Claim, Warrant, Impact

Similar documents
These are some of the simple truths as they relate to the militia; apply the "duh theory" often.

Issue Overview: Guns in America

Frequently Asked Jury Questions

Social Studies 7 Civics CH 4.2: OTHER BILL OF RIGHTS PROTECTIONS

Frequently Asked Jury Questions

English as a Second Language Podcast ESL Podcast Legal Problems

In an effort to combat the epidemic of gun violence in the United States,

ELEMENTS OF CRIMINAL LAW PART 2. November 7, Ms. Klinck

THE CONSTITUTION, JUDGES, AND THE VOTERS

AP EUROPEAN HISTORY 2011 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

EDITORIAL, DAILY RULES, CATEGORIES & ENTRY INSTRUCTIONS

SOUTHBOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT FIREARMS LICENSE APPLICATION

ON TORTURE, I: State Violence and Brutality, & Totalitarianism

Distributive Justice Rawls

McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010)

Present: Lacy, Hassell, Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, and Lemons, JJ., and Whiting, S.J.

ALLEGHENY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

GUIDE TO BEING AN EFFECTIVE CITIZEN LOBBYIST

Equal Justice And The Death Penalty: A Legal And Empirical Analysis By David C. Baldus READ ONLINE

FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES Edition AFGE. American Federation of Government Employees

Local 99 Health & Welfare Fund Legal Services Newsletter Rachel P. Roat, Esq.

American Government Get Out the Vote

AMERICANS EVALUATE IMMIGRATION REFORM PROPOSALS MARCH 2018 QUESTIONNAIRE

The Justice Department Discovers the Second Amendment

CIVIL HARASSMENT RENEWAL

Public Diplomacy and its role in the EU's external relations

10/11/2017. Chapter 6. The graph shows that average hourly earnings for employees (and selfemployed people) doubled since 1960

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

The Bill of Rights. Amendments #1-10 GET OUT FLASHCARDS!!

Good morning. I am Don Norris, Professor of Public Policy and Director of the

Printable Format for In Defense of "Sweatshops"

Political Science Final Exam -

INVISIBLE ENEMY: THE AFRICAN AMERICAN FREEDOM STRUGGLE AFTER 1965 BY GRETA DE JONG

Introduction and summary

Court of Appeals Supporting Documents Reading a Case

CHAPTER 1 THE POLITICAL LANDSCAPE. Chapter Goals and Learning Objectives

Center for American Progress Action Fund Survey of the Florida Puerto Rican Electorate

Battleground 2016: new game. June 30, 2016

Joint Committee on Criminal Justice. Richard C. Dieter

The Cook Political Report / LSU Manship School Midterm Election Poll

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, JURY TRIAL TRIAL - DAY 26 5 vs. Case No.

Lennard Lapoint Jenkins vs State of Florida

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NO. 29,570. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY Gary L. Clingman, District Judge

Hi I m Kimberly, Today you re going to find out why we wrote the constitution and how it

In my brief presentation I would like to touch upon some basic liberal principles and link

4. CROSS EXAMINATION 159

The Criminal Court System. Law 521 Chapter Seven

Turning Brain Drain into Brain Gain

Are Interest Groups Good or Bad for Democracy? What Kinds of Interest Groups Do Americans Join? Interest Groups in America (HA)

Middle-Childhood Lesson Plan By Whitney Whitehair

Agresti, J. D., Smith, R. K. (2010). Gun Control Facts. Retrieved from

MOCK TRIAL PROCEDURE

Unit 3 Section 1 Articles and Early Government.notebook. January 18, Vocabulary. Westward Ho! Need for State and National Government

JUDGES IN THE CLASSROOM LESSON PLANS

MODULE 8: REPORT WRITING

WHERE EVERYONE DESERVES A

Richmond General District Court, Criminal Division-Northside Protective Order Filing Information

U.S. ARMY TRIAL DEFENSE SERVICE DLIFLC & POM FIELD OFFICE ARTICLE 15 INFORMATION PAPER

GUN CONTROL 1. Gun Control: Genre Analysis of a You Tube video and an online article. Angel Reyes. University of Texas at El Paso

Spring Arbor University School of Education Lesson Plan Guide: Direct Instruction. Time Allotted: 47 minutes

Argumentative Writing

the ARTICLE (for teachers)

What were the final scores in your scenario for prosecution and defense? What side were you on? What primarily helped your win or lose?

Who s who in a Criminal Trial

Building Advocacy & Lobbying Capacity

Principles of American Democracy

PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS. CACI No. 100

Questions. Hobbes. Hobbes s view of human nature. Question. What justification is there for a state? Does the state have supreme authority?

Hobbes. Questions. What justification is there for a state? Does the state have supreme authority? What limits are there upon the state?

CRIMINAL DEFENSE LITIGATION HYPOTHETICAL ANSWER KEY. LABE M. RICHMAN, Esq.

U.S. Government and Politics

A Guide to Your First Mock Trial

Due Process Clause. Both 5th and 14 th Amendment provide that: no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law

Albert Lee Wright, Jr. Memorial Migrant Scholarship

NOMINATION AND ELECTION PROCEDURES BASED ON ROBERT S RULES OF ORDER AND SALTFLEET CONSTITUTION

AFT Frequency Questionnaire

EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION

Police Department Town of Duxbury Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Firearms Licensing Procedure & Application Instructions

Constitution Scavenger Hunt Use the Constitution in your text to complete this. Article I- Branch writ of habeas corpus Article II- Branch

AUGUST 2009 POLITICAL OPINION POLL REPORT

Guns in the Classroom 1

1. What kinds of warrants affect eligibility for welfare?

Revolution in Thought 1607 to 1763

>>> THE SECOND CASE IS GRIDINE V. THE STATE OF FLORIDA. YOU MAY PROCEED. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, I'M GAIL ANDERSON REPRESENTING MR.

Standard Eurobarometer 88. National report PUBLIC OPINION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION MALTA.

Twelve Angry Credits. Courses - December 31, 2015

We want to meet each other as equals, but something gets in the way

1 ST DACET-INTERSCHOOL DEBATE RULES MODIFIED OXFORD-OREGON FORMAT (for reference use only)

NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT NASSAU COUNTY

Questions for Candidates for State Legislative Office from the Conservative Coalition of Harris County

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level. Published

Wendy Cukier, Professor of Justice, Ryerson University; Co-founder and President Coalition for Gun Control; SAFER-Net

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Plaintiff,

Arguments by First Opposition Teams

Voices of Immigrant and Muslim Young People

Government of Canada Public Safety Initiatives

Chapter Six: Public Opinion and Political Socialization

The Contributions of Immigrants and Their Children to the American Workforce and Jobs of the Future

THEMATIC ESSAY REVIEW

bitqy The official cryptocurrency of bitqyck, Inc. per valorem coeptis Whitepaper v1.0 bitqy The official cryptocurrency of bitqyck, Inc.

Transcription:

Claim, Warrant, Impact

Building Strong Paragraphs For argumentative writing, three important terms to know are claim, warrant and impact. A claim is your position. For instance, your answer to the following question: Should American citizens be allowed to own firearms? Your claim might be: "No, I don't think Americans should own firearms" or "I support the right of American citizens to own firearms." A warrant is a reason or piece of evidence that supports your claim. For instance, your warrant might be "Americans should not be allowed to own firearms because each year, firearms cause thousands of deaths in America. Impact is something that good that will happen if people listen to you or something bad that will happen if they don't. For instance, your impact might be: "If Americans weren't allowed to have guns, there wouldn't be as many murders in the United States.

Claims Claims, as their name implies, a claim is a statement you are advancing as true. Even when you re not reading evidence, a claim is any declarative statement that you are trying to establish as true within the debate. So, if you are debating about immigration reform, and your strategy for the debate requires you to win that immigration reform is good because it improves the economy, your claim is simply immigration reform is good because it improves the economy.

Claims Here are some claims: Cigarette vending machines should be outlawed. Cytochrome is important in cell respiration. All students should be required to take computer science. Arthur killed Daphne in self-defense. Claims have two parts: the topic and what is asserted about the topic: TOPIC ASSERTION Cigarette vending machines > should be outlawed Arthur killed Daphne > in self-defense All students > should be required to take computer science

Warrant Warrants are what you use to create legitimacy for your claims. They are the reasons why the claim is true. You should dedicate a substantial amount of your time to debating about warrants. Warrants can be just about anything, as long as they re arguments that support the accuracy of the claim. The more specific the explanation is, the better off you will be.

Warrant For example, if you want to support the claim that immigration reform is good for the economy, you could say: Immigrants provide a necessary labor force to produce needed goods Immigrants pay taxes, resulting in more net revenue for the government Immigrants open businesses and make investments, increasing jobs Immigrants compensate for Baby Boomers leaving the workforce and keep entitlement programs solvent or plenty of other reasons Warrants are almost always better if they are supported by a piece of evidence.

Impact Impacts are why someone should care about your argument. In other words, why is this point important? For example, in this hypothetical argument about immigration reform, you would say: immigration reform is good because it improves the economy, articulate one or more reasons why you believe this is true, and then explain why having a strong, growing economy is important. You might then explain economic liberty is fundamental to respect for human rights. Or, you might simply want to explain that economic growth prevents poverty and improves quality of life. Exactly why economic growth is important is up to you, but make sure you have a reason. That s your impact for the claim, immigration reform is good

Putting it Together Each of these three steps (CLAIM, WARRANT, IMPACT) should be included in every paragraph you make in an argument. Remember, nothing should go into your essay without you considering and articulating WHAT you are claiming, HOW we know it is true, and WHY the reader should care. This will make sure your arguments are always fully-developed, your judge understands them, and they earn you maximum clout in the debate around your chosen topic.