STUDENT STUDY GUIDE CHAPTER THREE

Similar documents
An Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota

CHAPTER. OPENER- USE YOUR NOTES TO ANSWER THESE REVIEW Q s The Courts: Structure and Participants. Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458

Victim / Witness Handbook. Table of Contents

STUDENT STUDY GUIDE CHAPTER SEVEN

Legal Definitions: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A

Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART. Section 2.1 A Dual Court System

Chapter 1. Crime and Justice in the United States

The Courts CHAPTER. Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 7E by Frank Schmalleger

Directions: Read each of the questions or statements below, then choose the correct answer from those provided.

Court Records Glossary

Wyoming Judges Benchbook

acquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction Twelfth Edition

Appendix A. Functional Process Diagrams Overview and Criminal Case Management

The court process CONSUMER GUIDE. How the criminal justice system works. FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON

Courtroom Terminology

OUTLINE OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS

Criminal Justice Public Safety and Individual Rights

Criminal Justice Today, 15e (Schmalleger) Chapter 1 What Is Criminal Justice? 1.1 Multiple Choice Questions

Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial. Chapter 13

Bench or Court Trial: A trial that takes place in front of a judge with no jury present.

Judicial Branch. Why this is important What do I do if I m arrested? What are my rights? What happens in court?

Detailed Contents SECTION I: THE PURPOSE AND STRUCTURE OF AMERICAN COURTS

Wyoming Judges Benchbook

7. The crime control perspective views the justice system as a means of caring for and treating people who cannot manage themselves. a. True b.

Pretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial

Felony Cases. Police Investigation. Associate Circuit Court. Felony Versus Misdemeanor

HOW A CRIMINAL CASE PROCEEDS IN FLORIDA

Course Court Systems and Practices. Unit X Pre-trial

JUDGE: Paul Maughan - Third District Court

Criminal Justice in America CJ Chapter 10 James J. Drylie, Ph.D.

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 100 1

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS JUVENILE COURT DEPARTMENT

LOCAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PRACTICE IN THE CRIMINAL AND CIRCUIT COURTS SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT SULLIVAN COUNTY, TENNESSEE CLERK OF THE COURT

PELLISSIPPI STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE MASTER SYLLABUS CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE LAW 2120

Stages of a Case Glossary

Chapter 10 The Criminal Law and Business. Two elements must exist at the same time for a person to be convicted of a crime:

CIRCUIT COURT FOR CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND. Differentiated Case Management Plan for Criminal Cases INTRODUCTION

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND

Navigating Through the Criminal Justice System in Virginia

The Criminal Court System. Law 521 Chapter Seven

COURT RULES 21st JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

LR Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal

American Criminal Law and Procedure Vocabulary

Presentation to The Bail System Task Force on Laws as to Judicial Branch Procedures. December 17, Elizabeth Buckler Veronis Task Force Staff

Group / Category Docket Description Affidavits and Oaths Affidavits and Oaths Affidavits and Oaths Affidavits and Oaths Affidavits and Oaths

Pages , Looking Back

Who s who in a Criminal Trial

NASSAU COUNTY YOUTH PART District Court Room 268

Steps in the Process

Practice Test. Law & the Courts -1-

A VICTIM S GUIDE to the D.C. CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

YOU VE been CHARGED. with a CRIME What YOU. NEED to KNOW

Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step

Full file at

Effective Criminal Case Management (ECCM) Project Data Request Single-Tier Courts

Structure of the Criminal Justice System. Developed by Jo Ann Grode 2004

LOCAL RULES OF PROCEDURE AND RULES OF DECORUM FOR THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE COURTS PARKER COUNTY, TEXAS

63rd District Court 1950 East Beltline Avenue, Grand Rapids, MI Phone: (616) Fax: (616)

LITIGATING JUVENILE TRANSFER AND CERTIFICATION CASES IN THE JUVENILE AND CIRCUIT COURTS

LOCAL COURT RULES. 39th Judicial Circuit

CRIMINAL, TRAFFIC, CIVIL AND SMALL CLAIM RULES

LOCAL RULES 266 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT ERATH COUNTY, TEXAS

Trial Date and Time. In some cases, the Police Department and the defendant will reach a plea agreement in lieu of going to trial.

Fall, Criminal Litigation 9/4/17. Criminal Litigation: Arraignment to Appeal. How Do We Get A Case?

North Carolina District Attorney Candidate Questionnaire

Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL

CHARACTERS IN THE COURTROOM

Note: New caption for Rule 1:38 adopted July 16, 2009 to be effective September 1, 2009.

Learning Station #5 LEVEL ONE-13

Education & Training Plan Criminal Procedure Specialist Certificate Program with Externship

STRUCTURE OF A CRIMINAL TRIAL: (FELONY)

RULES OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEBANON COUNTY CRIMINAL DIVISION. 52-CrD-530 DUTIES AND POWERS OF A BAIL AGENCY 2

IN THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED

After the initial charges are laid against the accused the trial should take place: After Preliminary inquiry: within six months to one year

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE STEVEN LAUX. Argued: March 31, 2015 Opinion Issued: May 22, 2015

Judges and the Media. College for New Judges National Center for Juvenile and Family Court Judges

CRIMINAL JUSTICE, THE COURTS AND CORRECTIONS / PUBLIC SAFETY AND JUSTICE

CIRCUIT COURT CLERKS MANUAL - CRIMINAL

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR JUDGE/COMMISSIONER BENCH BOOK. JUDGE/COMMISSIONER: Jennifer Valencia Second District Court

General Background Check Terms

Roster Lawyers Tariff of Fees

POLICY AND PROGRAM REPORT

SENATE, Nos. 171 and 2471 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 212th LEGISLATURE

The jury panel is selected by lot from all the names of registered voters or from persons having a valid driver s license.

Texas Law & Due Process (Chapter 10) Dr. Michael Sullivan. Texas State Government GOVT

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULES 3:26 BAIL

The Code. for Crown Prosecutors

LOCAL RULES FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT AND THE COUNTY COURT-AT-LAW RUSK COUNTY, TEXAS

State and Local Judicial System. How and Why

CRIMINAL CASE CHECKLIST (State Court)

State of Kansas Board of Indigents Defense Services Permanent Administrative Regulations

LAW 898A LSN CRIMINAL LITIGATION. Spring Professor Susan Leff 1

Amendments to Rules of Criminal Procedure Affecting District Court Procedures

HANDBOOK FOR VICTIMS/WITNESSES OF VIOLENT CRIMES

Dodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District)

Glossary of Terms acquit action adjudication Administrator advance sheets adversary system affidavit affidavit of prejudice affirm allegation

Supplement No. 4 published with Gazette No. 13 of 26th June, CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE

Transcription:

Multiple Choice Questions STUDENT STUDY GUIDE CHAPTER THREE 1. California s Three Strikes Law has resulted in, which are jury acquittals when a punishment is grossly disproportionate to an offense. a. jury nullifications b. commuted sentences c. sanction diminutions d. penalty curtailments 2. Which of the following are not core members of the courtroom work group? a. Judges b. Prosecuting Attorneys c. Defense Attorneys d. Bailiffs 3. In their interactions with the police, judges are primarily making determinations as to whether exists. a. reasonable suspicion b. evidence preponderance c. probable cause d. clear and convincing evidence 4. In a jury trial, how does the jury obtain information on the appropriate laws, the evidence presented, and how it should be interpreted? a. Through their own observations throughout the trial b. Through instructions given by the judge c. Through arguments given by the attorneys for each side d. Through their own research prior to trial 5. Which of the following is not a responsibility of law clerks? a. Presiding over minor preliminary hearings b. Conducting legal research c. Summarizing statutory and case law d. Writing first-round opinion drafts 6. Which of the following is not one of Eisenstein and Jacobs Courtroom Work Group Characteristics? a. Engage in a variety of tasks b. Hold degrees of higher education c. Have specialized roles d. Held together by common goals 1

7. Sentencing guidelines are produced by a. U.S. Sentencing Commission b. The President c. Congress d. The U.S. Supreme Court 8. Which work group member possesses the most superior knowledge of a criminal case? a. Judges b. Law Clerks c. Prosecuting Attorneys d. Defense Attorneys 9. Which of the following is not a goal that unites the courtroom work group? a. Doing Justice b. Representing Society c. Maintaining Group Cohesion d. Reducing Uncertainty 10. What is the ultimate manifestation of the negotiation process? a. Plea Bargaining b. Determining bail eligibility and amount c. Determining conditions of pretrial release d. Setting of trial dates 11. An assessment of a case s true seriousness is known as the. a. going rate b. realistic perception c. case appraisal d. value assessment 12. Which judicial function involves a suspect entering a formal plea to the charges being brought against him/her? a. Indictment b. Arraignment c. Pretrial Motion d. Initial Appearance 13. What method is used in order to enforce cohesion? a. Informal sanctions b. Sanctions from the Bar Association c. Sanctions from the Executive Branch d. Sanctions from the Supreme Court 2

14. Which of the following is a primary motivation for privately retained defense attorneys to help dispose of the case load? a. Scorn from other judges b. Eliminating cases with undisputed facts c. Turning attention to high-profile cases d. Generating income 15. A prosecutor s decision of what charges to file is an example of a(n). a. pretrial motion b. unilateral decision c. adversarial proceeding d. negotiation Multiple Choice Answer Key 1. a 2. d 3. c 4. b 5. a 6. b 7. a 8. c 9. b 10. a 11. a 12. b 13. a 14. d 15. b 3

True/False Questions 1. The members of the courtroom work group fulfill their job functions independently of one another. 2. The interaction between judges and attorneys is very different in trial courts than in appellate courts. 3. The core members of the courtroom work group all typically hold law degrees. 4. Both prosecutors and defense attorneys may file motions for nolle prosequi. 5. Defense attorneys often have to convince their clients to accept a plea bargain. 6. Prosecuting attorneys often represent the interests of individual litigants. 7. Law clerks are rarely influential in their interactions with judges. 8. Witnesses introduce some degree of uncertainty into court proceedings. 9. Police officers and prosecutors generally have the same objective in regards to a defendant s punishment. 10. Judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys often share similar demographic characteristics. 11. Crime victims and litigants are classified as individuals who are regular members in the judicial process. 12. Judges are closely involved in most aspects of case processing. 13. The lawyers in a case work directly for the presiding judge. 14. A prosecuting attorney is under no obligation to be an advocate for the defendant. 15. Prosecutors and defense attorneys generally do not interact with one another during the trial process. 4

True/False Answer Key 1. F 2. T 3. T 4. F 5. T 6. F 7. F 8. T 9. F 10. T 11. F 12. T 13. F 14. T 15. F Study Questions 1. Discuss the role of the news media in the courtroom work group. Members of the courtroom work core group are sometimes able to use the media to portray a case to their client s or their own advantage. Does this help or hurt the court system and its goals? Should the role of the media be limited or expanded in any way? Explain your reasoning. 2. Witnesses and jurors add an element of unpredictability to the court system. Does this help or hurt the legal system and society? Should the role of witnesses and jurors be limited to give more predictability to the court system? Be specific and explain your reasoning. 3. Discuss the dynamics of the authority that each of the courtroom work group core members has, and the limitations that each group member may place upon the others. How does this affect the outcomes of the court system and its members common goals? Be specific and give examples. 4. Discuss the limitations that are placed upon judges authority and the impact that these limitations have upon the court system. Do these limitations help or hurt society? Should the authority of judges be expanded or further limited? Explain your reasoning. 5. Many participants in the court system are surprised to see the prosecuting and defense attorneys interacting casually and behaving in a friendly manner toward one another. Should the advocates for the two opposing sides behave this way in an adversarial system? Does this hurt their ability to be effective advocates for their clients? Should this type of relationship be limited or encouraged? Explain your reasoning. 5

Matching Questions 1. A motion asking for the trial to be moved to another location, particularly when there has been substantial pretrial publicity 2. Has rotating characters and brings some uncertainty to the trial process 3. A motion asking for additional time to locate evidence or prepare for the case 4. May be utilized so that a case is portrayed to the public in a certain way 5. Motion that can be filed to prevent a criminal case from going to trial 6. More concerned with an offender receiving a severe sentence than with case disposal 7. Motion to access physical evidence before trial 8. Issued by the grand jury when it determines that there is probable cause for a trial 9. Work to ensure that their client s rights are protected throughout criminal proceedings 10. Responsible for conducting legal research and writing first draft legal opinions 11. Has the responsibility of ruling on pretrial motions 12. Often serves as a legal advisor to law enforcement agencies 13. Responsible for maintaining a court s docket 14. Close and distinct exists in a jurisdiction when virtually all the lawyers and judges know one another. 15. A document that outlines the accusations against the defendant and the provisions of the case that establish probable cause 6

Word Bank a. news media b. continuance c. defense attorneys d. police officers e. court clerks f. nolle prosequi g. law clerks h. judge i. true bill j. local legal culture k. change of venue l. prosecuting attorneys m. criminal information n. jury o. discovery Matching Answer Key 1. k 2. n 3. b 4. a 5. f 6. d 7. o 8. i 9. c 10. g 11. h 12. l 13. e 14. j 15. m 7

Chapter Summary There are several groups that comprise the courtroom work group. These groups fulfill many functions, and all of their roles are interdependent. These groups have frequent and ongoing relationships in which they interact in a wide variety of manners and settings. Judges fulfill roles such as issuing warrants; making probable cause determinations; granting or denying bail; presiding over hearings; ruling on motions; and presiding over trials. Prosecuting attorneys represent the state in criminal cases. Defense attorneys, who may be privately retained or appointed, ensure that the defendant s rights are protected and defend their client throughout criminal proceedings. Other work group actors include law clerks, court clerks and administrators, jurors, witnesses, police officers, and the news media. The seven characteristics that define the courtroom work group are that they exhibit authority relationships; display influence relationships; are held together by common goals; have specialized roles; use a variety of work techniques; engage in a variety of tasks; and have different degrees of stability and familiarity. The core members of the courtroom work group, which include judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys, participate in courtroom processes with great frequency. They share common demographic characteristics, professional backgrounds, and a common perspective on court operations. Regular members, who include law enforcement personnel, expert witnesses, and the news media, all have frequent courtroom participation, but less participation than core group members. Occasional participants, who include jurors, crime victims, and litigants, participate in the court process on an infrequent or one-time basis. This group has very diverse training, values, and orientations. The courtroom work group has different authority relationships. Judges are the supreme rulers of the court, as is reflected in their dress, the courtroom design, and the way they are addressed. However, the judge s authority is limited by the prosecutor s discretion, budgetary control, jurisdiction, sentencing guidelines, and appeals. All work group members influence and are influenced by the other members, and members have different bases of power and areas of knowledge. Judges have formal authority and may direct actions of the court and the attorneys. Prosecutors have superior case knowledge and have discretion about what matters will go to trial. Defense attorneys are able to interview witnesses, obtain evidence through discovery, and file pretrial motions. The four common goals of the members are doing justice; maintaining group cohesion; disposing of the case load; and reducing uncertainty. Their different bases of knowledge give group members various types of power and influence. Three interaction techniques that are frequently utilized are unilateral decisions, adversarial proceedings, and negotiations. Stable and familiar relationships among the group members are more likely to lead to close working relationships. This often leads to better negotiations, less reliance on formalities, more utilization of informal arrangements, and the creation of cooperative relationships. Group interactions play a significant role in the way that one group member responds to another. There are occasionally outside factors that may create disruption to group goals. One example of this is California s Three Strikes Law. 8