January 17, 2017 Women in State Legislatures 2017

Similar documents
INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

If you have questions, please or call

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

2016 us election results

We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

New Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge

Congressional Districts Potentially Affected by Shipments to Yucca Mountain, Nevada

Now is the time to pay attention

PREVIEW 2018 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION

CA CALIFORNIA. Ala. Code 10-2B (2009) [Transferred, effective January 1, 2011, to 10A ] No monetary penalties listed.

Graduation and Retention Rates of Nonresidents by State

a rising tide? The changing demographics on our ballots

SPECIAL EDITION 11/6/14

Mrs. Yuen s Final Exam. Study Packet. your Final Exam will be held on. Part 1: Fifty States and Capitals (100 points)

Presented by: Ted Bornstein, Dennis Cardoza and Scott Klug

Incarcerated Women and Girls

Immigrant Policy Project. Overview of State Legislation Related to Immigrants and Immigration January - March 2008

NATIONAL VOTER REGISTRATION DAY. September 26, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. Identifying the Importance of ID. Overview. Policy Recommendations. Conclusion. Summary of Findings

Dynamic Diversity: Projected Changes in U.S. Race and Ethnic Composition 1995 to December 1999

/mediation.htm s/adr.html rograms/adr/

RULE 1.14: CLIENT WITH DIMINISHED CAPACITY

Constitution in a Nutshell NAME. Per

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

State Legislative Competition in 2012: Redistricting and Party Polarization Drive Decrease In Competition

Mandated Use of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PMPs) Map

RULE 1.1: COMPETENCE. As of January 23, American Bar Association CPR Policy Implementation Committee

THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

RULE 2.4: LAWYER SERVING

Geek s Guide, Election 2012 by Prof. Sam Wang, Princeton University Princeton Election Consortium

THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

Election 2014: The Midterm Results, the ACA and You

2016 NATIONAL CONVENTION

2018 NATIONAL CONVENTION

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2019

STANDARDIZED PROCEDURES FOR FINGERPRINT CARDS (see attachment 1 for sample card)

Understanding UCC Article 9 Foreclosures. CEU Information

A Nation Divides. TIME: 2-3 hours. This may be an all-day simulation, or broken daily stages for a week.

Presentation to the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers' International Union. Paul Lemmon July 26, 2010

Research Brief. Resegregation in Southern Politics? Introduction. Research Empowerment Engagement. November 2011

The Youth Vote in 2008 By Emily Hoban Kirby and Kei Kawashima-Ginsberg 1 Updated August 17, 2009

House Apportionment 2012: States Gaining, Losing, and on the Margin

Admitting Foreign Trained Lawyers. National Conference of Bar Examiners Washington, D.C., April 15, 2016

Uniform Wage Garnishment Act

Political Contributions Report. Introduction POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Gun Laws Matter. A Comparison of State Firearms Laws and Statistics

Prison Price Tag The High Cost of Wisconsin s Corrections Policies

Ballot Questions in Michigan. Selma Tucker and Ken Sikkema

Migrant and Seasonal Head Start. Guadalupe Cuesta Director, National Migrant and Seasonal Head Start Collaboration Office

RULE 3.1: MERITORIOUS CLAIMS AND CONTENTIONS

Exhibit A. Anti-Advance Waiver Of Lien Rights Statutes in the 50 States and DC

Governing Board Roster

Economic Nexus Standards in State Taxation. CEU Information

COMPARISON OF ABA MODEL RULE FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION WITH STATE VERSIONS AND AMENDMENTS SINCE AUGUST 2002

Reporting and Criminal Records

A contentious election: How the aftermath is impacting education

Mineral Availability and Social License to Operate

VOCA 101: Allowable/Unallowable Expenses Janelle Melohn, IA Kelly McIntosh, MT

Instructions for Completing the Trustee Certification/Affidavit for a Securities-Backed Line of Credit

ELECTORAL COLLEGE AND BACKGROUND INFO

WLSA&RDC 2014 GARY MONCRIEF

Bylaws of the Prescription Monitoring Information exchange Working Group

ANTI-POVERTY DISTRIBUTION OF FOOD STAMP PROGRAM BENEFITS: A PROFILE OF 1975 FEDERAL PROGRAM OUTLAYS* Marilyn G. Kletke

Next Generation NACo Network BYLAWS Adopted by NACo Board of Directors Revised February, 2017

Supreme Court Decision What s Next

Sunlight State By State After Citizens United

Washington, D.C. Update

RULE 3.8(g) AND (h):

The Impact of Wages on Highway Construction Costs

Candidate Faces and Election Outcomes: Is the Face-Vote Correlation Caused by Candidate Selection? Corrigendum

Briefing ELECTION REFORM. Ready for Reform? After a day of chaos, a month of uncertainty and nearly two years of INSIDE. electionline.

THE POLICY CONSEQUENCES OF POLARIZATION: EVIDENCE FROM STATE REDISTRIBUTIVE POLICY

the polling company, inc./ WomanTrend On behalf of the Center for Security Policy TOPLINE DATA Nationwide Survey among 1,000 Adults (18+)

Breakdown of the Types of Specific Criminal Convictions Associated with Criminal Aliens Placed in a Non-Custodial Setting in Fiscal Year 2015

By 1970 immigrants from the Americas, Africa, and Asia far outnumbered those from Europe. CANADIAN UNITED STATES CUBAN MEXICAN

SMART GROWTH, IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

How States Can Achieve More Effective Public Safety Policies

Relationship Between Adult and Minor Guardianship Statutes

50 State Survey of Bad Faith Law. Does your State encourage bad faith?

Presentation Outline

Sample file. 2. Read about the war and do the activities to put into your mini-lapbook.

State Governments Viewed Favorably as Federal Rating Hits New Low

Effective Dispute Resolution Systems and the Vital Role of Stakeholders

The Law Library: A Brief Guide

A Dead Heat and the Electoral College

Promoting Second Chances: HR and Criminal Records

The Progressive Era. 1. reform movement that sought to return control of the government to the people

Fundamentals of the U.S. Transportation Construction Market

DC: I estimate a 4,600 valid sig petition drive for President in I budget $15,000 from the LNC.

Admitting Foreign-Trained Lawyers. Professor Laurel S. Terry Penn State Dickinson School of Law Carlisle, Pennsylvania

Background and Trends

RIDE Program Overview

By Kamala Harris (D-CA), U.S. Senator

CRAIN S CLEVELAND BUSINESS

RULE 4.2: COMMUNICATION WITH PERSON REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL

Historically, state PM&R societies have operated as independent organizations that advocate on legislative and regulatory proposals.

Background Checks and Ban the Box Legislation. November 8, 2017

Transcription:

January 17, 2017 in State Legislatures 2017 Kelly Dittmar, Ph.D. In 2017, 1832 women (1107D, 703R, 4I, 4Prg, 1WFP, 13NP) hold seats in state legislatures, comprising 24.8% of the 7383 members; 442 women (253D, 175R, 1I, 13NP) (22.4%) serve in state senates and 1390 women (854D, 528R, 3I, 4Prg, 1WFP) (25.7%) serve in state houses. 1 This is a net increase of 26 women state legislators nationwide, just barely marking a record high for the proportion of women among all state legislators in the United States, up from 24.5% at the end of 2016. However, while 27 more women are serving in state houses at the start of 2017 than served at the end of 2016, the number of women state senators dropped by one in 2017. Moreover, women remain less than one quarter of all state legislators in 2017, despite being over 50% of the population. Percentage of in State Legislatures, 1971-2017 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Source: Center for American and Politics, Rutgers University Note: Data reflects the percentage of women in state legislatures at the end of each year except for 2017. Partisan Differences in s State Legislative Representation Proportion of in Each Party Caucus by Chamber, 2017 Percent 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 63.5 36.5 82.71 17.29 68.18 31.82 Source: Center for American and Politics, Rutgers University 84.43 15.57 House Democrats House Republicans Senate Democrats Senate Republicans Men are just over one-third (35.3%) of all Democrats in state legislatures, while women are just 16.8% of all Republicans holding state legislative seats in 2017. The partisan disparity among women state legislators is not as stark in state legislatures as it is in Congress. Sixty percent of all women state legislators are Democrats, while 38% are Republicans. In 2010, the gap in partisanship among women state legislators was significantly wider; 70% of women legislators were Democrats and 30% were Republicans. 1 All data reflect numbers as of 1/13/17. For the latest updates, visit http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu.

These trends in partisanship do not vary significantly by chamber, though the partisan gap among women members is slightly larger among state representatives than among state senators in 2017. Partisan Gap among State Legislators, 1990-2017 80.00% 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% Democrats Republicans Source: Center for American and Politics, Rutgers University Note: Data reflects the proportion of all women state legislators who are Democrats and Republicans in each year. of Color in State Legislatures Four hundred and thirty-three women of color (403D, 28R, 1Prg, 1WFP) serve in state legislatures in 2017. 2 They represent 5.9% of all state legislators, including 6% of all state representatives and 5.5% of all state senators. of color are 12.9% of all Democratic state legislators and 0.7% of all Republican state legislators. of Color as a Proportion of All State Legislators, by Party and Chamber Democrats Republicans All Legislators All Legislators 12.9% 0.7% 5.9% Representatives 12.9% 0.7% 6.0% Senators 12.6% 0.7% 5.5% Source: Center for American and Politics, Rutgers University of color represent 23.6% of all women state legislators, including 23.4% of all women state representatives and 24.4% of all women state senators. They are 36.4% of all Democratic women state legislators and 4.0% of all Republican state legislators in 2017. of Color as a Proportion of All State Legislators, by Party and Chamber Democrats Republicans All All Legislators 36.4% 4.0% 23.6% Representatives 35.5% 3.8% 23.4% Senators 39.5% 4.6% 24.4% Source: Center for American and Politics, Rutgers University Among the women of color serving in state legislative office in 2017, 264 (260D, 3R, 1WFP) identify primarily as Black, 111 (97D, 13R, 1Prg) identify primarily as Latina, 36 (28D, 8R) identify primarily as Asian/Pacific American, 13 (11D, 2R) women identify primarily as Native American and 9 (7D, 2R) identify primarily as multiracial. 2 CAWP is waiting for race/ethnicity confirmation for 15 women state legislators as of 1/13/17. CAWP relies upon officeholders selfidentification to determine race/ethnicity.

Numbers of of Color State Legislators, by Race/Ethnicity and Party Working Democrats Republicans Progressives Families Party Asian American/ Pacific Islander 28 8 0 0 36 Black 260 3 0 1 264 Latina 97 13 1 0 111 Native American 11 2 0 0 13 Multiracial 7 2 0 0 9 Source: Center for American and Politics, Rutgers University There are no women of color serving in either chamber of the state legislature in four states: Alaska, North Dakota, Nebraska, and South Dakota. There are no women of color serving in state houses in four states: Alaska, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. 3 There are no women of color serving in state senates in eleven states: Alaska, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, and Vermont. See the table below for a full listing of states representation of women of color as a percentage of all legislators and of all women legislators. s Legislative Representation by State In 2017, Vermont ranks first in the nation for its percentage of women state legislators; 40% of Vermont state legislators are women. Nevada ranks second with 39.7%. s representation in the Nevada legislature jumped by eight percentage points (more than any other state) and six spots in national rankings from 2016 to 2017. Colorado, which ranked first in the nation at the end of 2016, now ranks third at 39%, down from 42% in 2016. The proportion of women in the Arizona state legislature is just over three percentage points higher in 2017 than at the end of 2016, but the state s ranking dropped by one nationally to fourth. Illinois, the fifthranking state for women s state legislative representation in 2017, rose one spot from 2016 after seeing a 3.4 percentage point increase in women s representation. Bottom 5 States for s State Legislative Representation State Percent Mississippi 13.8% South Carolina 13.5% West Virginia 13.4% Oklahoma 12.8% Wyoming 11.1% Top 5 States for s State Legislative Representation The five states with the lowest representation of women in their state legislatures changed little between 2016 and 2017. Wyoming dropped one spot to the bottom of the list with a two percentage-point drop in women s state legislative representation, from 13.3% to 11.1%. Mississippi, which ranked 50 th in 2016, now ranks 46 th in the nation, with a slight rise in women s representation from 13.2% to 13.8%. Despite doubling the number of women in their state senate from two to four, South Carolina maintained a national ranking of 47 th,with its percentage of women dropping slightly from 14.1% to 13.5%. Oklahoma fell from 47 th to 49 th in 2017, with women just 12.8% of state legislators this year. Finally, while Alabama just barely escaped the bottom five in 2017, they swapped rankings with West Virginia, where women are now 13.4% of state legislators. Among other states, Kansas saw the largest jump in its national ranking for women in its state legislature, from 29 th in 2016 to 19 th in 2016. Nebraska jumped ten spots from 32 nd to 22 nd. California dropped ten spots in national rankings between the end of 2016 and start of 2017, from 22 nd to 32 nd, with a 3.3 percentage point drop in women s state legislative representation. By percentage points, Delaware was the state with the largest decline in women s state legislative representation between 2016 and 2017, falling to just under 20% in 2017 from 24.2% in 2016. State Percent Vermont 40.0% Nevada 39.7% Colorado 39.0% Arizona 38.9% Illinois 36.2% 3 Because Nebraska is a unicameral legislature, it is only listed among state senates with no women of color.

Senate House State Rank D R I* Senate D R I* House Leg. %Overall AL 45 3 0 1 4 35 11 5 16 105 20 140 14.3% AK* 13 1 5 6 20 3 9 12 40 18 60 30.0% AZ 4 6 8 14 30 12 9 21 60 35 90 38.9% AR 40 3 4 7 35 3 15 18 100 25 135 18.5% CA 32 6 3 9 40 14 3 17 80 26 120 21.7% CO 3 9 2 11 35 19 9 28 65 39 100 39.0% CT 20 7 2 9 36 20 22 42 151 51 187 27.3% DE 34 2 1 3 21 7 2 9 41 12 62 19.4% FL 25 4 8 12 40 15 14 29 120 41 160 25.6% GA 24 9 1 10 56 31 20 51 180 61 236 25.8% HI 19 7 0 7 25 10 4 14 51 21 76 27.6% ID 12 4 5 9 35 7 16 23 70 32 105 30.5% IL 5 13 5 18 59 34 12 46 118 64 177 36.2% IN* 35 2 5 7 50 11 11 22 100 29 150 19.3% IA 31 5 1 6 50 18 9 27 100 33 150 22.0% KS 18 4 11 15 40 15 17 32 125 47 165 28.5% KY* 42 2 2 4 38 9 10 19 100 23 138 16.7% LA 44 3 2 5 39 8 9 17 105 22 144 15.3% ME 7 6 4 10 35 36 18 54 151 64 186 34.4% MD 10 10 2 12 47 36 11 47 141 59 188 31.4% MA 23 12 0 12 40 31 9 40 160 52 200 26.0% MI 29 1 3 4 38 15 15 30 110 34 148 23.0% MN 9 9 7 16 67 28 20 48 134 64 201 31.8% MS 46 4 5 9 52 10 5 15 122 24 174 13.8% MO 30 5 1 6 34 17 21 38 163 44 197 22.3% MT 17 12 2 14 50 21 8 29 100 43 150 28.7% NE 22 Nonpartisan 13 49 Unicameral 13 49 26.5% NV 2 5 3 8 21 13 4 17 42 25 63 39.7% NH 16 4 3 7 24 77 38 115 400 122 424 28.8% NJ* 13 8 3 11 40 18 7 25 80 36 120 30.0% NM 15 5 2 7 42 17 9 26 70 33 112 29.5% NY 21 7 7 14 63 40 3 1 44 150 58 213 27.2% NC 26 6 7 13 50 15 13 28 120 41 170 24.1% ND 41 3 6 9 47 7 10 17 94 26 141 18.4% OH* 27 3 3 6 33 14 11 25 99 31 132 23.5% OK 49 2 4 6 48 5 8 13 101 19 149 12.8% OR 8 6 2 8 30 19 3 22 60 30 90 33.3% PA 39 3 4 7 50 19 21 40 203 47 253 18.6% RI 11 11 1 12 38 21 2 23 75 35 113 31.0% SC 47 2 2 4 46 10 9 19 124 23 170 13.5% SD 38 0 5 5 35 3 12 15 70 20 105 19.0% TN* 42 2 4 6 33 7 9 16 99 22 132 16.7% TX 33 2 6 8 31 21 8 29 150 37 181 20.4% UT 37 3 3 6 29 9 5 14 75 20 104 19.2% VT 1 9 2 11 30 41 13 7 61 150 72 180 40.0% VA* 35 7 3 10 40 13 4 0 17 100 27 140 19.3% WA 6 9 8 17 49 26 10 36 98 53 147 36.1% WV 48 0 3 3 34 2 13 15 100 18 134 13.4% WI* 27 6 3 9 33 13 9 22 99 31 132 23.5% WY 50 1 2 3 30 3 4 7 60 10 90 11.1% TOT. 253 175 1 442 1,972 854 528 8 1,390 5,411 1,832 7,383 24.8% *I = other parties; in the Senate, 1 Independent, 13 non-partisans; in the House, 1 Working Families Party, 4 Progressives, 3 Independents.

Change in Percent between 2016 and 2017 Change in Rank between 2016 and 2017 Percent in State Legislature, 2017 Percent in State Legislature, 2016 2017 2016 State Rank Rank NV + 8.00 +6 39.7 2 31.7 8 KS + 4.90 +11 28.5 18 23.6 29 ME + 4.80 +6 34.4 7 29.6 13 NE + 4.10 +10 26.5 22 22.4 32 UT + 3.80 +6 19.2 37 15.4 43 RI + 3.60 +7 31.0 11 27.4 18 NM + 3.50 +4 29.5 15 26 19 IL + 3.40 +1 36.2 5 32.8 6 AZ + 3.30-1 38.9 4 35.6 3 ID + 2.90 +5 30.5 12 27.6 17 MI + 2.70 +6 23.0 29 20.3 35 OR + 2.20 +2 33.3 8 31.1 10 WA + 2.10-2 36.1 6 34 4 NY + 1.40-1 27.2 21 25.8 20 GA + 1.20 +3 25.8 24 24.6 27 NC + 1.20 +4 24.1 26 22.9 30 MA + 1.00-1 26.0 23 25 22 KY* + 0.80 0 16.7 42 15.9 42 FL + 0.60-3 25.6 25 25 22 MS + 0.60 +4 13.8 46 13.2 50 TX + 0.50 +4 20.4 33 19.9 37 NH + 0.50-1 28.8 16 28.3 15 AK* 0.00-2 30.0 13 30 11 AL 0.00 +1 14.3 45 14.3 46 LA 0.00 0 15.3 44 15.3 44 NJ* 0.00-2 30.0 13 30 11 PA 0.00 +1 18.6 39 18.6 40 TN* 0.00-1 16.7 42 16.7 41 VA* 0.00 +3 19.3 35 19.3 38 CT -0.50-4 27.3 20 27.8 16 MD -0.50-3 31.4 10 31.9 7 SC -0.60 0 13.5 47 14.1 47 IA -0.70 0 22.0 31 22.7 31 ND -0.70-2 18.4 41 19.1 39 VT -1.10 +1 40.0 1 41.1 2 HI -1.30-5 27.6 19 28.9 14 OK -1.30-2 12.8 49 14.1 47 IN* -1.40-1 19.3 35 20.7 34 MN -1.50-4 31.8 9 33.3 5 AR -1.50-4 18.5 40 20 36 OH* -1.50-5 23.5 27 25 22 WV -1.50-4 13.4 48 14.9 44 SD -2.00-5 19.0 38 21 33 WY -2.20-1 11.1 50 13.3 49 WI* -2.30-7 23.5 27 25.8 20 MO -2.60-4 22.3 30 24.9 26 MT -2.60-8 28.7 17 31.3 9 CO -3.00-2 39.0 3 42 1 CA -3.30-10 21.7 32 25 22 DE -4.80-6 19.4 34 24.2 28

State of Color All All Legislators Percent of Color (of all women) Percent of Color (of all legislators) AK 0 18 60 0.0% 0.0% AL 12 20 140 60.0% 8.6% AR 4 25 135 16.0% 3.0% AZ 11 35 90 31.4% 12.2% CA 15 26 120 57.7% 12.5% CO 11 39 100 28.2% 11.0% CT 6 51 187 11.8% 3.2% DE 2 12 62 16.7% 3.2% FL 15 41 160 36.6% 9.4% GA 32 61 236 52.5% 13.6% HI 16 21 76 76.2% 21.1% IA 3 33 150 9.1% 2.0% ID 4 32 105 12.5% 3.8% IL 22 64 177 34.4% 12.4% IN 5 29 150 17.2% 3.3% KS 5 47 165 10.6% 3.0% KY 1 23 138 4.3% 0.7% LA 8 22 144 36.4% 5.6% MA 5 52 200 9.6% 2.5% MD 25 59 188 42.4% 13.3% ME 1 64 186 1.6% 0.5% MI 9 34 148 26.5% 6.1% MN 6 64 201 9.4% 3.0% MO 6 44 197 13.6% 3.0% MS 13 24 174 54.2% 7.5% MT 4 43 150 9.3% 2.7% NC 13 41 170 31.7% 7.6% ND 0 26 141 0.0% 0.0% NE 0 13 49 0.0% 0.0% NH 4 122 424 3.3% 0.9% NJ 20 36 120 55.6% 16.7% NM 18 33 112 54.5% 16.1% NV 9 25 63 36.0% 14.3% NY 26 58 213 44.8% 12.2% OH 9 31 132 29.0% 6.8% OK 4 19 149 21.1% 2.7% OR 4 30 90 13.3% 4.4% PA 10 47 253 21.3% 4.0% RI 5 35 113 14.3% 4.4% SC 7 23 170 30.4% 4.1% SD 0 20 105 0.0% 0.0% TN 8 22 132 36.4% 6.1% TX 22 37 181 59.5% 12.2% UT 6 20 104 30.0% 5.8% VA 11 27 140 40.7% 7.9% VT 2 72 180 2.8% 1.1% WA 7 53 147 13.2% 4.8% WI 4 31 132 12.9% 3.0% WV 2 18 134 11.1% 1.5% WY 1 10 90 10.0% 1.1%

For More Information Find more information about the women in the 115 th Congress and keep track of the latest numbers of women in elective office at all levels at http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu. There you can also find historical data on women candidates and officeholders. Follow CAWP on Facebook (facebook.com/womenandpolitics) and Twitter (@CAWP_RU) for the latest news and data on women s political representation.