MEMORANDUM. TA : Amendments to Chapter 27, Zoning

Similar documents
Wireless Facility Siting: Model Chapter Implementing Section 6409(a)

Planning Commission Report

Wireless Facility Siting: Model Chapter Implementing Section 6409(a) and. Wireless Facility Siting: Section 6409(a) Checklist

Implementing the FCC Order on Wireless Facilities Collocations - Ordinances and Application Forms

TO REPEAL AND RECREATE CHAPTER 64 OF THE WALWORTH COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES:

CITY OF SUMMERSET ORDINANCE 14 ORDINANCE FOR SITING OF WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES

TELECOMMUNICATIONS LAW AND PRACTICE IN GEORGIA

MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: THROUGH: SUBJECT: DATE: Planning Commission and City Council History

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Mountain Brook, Alabama, as follows:

Wireless Communication Facilities

ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICTS

PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission th St., S.W. Washington, D.C

Presenter: Jonathan Kramer

Sponsor: Councilwoman Janet Venecz Petitioner: Hammond Plan Commission ORDINANCE NO. 9364

Differing Treatment of Collocations and New Builds in Federal Law and Application to the Rights of Way

ORDINANCE NO

Telecommunications Law

ORDINANCE NO BE IT FURTHER ENACTED AND ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of Laurel, Maryland that

CITY OF FREEPORT STEPHENSON COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO

Developments in Wireless

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 687

ARTICLE 23 TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS

EXHIBIT A. Chapter WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY

WHEREAS, various federal and state laws partially restrict the City of El Paso de Robles' ability to regulate telecommunications facilities; and

City of Paso Robles Planning Commission Agenda Report

Action Required in the Event of Abandonment of Cellular Tower Staff Review Proposals by the Applicant

WHEREAS, under California Public Utilities Code Section 7901, the City may not ban such small cell facilities; and

ARTICLE 7 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS AND FACILITIES

WHEREAS, HB became effective on July 1, 2017; and

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MUSTANG, OKLAHOMA;

B. Establish a fair and efficient process for review and approval of applications.

COMMUNICATION TOWERS

PERSON COUNTY ROXBORO, NORTH CAROLINA APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES

FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

ITEM 4 ATTACHMENT B DRAFT ORDINANCE NO

Telecommunications Law

AN ORDINANCE REGULATING WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Alamance County, NC

Draft Program Comment for the Federal Communications Commission s Review of Collocations on Certain Towers Constructed Without Section 106 Review

Collocation/Modification of Wireless Telecommunication Facilities APPLICATION FOR EXPEDITED REVIEW APPLICANT S CHECKLIST

CLARENCE A. WEST Counselor and Attorney at Law Cellular: AUSTIN, TEXAS Office:

EMERGING RIGHT OF WAY ISSUES SMALL CELLS ARE A BIG DEAL Implementing Texas Local Government Code Chapter 284

l_132_ A B I L L

The Illinois legislature recently enacted the Small Wireless Facilities Deployment Act: 50 ILCS 835/15

CITY ORDINANCE NO. 585

ORDINANCE NO Ordinance No Page 1 of 7. Language to be added is underlined. Language to be deleted is struck through.

MODEL WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES CODE

DPW Order No:

TOWN OF BERNARDSTON COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Franklin, SS.

TOWNSHIP OF CLARK Ordinance No. Adopted. Introduced: January 20, 2015 Public Hearing: February 17, Motion: O Connor Motion:

ORDINANCE NO

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

Section 9.12: Cell Tower Regulations

Role of Small Cell Infrastructure Legal/Regulatory Background

AGENDA. CITY OF CENTRALIA, MISSOURI Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, October 5, :00 P.M. City Hall Council Chambers

Placed on first reading and referred to Public. for the original.

February 9, Marlene Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street, SW Washington, DC 20554

YORK COUNTY GOVERNMENT

Wireless Communication Facilities (City-wide) Sections:

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF RYE LOCAL LAW NO. 2017

BE IT ORDAINED, that the Revised General Ordinances of the City of Syracuse, as

On motion of Supervisor Sharp, which carried by a vote of 7-0, the following was adopted:

City of. Lake Lillian

ARTICLE 1: Purpose and Administration

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES ORDINANCE

City of Green River City Council Meeting Agenda Documentation

TOWN OF NAPLES NAPLES MINIMUM LOT SIZE ORDINANCE. Naples Lot Size Ordinance for the Town of Naples, Maine Attested by Town Clerk

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Alameda ordains as follows: SECTION I

WHEREAS, it is the policy of the City to require underground utilities with respect to new construction, as codified at 58-84(q); and

(ONLY for use by towns authorized to exercise TOWN ZONING under ss or 62.23, Wis. Stats.)

ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code by amending the zoning map.

RALEIGH COUNTY WIRELESS TELECOMMUNCIATIONS FACILITIES ORDINANCE. Adopted 3/12/2002. Amended

CITY OF SANIBEL ORDINANCE

WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Unified Development Code as Ordinance on December 8, 2008; and,

Ordinance No Exhibit A Antennas/Personal Wireless Telecommunication Facilities.

COLVILLE TRIBAL CODE TITLE 4 NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE ENVIRONMENT CHAPTER 4-22 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 57 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 6, 2015 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 26, Introduced by Assembly Member Quirk.

A Local Ordinance Regulating the Siting of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 211th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY 10, 2005

ZONING LOCAL LAW TOWN OF KIRKWOOD

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners (Board) of Manatee County, Florida, is

SIGN REGULATIONS Exterior signs have a substantial impact on the character and quality of the environment.

Town of Windsor, County of Broome, State of New York

Ordinance # SECTION 1: General Provisions. A. Administration

AMENDMENT TO THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE

FRANCONIA TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE #383

Chapter 35. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 and Wireless Telecommunications

ORDINANCE. D. The Planning Commission shall be vested with the authority to approve or disapprove Lot Add-on plans.

Building Place Rodney C. Nanney, AICP 301 West Nelson Street Midland, MI 48640

CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA ORDINANCE NO. 1423

Amended Bill No. 26, Ordinance No. 26, Session 2015 ARTICLE 1701 BOCA National Building Code

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS AMENDING ARTICLE 28 CHAPTER 3 TO TITLE 9 OF THE LOS BANOS MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO SIGNS

(Use this form to file a local law with the Secretary of State.)

Members of the City Council of the City of Gulfport, Mississippi, held on the day ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO. 17-' NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP, WASHTENAW COUNTY Ml

ORDINANCE NO INTRODUCED BY: ADMINISTRATION

CITY OF ST. AUGUSTA ORDINANCE NO

Staff Report. Kathleen Salguero Trepa, Assistant City Manager Laura Simpson, Planning Manager

ORDINANCE NO. (of Clark County, Nevada)

Transcription:

MEMORANDUM To: From: Mayor and City Council Lenny Felgin, Assistant City Attorney Date: September 15, 2015 Subject: TA 15-091: Amendments to Chapter 27, Zoning ITEM DESCRIPTION The attached provisions propose amendments to Chapter 27, Zoning, to provide for regulation of the installation and maintenance of small cell technology in the public right of way, as no such ordinances currently exist. DISCUSSION There has been interest in erecting small cell wireless antennas and associated freestanding structures in the public right of way. Such facilities are necessary for the provision of broadband and other such advanced wireless communication services that are heavily demanded throughout the City. It is in the City s interest to regulate the installation of such facilities in the public right of way so as to maintain acceptable levels of public safety, to preserve the desired aesthetic character of the city, and to provide for the integration of new structures with existing utility infrastructure. As such, the proposed text amendment encourages colocations on existing utility structures and requires an administrative variance for the erection of any new facility. The Federal Telecommunications Act allows local governments to adopt regulations over the location, expansion, height and maintenance of telecommunications facilities, provided that service is not prohibited. Review and Approval Criteria Pursuant to Section 27-335, the City Council shall use the following criteria when reviewing an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance: (1) Whether the zoning proposal is in conformity with the policy and intent of the comprehensive plan; and (2) Whether the proposed zoning ordinance text amendment corrects an error or inconsistency in the zoning ordinance, meets the challenge of a changing condition or is necessary to implement established policy. RECOMMENDATION At the September 8 meeting, the Planning Commission voted (3-2) to recommend approval of the text amendment. The Commission asked City Council to consider aesthetics, size of structures (new and collocated), and the number of colocations and new structures that can exist in the City. The legal team will be prepared to address questions related to the City s ability to regulate these components. Staff recommends adopting the provisions as proposed.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE TO ADOPT REGULATIONS OF SMALL CELL TECHNOLOGY IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council of the City of Dunwoody are charged with the protection of the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Dunwoody, Georgia; and WHEREAS, the installation, expansion, maintenance, and aesthetics of wireless support structures for Small Cell Technologies (as hereinafter defined) in City Rights-of-way can have significant impacts upon: (1) other uses within the right-of-way; (2) safety of the travelling public; (3) property values of adjacent parcels; (4) the historic and aesthetic character of the City; and (5) the public health, safety and welfare of citizens utilizing the roads and nearby properties; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to ensure the safe and efficient integration of facilities necessary for the provision of broadband and other advanced wireless communication services throughout the City; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to ensure the ready availability of reliable wireless communication services to the public to support personal communications, economic development and the general welfare; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to encourage where feasible the modification or collocation of Small Cell Technologies on existing support structures over the construction of new wireless support structures; and WHEREAS, the Federal Telecommunications Act allows local governments to provide for reasonable regulations over the location, expansion, height and maintenance of telecommunications facilities so long as service is not prohibited; and WHEREAS, the City has created certain requirements for applicants to obtain a wireless support structure use permit for wireless support structures within the City rights-of-way in support of Small Cell Technologies, which ensure adequate wireless coverage while preserving the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City, as well as preserving the aesthetic and historic nature of certain areas in the City; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council have conducted a properlyadvertised Public Hearing prior to adoption of this Ordinance.

THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF DUNWOODY HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Chapter 27 (Zoning) of the City of Dunwoody Code is hereby revised by amending Article III (Uses and Specific Regulations), Division 2 (Supplemental Regulations), Section 27-150 (Telecommunications Towers and Antennas), revising subsection (1) and by adding subsections (5), (6), (7), and (8) to read as follows: Sec. 27-150. Telecommunications Towers and Antennas. (1) Co-located antennas. (i) Antennas that are attached or affixed to existing telecommunications towers or other existing structures are permitted as of right in all zoning districts, provided that the antenna does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such structure. Deleted: project higher than ten feet above the height of the structure to which it is attached (ii) Co-location antennas that substantially change the physical dimensions of such structure, require administrative permit approval in accordance with article V, division 7 (private property) or an administrative variance in accordance with subsection (6) below (right-of-way). For the purpose of this Section, Substantial change shall mean: a. Increases height by more than 10% or 10/20 feet (rightof-way/private property), whichever is greater, as measured from facility as it existed as of October 1, 2012. b. Appurtenance added protrudes from body of structure more than 6 feet in width (right-of-way) or 20 feet in width (private property). c. If it involves installing more than the standard number of cabinets for the technology involved, not to exceed four cabinets (private property); or if it involves installation of any cabinets if there are no pre-existing cabinets, or involves installation of ground cabinets that are more than 10% larger in height or overall volume than any other associated ground cabinets (right-of-way). d. Involves excavation or deployment outside the current site. Site shall be defined as the current boundaries of the leased or owned property surrounding the tower and any access or utility easements (private property) or the area in proximity to the structure and other transmission equipment already deployed on the ground (right-of-way). Deleted: A Deleted: project more than ten feet above the height of the structure to which they are attached

e. For concealed or stealth-designed facilities, if a modification would defeat the concealment elements of the wireless tower or base station. f. The modification would not comply with other conditions imposed on the applicable wireless tower or base station, unless the non-compliance is due to an increase in height, increase in width, addition of cabinets, or new excavation that does not exceed the above thresholds. Building-mounted antennas in residential zoning districts must be visually screened from view of all abutting lots. Building-mounted antennas in other zoning districts must be screened or designed and installed so as to make the antenna and related equipment as visually unobtrusive as possible..... (5) Small Cell Technologies Definitions As used in this Subsection, the term: Accessory Equipment means any equipment serving or being used in conjunction with Small Cell Technology or Small Cell Technology Wireless Support Structures and includes, but is not limited to, utility or transmission equipment, power supplies, generators, batteries, cables, equipment buildings, cabinets and storage sheds, shelters or similar structures. Antenna means communications equipment that transmits or receives electromagnetic radio signals used in the provision of all types of wireless communications services. Application means a formal request submitted to the City to construct a Small Cell Technology Wireless Support Structure or colocated antenna. An application shall be deemed complete when all documents, information, and fees specifically enumerated in the City s regulations, ordinances and forms pertaining to the location, construction or operation of wireless facilities are submitted by the applicant to the City. Collocation means the placement or installation of new Small Cell Wireless Technology on the property of a utility, or other franchisee, legally existing in the public right of way. Such term includes the placement of accessory equipment within an existing equipment compound.

Equipment Compound means an area surrounding or adjacent to the base of a wireless support structure within which accessory equipment is located. Small Cell Technology means (1) individual small cell wireless antennas; or (2) networks of spatially separated small cell wireless antenna nodes connected to a common source via transport medium that provides wireless service within a geographic area or structure commonly referred to as Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS). Small Cell Technology Wireless Support Structure means a freestanding structure, designed to support or capable of supporting Small Cell Technology wireless facilities. Stealth Technology means a method of concealing or reducing the visual impact of Small Cell Technology and/or Small Cell Technology Wireless Support Structures by use of incorporating features or design elements of the installation which either totally or partially conceals the structure; achieves the result of having the structure blend into the surrounding environment; or otherwise minimizes the visual impact of the structure. (6) Placement of Small Cell Technologies in the Right-of-Way: the following standards shall apply for the placement of Small Cell Technology in the public right-of-way or public road: (i) (ii) (iii) Any Small Cell Technology in a City right-of-way shall be colocated on the property of a utility, or other franchisee, legally existing in the public right-of-way, unless the applicant can demonstrate that no co-location opportunities exist, utilizing the same factors as in subsection (3)(l) of this Section. The applicant may apply for an administrative variance for a co-location where a Substantial Change will take place or placement of a new Small Cell Wireless Support Structure within the area of the public right-of-way, to be determined by the City Manager or his/her designee. In applying for an administrative variance for a co-located Small Cell Technology, the review process, including timelines, shall be in accordance with any applicable State and Federal law. In reviewing the Application, the City Manager or his/her designee shall have the authority to assess the location(s) applied for and condition the approval on reasonably alleviating certain aesthetic and safety concerns of the request. In applying for an administrative variance for a Small Cell Wireless Support Structure, the review process, including

timelines, shall be in accordance with 47 U.S.C. 332(c)(7) of the Federal Telecommunications Act, and the FCC rules interpreting same, as well as the consideration of the following factors by the City Manager or his/her designee to determine if the administrative variance is appropriate: a. Demonstrated need for the Small Cell Technologies within the geographic area requested in order to deliver adequate service; b. Proof that all co-location sites in the area of need are/were pursued and have been denied; or that there does not exist the ability to co-locate using existing structures. The Applicant must demonstrate all actions taken to achieve colocation. c. The character of the area in which the Small Cell Technology Wireless Support Structure is requested, including evidence of surrounding properties and uses. d. Stealth Technology, if any, proposed to be utilized by the Applicant, or proof that Stealth Technology is either unnecessary or cannot be used. e. Proof that the proposed Small Cell Technology Wireless Support Structure is the minimal physical installation which will achieve the applicant s goals. f. The safety and aesthetic impact of: any proposed Small Cell Technology Wireless Support Structure; related accessory equipment; and/or Equipment Compound. (iv) Within 90 calendar days, if for a Substantial Change colocation, or 150 calendar days, if for a new Small Cell Wireless Support Structure, of the date an application for an administrative variance is filed with the City, unless another date is specified in a written agreement between the City and the Applicant, the City Manager or designee shall: a. Make his final decision to approve or disapprove the application; and b. Advise the applicant in writing of the final decision, including the specific reason(s) for said decision based on the applicable factors in this Subsection.

(v) Any appeal of a decision rendered pursuant to this Subsection shall be made by Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Superior Court of DeKalb County, Georgia. (7) Within 30 calendar days of the date an application is filed with the City, the City shall notify the Applicant in writing of any information required to complete the application. To the extent additional information is required, to complete the application, the time required for the applicant to provide such information shall not be counted toward the 60 calendar day review period (for Section 6409 colocation), 90 calendar day review period (for Substantial Change colocation) or 150 calendar day period (for new Support Structures) set forth herein. (8) In submitting an application for telecommunications equipment, the applicant shall make an affirmative election at the time of application as to whether to apply for a co-location (under Section 6409), including co-location of Small Cell Technology on private property and right-of-way, or for a new Telecommunications Tower (private property) via Administrative Use Permit or Special Use Permit or Small Cell Technology Wireless Support Structures (right-of-way) via Administrative Variance. If a co-location application is denied, and applicant elects to apply for a new Tower or Support Structure, the timeline/shot clock requirements shall reset and follow anew the appropriate provisions of the Telecommunications Act and applicable Georgia law. Section 2: This Amendment shall become effective upon approval by the Mayor and City Council, and incorporated into the Code of the City of Dunwoody, Georgia. This Amendment hereby repeals any and all conflicting ordinances and amendments. SO ORDAINED, this day of, 2015. Approved: Michael G. Davis, Mayor ATTEST: Approved as to Form and Content: Sharon Lowery, City Clerk Office of City Attorney