OFFI t. : fl LEO. MARTHA MURPHY, Individually and as duly appointed Personal Representative of the Estate of John M. "Mike" Murphy, deceased,

Similar documents
UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRE-TRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION (CPS Trial)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51-

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION [Required For Bench Trials over two (2) hours]

Judicial Assistant s > ALWAYS copy opposing counsel(s) on correspondence to the Court

Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil/Section 11

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNIFORM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Civil No. 1:13-CV-1211 vs. GLS/TWD Andrew Cuomo, et al.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER (JURY TRIAL) for Plaintiff.

Honorable Judge Thomas Ramsberger 545 First Avenue North, Room 200 St. Petersburg, FL JURY TRIAL WEEKS * ALL ONE (1) WEEK DOCKETS *

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/29/ :53 AM INDEX NO /2017

FRANK RIDEAU DOCKET NO. 623,918 SEC th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,360 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. JESSECA PATTERSON, Appellant, KAYCE CLOUD, Appellee.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY

Function of the Jury Burden of Proof and Greater Weight of the Evidence Credibility of Witness Weight of the Evidence

Department 16 has prepared this document to assist counsel in scheduling motions and reporters in Department 16.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO

REPORTED OF MARYLAND. No. 751

Gonzalez v Schlau 2011 NY Slip Op 31048(U) April 12, 2011 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 8960/2009 Judge: Robert J. McDonald Republished

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Chapter 3 The Court System and Chapter 4 The Litigation Process

Mock Trial Practice Law Test

Expedited Jury Trials

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PLAINTIFF S MOTIONS IN LIMINE

The Civil Action Part 1 of a 4 part series

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Superior Court of California County of Orange

MONTANA UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES

Standard Interrogatories. Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

JUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE. JUDGE MELISSA R. McCORMICK DEPARTMENT C13. CLERK: Alma Bovard COURT ATTENDANT: As Assigned

F 3.201(2)(A) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS ) JOHN D. DOE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THOMAS M. SMITH, ) ) Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER JUDGE

RULE 7: CALENDAR CALL AND PRETRIAL MEMORANDA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 4, 2009 Session

SAM OOLIE, HAROLD OOLIE, Davidson Circuit No. 95C Plaintiffs, Hon. Walter Kurtz, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER MEDIATION AND HEARING PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Dupiton v New York City Tr. Auth NY Slip Op 33234(U) November 26, 2018 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: /2016 Judge: Ernest F.

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development Bureau of Workers' Compensation

Preparing the Physician for Deposition and Trial

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

Antithetical Antics: New and Unusual Tactics from the Plaintiff's Bar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND DIRECTING PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

VIEW FROM THE WITNESS BOX: TESTIFYING IN COURT

Standard Interrogatories. Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT C17 LAW AND MOTION AND TRIAL PROCEDURES JUDGE GLENDA SANDERS

JUDGE LEONARD G. BROWN, III JUDGE S PROCEDURES (2015)

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION (JUDGE HAYES)

Amended Order of Dismissal for Continued Violation of Discovery Obligations

STATE OF GEORGIA! i,- 1 ii tu 1, Rs I fa~~~~~,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs-Appellants, : No. 11AP-1014 v. : (C.P.C. No. 10CVC )

JUDGE GABRIELLE N. SANDERS Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations For Osceola County Civil Division 60-G, Courtroom 4B

2018 IL App (1st) U. No

THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CHARLOTTE COUNTY,

Case 9:01-cv MHS-KFG Document 72 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1935

Special Civil A Guide to the Court

Sri McCam ri Q. August 16, 2017 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING AND OVERNIGHT DELIVERY

ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED

LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 18, 2005 Session

Standard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)

LIST OF CHAPTERS. Joseph J. Mellon, Esq. Thomas J. Tomazin, Esq. Lorraine E. Parker, Esq. Lauren E. Sykes, Esq. Krista Maher, Esq.

No. 94-CV Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. (Hon. Mary Ellen Abrecht, Trial Judge)

Case 1:11-cv RGS Document 200 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS.

Book containing this chapter and any forms referenced herein is available for purchase at or by calling

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PA

PREPARING FOR TRIAL. 3. Opponent s experts identified, complete Rule 26 responses received and, if possible and necessary, experts have been deposed.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA MOTION TO ALTER, VACATE OR AMEND AND NEW TRIAL PURSUANT TO RULE 59 ALABAMA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

) Cause No. 1:14-cv-937-WTL-DML. motions are fully briefed and the Court, being duly advised, resolves them as set forth below.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/20/ :40 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/20/2016

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 24, 2012 Session

TRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/15/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/15/2017

Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations Orange County Circuit Civil Division 40 Judge Bob LeBlanc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE * * * *

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

State of Florida Ninth Judicial Circuit of Florida

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3730, Tallahassee, FL (904) / (800) * FAX (850)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 12, 2005 Session

RULE CHANGE 2018(06) COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Depositions: Practice Pointers

Transcription:

Murphy v. Svoboda et al Doc. 83. fl LEO lj.s. DISTRI T COURT DISTRIC T OF HEOR :\ SKA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,. FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA i.' l 5 NOV 16 PM 2: 03 MARTHA MURPHY, Individually and as duly appointed Personal Representative of the Estate of John M. "Mike" Murphy, deceased, vs. Plaintiff, OFFI t. : Case No. 8:13-CV-155 ORDER ON FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE EMILY R. SVOBODA and SHARON SOL TERO and SAUL SOL TERO, d/b/a PENNY'S FLORAL, Defendants. A final pretrial conference was held on the 2nd day of November, 2015. Appearing for the parties as counsel were: Michelle Epstein on behalf of the Plaintiff Dave Mullin on behalf of Emily R. Snitily, f/k/a Emily R. Svoboda, and Sharon Soltero and Saul Soltero. (A) Exhibits. See attached Exhibit List. Caution: Upon express approval of the judge holding the pretrial conference for good cause shown, the parties may be authorized to defer listing of exhibits or objections until a later date to be specified by the judge holding the pretrial conference. The mere listing of an exhibit on an exhibit list by a party does not mean it can be offered into evidence by the adverse party without all necessary evidentiary prerequisites being met. (B) Uncontroverted Facts. The parties have agreed that the following may be accepted as established facts for purposes of this case only: The parties agree to the following uncontroverted facts: Plaintiff Martha M. Murphy is a resident of Opelika, Lee County, Alabama. John M. "Mike" Murphy died at his home in Opelika, Alabama, on July 13, 2015. Mr. Murphy's death certificate lists his cause of death as chronic lymphoid leukemia. Emily R. Snitily, f/k/a Emily R. Svoboda, is a resident of Crawford, Dawes County, Nebraska. 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Sharon Soltero and Saul Soltero are residents of Columbus, Platte County, Nebraska. On October 4, 2010 John M. "Mike" Murphy was involved in an automobile accident in Columbus, Platte County, Nebraska involving his car and a van driven by Defendant Emily R. Snitily. At the time of the automobile accident, Mr. Murphy was working as a contractor for Emerson Electric in Columbus, Nebraska and was staying in Columbus. At the time of the automobile accident, Defendant Emily R. Snitily was employed by the Defendants Sharon Soltero and Saul Soltero, d/b/a Penny's Floral in Columbus, Platte County, Nebraska and as part of her employment, operated a 2003 Dodge Grand Caravan van for work-related purposes. The van was owned by the Defendants, Sharon Soltero and Saul Soltero, d/b/a Penny's Floral. On October 4, 2010, Emily Snitily was driving the van within the scope of her employment with Penny's Floral and was driving the van with the permission of Sharon Soltero and/or Saul Soltero. On the day of the accident, John M. Murphy was driving his 2007 Ford Focus vehicle westbound on Highway 30 in Columbus, Platte County, Nebraska. Emily R. Snitily was driving the 2003 Dodge Grand Caravan van eastbound on Highway 30 in Columbus. Emily R. Snitily turned the van in front of John M. Murphy's vehicle and as a result, the Murphy vehicle collided into the passenger side of the van. After colliding with the van, the Murphy vehicle struck a stop sign and then came to a stop in a ditch adjacent to Highway 30. The sole and proximate cause of the October 4, 2010, automobile collision was the negligence of Emily R. Snitily. John M. "Mike" Murphy and Martha Murphy had been married for 49 years at the time of Mr. Murphy's death. (C) Controverted and Unresolved Issues. The issues remaining to be determined and unresolved matters for the court's attention are: 2

1. Whether the collision was a proximate cause of some damage to Mike M. Murphy; 2. The nature and extent of Mr. Murphy's damage; 3. Whether the collision was a proximate cause of some damage to Martha Murphy; 4. The nature and extent of Mrs. Murphy's damage. Plaintiff claims the following special damages: Medical Expenses $44,567.57 Lost Wages: $99,000.00 Plaintiff claims Mr. Murphy sustained the following permanent injuries as result of the automobile accident: 1. Permanent injury to his left knee; 2. Permanent brain injury - specifically, injury to the pre-frontal cortex of the brain; 3. Permanent injury to his neck; and 4. Permanent injury to his left wrist. (D} Witnesses. All witnesses, including rebuttal witnesses, expected to be called to testify by plaintiff, except those who may be called for impeachment purposes as defined in NECivR 16.2(c) only, are: 1. Plaintiff Martha Murphy, 723 N. Cary Drive, Auburn, AL 36830 (will be present at trial). 2. Defendant Emily R. Svoboda, 313 W. Maple St., Dwight, NE 68635 (expected to be present at trial). 3. Marie Wooldridge, 14211 Snowberry Dr., Wellington, FL 33414 (will be present at trial). 4. Don Young, Emerson Industrial Automation, 9377 West Higgins Road, Rosemont, Illinois, 60018 (expected to be present at trial). 3

All witnesses expected to be called to testify by defendants, except those who may be called for impeachment purposes as defined in NECivR 16.2(c) only, are: 1. Martha Murphy Will Call 723 Cary Drive Auburn, AL 36830 2. 3. 4. Emily Snitily, f/k/a Emily Svoboda 312 Annin Street Crawford, NE 69339 Sharon Soltero 208 SE Calle Columbo Columbus, NE 68601 Saul Soltero 208 SE Calle Columbo Columbus, NE 68601 Will Call Will Call May Call It is understood that, except upon a showing of good cause, no witness whose name and address does not appear herein shall be permitted to testify over objection for any purpose except impeachment. A witness whose only testimony is intended to establish foundation for an exhibit for which foundation has not been waived shall not be permitted to testify for any other purpose, over objection, unless such witness has been disclosed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3). A witness appearing on any party's witness list may be called by any other party. (E) Expert Witnesses' Qualifications. Experts to be called by plaintiff and their qualifications are: Dr. Raymond Godsil, Jr., Auburn Orthopedic Center 1800 Lakeside Circle, Auburn, AL 36830. Dr. Godsil's qualifications are stipulated. Dr. Ona Graham, PsyD, 1443 1yth St. Columbus, GA 31901. Dr. Graham's qualifications are stipulated. Dr. Michael Gorum, Columbus Neurologic Institute, 1538 13th Ave. Suite 8300, Columbus, GA 31901-2563. Dr. Gorum's qualifications are stipulated. Experts to be called by defendants and their qualifications are: 4

Thomas Haley, Ph.D., 12728 Augusta Avenue, Suite 150, Omaha, NE 68144. Dr. Haley's qualifications are stipulated. Joel Cotton, M.D., 8901 W. Dodge Road, Suite 210, Omaha, NE 68114. Dr. Cotton's qualifications are stipulated. (F) Voir Dire. Counsel have reviewed Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 47(a) and NECivR 47.2(a) and suggest the following with regard to the conduct of juror examination: The parties would like to conduct voir dire to the extent the Court sees fit. (G) Number of Jurors. Counsel have reviewed Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 48 and NECivR 48.1 and suggest that this matter be tried to a jury composed of 12 members. (H) Verdict. The parties will stipulate to a less-than-unanimous verdict. The parties' stipulation is: after six hours of deliberations have passed, ten or eleven jurors may enter a verdict. (I) Briefs, Instructions, and Proposed Findings. Counsel have reviewed NECivR 39.2(a), 51.1(a), and 52.1, and suggest the following schedule for filing trial briefs, proposed jury instructions, and proposed findings of fact, as applicable: The parties agree that proposed jury instructions shall be filed five (5) working days before the first day of trial. (J) Length of Trial. Counsel estimate the length of trial will consume not less than 2 days, not more than 3 days, and probably about 3 days. (K) Trial Date. Trial is set for November 23, 2015. 5

MARTHA MURPHY, Individually and as duly appointed Personal Representative of the Estate of John M. "Mike" Murphy, deceased, Plaintiff By: /s/ Michelle D. Epstein Michelle D. Epstein # 21936 Jason G Ausman,# 22261 AUSMAN LAW FIRM PC LLO 1015 N. 98 1 h St. Ste. 102 Omaha, NE 68114 Telephone: 402-933-8140 Facsimile: 402-718-9423 m ichelle@ausmanlawfirm.com jason@ausmanlawfirm.com EMILY R. SVOBODA, SHARON SOLTERO AND SAUL SOL TERO, D/B/A PENNY'S FLORAL, Defendants By: /s/ David C. Mullin David C. Mullin, #21985 FRASER STRYKER PCLLO 500 Energy Plaza 409 South 1 ]1hstreet Omaha, NE 68102-2663 Telephone: ( 402) 341-6000 Facsimile: (402) 341-8290 Email: dmullin@fslf.com ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS BY THE COURT: F.4. セ jzj[n@ I I si.s, /U,:u-.J-1,::>t); 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MARTHA MURPHY, INDIVIDUALLY and as SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN M. "MIKE" MURPHY, DECEASED, Plaintiff, Case No. 8:13-CV-155 JOINT EXHIBIT LIST vs. EMILY R. SVOBODA and SHARON SOL TERO and SAUL SOL TERO, d/b/a PENNY'S FLORAL, Case Number: Courtroom Deputy: Court Reporter: Defendants. Trial Date: November 23, 2015 EXH DESCRIPTION OFF OBJ RCVD NOT NO. RCVD DATE 1 Photograph, Mr. Murphy's vehicle post-mva 2 Photograph, Mr. Murphy's vehicle post-mva 3 Photograph, Mr. Murphy's vehicle post-mva 4 Photograph, Mr. Murphy's vehicle post-mva 5 Photograph, Mr. Murphy's vehicle post-mva 6 Photograph, Mr. Murphy's vehicle post-mva 7 Photograph, Mr. Murphy's vehicle post-mva 8 Photograph, Ms. Svoboda's vehicle post-mva 9 Photograph, Ms. Svoboda's vehicle post-mva 10 Photograph, Ms. Svoboda's vehicle post-mva 11 Deposition Transcript, Dr. Ona Graham 12 Deposition Video, Dr. Ona Graham (1) 13 Deposition Video, Dr. Ona Graham (2) 14 Curriculum Vitae, Dr. Ona Graham (Ex. 2 Dr. Graham's Deposition)

EXH DESCRIPTION OFF OBJ RCVD NOT DATE NO. RCVD 15 Dr. Graham's Billing Statement (Ex. 1 Dr. Graham's Deposition) 16 Dr. Graham's report/note, 1 /16/13 (Ex. 3 Dr. Graham's Deposition) 17 Dr. Graham's report/note, 4/4/14 (Ex. 4 Dr. Graham's Deposition) 18 Deposition Transcript, Dr. Michael Gorum 19 Deposition Video, Dr. Michael Gorum 20 Curriculum Vitae, Dr. Michael Gorum (Ex. 1 Dr. Gorum's Deposition) 21 Dr. Gorum's Billing Statements (Ex. 2 Dr. Gorum's Deposition) 22 Deposition Transcript, Dr. Raymond Godsil, Jr. 23 Deposition Video, Dr. Raymond Godsil, Jr. 24 Curriculum Vitae, Dr. Raymond Godsil, Jr. (Ex. 1 Dr. Godsil's Deposition) 25 Medical Billing Statements Reviewed by Dr. Godsil (Ex. 2 Dr. Godsil's Deposition) 26 Columbus Orthopedic & Sports Medicine Clinic record, 10/12/10 (Ex. 3 Dr. Godsil's Deposition) 27 Columbus Family Practice record, 10/5/1 O (Ex. 4 Dr. Godsil's Deposition) 28 Avenue Chiropractic Records, 10/13/10, 10/18/10, 11/3/10 (Ex. 5 Dr. Godsil's Deposition) 29 The Orthopaedic Clinic records, 9/19/11, 10/17 /11, 10/20/11, 10/27/11, (Ex. 6 Dr. Godsil's Deposition) 30 Advantage Chiropractic Records, 2/10/11, 2/11 /11 J 2/14/11, 2/16/11, 2/28/11 31 Auburn Orthopaedic Center Records, 1 /13/11, 1 /24/11 J 5/4/11 J 9/9/11 32 U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services, CDC R,H Pamphlet "Facts for Physicians" 33 U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services, CDC R,H Pamphlet, "Facts About Concussion and Brain Injury" 2

EXH DESCRIPTION OFF OBJ RCVD NOT DATE NO. RCVD 34 Deposition Transcript, Donald Young 35 Mr. Murphy Obituary, 7/21/5 R, H 36 Women's Hope Medical Clinic Publication, September 2015 37 Mike Murphy Resume R,H 38 Emerson Electric Payments to Mike Murphy; 5/11/10-1/1/11 39 Stipulation or Summary of Business Expenses, R,F,H Mike Murphy Consulting 40 Murphy Family Photographs R 100 Rule 1006 Medical Expense Summary, sorted by provider 101 Rule 1006 Medical Expense Summary, sorted in chronological order 102 Letter to James Rosa from John "Mike" Murphy, dated 11/11/10 103 Brochure by Dr. Jonathan Liss regarding R, H Alzheimer's, MURPHY 000-601 through MURPHY 000-621 104 Proposed letter by John Michael Murphy, dated 06/10/12, MURPHY 000-622 through MURPHY 000-625 105 Driver's Motor Vehicle Accident Report by John Michael Murphy, dated 10/06/10, MURPHY 000-686 through MURPHY 000-687 106 Deposition transcript of Martha Murphy 107 Affidavit of Donald Young H 108 Curriculum Vitae of Joel Cotton, M.D. 3

EXH DESCRIPTION OFF OBJ RCVD NOT DATE NO. RCVD 109 Deposition transcript of Dr. Joel Cotton 110 Videotape from the deposition of Dr. Joel Cotton 111 Curriculum Vitae of Thomas Haley, Ph.D. 112 Report of Thomas Haley, Ph.D. H 113 Report of Dr. Thomas Haley, dated 01/23/15 and H the CV of Dr. Thomas Haley (Graham Depa. Exh. 5) 114 Office notes of Dr. Raymond Godsil (Godsil Depa. R Exh. 11) 115 Prehospital Care Report by Columbus Fire Department, dated 10/04/10 (Godsil Depa. Exh. 13 and Cotton Depa. Exh. 2) 116 Office Note by Dr. Jonathan Liss, dated 01/28/13 R (Cotton Depa. Exh. 6) 117 Record from Auburn Orthopaedic Center, dated R 02/23/10 118 Record from Auburn Orthopaedic Center, dated R 01/04/11 119 Record from George McCluskey, M.D. - St. R Francis Orthopaedic Institute, dated 01/19/11 120 Record from Auburn Orthopaedic Center, dated R 04/28/11 121 Record from Aldridge Physical Therapy, dated R 05/10/11 122 Record from Aldridge Physical Therapy, dated R 08/02/11 123 Record from Aldridge Physical Therapy, dated R 11/22/11 124 Record from Michael Gorum, M.D. - Columbus R Neurologic Institute, dated 12/07/11 125 Record from Michael Gorum, M.D. - Columbus R Neurologic Institute, dated 12/12/11 126 Record from Auburn Orthopaedic Center I The R Orthopaedic Clinic, P.C., dated 02/02/12 4

EXH NO. DESCRIPTION OFF OBJ RCVD NOT DATE RCVD 127 Record from Advantage Chiropractic Clinic, dated 03/07/13 128 Record from Brandon Johnson, M.D., dated 12/17/13 R R 129 Plaintiffs Tax Returns 130 Plaintiff John Murphy's Responses to Defendants' First Set of Request for Production, dated 09/26/13 131 Plaintiff Martha Murphy's Verified Answers to Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories, dated 10/10/13 132 Plaintiff John Murphy's Verified Answers to Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories, dated 10/10/13 133 Plaintiff John Murphy's Supplemental Answers to Interrogatories, dated 01/07/15 134 Plaintiff John Murphy's Supplemental Responses to Requests for Production of Documents, dated 01/07/15 135 Plaintiffs Supplemental Answers to Interrogatories, received 11 /12/15 136 Demonstrative exhibits OBJECTIONS: R: Relevancy H: Hearsay A: Authenticity 0: Other (specify) 1370739v1 5