Final Revision, 11/7/16

Similar documents
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW B LAW 5501, Section 0622 (4 credits) Professor Berta E. Hernández-Truyol. Fall 2017 SYLLABUS

1 1/16/ The Founding Foundational Documents The Constitution 96 96

THE 14 TH AMENDMENT and SUING LOCAL GOVERNMENT Course Policies and Syllabus MWF 9:00-9:50 Professor Sanders SYLLABUS

Assigned reading has been posted on Blackboard as.pdf files under Course Materials. There is no assigned textbook.

Assigned reading has been posted on Blackboard as.pdf files under Course Materials. There is no assigned textbook.

Constitution Law II Spring 2019

POS 471 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I Tuesday 6:40-9:30 SS 229

1. Geoffrey R. Stone, Louis M. Seidman, Cass R. Sunstein and Mark V. Tushnet, Constitutional Law, 4 th ed. (Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers, 2001).

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Syllabus Spring 2019 Professor D. Theodore Rave

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I LAW 650 SECTION 339 SPRING 2015 PROF. PETERS. Syllabus (version 1 dated 12/01/14)

Class Hours: Monday & Wednesday, 4:30 5:50 (Tureaud Hall, rm. 215) Office Hours: Monday & Wednesday, 6:00 7:00 (Stubbs, rm. 330), and by appointment

Constitutional Law I Fall 2015

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Syllabus Spring 2017 Section A Professor Renee Knake

TUFTS UNIVERSITY. U R B A N & E N V I R O M E N T A L POLICY AND P L A N N I N G L e g a l F r a m e w o r k s of S o c i a l P o l i c y

Professor Ken Vandevelde Fall 2017 SYLLABUS. Description of the Course

PHIL 165: FREEDOM, EQUALITY, AND THE LAW Winter 2018

SCOTUS Comparison Cases

Chief Justice, info Case Name and Year Holding Winners Losers Shorthand /Notes. -Strict Construction Power to tax is the (1819)

POL 743: Constitutional Law I. Dr. Carrington Office Hours: M-W 2:00pm-3:00pm

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Professor Emily Berman. Course Description

Government 357(M) THE STRUCTURE OF INDIVIDUAL LIBERTIES

A.P. US Government & Politics Summer Assignment THIS IS A TWO PART ASSIGNMENT! BE SURE TO READ THROUGH THIS ENTIRE DOCUMENT!!!

Northern Illinois University Zulauf 403. DU 459 Office Hrs: Tues 2-5 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I

CONTENTS PART ONE FOUNDATIONS 1. CHAPTER 1 Studying Constitutional Law 3

Lochner & Substantive Due Process

TUFTS UNIVERSITY. U R B A N & E N V I R O M E N T A L POLICY AND P L A N N I N G L e g a l F r a m e w o r k s of S o c i a l P o l i c y UEP-0215

TUFTS UNIVERSITY. U R B A N & E N V I R O M E N T A L POLICY AND P L A N N I N G L e g a l F r a m e w o r k s of S o c i a l P o l i c y UEP-0215

Civil Liberties Group Presentations Questions

Established judicial review; "midnight judges;" John Marshall; power of the Supreme Court

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I LAW 650 SECTION 339 SPRING 2017 PROF. PETERS. SYLLABUS (version 1 dated 12/01/16)

Office: Classroom Building 347 Tues. 10:30-12:30, POLI 110: Governmental Power and the Constitution Spring 2011

PSC : Civil Liberties Spring 2013 Tuesday and Thursday, 2-3:15 pm Graham 307

Federalism (States v. National Gov t & Regulation)

THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION AND CIVIL LIBERTIES

Spring 2012, University of Colorado Law School Professor Scott Moss: Office 451; ;

Professor Patricia A. Broussard FAMU College of Law Constitutional Law II Fall **** 2016

TOPIC CASE SIGNIFICANCE

RESEARCHING GONSTITUTIONAL LAW

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW R. Miller Fall 2004

Introductory Terms/Concepts, Text of the EPC, Early Cases: Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886) Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Equality And The Constitution

Pol Sci 3325 Topics in Politics: Constitutional Politics in the United States

POLITICAL SCIENCE Constitutional Rights and Liberties. Professor Judith Baer TR 11:55 AM 1:10 PM Allen 1015

This is a graduate level course; as such, be sure that you have met the perquisites for enrollment.

Courts and Civil Liberties Pol Sci 344

CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES. A. Introduction

LESSON 12 CIVIL RIGHTS ( , )

AP Government and Politics Summer Assignment Students have a FOUR part summer assignment ALL PARTS ARE DUE ON THE FIRST DAY OF SCHOOL

Civil Liberties Instructor Time Room Office Phone Office Hours Introduction

1 pt. 2pt. 3 pt. 4pt. 5 pt

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY E E D TD V I K I N G

THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION AND CIVIL LIBERTIES

Office: Social Sciences & Management 304B Tues. & Thurs. 1-2, POLI 110: Governmental Power and the Constitution Spring 2014

Great Cases: American Legal History Center for Talented Youth

AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM I GVPT 431. Course Content. Course Requirements

Read the book Reclaiming Hope: Lessons Learned in the Obama White House about the Future of Faith in America by Michael Wear.

POS 335 The American Supreme Court. Syllabus Spring 2013

How did each of the below amendments attempt to increase political equality? What did each one prohibit or demand? Equality Equality of opportunity

TOPIC CASE SIGNIFICANCE

TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. The Supreme Court s Authority and Role Chapter 2. Federalism: History and Principles

Constitutional Law I. Prof. Fletcher. Mondays, 2:00 3:40 PM. Room 472. Syllabus v Mondays, 4PM to 5PM By appointment

Constitutional Law: The Separation of Powers and Governmental Institutions Political Science 353 Fall 2009

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW II LAW SPRING 2018 MARTIN LEVY

Constitutional Theory. Professor Fleming. Spring Syllabus. Materials for Course

AP United States Government. Summer Assignment 2016

Two Thoughts About Obergefell v. Hodges

ConLaw I: Structure of Government LAW 121 (002) Prof. Greve Fall Welcome

Constitutional Theory. Professor Fleming. Spring Syllabus. Materials for Course

Eric J. Williams, PhD. Dept. Chair of CCJS, SSU

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I GOVT SYLLABUS (REVISED) Georgetown University Summer Tuesdays & Thursdays, 12:45-2:00 PM, by appointment

American Constitutional Development:

There is no textbook for this course. All assigned reading materials can be found online on Westlaw, LEXIS, SSRN, or other electronic databases.

CRS Report for Congress

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY MOORHEAD POL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I: POWERS and INSTITUTIONS FALL SEMESTER 2015

Unit 3: Civil Liberties, Civil Rights

AP GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS THE JUDICIARY. Learning Guide Study Guide Topic Notes

AP Government Ch. 4 Civil Liberties & Ch. 5 Civil Rights Study Guide Name Date Period

Government Chapter 5 Study Guide

Advanced Placement American Government and Politics REQUIRED SUMMER ASSIGNMENTS,

AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND DEVELOPMENT POSC 4241 MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY, FALL 2013

Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Edwards only (nothing from Ellis debate reader, and chapter 6 of Edwards will be on the next exam).

THE POLITICS OF CIVIL RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES POSC 4251 MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY, SPRING 2013

AP GOVERNMENT SUMMER ASSIGNMENT

Heightened Scrutiny And Gender

1. The party favored a strong national government.

Legal Reference Guide for Librarians. Handout for Legal Ease Workshop DO S & DON TS FOR LEGAL REFERENCE

Significant Supreme Court Cases. Around the World Style

Name: Pd: Regarding Unit 6 material, from College Board:

Commerce Clause Doctrine

APGOPO Unit 5 Study Guide A3

AP US GOVERNMENT & POLITICS UNIT 6 REVIEW

SPRING 2012 May 4, 2012 FINAL EXAM DO NOT GO BEYOND THIS PAGE UNTIL THE EXAM BEGINS. MAKE SURE YOUR EXAM # is included at the top of this page.

AP Government and Politics Summer Assignment 2018 J. Cunning

Not So Sweeping After All: The Limits of the Necessary and Proper Clause

Name: Pd: Regarding Unit 6 material, from College Board:

Constitutional Law. Spring Nelson Tebbe Office (o) (m)

AP UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT & POLITICS SUPREME COURT REVIEW

AP Civics Chapter 3 Notes Federalism: Forging a Nation

Important Court Cases Marbury v. Madison established power of Supreme Court to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional

POL 744: Constitutional Law II Civil Rights. Dr. Carrington Office Hours: M-W 10:00am-11:30am. Assignments

Transcription:

Final Revision, 11/7/16 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW FALL, 2016 PROFESSOR WOLF Page number xv The Constitution of the United States CHAPTER 1 THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL POWER A. The Authority for Judicial Review 1 Marbury v. Madison 2 Notes on Marbury v. Madison 8 Authority for Judicial Review of State Judgments 10 MARTIN v. HUNTER S LESSEE 10 COHENS v. VIRGINIA 10 B. Limits on the Federal Judicial Power 11 1. Interpretive Limits 11 How Should the Constitution Be Interpreted? The Second Amendment as an Example 13 District of Columbia v. Heller 13 2. Justiciability Limits 33 a. Standing 33 Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency 34 Hollingsworth v. Perry 40 United States v. Windsor 45 b. The Political Question Doctrine 53 i. The Political Question Doctrine Defined 53 What Is A Political Question? The Issues of Malapportionment and Partisan Gerrymandering 54 Baker v. Carr 55 ii. The Political Question Applied: Congressional Self-Governance 57 Powell v. McCormack 57 iii. The Political Question Doctrine Applied: Foreign Policy 59 CHAPTER 2 THE FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE POWER A. Introduction: Congress and the States 61 The Framework for Analysis: Mcculloch v. Maryland 62 McCulloch v. Maryland 63 B. The Necessary and Proper Clause 72 United States v. Comstock 72 C. The Commerce Power 78 1. The Initial Era: Gibbons v. Ogden Defines the Commerce Power 79 Gibbons v. Ogden 79 2. The 1890s-1937: A Limited Federal Commerce Power 82

a. What Is Commerce? 84 b. What Does Among the States Mean? 85 c. Does State Sovereignty Limit Congressional Power? 87 3. 1937-1990s: Broad Federal Commerce Power 89 Key Decisions Changing the Commerce Clause Doctrine 90 NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. 90 United States v. Darby 93 Wickard v. Filburn 96 The Meaning of Commerce Among the States 98 Civil Rights Laws 98 Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States 98 Katzenbach v. McClung 101 Regulatory Laws 101 HODEL v. INDIANA 102 Criminal Laws 103 PEREZ v. UNITED STATES 103 The Tenth Amendment Between 1937 and the 1990s 104 Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority 106 4. 1990s-???: Narrowing of the Commerce Power and Revival of the Tenth Amendment as a Constraint on Congress 110 a. What Is Congress s Authority to Regulate Commerce Among the States? 111 United States v. Lopez 111 United States v. Morrison 122 Gonzales v. Raich 130 b. Does the Tenth Amendment Limit Congress s Authority? 140 Printz v. United States 140 Reno v. Condon 148 D. The Taxing and Spending Power 150 Conditions on Grants to State Governments 151 South Dakota v. Dole 151 What Role Should Concern Over Protecting States Have in Defining Congress s Powers? 153 National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius 157 E. Congress s Powers Under the Post-Civil War Amendments 179 1. Whom May Congress Regulate Under the Post-Civil War Amendments? 179 United States v. Morrison 181 2. What Is the Scope of Congress s Power? 184 Katzenbach v. Morgan 184 City of Boerne v. Flores 189 CHAPTER 5 THE STRUCTURE OF THE CONSTITUTION'S PROTECTION OF CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES A. Introduction 297

B. The Application of the Bill of Rights to the States 298 1. The Rejection of Application Before the Civil War 298 Barron v. Mayor City Council of Baltimore 299 2. A False Start in Applying the Bill of Rights to the States: The Privileges or Immunities Clause and the Slaughter-House Cases 300 The Slaughter-House Cases 302 Saenz v. Roe 308 3. The Incorporation of the Bill of Rights into the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment 310 The Debate Over Incorporation 312 ADAMSON v. CALIFORNIA 313 The Current Law as to What's Incorporated 316 Duncan v. Louisiana 316 McDonald v. City of Chicago 319 The Content of Incorporated Rights 326 C. The Application of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution to Private Conduct 328 1. The Requirement for State Action 328 The Civil Rights Cases 328 2. Exceptions to the State Action Doctrine 331 a. The Public Functions Exception 333 Marsh v. Alabama 333 Terry v. Adams 335 Evans v. Newton 336 b. The Entanglement Exception 338 Judicial and Law Enforcement Actions 339 Shelley v. Kraemer 339 Government Regulation 342 Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority 342 Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis 344 Entwinement 356 Brentwood Academy v. Tenn. Secondary School Athletic Ass'n. 356 CHAPTER 6 ECONOMIC LIBERTIES A. Introduction 363 Historical Overview 363 Organization of the Chapter 365 B. Economic Substantive Due Process 365 1. Introduction 365 2. The Early History of Economic Substantive Due Process 366 3. Substantive Due Process of the Lochner Era 368 Allgeyer v. Louisiana 369 Lochner v. New York 370 Laws Protecting Unionizing 376 Maximum Hours Laws 377 Muller v. Oregon 377

Minimum Wage Laws 379 Adkins v. Children s Hospital 379 Consumer Protection Legislation 381 Nebbia v. New York 381 4. Economic Substantive Due Process Since 1937 383 Pressures for Change 383 The End of Lochnerism 384 West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish 384 United States v. Carolene Products Co. 386 Economic Substantive Due Process Since 1937 388 Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. 388 CHAPTER 7 EQUAL PROTECTION A. Introduction 417 1. Constitutional Provisions Concerning Equal Protection 417 2. A Framework for Equal Protection Analysis 418 Question 1: What is the Classification? 418 Question 2: What is the Appropriate Level of Scrutiny? 419 Question 3: Does the Government Action Meet the Level of Scrutiny? 421 The Protection of Fundamental Rights Under Equal Protection 422 B. The Rational Basis Test 423 1. Introduction 423 2. Does the Law Have a Legitimate Purpose? 425 What Constitutes a Legitimate Purpose? 425 Romer v. Evans 425 Must it be the Actual Purpose, or Is a Conceivable Purpose Enough? 430 Cases in which Laws Are Deemed Arbitrary and Unreasonable 432 U.S. Department of Agriculture v. Moreno 432 City of Cleburne, Texas v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc. 435 C. Classifications Based on Race and National Origin 438 1. Race Discrimination and Slavery Before the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments 439 Dred Scott v. Sandford 440 Dred Scott v. Sandford 441 The Post-Civil War Amendments 444 2. Strict Scrutiny for Discrimination Based on Race and National Origin 444 3. Proving the Existence of a Race or National Origin Classification 446 a. Race and National Origin Classifications on the Face of the Law 446 Race-Specific Classifications that Disadvantage Racial Minorities 446 Korematsu v. United States 447 Racial Classifications Burdening Both Whites and Minorities 452 Loving v. Virginia 452 Laws Requiring Separation of the Races 455 Plessy v. Ferguson 456 Plessy v. Ferguson 456

The Initial Attack on Separate But Equal 459 Brown v. Board of Education 460 Brown v. Board of Education 461 b. Facially Neutral Laws with a Discriminatory Impact or with Discriminatory Administration 464 The Requirement for Proof of a Discriminatory Purpose 464 Washington v. Davis 464 5. Racial Classifications Benefiting Minorities 486 The Emergence of Strict Scrutiny as the Test 488 The Arguments for and Against Strict Scrutiny 498 The Use of Race to Benefit Minorities in College and University Admissions 499 Gratz v. Bollinger 507 Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2013) 513 D. Gender Classifications 519 1. The Level of Scrutiny 519 Early Cases Approving Gender Discrimination 520 The Emergence of Intermediate Scrutiny 522 Craig v. Boren 525 United States v. Virginia 528 CHAPTER 8 FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS UNDER DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION A. Introduction 575 The Concept of Fundamental Rights 575 The Ninth Amendment 577 Procedural Due Process 577 B. Framework for Analyzing Fundamental Rights 578 First Issue: Is There a Fundamental Right? 578 Second Issue: Is the Constitutional Right Infringed? 579 Third Issue: Is There a Sufficient Justification for the Government's Infringement Of a Right? 580 Fourth Issue: Is the Means Sufficiently Related to the Purpose? 580 C. Constitutional Protection for Family Autonomy 581 1. The Right to Marry 581 LOVING v. Virginia 581 Obergefell v. Hodges 588 D. Constitutional Protection for Reproductive Autonomy 607 2. The Right to Purchase and Use Contraceptives 610 Griswold v. Connecticut 610 3. The Right to Abortion 619 a. The Recognition and Reaffirmation of the Right to Abortion 619 Roe v. Wade 619 Planned Parenthood v. Casey 628 Planned Parenthood v. Casey (majority opinion only) 628 b. Spousal Consent and Notice Requirements 639

Planned Parenthood v. Casey (majority opinion only) 641 Syllabus for Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016) Syllabus for Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt LexisNexis Web Course LexisNexis Web Course