which shall govern any matters not specifically addressed in these rules.

Similar documents
STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 45C 1

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

NABORS INDUSTRIES, INC. HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Case: 4:15-cv JAR Doc. #: 21 Filed: 08/05/16 Page: 1 of 13 PageID #: 302

Mastering Civil Procedure Checklist

Case 3:16-cv JCH Document 20 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Verizon Wireless Services

Case 2:14-cv SPL Document 25 Filed 09/11/14 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

Orkal Indus. v Array Connector Corp NY Slip Op 31370(U) May 16, 2011 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: /2010 Judge: Ira B.

Uniform Arbitration Act; Mediation or Arbitration of Trust Instruments; HB 2571

Ethical and Practical Guidance to Avoiding Pitfalls When Drafting Arbitration Clauses. October 11, 2016

INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/02/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/02/2016

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS

ARBITRATION RULES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ADR COUNCIL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

Case 1:07-cv UU Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2008 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:16-cv MR-DLH

New AAA Rules Provide Straightforward Guidelines for Appeals

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, 2012

Consolidated Arbitration Rules

PAYMENT DEDUCTION AUTHORIZATION AND AGREEMENT

INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN NEW YORK: A PRACTICAL PERSPECTIVE John Fellas, Hagit Elul & Apoorva Patel Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

MUTUAL AGREEMENT TO ARBITRATE CLAIMS

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This [act] may be cited as the Uniform Family Law

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

United States Supreme Court Considering A California Appellate Court Opinion Invalidating A Class Action Arbitration Waiver

COMMERCIAL DIVISION PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE ORDER PURSUANT TO PART 202 OF THE UNIFORM CIVIL RULES FOR THE SUPREME COURT KINGS COUNTY

ARBITRATION: CHALLENGES TO A MOTION TO COMPEL

THE PHI KAPPA TAU FRATERNITY CLAIM AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION PLAN AND RULES

Coldwell Banker Residential Referral Network

Case: 1:10-cv SO Doc #: 19 Filed: 10/18/10 1 of 9. PageID #: 1267 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION

Case 3:15-cv TLB Document 96 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 791

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv AT. versus

Case 2:12-cv GP Document 27 Filed 01/17/13 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:16-cv JHS Document 16 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA OPINION

Joseph Gunnar & Co., LLC v Rice 2015 NY Slip Op 30233(U) February 13, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2014 Judge: Eileen A.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MEMORANDUM. Introduction. The Commercial Division Advisory Council has previously proposed an

AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex, Commercial Disputes)

Case 1:16-cv NRB Document 46 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 10

ARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013)

WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER

Case 6:14-cv CEM-TBS Document 31 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1331

Court Rules of The Honorable Martin D. Auffredou, J.S.C. ~ 2017 ~

May 7, Dear Ms. England:

The Hegemonic Arbitrator Replaces Foreign Sovereignty: A Comment on Chevron v. Republic of Ecuador

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/16/ :54 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/16/2017

THERE ARE NO SUBMITTED MOTIONS IN THIS PART AND ALL MOTIONS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, MUST BE ORALLY ARGUED.

1. How This Agreement Applies

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendant.

Case 2:17-cv DB Document 48 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

LA. REV. STAT. ANN. 9:

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 35 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2017

Caudill v Can Capital, Inc NY Slip Op 30008(U) January 3, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2016 Judge: Eileen A.

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 25 Filed 06/11/2009 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT SUPREME COURT RICHMOND COUNTY UNIFORM CIVIL TERM RULES

Case 2:17-cv JP Document 76-1 Filed 06/01/18 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : :

WIPO WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANISATION ARBITRATION RULES

Case 1:17-cv TNM Document 1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:08-cv DAB Document 78 Filed 07/14/11 Page 1 of 5. On March 10, 2010, this Court denied Defendants recovery

Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes)

ARBITRATION AGREEMENT. Between. BNSF RAILWAY CO., CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO., and UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

Construction Industry Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Construction Disputes)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU -PART 47

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

MASSACHUSETTS CLEAN ENERGY TECHNOLOGY CENTER RENEWABLE ENERGY TRUST FUND MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT

FORMATION OF CONTRACT INTENTION TO BE BOUND (ART. 14 CISG) - RELEVANCE OF PRACTICES BETWEEN THE PARTIES (ART. 8(2) & (3) CISG)

Li Ping Xie v Jang 2012 NY Slip Op 33871(U) February 28, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2008E Judge: Paul G.

Case 1:16-cv GJQ-PJG ECF No. 106 filed 08/28/17 PageID.794 Page 1 of 8

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT Virginia

Royal Wine Corp. v Cognac Ferrand SAS 2018 NY Slip Op 30367(U) February 26, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018 Judge:

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CORPORATE FARE TERMS & CONDITIONS

Recent Developments in Federal and State Arbitration Law

Case 1:08-cv Document 44 Filed 03/23/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 108 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT WINCHESTER MEMORANDUM OPINION

Special Commission on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments (13-17 November 2017)

CALIFORNIA YACHT BROKERS ASSOCIATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:16-cv MR-DLH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT Title 3. Civil Rules Division 8. Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 1. General Provisions

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SOUTHERN DIVISION

Compelling and Staying Arbitration in Michigan

PAMS ARBITRATION RULES

Transcription:

INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION PART RULES -- PART 53 These International Arbitration Part Rules supplement the Part 53 Practice Rules, which shall govern any matters not specifically addressed in these rules. Parties to international arbitration-related matters before this court should familiarize themselves with the following rules and resources: a. The Part 53 Practice Rules and Rule 202.5-b of the Uniform Rules for the New York State Trial Courts, which addresses electronic filing. b. CPLR Article 75 Arbitration. c. The Federal Arbitration Act, (FAA) 9 U.S.C. 1 et seq. d. The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards ("New York Convention"), June 10, 1958, 21 U.S.T. 2517, 330 U.N.T.S. 38, if applicable. e. The Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration ("Panama Convention"), Jan. 30, 1975, S. Treaty Doc. No. 97-12, O.A.S.T.S. No. 42, 14 I.L.M. 336, if applicable. If the parties wish to avail themselves of these International Arbitration Rules, they are strongly advised to include a forum selection clause in their contracts that explicitly waives the right of removal to Federal court, which is otherwise available under the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards and chapter 2 of the FAA. In this regard, please see Yakin v Tyler Hill Corp. (566 F3d 72 [2d Cir 2009] [ Parties are free to bind themselves to forum selection clauses that trump what would otherwise be a right to remove cases to federal courts ]). It is the policy of New York State to enforce arbitration agreements and awards, as set out in CPLR 7501: "A written agreement to submit any controversy thereafter arising

or any existing controversy to arbitration is enforceable without regard to the justiciable character of the controversy and confers jurisdiction on the courts of the state to enforce it and to enter judgment on an award." This Court will enforce the parties written agreements and applicable conventions governing international arbitrations with regard to all matters, including restrictions or limitations on the right to discovery, provisional remedies and the rules of evidence. In all regards, it is preferable that the applicable convention be incorporated by reference in the agreement to arbitrate. 1. A Special Proceeding in accordance with CPLR 7502 shall be used to bring before the Court the first application arising out of an arbitrable controversy which is not otherwise made by motion in a pending action. All subsequent applications shall be made by motion in the special proceeding or in the action in which the first application was made. 2. Any party making an application arising out of an arbitrable controversy, whether or not it is the first such application, shall include with the application the full text of the arbitration agreement and any other contractual provisions that govern the dispute resolution process. 3. Applications for the following relief shall be made by motion on notice or on an expedited basis by Order to Show Cause: a. Orders to compel arbitration or to stay an action. CPLR 7503(a). 2

b. Orders to confirm an award. CPLR 7510. c. Orders to vacate or modify an award. CPLR 7511. The following applications should be made only by order to show cause: a. preliminary injunction. b. A stay of arbitration. c. Disclosure to aid in arbitration. d. An Order of Attachment. 4. Unless the parties stipulate to the contrary or extraordinary circumstances are present, all motions and applications shall be decided within 60 days of oral argument and any party may for any reason request an expedited decision. a. Applications by letter may be on consent for the appointment of an arbitrator and for a direction that the arbitrator proceed promptly with the hearing. Absent consent, a motion is required. 5. In the event the Court appoints an arbitrator, the court will appoint a sole arbitrator unless the parties have agreed otherwise. Arbitrators shall be selected by this Court from a list or source agreed to by the parties or from the Unified Court System s Fiduciary Eligibility List. 6. Counsel should note that The United States is a party to two significant international conventions that promote the enforcement of arbitration agreements and the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards. They are: 3

a. The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, June 10, 1958, 21 U.S.T. 2517, 330 U.N.T.S. 38 ("New York Convention"), and the Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration, Jan. 30, 1975, S. Treaty Doc. No. 97-12, O.A.S.T.S. No. 42, 14 I.L.M. 336 ("Panama Convention"). b. The New York Convention refers to the laws of its member states to determine whether an arbitration should be considered international. See New York Convention, Art. I(1) (covering "awards made in a territory of a State other than the State where the recognition and enforcement of such awards are sought" and awards "not considered as domestic awards in the State where their recognition and enforcement are sought"). The Federal Arbitration Act sets forth the following test to determine whether a matter falls under the New York Convention: An arbitration agreement or arbitral award arising out of a legal relationship, whether contractual or not, which is considered as commercial, including a transaction, contract, or agreement described in section 2 of this title, falls under the Convention. An agreement or award arising out of such a relationship which is entirely between citizens of the United States shall be deemed not to fall under the Convention unless that relationship involves property located abroad, envisages performance or enforcement abroad, or has some other reasonable relation with one or more foreign states. For the purpose of this section a corporation is a citizen of the United States if it is incorporated or has its principal place of business in the United States. 7. Counsel are reminded that any request to assign or to transfer an action or 4

proceeding to Part 53 requires that a copy of the Administrative Order of the Administrative Judge for Civil Matters of the First Judicial District must accompany such request. A copy of said order is available from the Commercial Division website at: http://www.nycourts.gov/courts/comdiv/pdfs/practices_in_part_53.pdf. 5