S 2822 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Similar documents
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013

NC General Statutes - Chapter 75 Article 8 1

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 216th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 10, SYNOPSIS Prohibits bad faith assertion of patent infringement.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION

ASSEMBLY, No. 310 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION

States Still Fighting Bad-Faith Patent Infringement Claims

States Attempt to Prohibit Bad-Faith Patent Infringement Claims

Law360. States Try To Prohibit Bad-Faith Patent Infringement Claims. By J. Michael Martinez de Andino and Matthew Nigriny

Oregon enacts statute to make improper patent license demands a violation of its unlawful trade practices law

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND

S 0808 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

H 5521 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

C. Public-private partnership construction contracts. (a) Definitions for purposes of this section: (1) Construction contract.

H 7837 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

WIPO ASIAN REGIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE IMPORTANCE OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SYSTEM FOR HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session

TITLE 6 SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY

TITLE 6 SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY

April 30, The Sections of Antitrust Law and International Law (the Sections ) of the American

A Bill Third Extraordinary Session, 2016 HOUSE BILL 1002

H 7502 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Assembly Bill No. 19 Assemblymen Parks and Hardy CHAPTER...

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; REFERENCE; TABLE OF CON-

S 2063 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Ownership of Site; Agreement to Terms of Use

AGE FOTOSTOCK SPAIN, S.L. NON-EXCLUSIVE PHOTOGRAPHER AGREEMENT FOR RIGHTS MANAGED LICENSING

HB By Representatives Henry, Hammon, Moore (B) and Harbison. RFD: Judiciary. First Read: 19-MAR-15. Page 0

1 SB By Senators Orr and Holley. 4 RFD: Governmental Affairs. 5 First Read: 13-FEB-18. Page 0

H 5488 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

NC General Statutes - Chapter 93A Article 2 1

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 SESSION LAW SENATE BILL 853

Connecticut Multiple Listing Service, Inc.

Terms and Conditions

A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 965

National Cooperative Research and Production Act of ~ as amended on June 22, 2004 by the ~

Sponsored Clinical Research Agreement

AUBURN UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF INNOVATION ADVANCEMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION. Ready To Sign non-exclusive licensing program

H 7502 SUBSTITUTE A ======== LC004302/SUB A ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

AWORKER WORK TOKEN PURCHASE AGREEMENT

Assembly Bill No. 481 Committee on Ways and Means

QUICKPOLE.CA TERMS OF SERVICE. Last Modified On: July 12 th, 2018

A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 79

Understanding Patent Issues During Accellera Systems Initiative Standards Development

Software License Agreement

RETS DATA ACCESS AGREEMENT

S 2453 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED AND ORDAINED,

H 5726 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

One Hundred Fifth Congress of the United States of America

Claims for benefits.

The Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange, California, ordains as follows:

Site Builder End User License Agreement

1 HB By Representative Williams (P) 4 RFD: Technology and Research. 5 First Read: 13-FEB-18. Page 0

First Regular Session Seventy-first General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED SENATE SPONSORSHIP HOUSE SPONSORSHIP

SENATE FILE NO. SF0132. Sponsored by: Senator(s) Scott and Representative(s) Stubson and Walters A BILL. for

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 1993 S 1 SENATE BILL 9. January 28, 1993

H 5340 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

West Virginia Manufactured Housing Construction Safety Standards Act. Chapter 21, Article 9 Code of West Virginia and Legislative Rule

DOES FRAUD PAY: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF ATTORNEY'S FEES PROVISIONS IN CONSUMER FRAUD STATUTES

Patent Reform Act of 2007

Tenn. Code Ann TENNESSEE CODE ANNOTATED 2011 by The State of Tennessee All rights reserved *** CURRENT THROUGH THE 2011 REGULAR SESSION ***

POLICY ON INVENTIONS, PATENTS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. Summa Health System Akron, Ohio

S 0555 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

S A BILL. Calendar No To encourage the disclosure and exchange of information 105TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION

The Status of Patent Reform Efforts in Congress

LEGAL TERMS OF USE. Ownership of Terms of Use

CASELLE, INC. Software as a Service Agreement

END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center

Innovation Act (H.R. 9) and PATENT Act (S. 1137): A Comparison of Key Provisions

H 6178 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. November 2, 2010

ARTICLE 12 AS AMENDED

GENERAL TERMS & CONDITIONS

[CLIENT] CHAPTER AFFILIATION AGREEMENT

Introduced by Senators Campbell, Ashe, Ayer, Baruth, Fox, Galbraith, 2 Lyons, MacDonald, McCormack, Pollina, Starr, White, and3

For An Act To Be Entitled

S 0556 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

LICENSE AGREEMENT. between AUBURN UNIVERSITY. and

VISA Inc. VISA 3-D Secure Authentication Services Testing Agreement

1 SB By Senators Orr and Holley. 4 RFD: Governmental Affairs. 5 First Read: 13-FEB-18. Page 0

ALCOA STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

LANEAXIS AXIS TOKEN SALE TERMS

DECORATE YOUR SPACE! MAY 2012 WINNER ASSIGNMENT AND RELEASE

Basis Account Terms of Service Agreement. Statista, Inc.

JOINT OWNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM AND

H. R. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OCTOBER 4, 2017

TRANSOCEAN PARTNERS LLC 2014 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

Crime Victims Financial Recovery

NC General Statutes - Chapter 66 Article 33 1

Massachusetts Lemon Law Statute

INDICATORS OF COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR BIRTH CENTERS END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

.., . ' / ' ,. I. t]. . / " I ~ I: ') MURIEL BOWSER MAYOR

PROBATE CODE SECTION

S 2589 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS STAFF REPORT

MEMORANDUM NEW ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT LEGISLATION FOR INDIAN COUNTRY SUMMARY

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT

the Notices section below.

Transcription:

LC000 01 -- S S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T RELATING TO COMMERCIAL LAW - GENERAL REGULATORY PROVISIONS - PATENT INFRINGEMENT Introduced By: Senators Algiere, Lombardi, Hodgson, McCaffrey, and Walaska Date Introduced: March, 01 Referred To: Senate Judiciary It is enacted by the General Assembly as follows: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SECTION 1. Title of the General Laws entitled "COMMERCIAL LAW - GENERAL REGULATORY PROVISIONS" is hereby amended by adding thereto the following chapter: CHAPTER 1.1 PATENT INFRINGEMENT -1.1-1. Legislative findings and statement of purpose. -- (a) Rhode Island is striving to build an entrepreneurial and knowledge based economy. Attracting and nurturing small and medium-size internet technology ("IT") and other knowledge-based companies is an important part of this effort and will be beneficial to Rhode Island's future. (b) Patents are essential to encouraging innovation, especially in the IT and knowledgebased fields. The protections afforded by the federal patent system create an incentive to invest in research and innovation, which spurs economic growth. Patent holders have every right to enforce their patents when they are infringed, and patent enforcement litigation is necessary to protect intellectual property. (c) The general assembly does not wish to interfere with the good faith enforcement of patents or good faith patent litigation. The general assembly also recognizes that Rhode Island is preempted from passing any law that conflicts with federal patent law. (d) Patent litigation can be technical, complex, and expensive. The expense of patent litigation, which may cost hundreds of thousands of dollars or more, can be a significant burden

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 on small and medium-size companies. Rhode Island wishes to help its businesses avoid these costs by encouraging the most efficient resolution of patent infringement claims without conflicting with federal law. (e) In order for Rhode Island companies to be able to respond promptly and efficiently to patent infringement assertions against them, it is necessary that they receive specific information regarding how their product, service, or technology may have infringed the patent at issue. Receiving such information at an early stage will facilitate the resolution of claims and lessen the burden of potential litigation on Rhode Island companies. (f) Abusive patent litigation, and especially the assertion of bad faith infringement claims, can harm Rhode Island companies. A business that receives a letter asserting such claims faces the threat of expensive and protracted litigation and may feel that it has no choice but to settle and to pay a licensing fee, even if the claim is meritless. This is especially so for small and mediumsize companies and nonprofits that lack the resources to investigate and defend themselves against infringement claims. (g) Not only do bad faith patent infringement claims impose a significant burden on individual Rhode Island businesses, they also undermine Rhode Island's efforts to attract and nurture small and medium-size IT and other knowledge-based companies. Funds used to avoid the threat of bad faith litigation are no longer available to invest, produce new products, expand, or hire new workers, thereby harming Rhode Island's economy. (h) Through this narrowly focused act, the general assembly seeks to facilitate the efficient and prompt resolution of patent infringement claims, protect Rhode Island businesses from abusive and bad faith assertions of patent infringement, and build Rhode Island's economy, while at the same time respecting federal law and being careful to not interfere with legitimate patent enforcement actions. -1.1-. Definitions. As used in this chapter: (1) "Demand letter" means a letter, e-mail, or other communication asserting or claiming that the target has engaged in patent infringement; () "Person" means any natural person or the estate of any natural person, or trust or association of persons, whether formal or otherwise, or any corporation, partnership, company, or any other legal or commercial entity; () "Target" means a Rhode Island person; (i) Who has received a demand letter or against whom an assertion or allegation of patent infringement has been made; (ii) Who has been threatened with litigation or against whom a lawsuit has been filed LC000 - Page of

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 alleging patent infringement; or (iii) Whose customers have received a demand letter asserting that the person's product, service, or technology has infringed a patent. -1.1-. Bad faith assertions of patent infringement. (a) A person shall not make a bad faith assertion of patent infringement. (b) A court may consider the following factors as evidence that a person has made a bad faith assertion of patent infringement: (1) The demand letter does not contain the following information: (i) The patent number; (ii) The name and address of the patent owner or owners and assignee or assignees, if any; and (iii) Factual allegations concerning the specific areas in which the target's products, services, and technology infringe the patent or are covered by the claims in the patent. () Prior to sending the demand letter, the person fails to conduct an analysis comparing the claims in the patent to the target's products, services, and technology, or such an analysis was done but does not identify specific areas in which the products, services, and technology are covered by the claims in the patent. () The demand letter lacks the information described in subdivision (1) of this section, the target requests the information, and the person fails to provide the information within a reasonable period of time. () The demand letter demands payment of a license fee or response within an unreasonably short period of time. () The person offers to license the patent for an amount that is not based on a reasonable estimate of the value of the license. () The claim or assertion of patent infringement is meritless, and the person knew, or should have known, that the claim or assertion is meritless. () The claim or assertion of patent infringement is deceptive. () The person or its subsidiaries or affiliates have previously filed or threatened to file one or more lawsuits based on the same or similar claim of patent infringement and: (i) Those threats or lawsuits lacked the information described in subdivision (1) of this subsection; or (ii) The person attempted to enforce the claim of patent infringement in litigation and a court found the claim to be meritless. () Any other factor the court finds relevant. LC000 - Page of

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 (c) A court may consider the following factors as evidence that a person has not made a bad faith assertion of patent infringement: (1) The demand letter contains the information described in subsection (b)(1) of this section. () Where the demand letter lacks the information described in subsection (b)(1) of this section and the target requests the information, the person provides the information within a reasonable period of time. () The person engages in a good faith effort to establish that the target has infringed the patent and to negotiate an appropriate remedy. () The person makes a substantial investment in the use of the patent or in the production or sale of a product or item covered by the patent. () The person is: (i) The inventor or joint inventor of the patent or, in the case of a patent filed by and awarded to an assignee of the original inventor or joint inventor, is the original assignee; or (ii) An institution of higher education or a technology transfer organization owned or affiliated with an institution of higher education. () The person has: (i) Demonstrated good faith business practices in previous efforts to enforce the patent, or a substantially similar patent; or (ii) Successfully enforced the patent, or a substantially similar patent, through litigation. () Any other factor the court finds relevant. -1.1-. Bond. Upon motion by a target and a finding by the court that a target has established a reasonable likelihood that a person has made a bad faith assertion of patent infringement in violation of this chapter, the court shall require the person to post a bond in an amount equal to a good faith estimate of the target's costs to litigate the claim and amounts reasonably likely to be recovered under -1.1-(b), conditioned upon payment of any amounts finally determined to be due to the target. A hearing shall be held if either party so requests. A bond ordered pursuant to this section shall not exceed two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($0,000). The court may waive the bond requirement if it finds the person has available assets equal to the amount of the proposed bond or for other good cause shown. -1.1-. Enforcement, remedies, and damages. (a) The attorney general shall have the same authority under this chapter to make rules, conduct civil investigations, bring civil actions, and enter into assurances of discontinuances as provided under chapter - entitled "Antitrust Law". In an action brought by the attorney general under this chapter, the court may LC000 - Page of

1 1 1 1 award or impose any relief available under chapter - entitled "Antitrust Law". (b) A target of conduct involving assertions of patent infringement, or a person aggrieved by a violation of this chapter or by a violation of rules adopted under this chapter, may bring an action in superior court. A court may award the following remedies to a plaintiff who prevails in an action brought pursuant to this subsection: (1) Equitable relief; () Actual damages; () Costs and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees; and () Exemplary damages in an amount equal to fifty thousand dollars ($0,000) or three () times the total of actual damages, costs, and fees, whichever is greater. (c) This chapter shall not be construed to limit rights and remedies available to the state of Rhode Island or to any person under any other law and shall not alter or restrict the attorney general's authority under chapter - entitled "Antitrust Law" with regard to conduct involving assertions of patent infringement. SECTION. This act shall take effect upon passage. LC000 LC000 - Page of

EXPLANATION BY THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL OF A N A C T RELATING TO COMMERCIAL LAW - GENERAL REGULATORY PROVISIONS - PATENT INFRINGEMENT *** 1 This act would authorize the attorney general and/or persons aggrieved to file a bad faith patent infringement suit in superior court seeking equitable and/or monetary relief from persons filing frivolous patent infringement claims as well as costs, fees, including reasonable attorney's fees and punitive damages of at least fifty thousand dollars ($0,000) or three () times the total of actual damages, costs, and fees, whichever is greater. This act would take effect upon passage. LC000 LC000 - Page of