THAILAND SYSTEMATIC COUNTRY DIAGNOSTIC Public Engagement March 2016
Contents 1. Objectives of the Engagement 2. Systematic Country Diagnostic (SCD) 3. Country Context 4. Growth Story 5. Poverty Story 6. Looking ahead: Risks to inclusive and sustainable growth? 7. Tentative priorities for creating more inclusive and sustainable growth
Objectives of the Engagement
Objectives of the Engagement Identify key development opportunities, constraints and challenges for Thailand Identify priorities for poverty reduction, inclusive growth and widely shared prosperity Definitions: Inclusive growth: Emphasis on growth of income/consumption of the poorest 40 % of the population.
Systematic Country Diagnostic
Systematic Country Diagnostic The SCD is a diagnostic study, based on empirical evidence, to identify opportunities and constraints to inclusive growth in Thailand.
Questions What will it take to put Thailand on the path of inclusive and sustainable growth? How to revive economic growth? Why have exports, investment and private consumption stagnated? What will it take to increase investments and revive consumption? How to make growth more inclusive? How to boost agricultural productivity? How to strengthen social safety nets and protection? How to create more opportunities for the bottom 40% of the population? What are the opportunities for greener growth (improving energy efficiency and shifting away from coal)?
Country Context
1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 Agriclutral value added as % of total value added Agricultural employment as % of total employment Country Context Thailand has an unusually large share of workers in agriculture (second highest share amongst middle income countries, after Albania) 50 40 30 20 10 0 Share of value added Share of employment 100 80 77 60 40 40 20 0 Thailand Malaysia Turkey Thailand Malaysia Turkey Source: World Development Indicators database
Growth: Stellar past performance but slowdown recently
Slower GDP growth across the board Average annual growth rates in GDP and its components (excluding crisis periods, 97-00 and 2008-10) By sector By expenditure Consumption GDP Agri Indu. Services Private Govern. Invest 1/ Exports Imports 1986-96 9.4 3.9 11.9 9.1 8.5 14.8 15.0 15.0 18.3 2000-07 5.4 2.8 6.3 5.1 5.4 7.7 7.2 8.1 8.7 2010-13 3.9 3.3 1.4 5.5 3.9 5.5 6.3 5.6 6.5 2013-14 0.9 0.7-0.3 1.7 0.6 2.1-2.4 0.2-5.3 Source: Asia Productivity Database and NESDB 1/ Gross fixed capital formation
Percent of GDP Investment never fully recovered after the Asian crisis 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 Percent of GDP 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Investment Domestic savings Public Private GFCF (share of GDP) Source: World Development Indicators and NESDB
Plenty of room to improve productivity Singapore Hong Kong ROC Australia Japan Republic of Korea Turkey Malaysia Thailand Indonesia ASEAN-5 China Philippines India Lao PDR Vietnam Myanmar Cambodia Labor productivity is 2x higher in neighboring Malaysia 8 8 5 8 22 25 19 20 16 13 51 50 62 71 91 87 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 GDP per worker (Thousands of US dollars in PPP terms (as of 2013)) 100 122 Source: Asia Productivity Database
Ratio of labor productivity in agriculture to labor productivity in industry and services Large productivity gaps across sectors 7 6 6.5 Industrial workers in Thailand are 6.5 more productive than farmers 5 4 3 2 1 0 Thailand Philippines China Indonesia Vietnam India Turkey Malaysia Industry Services Source: Asia Productivity Database
Thailand s competitive edge has been eroded from 2006/07 2006/07 Thailand Structural peers Upple middle income ASEAN Business sophistication Market size Innovation Institutions 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Infrastructure Macroeconomic environment Health and primary education Technological readiness Higher education and training Financial market development Labor market efficiency Goods market efficiency Source: World Economic Forum s Global Competitiveness database Structural peers selected for this study: Bulgaria, China, Colombia, Malaysia and Mexico
to 2015/16 2015-16 Thailand Structural peers Upple middle income ASEAN Business sophistication Market size Innovation Institutions 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Infrastructure Macroeconomic environment Health and primary education Technological readiness Higher education and training Financial market development Labor market efficiency Goods market efficiency Source: World Economic Forum s Global Competitiveness database Structural peers selected for this study: Bulgaria, China, Colombia, Malaysia and Mexico
Governance indicators have worsened in Thailand while they improved elsewhere 1996 2014 Thailand Upper middle income Thailand Upper middle income ASEAN-5, excl. Thailand Structural peers ASEAN-5, excl. Thailand Structural peers Voice and Accountability: Rule of Law: Control of Corruption: 80 60 40 20 0 Government Effectiveness: Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrori sm: Voice and Accountability: Rule of Law: Control of Corruption: 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Government Effectiveness: Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terroris m: Regulatory Quality: Regulatory Quality: Source: World Bank Governance Indicators
Bureaucratic quality is perceived to have declined in Thailand while it improved elsewhere 0-4 (4= high quality) 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Bureaucratic Quality Score (0-4) The BQ score measures: the strength and expertise to govern without drastic changes in policy or interruptions, autonomy from political pressure, presence of an established mechanism for recruitment and training. 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010-15 Source: Political Risk Services, International Country Risk Guide (ICRG).
Inclusion and Poverty: impressive progress; challenges remain
By all measures of poverty, Thailand has made impressive progress in poverty reduction Percentage of households (%) GDP per capita - (Thousands, 2005 constant USD) 90 4 80 70 3 60 50 2 40 30 20 1 10 - - National Poverty Estimate Food Poverty Estimate $1.9 Poverty Estimate (2011 PPP) Vulnerability Poverty Estimate GDP per capita (constant 2005 US$) Source: Socio-Economic Surveys, National Statistical Office
Thailand remains relatively unequal by international comparison Gini coefficient 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 South Africa Brazil Thailand 1996 Malaysia Philippines Source: World Development Indicators Thailand 2010 60-69 50-59 40-49 30-39 20-29 Thailand 2013 Indonesia China Lao PDR Vietnam India Japan Cambodia Afghanistan Denmark Sweden
The Northeast and South lag in multiple dimensions Participation Transport and communication 1 Health 0.8 Education 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Employment Family and community life Income Household and living conditions Bangkok Metropolis Northeast Southern Region Source: Thailand Human Development Report, UNDP 2014
Gender equality: much progress; challenges remain Full equality in education and health outcomes Thailand has exceptionally few women in politics Female labor force participation (at 71%) is relatively low Rising gender based violence (9,500 reported cases in 2007; 13,000 in 2012) Source: Global Gender Gap Report 2015
Enrollment rates have risen (especially during the 1990s) but many students are not learning 47% of 15 year olds attending village schools are functionally illiterate : they struggle to understand what they read. Functionally illiteracy by type of school Large cities 16% Small towns 31% Village students 47% Source: Results from OECD s Programme for International Student Assessment
Jobs were the key to reducing poverty in 1988-96. Farm incomes were the key in 2000-13. 1988-1996 What factors explains the decline in poverty? 2000-2013 Others, - 3% In-kind, - 10% Share of working age, -8% Govt Transfers, - 2% Private Transfers (remittances), -12% Non-Farm, -15% Share of employed, - 0.3% Farm, -9% Labor income, - 42% Share of working age, Others, -3% -12% In-kind, -3% Private Transfers (remittance Govt Transfers, - 9% Non-Farm, - 6% Share of employed, - 5% Labor income, - 11% Farm income, - 46% Source: World Bank calculations based on Socio-Economic Surveys (from NSO)
2002=1 How did farm incomes rise and reduce poverty? Answer: booming agricultural prices since 2001 1.7 1.6 1.5 World Agricultural Commodity Price Index, constant 2005 USD converted into index, with 2002=1) 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
How did labor income reduce poverty? Answer: millions of better paid jobs were created Thousands 1987 1996 2000 2013 Change, thousands 1987-96 1996-00 2000-13 Employment 24,937 30,361 30,628 37,419 5,424 267 6,791 Agriculture 14,958 13,676 13,490 14,609-1,282-186 1,119 Industry 3,275 7,045 6,228 8,001 3,770-817 1,773 Services 6,704 9,639 10,909 14,808 2,935 1,270 3,899 Industry and Services Population age 15-65 9,979 16,684 17,138 22,809 6,705 453 5,672 31,877 39,349 41,670 47,803 7,473 2,320 6,133 Source: Labor Force Surveys (from NSO)
Looking ahead: Risks to inclusive and sustainable growth?
Political instability and social tensions Political instability and social tensions creates uncertainties that can deter investors How do Thai people perceive equity? Are the benefits of growth shared equitably? Do people have equal opportunities? What will happen to poverty, shared prosperity (and social tensions) if agricultural prices continue to fall? Photo: Rufus Cox/Getty Images
Aging will bring new challenges, both on growth side but also in terms of its inclusiveness 1000s Population by age group 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 1970 1985 2000 2015 2030 2045 Working age (15-64) Young (0-14) Old (65+) Total population Source: United Nations Population Projection (2015 Revision). 11 million more old people. How to care for them? 11 million fewer people in working age population
Percent of population Example of challenges related to aging 16 14 Higher poverty rates for households headed by older people 14.5 14 million farmers in 1987 Average age: 35 years old (Industry: 33 years old) 12 10 8 National average 10.2 14 million farmers in 2015 Average age: 43 years old (Industry: 38 years old) 6 7.0 4 2 3.2 0 15-30 31-49 50-64 65+
Can Thailand find a way to re-start structural transformation for faster productivity growth? annual labor productivity growth (%) Central and South East Europe Latin America and the Caribbean Middle East and Africa Sub-Saharan Africa South Asia Source: World Development Report 2013 (Jobs), Thailand Labor Force Surveys East Asia and the Pacific China Vietnam Mongolia Indonesia Thailand, 1987-1996 Hong Kong SAR, China Taiwan, China Korea, Rep. Singapore Malaysia Philippines Thailand, 2003-2013 8 What drove labor productivity (1999-2008, except Thailand 1986-1996 and 2003-2013) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0-1 Labor productivity growth coming from "cross sector reallocations" Labor productivity growth coming from "within sector" changes
Attracting FDI and gaining export market shares may become more challenging in the future Attracting FDI and being a hub for manufacturing exports in Asia was much easier in the 1980s and early 1990s compared to today Thailand will likely face headwinds due to a much more competitive regional and global economic environment in the future. Neighboring countries are pushing ahead with far-reaching and deep reforms to improve their competitiveness: e.g., Malaysia s New Economic Model, Vietnam s investments in a better skilled workforce
The environmental situation will increasingly present challenges to inclusive growth Percent on GNI The poorer regions are more affected by droughts Poverty incidence (%) 2013 number Population affected By drought (persons), 2011 (% ) Kingdom 11 16,560,561 26 Bangkok 1 0 0 Central 5 2,041,717 13 North 17 3,642,235 31 Northeast 17 10,715,171 50 South 11 161,438 2 Source: Thailand Human Development Report, UNDP 2014 Thailand s natural resources are being depleted (total natural resource depletion, % of GNI) 5 0 Carbon dioxide damage Mineral depletion Energy depletion Net forest depletion (Photo by Chanat Katanyu, printed in Bangkok Post March 3, 2016)
Systematic Country Diagnostic
What will it take to create more inclusive and sustainable growth? A. Creating more and better jobs B. Providing more targeted support for the bottom 40 percent C. Making growth greener and sustainable Boost investments in infrastructure Increase competition through free trade agreements and deregulation Improve the business and institutional environment Improve the overall education and skills of the workforce Expand smart social protection, especially for elderly and informal workers Boost agricultural productivity Narrow learning gap between socio-economic groups Preserve Thailand's natural resources Manage the impacts of large-scale public investments D. Enhancing governance, accountability, and transparency
Several positive recent signs Thailand first ever inheritance tax law became effective on Feb 1, 2016 Introduction of targeted child grant for newborns in 2015. Major push to bring more SMEs into formal economy (providing them with incentives to move towards a single financial account) [SMEs have to register by March 15 to be eligible for tax break]. Government transferred responsibility of supervision and regulation of State Financial Institutions to Bank of Thailand. Establishment of the Supervision Board for State Enterprises. Board of Investment regime revised: focus on innovative industries with high research and development content.
Thank you! A summary of recommendations and participant list from this meeting will be sent to you and posted on the WBG Website. Suggestions or comments should be sent to: thailand@worldbank.org or to www.facebook.com/worldbankthailand There is an online survey available on the World Bank Thailand website: www.worldbank.org/thailand