The Outlook for the 2010 Midterm Elections: How Large a Wave?

Similar documents
Political Report: September 2010

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

Background Information on Redistricting

Most Have Heard Little or Nothing about Redistricting Debate LACK OF COMPETITION IN ELECTIONS FAILS TO STIR PUBLIC

The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate

On Election Night 2008, Democrats

Chronology of Successful and Unsuccessful Merit Selection Ballot Measures

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

Redistricting in Michigan

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

Judicial Selection in the States

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

Party Money in the 2006 Elections:

2010 Legislative Elections

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

Rising American Electorate & Working Class Women Strike Back. November 9, 2018

THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE: SOME FACTS AND FIGURES. by Andrew L. Roth

Who Runs the States?

Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

This journal is published by the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

2008 Legislative Elections

Rising American Electorate & White Working Class Strike Back. November 27, 2018

Mindy Romero, Ph.D. Director

ELECTION OVERVIEW. + Context: Mood of the Electorate. + Election Results: Why did it happen? + The Future: What does it mean going forward?

The 2010 Election and Its Aftermath John Coleman and Charles Franklin Department of Political Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

Mindy Romero, Ph.D. Director

Race to the White House Drive to the 2016 Republican Nomination. Ron Nehring California Chairman, Ted Cruz for President

American Dental Association

Allocating the US Federal Budget to the States: the Impact of the President. Statistical Appendix

Unit 5 Reading Guide

ELECTION UPDATE Tom Davis

Red Shift. The Domestic Policy Program. October 2010

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws

The Electoral College And

2018 MIDTERMS PRE- ELECTION OVER VIEW OCTOBER 2018

Congressional Redistricting Decisions, 2011

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment

Democratic Convention *Saturday 1 March 2008 *Monday 25 August - Thursday 28 August District of Columbia Non-binding Primary

2016 State Elections

Congressional Elections, 2018 and Beyond

2018 Midterm Elections

Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

to demonstrate financial strength and noteworthy success in adapting to the more stringent

The Forum. Volume 8, Issue Article 14. Forecasting Control of State Governments and Redistricting Authority After the 2010 Elections

Election of Worksheet #1 - Candidates and Parties. Abraham Lincoln. Stephen A. Douglas. John C. Breckinridge. John Bell

The sustained negative mood of the country drove voter attitudes.

CenturyLink Political Contributions Report. July 1, 2017 December 31, 2017

Making a Difference In Washington, D.C.

More State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case

Campaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30

The 2014 Legislative Elections

Chapter Four: Chamber Competitiveness, Political Polarization, and Political Parties

REDISTRICTING REDISTRICTING 50 STATE GUIDE TO 50 STATE GUIDE TO HOUSE SEATS SEATS SENATE SEATS SEATS WHO DRAWS THE DISTRICTS?

Chapter 12: The Math of Democracy 12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment - SOLUTIONS

Republican National Committee

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State

December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote

American Government. Workbook

United States House Elections Post-Citizens United: The Influence of Unbridled Spending

Another Billion-Dollar Blunder?

THE STATE OF VOTING IN 2014

New message platform for 2018 s key battlegrounds Report from phone survey & web-panel in the 12-state battleground

Discussion Guide for PRIMARIES in MARYLAND: Open vs. Closed? Top Two/Four or by Party? Plurality or Majority? 10/7/17 note without Fact Sheet bolded

at New York University School of Law A 50 state guide to redistricting

New Census Estimates Show Slight Changes For Congressional Apportionment Now, But Point to Larger Changes by 2020

Campaign Finance Options: Public Financing and Contribution Limits

PARTISANSHIP AND WINNER-TAKE-ALL ELECTIONS

Please note: additional data sources are referenced throughout this presentation, including national exit polls and NBC/WSJ national survey data.

Official Voter Information for General Election Statute Titles

2014 Midterm Election Results

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

Keep it Clean? How Negative Campaigns Affect Voter Turnout

Amy Tenhouse. Incumbency Surge: Examining the 1996 Margin of Victory for U.S. House Incumbents

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

Voting Laws Roundup 2018

CRS Report for Congress

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Trump, Populism and the Economy

VNP Policy Overview. Davia Downey, Ph.D Grand Valley State University

DETAILED CODE DESCRIPTIONS FOR MEMBER DATA

Gender, Race, and Dissensus in State Supreme Courts

The remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills.

United States: Implications of the Midterm Elections for Economic Policy

Politicians who needs them? 1 of 5 10/23/2014 8:30 AM. October , 5.34am EDT. Glenn Altschuler

2008 Democratic Nomination

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

This Rising American Electorate & Working Class Strike Back

New message platform for 2018 s key battlegrounds Findings from Wave 1 of Battleground web-panel & phone survey. May 2018

Forecasting the 2018 Midterm Election using National Polls and District Information

The Cook Political Report 2012 Election Outlook

the rules of the republican party

Number of Bills Passed Per Issue

Latinos and the Mid- term Election

Transcription:

The Outlook for the 2010 Midterm Elections: How Large a Wave?

What is at stake? All 435 House seats 256 Democratic seats 179 Republican seats Republicans needs to gain 39 seats for majority 37 Senate seats 19 Democratic seats 18 Republican seats Republicans need to gain10 seats for majority

37 governorships 19 Democratic seats,17 Republican seats, 1 independent seat There are currently 26 Democratic governors, 23 Republicans, and 1 independent 88 state legislative chambers 1,167 of 1,971 state senate seats 4,958 of 5,462 state house seats Democrats currently control both chambers in 28 states, Republicans control both chambers in 13 states, 8 states have divided control, 1 state has nonpartisan legislature

Control of Redistricting at Stake

Results of Midterm Elections Since World War II President s party has lost House seats in 14 of 16 midterm elections Average loss of 24.1 seats Range from -56 to +8 President s party has lost Senate seats in 13 of 16 midterm elections Average loss of 3.5 seats Range from -13 to +4

The Pattern Even Extends to Gubernatorial and State Legislative Elections President s party has lost statehouses in 13 of 16 midterms since World War II with an average loss of 4.2 seats President s party has lost state legislative seats in 13 of 16 midterms since World War II with an average loss of 3.6% of seats

Why?

Explaining the Midterm Phenomenon Surge and Decline: Return to Normal Voting Patterns Negative Voting: Disgruntled Voters Turn Out and Take Out Anger on President s Party Balancing: Check President for Next Two Years

Why do midterm losses vary? Mood of the Electorate Approval of President Economic Conditions Seats at Risk Marginal seats Open seats Strength of challengers

Midterm as Referendum on President s Performance

It Doesn t Work as Well for the Senate

It s Not Just About the Economy

Seats at Risk In general, the more marginal or high risk seats the president s party holds, the more seats it tends to lose Seats can be evaluated based on recent presidential voting patterns Safe districts Marginal districts High risk districts

Democratic Vulnerability in 2010: Presidential Election Results in House Districts 256 Democratic seats 169 seats carried by Dems in both 04 and 08 40 seats carried by Reps once 47 seats carried by Reps in both 04 and 08 179 Republican seats 147 seats carried by Reps in both 04 and 08 26 seats carried by Dems once 6 seats carried by Dems in both 04 and 08

But Democrats in Stronger Position than in 1994 145 House districts at least 5 points more Democratic than the nation in last presidential election vs. 114 in 1994 Only 19 open House seats compared with 31 in 1994

The Senate Elections 19 Democratic seats 2 seats almost certainly lost: Arkansas, North Dakota 2 seats very likely lost: Delaware, Indiana 7 seats in play: California, Colorado, Illinois, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Washington, Wisconsin 18 Republican seats 6 seats in play: Florida, Kentucky, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio

Political Climate Tilted Toward GOP

Predicting Congressional Election Results Seat-by-seat approach (Cook, Sabato, Rothenberg, CQ) Statistical forecasting of aggregate seat change

Asking Paul the Octopus

The Midterm Forecasting Model Dependent Variable: Change in Republican Seats Independent Variables Party of President Generic Ballot Margin Previous Republican Seats

Results of Regression Analyses of House and Senate Seat Change in Midterm Elections House Senate Independent Variable B (S.E.) t B (S.E.) t Previous R Seats -.442 (.139) - 3.18 -.822 (.268) - 3.07 Midterm Party - 14.1 (3.73) - 3.77-2.28 (0.90) - 2.65 Generic Ballot 1.69 (.298) 5.66.200 (.080) 2.49 Constant 105.1 15.3 Note: Dependent variable is change in Republican seats Source: Data compiled by author

Predicted Change in Republican House and Senate Seats Generic Ballot House Seats Senate Seats D +10 + 23 + 1 D +5 + 32 + 2 Tie + 40 + 3 R +5 + 49 + 4 R +10 + 57 + 5 Source: Data compiled by author

We Can Use the Same Model to Predict Results of State Legislative Elections Results of Regression Analysis of State Legislative Seat Change in Midterm Elections, 1946-2006 Independent Variable B (S.E.) Beta t Sig. Previous R Seats -.477 (.097) -.616 5.32.001 President s Party - 1.955 (.623) -.341 3.14.01 Generic Ballot.307 (.052).731 5.89.001 Constant 23.66 Adjusted R 2.733 Source: Congressional Quarterly s Guide to U.S. Elections Note: Dependent variable is change in number of Republican governors

And Gubernatorial Elections Results of Regression Analysis of Gubernatorial Seat Change in Midterm Elections, 1946-2006 Independent Variable B (S.E.) Beta t Sig. Previous R Seats -.722 (.184) -.581 3.92.001 President s Party - 2.871 (.938) -.454 3.06.01 Generic Ballot.217 (.086).376 2.52.025 Constant 14.678 Adjusted R 2.718 Source: Congressional Quarterly s Guide to U.S. Elections Note: Dependent variable is change in number of Republican governors

Predicted Results of 2010 Gubernatorial and State Legislative Elections based on Early September Generic Ballot Generic Republican Republican Republican Ballot Governors State Legislators Chambers D +6 + 4 + 199 + 5 D +4 + 4 + 244 + 7 D +2 + 5 + 289 + 8 Tie + 5 + 334 + 9 R +2 + 6 + 379 + 10 R +4 + 6 + 424 + 12 R +6 + 7 + 469 + 13 R +8 + 7 + 514 + 14 R +10 + 8 + 559 + 16 Source: Congressional Quarterly s Guide to U.S. Elections and data compiled by author

Could the Republicans Blow It? Internal Divisions Financial Woes Fringe Candidates

Divisions Between Conservatives and Moderates

Democratic Financial Advantage Source: Campaign Finance Institute

July Fundraising Update Raised Cash on Hand DNC 11.6M 10.8M RNC 5.5M 5.3M DCCC 6.2M 35.8M NRCC 8.5M 22.0M DSCC 4.4M 22.4M NRSC 4.2M 21.2M Dem Total 22.2M 69.0M Rep Total 18.2M 48.5M

Fundraising Through June 30 in 52 House Districts with Endangered Democratic Incumbents Total Raised Cash on Hand D Incumbents $1.65 Million $1.21 Million R Challengers $0.97 Million $0.46 Million Source: Campaign Finance Institute

Finances of GOP Challengers in 52 Competitive Districts Total Raised Cash on Hand LT $250,000 1 21 $250-$499,999 7 16 $500-$999,999 26 10 $1,000,000 + 18 5 Source: Campaign Finance Institute

Fringe Candidates

Is there a silver lining for Democrats?

Midterm results do not predict outcome of subsequent presidential election Public s view of Republican Party remains decidedly negative GOP victory may enhance influence of right wing of party Demographic trends continue to favor Democratic Party