Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 180 Filed 03/03/2009 Page 1 of 5

Similar documents
Case 3:17-cv WHA Document 193 Filed 03/28/18 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv JFK Document 62 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc. Doc. 52

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No

Case4:11-cv YGR Document22 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 5

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:11-cv SBA Document 93 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiffs,

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:15-cv JST Document 90 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv WHA Document 67 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 9

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT AIR FRANCE-KLM WITHOUT PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. 4141(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 134 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 31

Case 3:18-cv RS Document 30 Filed 06/18/18 Page 1 of 6

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

Case3:10-cv WHA Document1210 Filed06/20/12 Page1 of 6

Supreme Court of the United States

Case 8:15-cv DOC-KES Document 184 Filed 04/03/19 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:4371

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:13-cv SV Document13 FUec101/22/14 Pagel of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

Case4:12-cv JSW Document34 Filed09/19/14 Page1 of 11

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case3:09-cv RS Document78 Filed05/03/11 Page1 of 7

STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES CASE NO: 2: RGK-E

Case3:14-cv RS Document66 Filed09/01/15 Page1 of 9

Case 3:17-cv WHA Document 170 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 9

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Northern District Court Case No. 3:11-cv County of Marin v. Deloitte Consulting LLP et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

Case 1:12-cv GBL-JFA Document 17 Filed 09/10/12 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 185

Case 1:10-cv EGS Document 44 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION, LOS ANGELES

Case 5:14-cv BLF Document 798 Filed 09/26/18 Page 1 of 7

Case: Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 07/25/ , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Case 5:14-cv BLF Document 795 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:06-cv AB-JC Document 797 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:25126

Case 2:12-cv SVW-PLA Document 21 Filed 05/24/12 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:204

Case 8:14-cv DOC-AN Document 85 Filed 09/11/14 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:2663

Case3:12-cv VC Document77 Filed06/25/15 Page1 of 5

Case4:09-cv CW Document42 FUedi 0/07/09 Pagel of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case3:12-cv VC Document70 Filed06/23/15 Page1 of 3

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ORACLE USA, INC., et al.,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

Attorneys for Defendants TerraForm Global, Inc. and Peter Blackmore UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:18-cv PSG-FFM Document 24 Filed 10/11/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:219. Deadline

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETT S CLASS ACTION JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 3:16-md VC Document 2391 Filed 12/31/18 Page 1 of 5

Case3:13-cv SC Document99 Filed06/05/15 Page2 of 7 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Arville Winans and Wilma Fritz in this action entitled Arville 2 Winans

U.S. District Court California Northern District (Oakland) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:10-cv CW

Case 4:08-cv JSW Document 767 Filed 02/23/16 Page 1 of 7

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:08-cv PAC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv VC Document 171 Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 9

Case4:07-cv PJH Document1062 Filed04/20/11 Page1 of 5

U.S. District Court California Northern District (Oakland) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:12-cv SBA

Case3:13-cv MMC Document95 Filed09/17/14 Page1 of 7

Case5:08-cv PSG Document519 Filed08/22/13 Page1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case4:07-cv PJH Document1051 Filed03/24/11 Page1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Case5:10-cv JW Document72 Filed03/11/11 Page1 of 5

Case 4:18-cv JSW Document 18 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 10

Case3:12-cv VC Document46 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 5

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 276 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case3:12-mc CRB Document45 Filed01/02/13 Page1 of 6

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1777 Filed08/15/12 Page1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 28 EXHIBIT 9

Case 8:11-cv FMO-AN Document 193 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:4291

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:06-cr LAB Document 378 Filed 09/01/07 Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case4:07-cv PJH Document728-1 Filed08/05/10 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case3:07-cv SI Document102 Filed08/04/09 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Case3:11-cv WHA Document33 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiffs,

Transcription:

Case :0-cv-0-SBA Document 0 Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 JOHN F. DAUM (SBN ) jdaum@omm.com 00 South Hope Street Los Angeles, CA 00- Telephone: () 0- Facsimile: () 0-0 JONATHAN D. HACKER (Pro hac vice) jhacker@omm.com Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 00-00 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () - EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION [Counsel Listing Continued on Next Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION NATIVE VILLAGE OF KIVALINA and CITY OF KIVALINA, Plaintiffs, vs. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION; BP P.L.C.; BP AMERICA, INC.; BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; CHEVRON CORPORATION; CHEVRON U.S.A., INC.; CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY; ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC; SHELL OIL COMPANY; PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION; THE AES CORPORATION; AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC.; AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICES CORPORATION; DTE ENERGY COMPANY; DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION; DYNEGY HOLDINGS, INC.; EDISON INTERNATIONAL; MIDAMERICAN ENERGY HOLDINGS COMPANY; MIRANT CORPORATION; NRG ENERGY; PINNACLE WET CAPITAL CORPORATION; RELIANT ENERGY, INC.; THE SOUTHERN COMPANY; AND XCEL ENERGY, INC., Defendants. CASE NO. C 0-0 SBA AMENDED RE-NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF CERTAIN OIL COMPANY DEFENDANTS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. (b)() [Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof Previously Filed on June 0, 0; Reply Memorandum in Support Thereof Previously Filed on November, 0] Time: May, 0, :00 P.M. Ctrm.: Courtroom, 0 Clay Street, Oakland, California The Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong

Case :0-cv-0-SBA Document 0 Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 RONALD L. OLSON (SBN ) Ronald.Olson@mto.com DANIEL P. COLLINS (SBN ) Daniel.Collins@mto.com South Grand Avenue, th Floor Los Angeles, CA 00-0 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -0 JEROME C. ROTH (SBN ) Jerome.Roth@mto.com 0 Mission Street San Francisco, CA 0-0 Telephone: () -000 Facsimile: () -0 SHELL OIL COMPANY STUART A. C. DRAKE (Pro hac vice) sdrake@kirkland.com ANDREW B. CLUBOK (Pro hac vice) aclubok@kirkland.com SUSAN E. ENGEL (Pro hac vice) Fifteenth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 00 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () -0 ELIZABETH DEELEY (SBN 0) edeeley@kirkland.com California Street San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () -00 Attorneys for CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY ROBERT MEADOWS (Pro hac vice) rmeadows@kslaw.com TRACIE J. RENFROE (Pro hac vice) trenfroe@kslaw.com JONATHAN L. MARSH (Pro hac vice) jlmarsh@kslaw.com 00 Louisiana Street, Suite 000 Houston, TX 00- Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () -0 LISA KOBIALKA (SBN 0) lkobialka@kslaw.com 000 Bridge Parkway, Suite 00 Redwood City, CA 0 Telephone: (0) 0-000 Facsimile: (0) 0-00 s CHEVRON CORPORATION and CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. MATTHEW HEARTNEY (SBN ) Matthew.Heartney@aporter.com S. Figueroa Street, th Floor Los Angeles, CA 00- Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () - PHILIP H. CURTIS (Pro hac vice) Philip.Curtis@aporter.com MICHAEL B. GERRARD (Pro hac vice) Michael.Gerrard@ aporter.com Park Avenue New York, New York 00 Telephone: () -000 Facsimile: () - Attorneys for BP AMERICA INC., AND BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA INC.

Case :0-cv-0-SBA Document 0 Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 AMENDED RE-NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on May, 0 at :00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard in Courtroom of the above-captioned Court, located at 0 Clay Street, Oakland, California,, Defendants Shell Oil Company, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., ConocoPhillips Company, BP America Inc., and BP Products North America Inc. ( Oil Company Defendants or Defendants ) will and hereby do move to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. (b)(). By this motion, Defendants seek an order from this Court dismissing the case with prejudice. This motion is based on this Amended Re-Notice of Motion and Motion; the Notice of Motion and Motion of Certain Oil Company Defendants to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. (b)() previously filed on June 0, 0 (the June 0, 0 Notice of Motion ); the Memorandum of Points and Authorities attached to the June 0, 0 Notice of Motion; and the Reply Memorandum in Support of the Motion of Certain Oil Company Defendants to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. (b)() previously filed on November, 0; the pleadings and records on file in this action; such additional authority and argument as may be presented at the hearing on this Motion; and such other matters of which this Court may take judicial notice. This Amended Re-Notice of Motion and Motion are being filed pursuant to this Court s February, 0 Order. In accordance with that Order, the Oil Company Defendants are not refiling any of the above-mentioned pleadings that have been previously filed. Pursuant to Section C of this Court s Standing Order (as revised June, 0), Defendants, through counsel, certify that, as contemplated in the stipulation previously filed with the Court on May, 0, counsel for Defendants and counsel for Plaintiffs met and conferred telephonically on May, 0, concerning, inter alia, the grounds to be asserted in this motion.

Case :0-cv-0-SBA Document 0 Filed 0/0/0 Page of Dated: March, 0 By: /s/ Daniel P. Collins Daniel P. Collins SHELL OIL COMPANY Respectfully Submitted, By: /s/ John F. Daum John F. Daum EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION 0 By: /s/ Tracie J. Renfroe Tracie J. Renfroe s CHEVRON CORPORATION and CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. By: /s/ Matthew Heartney Matthew Heartney s BP AMERICA, INC., AND BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC. By: /s/ Andrew B. Clubok Andrew B. Clubok CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY - -

Case :0-cv-0-SBA Document 0 Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 DECLARATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER, SECTION X I, John F. Daum, declare and attest, pursuant to this Court s General Order, section X, subparagraph B, that I am an ECF User and the filer of this document and that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories (in addition to myself) shown on page of this document. I further declare and attest, pursuant to that same subparagraph of General Order, that I will maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection upon request by a party until one year after final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any). I declare, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America, that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated March, 0 /s/ John F. Daum John F. Daum