Policy Number. Applicability DOC CBC Iowa Code Reference IO-RD-01 STATE OF IOWA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. Policy Code. Public Access POLICY

Similar documents
Policy Number IO-RD-03. Policy Code. Public Access. Related DOC Policies AD-FM-01, IO-HO-05, IO-HO-07, IO-SC-21, IO-SC-33, IO-RD-01, IO-RD-02

Yukon Corrections: Adult Custody Policy Manual. B 4.1 Inmate Disciplinary Process Approved by: Revised: February 9, 2018

Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE

Department of Corrections

DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: March 10, 2016 TIME COMPUTATION

ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATION

Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction

(1) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant;

Florida Senate SB 880

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 100 1

Arkansas Parole Board Manual SOS Rule Number 158 Stricken Language New Language 3 - RELEASE REVOCATION

Boston Police Department Rules and Procedures Rule 400C January 8, 2007

IC Chapter 6. Release From Imprisonment and Credit Time

PENNINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE PENNINGTON COUNTY JAIL

Select Post-Conviction Moments in Adult Criminal Cases

Glossary of Criminal Justice Sentencing Terms

1. The current or related charge is one of domestic violence (AS (c));

REVISOR XX/BR

the following definitions shall apply:

COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY POLICY

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION

CHAPTER 13 - STANDARDS FOR JAIL FACILITIES - INMATE BEHAVIOR, DISCIPLINE AND GRIEVANCE

This code is applicable to all employees of Finbond Mutual Bank, including temporary employees.

State of Alaska Department of Corrections Policies and Procedures Chapter: Subject:

PAROLE AND PROBATION VIOLATIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Substitute for HOUSE BILL No. 2159

TRAFFIC TICKET PLEA POLICY PLEASE READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY

Massachusetts Sentencing Commission Current Statutes Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 211E 1-4 (2018)

State of North Carolina Department of Correction Division of Prisons

Discrimination Complaint and Investigation Procedure

Discrimination and Harassment Complaints and Investigations Administrative Procedure (3435)

2012 Judicial Conference. Swift and Sure Sanctions Pilot Program (SSSP)

Assembly Bill No. 510 Select Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

NEW JERSEY REGISTER, MONDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2017 (CITE 49 N.J.R. 3409)

Derbyshire Constabulary SIMPLE CAUTIONING OF ADULT OFFENDERS POLICY POLICY REFERENCE 06/122. This policy is suitable for Public Disclosure

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 113,928. In the Matter of ELIZABETH ANNE HUEBEN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

SUBCHAPTER F PENNSYLVANIA COMMISSION ON SENTENCING

Sentencing: The imposition of a criminal sanction by a judicial authority. (p.260)

I. AUTHORITY: TCA , TCA , TCA , TCA , and TCA

CRIMINAL CASE CHECKLIST (State Court)

Act No. 10 of 2017 BILL

1 Introduction. 2 Purpose and scope

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE JUVENILE COURT OF CLAYTON COUNTY THE CLAYTON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM THE CLAYTON COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT

Solitary confinement of prisoners Extract from the 21st General Report [CPT/Inf (2011) 28]

Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE

INMATE FORM FOR CIVIL ACTIONS FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA

DATE ISSUED: 9/11/ of 5 LDU FMA(LOCAL)-X

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 2 HOUSE BILL 369 Committee Substitute Favorable 4/11/17

TRAFFIC TICKET PLEA PROGRAM PURPOSE

APRIL 2017 RECOGNITION AND PREVENTION OF DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT & VIOLENCE POLICY

(1) A separate guardianship must be filed and a corresponding case file established for each proposed ward.

CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: February 9, 2016 CRIMINAL ACTS

STATUTES / RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: Probation Revocations

Ontario Swimming Coaches Committee Disciplinary and Complaints Procedures

RECOMMENDATION No. R (99) 22 OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS TO MEMBER STATES CONCERNING PRISON OVERCROWDING AND PRISON POPULATION INFLATION

Session of SENATE BILL No By Committee on Financial Institutions and Insurance 1-10

Governors Adjudications. Easy Read Self Help Toolkit

Parole Release and. Revocation Project ASSOCIATION OF PAROLING AUTHORITIES INTERNATIONAL ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE MAY 17, 2016

CHAPTER 4 ENFORCEMENT OF RULES

PRISONERS' GUIDE TO PRISON DISCIPLINE

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Standard Operating Procedures

ARTICLE 11A. VICTIM PROTECTION ACT OF 1984.

Title IX Investigation Procedure

CHAPTER 4. ADJUDICATORY HEARING

CRIMINAL CODE. ( Official Gazette of the Republic of Montenegro no. 70/2003, and Correction, no. 13/2004) GENERAL PART CHAPTER ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS

Law of the People's Republic of China on Administrative Penalty

AGENCY BILL ANALYSIS 2017 REGULAR SESSION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BILL POSTING, ANALYSIS TO: and

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 15.b of the Statute of the Council of Europe

Male Initial Custody Assessment Procedures

LONDONDERRY POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

ARTICLE 21 JUST CAUSE, DUE PROCESS AND PROGRESSIVE DISCIPLINE FTA COUNTER SEP 12, 2013

Jay Bequette BEQUETTE & BILLINGSLEY, P.A. 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 3200 Little Rock, AR Phone: (501) Fax: (501)

NRPSI INDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE

Background: Focus on Public Safety Outcomes in Sentencing

Criminal Justice in America CJ Chapter 11 James J. Drylie, Ph.D.

ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION

IC Chapter 6. Parole and Discharge of Delinquent Offenders

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 85 1

City of New Britain POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY

JUVENILE MATTERS Attorney General Executive Directive Concerning the Handling of Juvenile Matters by Police and Prosecutors

Colorado Legislative Council Staff

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2018

2. Definitions Bullying: the persistent and ongoing ill treatment of a person that victimises, humiliates, undermines or threatens that person.

Immigration Violations

House Bill 3078 Ordered by the House June 30 Including House Amendments dated June 2 and June 30

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2017

CHAPTER 14 PUNISHMENT AND SENTENCING CHAPTER OUTLINE. I. Introduction. II. Sentencing Rationales. A. Retribution. B. Deterrence. C.

TITLE 3 MUNICIPAL COURT CHAPTER 1 1 TOWN COURT ADMINISTRATION 2

HEADQUARTERS UTAH NATIONAL GUARD Office of The Adjutant General Post Office Box 1776 Draper, Utah

Effective Dates For most provisions: June 8, 2011 Delayed effective dates for some provisions (noted later)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0094. Sponsored by: Joint Judiciary Interim Committee A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to criminal justice; amending provisions

Ohio Felony Sentencing Statutes Ohio Rev. Code Ann (2018)

Corporate Administration Detection and Prevention of Fraud and Abuse CP3030

OPR: OLS REVIEW MONTH: August Joe Ortiz Executive Director

Introduction to Sentencing and Corrections

Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment Rights

BOARD POLICY. TEXAS BOARD Number: BPP-POL OF Date: January 16, PARDONS AND PAROLES Page: 1 of 7

Transcription:

STATE OF IOWA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS POLICY AND PROCEDURES Policy Number Policy Code Public Access Applicability DOC CBC Iowa Code Reference Before July 1, 1983 246.38,39,40,41,42,43 After July 1, 1983 610A.3, 901A, 902, 903A, 904.504, 904.505 Chapter 3 INSTITUTIONAL OPERATIONS Sub Chapter RULES & DISCIPLINE Related DOC Policies IO-SC-21 IO-SM-02 IO-RD-02 IO-RD-03 Administrative Code Reference N/A Subject ACA Standards Responsibility OVERVIEW AND PHILOSOPHY OF OFFENDER DISCIPLINE I. PURPOSE 4/4228 4-4229 Effective Date January 2013 Michael Savala Authority John Baldwin Director Signature on file at Iowa DOC To describe the disciplinary system that shall be used in the Iowa Department of Corrections (IDOC) institutions to encourage responsible pro-social behavior and enforce rules and regulations. The IDOC staff are trained to assist offenders in changing the thinking and behavior that contributed to their confinement. The various disciplinary processes define specific classes of offenses based on severity of the offense, establish policy for imposing appropriate disciplinary actions, and provide review procedures governing the offender disciplinary process. Offenders shall be required to conform to the standards of conduct reflected in institution rules and regulations, which are provided to them on intake. Any offender who violates 1 -

an institution rule or regulation may be subject to disciplinary action under the provisions of the policies in the Rules and Discipline subchapter. II. POLICY A. It is the policy of the IDOC to have in place in each of its institutions a system of offender discipline that serves to advance successful offender reentry into the community and to protect the public, staff, and offenders from victimization, and maintains order in the institution, through the impartial application of a fully developed, well-understood set of rules and regulations, and procedures that incorporates all applicable due process requirements. B. Iowa Code 904.505 directs the IDOC to establish disciplinary procedures and rules and appropriate disciplinary actions for violations of those rules. The statute directs the IDOC to use the following guidelines in establishing its disciplinary rules and procedures: 1. To ensure that sanctions are imposed only at such times and to such a degree as is necessary to regulate offender behavior within the limits of the disciplinary rules and to promote a safe and orderly institutional environment. 2. To control offender behavior in an impartial and consistent manner. 3. To ensure that disciplinary procedures are fair and that sanctions are not capricious or retaliatory. 4. To prevent the commission of offenses through the deterrent effect of the sanctions available. 5. To define the elements of each offense and the penalties which may be imposed for violations, in order to give fair warning of prohibited conduct. 6. To provide procedures for preparation of reports of disciplinary actions for conducting disciplinary hearings, and for processing of disciplinary appeals. C. It is the intent of these policies that IDOC staff shall follow all of the procedures described in each of the Department s disciplinary policies. However, nothing in any of the policies shall require the dismissal or expungement of any disciplinary report for minor deviations from the 2 -

procedures described in the disciplinary policies that do not negatively affect the substantive rights of the offender subject to the disciplinary procedure. D. The IDOC believes that a properly managed offender discipline program shall do the following: 1. Maintain security, control, and safety; 2. Ensure applicable Wolff v. McDonald safeguard and offenders' due process rights; 3. Ensure fair and consistent, and where appropriate, progressive disciplinary practices, which are designed to address offender behavior at the lowest level possible; 4. Ensure proper documentation of all rule violations when sanctions are imposed; 5. Provide staff with training in the Department s disciplinary policies, including familiarity with the rules of the facility, rationale for the rules, sanctions available, and report writing. E. The objectives of the IDOC's disciplinary policies, are: 1. To ensure that sanctions are imposed in a fair and consistent manner to promote a safe and orderly institutional environment. 2. To deter future unacceptable offender behavior. 3. To define each offense and the sanctions imposed if the offender is found guilty. 4. To establish consistent procedures for disciplinary reports, presenting investigative facts, conducting disciplinary hearings, and processing of disciplinary appeals. 5. To ensure that progressive discipline, as appropriate, is implemented (informal, minor, major). 6. To provide a range of informal alternatives and formal sanctions designed to deal with infractions of the rules at the lowest reasonable level and in a manner that does not simply punish irresponsible behavior but encourages responsible behavior. 3 -

F. The disciplinary policies apply to all offenders assigned to institutions within the IDOC. G. Offenders serving sentences for offenses committed prior to July 1, 1983, are subject to the requirements set forth in Section 246 of the 1983 Iowa Code and the disciplinary policies. Offenders serving sentences for offenses committed on or after July 1, 1983, shall be subject to the requirements of Chapter 903A. Offenders serving sentences under Chapter 901A and 902 are subject to those sections. H. In addition to being subject to the IDOC s disciplinary policies, all offenders under the jurisdiction of the IDOC must obey all laws of the United States and the State of Iowa. If a violation of the rules would also be a violation of a federal, state, or local law, an offender is subject to the provisions of the law, as well as the rules for offender discipline. Disciplinary action by the institution may be taken before or after criminal prosecution, and may be in addition to criminal punishment or in spite of dismissal of criminal charges. I. The Department s disciplinary policies are designed to create processes in disciplinary matters that ensure offenders rights under the United States Constitution, the Iowa State Constitution, Federal law, and Iowa law. These policies do not create or add new independent legal rights for offenders. J. In a case where court decisions (state and federal) are in conflict with the disciplinary policies, the court decision shall prevail over the policies. The IDOC shall work with the Attorney General to ensure that policy and practice are consistent with current applicable case law. K. The Warden/Superintendent of each institution, assisted by all supervisory personnel, shall establish order and discipline by consistent application of offender behavior standards. Each Warden/Superintendent shall develop a fair, unbiased, and orderly procedure for administering all disciplinary rules and policies. L. Amendments and supplements to the disciplinary policies may be issued at any time by the Director of the IDOC. M. The procedures described in these disciplinary policies require staff and offenders to make use of various forms. The Iowa Corrections Offender Network (ICON) system generates some of those forms from information entered by IDOC staff. Other forms appear only in paper versions that must be filled out by the appropriate staff member, witness, or offender. The IDOC shall approve the format of all forms generated by the ICON computer system before they are used in the disciplinary process. If the ICON system 4 -

is not available for use, staff members may use documents that contain the information of the ICON forms that shall be entered later. Paper forms should use the general format of the forms attached to this policy. Similar paper forms may be used by making additions or changes to those forms. Institutions may modify and adapt the non-icon forms for use with computers or other electronic devices. III. DEFINITIONS See Policy IO-RD-03 and Policy AD-GA-16 for definitions that apply to this policy. IV. PROCEDURES A. As soon as a staff member or other person given authority over offenders by the Warden/Superintendent or Director becomes aware that an offender has violated a rule established by the IDOC or by an institution, that staff member or person should seek to correct the violation by using appropriate disciplinary action. B. Available Levels of Disciplinary Action Levels of disciplinary action available include: 1. Informal disciplinary action (see Policy IO-RD-02) 2. Disciplinary action using a minor report (see Policy IO-RD-02) 3. Disciplinary action using a major report (see Policy IO-RD-03) The level of disciplinary action may be modified at the advice and/or direction of supervisory staff. As an example, a minor report written by a staff member may, upon supervisory review, be enhanced to a major report. In such cases, any sanction imposed and served shall be incorporated into the sanction imposed for the major report. In the same way, informal action may be enhanced to formal discipline or formal discipline reduced to a more appropriate level of response. C. Considerations in the Imposition of Discipline In general, an offender should receive the lowest reasonable level of disciplinary action for the type of violation. These factors, collectively, may serve to mitigate or aggravate the level of discipline imposed. In determining the appropriate level of disciplinary action, staff shall consider: 5 -

1. The seriousness of the offense and the degree of disciplinary action needed to help protect the public, employees, and offenders. 2. The degree of disciplinary action needed to facilitate change in offender behaviour and to reduce future violation or victimization. 3. The degree of disciplinary action needed to reduce or prevent someone from being victimized in the future. 4. The offender s disciplinary record and whether the offender has previously committed a similar rule violation before. 5. Attitude, program involvement, and the offender s progress towards established goals. 6. The current mental health status of the offender. D. Dismissing Disciplinary Actions If a supervisor, Administrative Law Judge, or other staff member identified by institutional procedure determines that an offender did not commit a violation, then it is appropriate to dismiss any pending disciplinary action in accordance with the disciplinary policies. E. Records and Tracking The tracking of offender violations and offender behaviour is critical to implementing an appropriate disciplinary process. Tracking of minor and major reports is an automatic process and these records are available to staff. Each facility shall establish procedures for tracking, and ensuring that staff has access to information related to informal disciplinary action. F. Training All personnel who work with offenders shall receive sufficient training so that they are thoroughly familiar with the rules of offender conduct, rationale for the rules, and the sanctions available. (4-4229) G. Offender Notification/Rulebooks 1. All offenders shall receive a copy of the institution s rules for offender conduct and policies and procedures for minor reports, major reports, and appeals. These documents shall, at minimum, be available to offender in English and Spanish. Offenders shall acknowledge receipt 6 -

with their signature. A copy of these materials will be made available to each staff member. 2. When language, reading skills, or intellectual capacity compromise an offender s ability to understand the rules, staff assistance shall be provided. 3. In lieu of providing a written offender rulebook, institutions may establish electronic means by which offenders may readily access IDOC and institutional rules. H. Applicability (4-4228) 1. The disciplinary rules and procedures established in the disciplinary policies are applicable to offenders only while under the physical custody of the IDOC or its agents. The rules and procedures are not applicable to offenders transferred from Iowa pursuant to Iowa Code 913, Interstate Corrections Compact, or transferred to the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, pursuant to Iowa Code 904.504. Compact offenders from other states may be subject to loss of earned time or similar time credits or sentence reductions based on the statutes of the sending states. 2. These disciplinary policies apply to all institutions except that certain sections may be superseded by court orders or consent decrees that apply to individual institutions, such as, the Iowa State Penitentiary and the John Bennett Correctional Center. 3. Except as permitted by policy, institutions shall not modify the disciplinary policies unless approved in writing by the Director. Institutions may publish verbatim portions and/or summaries of the disciplinary policies for offenders. 4. For all cases of offender discipline for major infractions, IDOC Policies and IO-RD-03 shall be the official documents governing offender discipline. Origination Date: May 2012. Revised: Aug. 2012. Reviewed: Jan. 2013..- 7 -