-Rom in WordPerfect or Microsoft Word format. 10. Final Pre-Trial Conference The parties are directed to appear before the undersigned in Courtroom No. 12D 2, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007, for a final pre-trial conference on September 29, 2017, at 11:30 a.m. The purpose of the conference is to explore the possibility of settlement, schedule the trial (which will, the Court's calendar permitting, commence within two weeks after the conference) if necessary, to review the issues to be tried and the proof to be offered in connection therewith, and to resolve any remaining pre-trial issues. The counsel who plan to try the case must appear at such conference. Counsel attending the conference must seek settlement authority from their respective clients prior to such conference. If counsel is not granted such authority, the client must be present in person or available by telephone so that a settlement can be consummated if possible. Settlement authority, as used in this order, includes the power to enter into stipulations and make admissions regarding all matters that the parties may reasonably anticipate discussing at the 2 On the day of the conference, check the electronic board in the lobby to be certain of the proper courtroom. formc3pat.wpd version 6/25/14 5

Case 1:15-cv-08240-LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 6 of 7 pre-trial conference including, but not limited to, the matters enumerated in this Pre-Trial Scheduling Order. The Court will not adjourn the final pre-trial conference or excuse the appearance of a party or its counsel unless a stipulation of settlement is on file prior to the pre-trial conference date set forth in this paragraph 9. 11. No Adjournment of Deadlines The deadlines set forth in this Pre-Trial Scheduling Order will not be adjourned except in the Court s discretion upon good cause as shown in a written application signed by counsel, stating whether the other part(ies) consent, and served upon all parties. Good cause, as used in this paragraph, does not include circumstances within the control of counsel or the client. 12. Non-Compliance with This Order In the event that any party fails to comply with this Pre-Trial Scheduling Order, or is not prepared to go forward with trial on the date scheduled, the Court may impose sanctions or take other action as appropriate. Such sanctions and action may include assessing costs and attorney s fees, precluding evidence or defenses, dismissing the action, granting judgment by default, and/or other appropriate penalties. In particular, the parties are advised that the Court may, without further hearing, render judgment in favor of the adverse party if a party is not prepared to proceed to trial within two weeks of the scheduled final pre-trial conference date. 13. Other Matters The parties must make their FRCP 26(a)(1) disclosures by March 18, 2016. The parties must begin meeting with the Magistrate Judge for settlement purposes by September 9, 2016. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York March 11, 2016 formc3pat.wpd version 6/25/14 6

Case 1:15-cv-08240-LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 7 of 7 /s/laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN United States District Judge formc3pat.wpd version 6/25/14 7