UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) E.D. Case No.

Similar documents
1. The Plaintiff, Richard N. Bell, took photograph of the Indianapolis Skyline in

Attorney for Plaintiff TIPSY ELVES LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:16-cv LB Document 1 Filed 06/11/16 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 0:10-cv MJD-FLN Document 1 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Court File No.

3 James A. McDaniel (Bar No ) 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/29/16 Page 1 of 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 1:18-cv TWP-DML Document 1 Filed 01/06/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:08-cv JAM-DAD Document 220 Filed 07/25/12 Page 1 of 21

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1

Case 8:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1

Case 3:19-cv GPC-LL Document 4 Filed 03/22/19 PageID.16 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:18-cv NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 1

Case 2:18-cv JTM-MBN Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 3:17-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv MHL Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 26 PageID# 58

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:11-cv CMA -BNB Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

Case 3:15-cv AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:16-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 21. Case No.

Case 1:18-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 06/11/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Central District Court Case No. 2:16-cv WBS, Inc. v. Stephen Pearcy et al. Document 2.

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

Case 2:14-cv PMW Document 4 Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 20

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 3:13-cv BTM-NLS Document 1-1 Filed 10/16/13 Page 1 of 28 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/05/16 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1

RETS DATA ACCESS AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/17 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

Attorneys for Plaintiffs LARRY KING ENTERPRISES, INC. and ORA MEDIA LLC

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. Case No.

FILED SAN MAteO COUNTY

Superior Court of California

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:14-cv HRH Document 37 Filed 12/08/14 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

the Notices section below.

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/07/16 Page 1 of 7

Title 10: COMMERCE AND TRADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case3:14-cv MEJ Document1 Filed11/24/14 Page1 of 18

Case 3:12-cv P Document 1 Filed 06/14/12 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.

Case 2:17-cv DMG-JEM Document 1 Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1

Connecticut Multiple Listing Service, Inc.

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Case 3:16-cv SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 23

Case 1:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv DMS-RBB Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Courthouse News Service

Case 2:18-cv JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:14-cv B Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 18 PageID 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 2:14-cv JFW-AGR Document 1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

NO. EDMUNDS.COM, INC. IN THE DISTRICT COURT a New York Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS

1. OVERTIME COMPENSATION AND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv LB Document 1 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:13-cv DSF-MRW Document 14 Filed 12/16/13 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:150

Case 8:18-cv JVS-DFM Document 1-5 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:41

IxANVL Binary License Agreement

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

Transcription:

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 GREGORY T. MEATH (State Bar No. 0 MEATH & PEREIRA 0 North Sutter Street, Suite 00 Stockton, CA 0- Ph. (0-00 Fx. (0-0 greggmeath@hotmail.com Attorneys for Plaintiff: DENIRO MARKETING, LLC. A California Limited Liability Company DENIRO MARKETING, LLC A California Limited Liability Company vs. Plaintiff, NEW EDGE MEDIA INC. a California corporation, individually and D/B/A MEONYOU.COM; STEPHEN CORGIAT; MARISSA L. NICKNIG; and DOES through Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION E.D. Case No. FOR: (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT; BREACH OF CONTRACT; MISAPPROPRIATION OF TRADE SECRETS; UNFAIR COMPETITION; FALSE ADVERTISING; Plaintiff, DENIRO MARKETING, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, for its complaint against NEW EDGE MEDIA INC. a California corporation, individually and D/B/A MEONYOU.COM, STEPHEN CORGIAT; MARISSA L. NICKNIG; and DOES through, Defendants, alleges as follows: JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This court has original and exclusive subject matter jurisdiction of this action under U.S.C.A. (a because the action arises under the Copyright Act, U.S.C.A. et seq.,

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0. This Court has supplemental subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to USC (a over all other claims contained within this complaint because all of Plaintiff s claims are so related to claims in the action where this Court has original jurisdiction, that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the U.S. Constitution.. This Court has personal jurisdiction over each of the Defendants because each is a resident of the State of California, and within the Eastern District, and each conducts systematic and continuous business in the State of California, and within this Judicial District.. Venue in this Court is proper pursuant to U.S.C.A. since Defendants or their agents are subject to personal jurisdiction in this jurisdiction. Defendants are also subject to personal jurisdiction in California because Defendants transact business within the State of California or contract elsewhere to supply goods and services in the State of California.. Venue in this District is proper pursuant to U.S.C.A. (b( because a substantial part of the events giving rise to this action arose within this Judicial District, and because Defendant NEW EDGE MEDIA INC. is, and at all relevant times was, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of California with its principal place of business at 0 Ninth St., th Floor, Sacramento, CA and is systematically and purposefully availing itself, and at all relevant times has systematically and purposefully availed itself of the privilege of conducting business activities with plaintiff in the State of California.. Venue in this District is proper because defendant STEPHEN CORGIAT is, and at all relevant times was, a citizen of the United States, residing in California, within this Judicial District.

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0. Venue in this District is proper because defendant MARISSA L. NICKNIG is, and at all relevant times was, a citizen of the United States, residing in Sacramento, California, within this Judicial District. THE PARTIES. Plaintiff, DENIRO MARKETING, LLC., ( DENIRO is and was at all relevant times, a corporation existing under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at all relevant times located in the State of California, County of San Joaquin.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that defendant NEW EDGE MEDIA INC. individually and D/B/A MEONYOU.COM ( NEW EDGE is, and at all relevant times was, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of California with its principal place of business at 0 Ninth St., th Floor, Sacramento, CA. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that defendant STEPHEN CORGIAT ( CORGIAT is, and at all relevant times was, a citizen of the United States, residing in California.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that defendant STEPHEN CORGIAT is, and at all relevant times was, an agent, officer, or director of defendant NEW EDGE MEDIA, INC.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that defendant MARISSA L. NICKNIG ( NICKNIG is, and at all relevant times was, a citizen of the United States, residing in Sacramento, California.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that defendant MARISSA L. NICKNIG is, and at all relevant times was, an agent, officer, or director of defendant NEW EDGE MEDIA, INC.

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0. Plaintiff is uninformed of the true names and capacities of defendants sued herein as DOES through, inclusive, and therefore sues these defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff will amend this complaint to allege the DOE defendants true names and capacities when ascertained. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that each of the fictitiously named defendants was the proximate and legal cause of the plaintiff s damages herein alleged and that the liability of said DOE defendants arises from the matters herein alleged. INTRODUCTION. The dispute at hand involves the programming and operation of dating websites. Plaintiff operates several dating websites including Amateurmatch.com. Defendant STEPHEN CORGIAT was employed by Plaintiff DENIRO from October 0, 00 through June 0, 00 Defendant NEW EDGE operates a dating website known as MEONYOU.COM. Defendant STEPHEN CORGIAT and Defendant MARISSA L. NICKNIG are employed by NEW EDGE with respect to the programming and operation of NEW EDGE S MEONYOU.COM dating website. FACTS COMMON TO ALL COUNTS A. Dating Websites. Internet users interested in meeting others may choose to join a dating website. Dating websites match users based upon a set of algorithms that compare the information provided by the user with the information provided by others. Dating websites such as Plaintiff DENIRO MARKETING S Amatuermatch.com and Defendant NEW EDGE MEDIA, INC S D/B/A MEONYOU.COM offer free membership levels but charge a membership fee for additional access, features and services.

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0. The differentiating characteristics of any particular dating website are the number and quality of its member profiles, and the method by which the member matches are made. That method is a computer program, and the member profiles are collectively represented in a database. B. Stephen Corgiat. Incident to STEPHEN CORGIAT S employment at DENIRO he worked with, and had access to, material that is considered by DENIRO as Confidential Information and held as Trade Secrets. This material includes, but is not necessarily limited to DENIRO S website membership and profile lists, member databases containing member profiles and other information, and to the programming code that operates the website.. Additionally incident to STEPHEN CORGIAT S employment at DENIRO he had access to, and worked with proprietary material that is covered by one or more United States registered copyrights held by DENIRO including U.S. Copyright Numbers TX -- and TX --0. 0. On March, 00 Defendant CORGIAT S signed a Confidentiality Agreement between himself and DENIRO wherein he agreed that the sale or unauthorized use or disclosure of any of DENIRO S Confidential Information obtained by CORGIAT during the course of his employment constituted unfair competition. CORGIAT further agreed not to engage in any such activity, either during the course of his employment or at any time thereafter.. CORGIAT also agreed in the Confidentiality Agreement that if he was to reveal or disclose, or threaten to reveal or disclose, any such Confidential Information, that the Company would be entitled to an injunction restraining him from disclosing such information, or from rendering any services to any entity to whom such information has been or is threatened to be disclosed.

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0. CORGIAT also agreed in the Confidentiality Agreement that following his resignation or termination of employment, he would not: (a engage in unfair competition with the Company; (b aid others, including any future employer, in any unfair competition with the Company; (c in any way breach the confidence that the Company placed in Employee during his or her employment with the Company; (d misappropriate or disclose any Confidential Information. CORGIAT specifically released DENIRO from any requirement of posting any bond in connection with temporary or interlocutory injunctive relief, to the extent permitted by law. C. Marissa L. Nicknig. Defendant MARISSA L. NICKNIG is employed by NEW EDGE MEDIA on projects including but not necessarily limited to the programming and operation of the MEONYOU.COM dating website. Upon information and belief NICKNIG is the CEO of NEW EDGE. D. MEONYOU.com.. MEONYOU.COM is a dating website operated by Defendant NEW EDGE MEDIA, INC. at http://www.meonyou.com. Defendants CORGIAT and NICKNIG work for NEW EDGE MEDIA on projects including but not necessarily limited to the programming and operation of the MEONYOU.COM dating website.. Upon information and belief, the Plaintiff believes that all of the Defendants are acting in concert with malice and fraudulent intent through the use of Plaintiff s copyrighted material and trade secrets received from CORGIAT, for the purpose of unfair competition with Plaintiff. /// ///

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 COUNT I COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT [Against Defendants New Edge Media Inc. A California Corporation, Individually And D/B/A Meonyou.Com; Stephen Corgiat; And Marissa L. Nicknig]. Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs -, inclusive as if fully set forth.. DENIRO is the sole proprietor of all rights, title, and interest in and to the copyright of the databases entitled Amateurmatch.com Database Reg. No. TX -- and Amateurmatch.com ONLINE CUPID Database Reg. No. TX - 0, registered with the United States Office of Copyright pursuant to U.S.C.A. (a. Attached hereto and incorporated herein respectively as Exhibit A and Exhibit B.. The databases discussed above contain material wholly original with DENIRO and are copyrightable subject matter under the laws of the United States. 0. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that Defendants CORGIAT; NICKNIG and NEW EDGE infringed DENIRO S copyright, in violation of the Copyright Act, U.S.C.A. et seq., by knowingly and willfully copying original elements of the databases, and by distributing and publishing those original elements, via profiles featured on the MEONYOU.COM website, without the consent or authorization of DENIRO.. As a result of the foregoing, DENIRO has been damaged in an amount not less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($0,000.00. /// ///

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 COUNT II BREACH OF CONTRACT [Against Defendant Stephen Corgiat]. Plaintiff incorporates and restates herein the allegations contained in paragraphs -.. On March, 00 Defendant CORGIAT S signed a Confidentiality Agreement between himself and DENIRO wherein he agreed that the sale or unauthorized use or disclosure of any of DENIRO S Confidential Information obtained by CORGIAT during the course of his employment constituted unfair competition. CORGIAT further agreed not to engage in any such activity, either during the course of his employment or at any time thereafter.. CORGIAT also agreed in the Confidentiality Agreement that following his resignation or termination of employment, he would not: (a engage in unfair competition with the Company; (b aid others, including any future employer, in any unfair competition with the Company; (c in any way breach the confidence that the Company placed in Employee during his or her employment with the Company; (d misappropriate or disclose any Confidential Information. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that in breach of this Confidentiality Agreement CORGIAT disclosed DENIRO S Confidential Information, including but not limited to DENIRO S website membership and profile lists, member databases containing member profiles and other information, and the programming code that operates the website, to NEW EDGE for use in operating its MEONYOU.COM dating website.. CORGIAT has breached the confidence that DENIRO placed in him during his employment and has misappropriated and disclosed DENIRO S Confidential Information. In doing so, and in using this information in direct competition with DENIRO S dating websites, CORGIAT is breaching his agreement

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 by engaging in unfair competition with DENIRO, and by aiding NEW EDGE in unfair competition with DENIRO.. CORGIAT also agreed in the Confidentiality Agreement that if he was to reveal or disclose, or threaten to reveal or disclose any such Confidential Information, that the Company would be entitled to an injunction restraining him from disclosing such information, or from rendering any services to any entity to whom such information has been or is threatened to be disclosed.. Further, CORGIAT specifically released DENIRO from any requirement of posting any bond in connection with temporary or interlocutory injunctive relief, to the extent permitted by law.. As a result of the foregoing breach, DENIRO has been damaged in an amount not less than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($00,000.00. COUNT III CALIFORNIA'S UNIFORM TRADE SECRETS ACT, CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE et seq. [Against Defendants New Edge Media Inc. A California Corporation, Individually And D/B/A Meonyou.Com; Stephen Corgiat; And Marissa L. Nicknig] 0. Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs -, inclusive as if fully set forth.. DENIRO S website membership and profile lists, member databases containing member profiles and other information, and the programming code that operates DENIRO S dating websites are valuable proprietary property and trade secrets that derive independent economic value from not being generally known to the public or to other persons who can obtain economic value from their disclosure or use.

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0. DENIRO has adopted reasonable measures as described herein to maintain the secrecy of the DENIRO S Trade Secrets and Confidential Information, including, but not limited to having employees read, agree, and sign Confidentiality Agreements.. Incident to STEPHEN CORGIAT S employment at DENIRO he had access to, and worked with DENIRO S website membership and profile lists, member databases containing member profiles and other information, and the programming code that operates DENIRO S dating websites.. On March, 00, Defendant CORGIAT S signed a Confidentiality Agreement between himself and DENIRO wherein he agreed not to sell or make any unauthorized use or disclosure of any of DENIRO S Confidential Information obtained by CORGIAT during the course of his employment. The Agreement provided that DENIRO S Confidential Information was all information, documents, data, and know-how relating to DENIRO, including but not limited to DENIRO S members, consumer payment information, designers, programmers, methods of processing, merchant accounts, aggregate processing accounts, finances, products, product plans, services, customers, clients, markets, developments, inventions, designs, drawings, engineering, software (including source and object code, hardware, hardware configuration, marketing, trade secrets, processes, business or affairs or confidential or proprietary information, which was disclosed by DENIRO.. Defendant CORGIAT knew or should have known when he copied and misappropriated DENIRO S website membership and profile lists, member databases containing member profiles and other information, and the programming code that operates DENIRO S dating websites, and when he shared this information with NEW EDGE that such was unauthorized use of DENIRO S proprietary Trade Secret information.

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that Defendants NICKNIG and NEW EDGE knew or should have known when they accepted, copied, used and integrated any website membership and profile lists, member databases, member profiles and other information, and any programming code that operates dating websites from CORGIAT that such information was, or DENIRO S Trade Secret or was created through the unauthorized use of DENIRO S proprietary Trade Secret information.. Defendant NICKNIG and NEW EDGE S acceptance, copying, use and integration of any website membership and profile lists, member databases, member profiles and other information, and any programming code that operates dating websites which was received from CORGIAT with full knowledge of its unlawful purpose and despite notice of its infringing nature, constitutes the willful misappropriation of DENIRO S Trade Secrets.. Defendant CORGIAT S copying, misappropriation, acceptance, use and integration of any website membership and profile lists, member databases, member profiles and other information, and any programming code that operates dating websites which was received from CORGIAT with full knowledge of its unlawful purpose and despite notice of its infringing nature, constitutes the willful misappropriation of DENIRO S Trade Secrets.. As a result of Defendants misappropriation of its trade secrets, DENIRO has suffered and continues to suffer irreparable injury, for which there is no adequate remedy at law. 0. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that Defendants misappropriation of DENIRO S trade secrets was carried out in a willful, wanton and reckless manner in disregard of the rights of DENIRO.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that unless enjoined by the Court, Defendants will continue their misappropriation of the

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 DENIRO trade secrets by continuing to post and link to the proprietary information on their websites, and continue to use DENIRO S programming code that operates dating websites. Unless enjoined Defendants will continue to gain unjust enrichment through their use of DENIRO S Trade Secrets and DENIRO will continue to suffer irreparable harm. COUNT IV UNFAIR COMPETITION, CALIFORNIA BUS. & PROF. CODE 00 et seq. [Against Defendants New Edge Inc. A California Corporation, Individually And D/B/A Meonyou.Com; Stephen Corgiat; And Marissa L. Nicknig] A. Undisclosed Use of Profiles That Contain Information, Text, And Pictures That Do Not Pertain To Any Actual Person.. Plaintiff incorporates and restates herein the allegations contained in paragraphs -.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that MEONYOU.COM S dating website features numerous members and their profiles that contain information, text, and pictures that do not pertain to any actual person. Rather, MEONYOU.COM S fictitious profiles work for the site in an effort to stimulate conversation with users, in order to encourage further and broader participation in all of the site's services, including the posting of additional information and/or pictures to the users' profiles. This additional participation generates additional income through more users memberships and online advertising.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that an operator, or a computer program representing itself as being one or more of the fictitious profiles may contact both free users and paid users via computer-generated Instant

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 Messages or E-mails for purposes of encouraging further or broader participation in MEONYOU s website services. These messages may be transmitted to multiple recipients at the same or similar time(s.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that in the event the user responds to a message from one of MEONYOU.COM S fictitious profiles, either via email or Instant Message, the user may receive one or more additional personal or form responses from the fictitious profiles. Nowhere in the terms and conditions of use, nor elsewhere apparent on MEONYOU.COM S website is there any disclaimer of the fact that these fictitious profiles are participating in the operation, discussion, and profit generating aspects of the MEONYOU.COM dating website.. Despite the objective of a dating website being to allow members to have a physical meeting, this will never take place between any of MEONYOU.COM S users and their fictitious profiles.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that MEONYOU.COM S undisclosed use of fictitious profiles participating in the operation, discussion, and profit generating aspects of the MEONYOU.COM dating website is an unfair and/or fraudulent business practice. This practice allows MEONYOU.COM to mislead dating site customers and provide them with bad experiences that will make it less likely to use any other dating site, including DENIRO S dating websites. Further, it allows MEONYOU.COM to pose as a membership dating site that does not use profiles that contain information, text, and pictures that do not pertain to any actual person.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that there is a class of dating websites that use profiles that contain information, text, and pictures that do not pertain to any actual person, and which disclose this fact in their terms and conditions of use. NEW EDGE S failure to disclose the use of these profiles to

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 customers and potential customers of MEONYOU.COM is unfair competition in violation of California Bus. & Prof. Code 00 et seq. with regard to DENIRO and other dating website operators who do so disclose.. As a result of the foregoing, DENIRO has been damaged in an amount not less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($0,000.00. B. Misappropriation of Trade Secrets. 0. Defendant CORGIAT S copying, misappropriation, use and integration of any website membership and profile lists, member databases, member profiles and other information, and any programming code that operates dating websites obtained from DENIRO with full knowledge of its unlawful purpose and despite notice of its infringing nature, constitutes the willful misappropriation of DENIRO S Trade Secrets.. Defendants NEW EDGE and NICKNIG acceptance, copying, use and integration of any website membership and profile lists, member databases, member profiles and other information, and any programming code that operates dating websites which was received from CORGIAT with full knowledge of its unlawful purpose and despite notice of its infringing nature, constitutes the willful misappropriation of DENIRO S Trade Secrets.. The Defendants use copying, misappropriation, acceptance, use and integration of any of DENIRO S website membership and profile lists, member databases, member profiles and other information, and any programming code that operates dating websites received from CORGIAT, and used in competition with DENIRO for customers and potential customers of dating websites is Unfair Competition in violation of California Bus. & Prof. Code 00 et seq.. The Defendants use copying, misappropriation, acceptance, use and integration of any of DENIRO S trade secrets in competition with DENIRO has

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 resulted in damage to DENIRO in an amount not less than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($00,000.00. COUNT V FALSE ADVERTISING CALIFORNIA BUS. & PROF. CODE 00 et seq. [Against Defendant New Edge Inc. A California Corporation, Individually And D/B/A Meonyou.Com]. Plaintiff incorporates and restates herein the allegations contained in paragraphs -.. MEONYOU.COM S undisclosed use of fictitious profiles participating in the operation, discussion, and profit generating aspects of the MEONYOU.COM dating website is false advertising. There is a class of dating websites that use profiles that contain information, text, and pictures that do not pertain to any actual person, and which disclose this fact in their terms and conditions of use. MEONYOU.COM S failure to disclose the use of these profiles to customers and potential customers is false advertising in violation of California Bus. & Prof. Code 00 et seq.. As a result of the foregoing, DENIRO has been damaged in an amount not less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($0,000.00. DEMAND FOR JUDGMENT AND REQUEST FOR RELIEF. WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands: ( For Count I, Copyright Infringement: (a That judgment be entered against Defendants NEW EDGE individually and D/B/A/ MEONYOU.COM; STEPHEN CORGIAT; and MARISSA L. NICKNIG in favor of Plaintiff for such damages as Plaintiff has

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 sustained in consequence of Defendants' infringement of Plaintiff s copyrights but in no case less than $0,000.00. (b That an order be entered compelling Defendants NEW EDGE individually and D/B/A/ MEONYOU.COM; STEPHEN CORGIAT; and MARISSA L. NICKNIG to account for all gains, profits and advantages derived by each Defendants by its infringement of Plaintiff's copyrights or such damages as to the court shall appear proper within the provisions of the copyright statutes. (c That an Order be entered pursuant to U.S.C.A. 0 awarding enhanced statutory damages for each infringement DENIRO S copyrighted works alleged herein. (d That an injunctive relief be granted preventing and restraining infringement of Plaintiff's copyright by Ordering Defendants NEW EDGE individually and D/B/A/ MEONYOU.COM; STEPHEN CORGIAT; and MARISSA L. NICKNIG not to use, publish, distribute, or in any way disseminate the copyrighted materials and trade secrets of Plaintiff. (e An Order pursuant to U.S.C.A. 0 for the impounding of all materials used in the violation of Plaintiff, copyright owner's exclusive rights. ( For Count II, Breach of Contract: (a That judgment be entered against Defendant STEPHEN CORGIAT in favor of Plaintiff for such damages as Plaintiff has sustained in consequence of Defendant CORGIAT S breach of contract but in no case less than $00,000.00. (b An injunction, without bond, enjoining CORGIAT from disclosing any further information, or from rendering any further services to NEW EDGE.

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 ( For Count III, Trade Secrets: (a That judgment be entered against Defendants NEW EDGE individually and D/B/A/ MEONYOU.COM; STEPHEN CORGIAT; and MARISSA L. NICKNIG in favor of Plaintiff for such damages as Plaintiff has sustained in consequence of their misappropriation, and use of Plaintiff s trade secrets, in no case less than $00,000.00. (b That judgment be entered for exemplary damages pursuant to California Civil Code..(c (; for damages for the actual loss caused by the misappropriation, and for the unjust enrichment caused to Defendants by misappropriation of trade secrets, pursuant to California Civil Code..(a., as well as for reasonable attorney's fees and costs pursuant to California Civil Code.. (c A temporary restraining order and preliminary and permanent injunctions, enjoining and restraining Defendants, their officers, directors, principals, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, successors and assigns, and all those acting in concert, combination or participation with any of them either directly or indirectly, singly or together, from making any further use or otherwise disclosing or distributing, on their web sites or elsewhere, or linking to other web sites which disclose, distribute, or link to any of Plaintiff s proprietary property or trade secrets and specifically enjoining Defendants, its officers, directors, principals, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, successors and assigns, and all those acting in concert, combination or participation with any of them either directly or indirectly, singly or together, from copying, duplicating, licensing, selling, distributing, publishing, leasing, renting or otherwise marketing Plaintiff s copyrighted material and trade secrets and all other products containing, using, and/or substantially derived from Plaintiff s proprietary property or trade secrets.

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 ( For Count IV, Unfair Competition: (a That judgment be entered against Defendants NEW EDGE individually and D/B/A/ MEONYOU.COM; STEPHEN CORGIAT; and MARISSA L. NICKNIG in favor of Plaintiff for such damages as Plaintiff has sustained in consequence of Defendant s Unfair Competition, in no case less than $0,000.00. (b An Order to be entered enjoining Defendants from continued use of DENIRO S Trade Secrets pursuant to California Business and Professions Code 0. (c An Order to be entered enjoining Defendants from continuing to operate MEONYOU.COM without disclosing the fact that the site uses profiles that contain information, text, and pictures that do not pertain to any actual person, and requiring MEONYOU.COM to disclose this fact, and the detailed role that their fictitious profiles play in the operation of their website, in their terms and conditions of use, pursuant to California Bus. & Prof. Code. ( For Count V, False Advertising: (a That judgment be entered against Defendant NEW EDGE individually and D/B/A/ MEONYOU.COM in favor of Plaintiff for such damages as Plaintiff has sustained in consequence of Defendant s False Advertising, in no case less than $0,000.00. (b An Order to be entered enjoining Defendants from continuing to operate MEONYOU.COM without disclosing the fact that the site uses profiles that contain information, text, and pictures that do not pertain to any actual person, and requiring MEONYOU.COM to disclose this fact, and the detailed role that their fictitious profiles play in the operation of their website, in their terms and conditions of use, pursuant to California Bus. & Prof. Code.

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 ( Other Relief: (a That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as is just including costs, and expenses as Plaintiff has incurred in regard to this lawsuit. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Plaintiff, DENIRO MARKETING, LLC. demands a jury trial on all issues so triable. DATED: April, 00 MEATH & PERIERA ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS GREGORY T. MEATH 0 By: Gregory T. Meath Attorneys for Plaintiff: DENIRO MARKETING, LLC.

Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page 0 of 0