COMPLAINT AIYD DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL DAVID M ORTLEY

Similar documents
Case 3:16-cv DPJ-FKB Document 9 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 11

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF TWIN FALLS

Case 2:15-cv SVW-AS Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1

IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR ROGERS COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA PETITION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

26 /1/ 28 /1/ Donny E. Brand (SBN ) BRAND LAW FIRM E. 4th St., Suite C-473

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR DUBUQUE COUNTY. Plaintiffs, Case No: PETITION THE PARTIES

Case: 1:11-cv DAP Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/19/11 1 of 9. PageID #: 1

Case 4:11-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 13

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:17-cv LB Document 1 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 11

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PHOENIX ARIZONA DIVISION. Plaintiff, pro se )

COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through her counsel of record, Julio K. Morales, PRO HAC VICE, and I. INTRODUCTION

DEFENDANT S COUNTERCLAIM. Cause No COUNTY OF BASTROP ET AL IN THE 21 ST Plaintiff and counter-defendant,

Case: 3:11-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/07/11 Page: 1 of 13 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Courthouse News Service

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

Case 2:16-cv MMD-CWH Document 1 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:14-cv WTL-MJD Document 1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/ :58 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 08/29/14 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY, MISSOURI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 3:16-cv WHB-JCG Document 4 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 8

CAUSE NO CV ANNA DRAKER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR STORY COUNTY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:17-cv SGC Document 1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

Case 4:10-cv CW Document 1 Filed 10/13/10 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Central District Court Case No. 2:16-cv WBS, Inc. v. Stephen Pearcy et al. Document 2.

2:18-cv CSB-EIL # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF OCONEE C.A. NO.: 2017-CP-10- Jane Doe, Plaintiff,

1. Under what theory, or theories, if any, might Patty bring an action against Darby? Discuss.

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : : : : : :

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 5:18-CV-96 COMPLAINT

Case: 2:16-cv ALM-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/02/16 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 1

Case 3:08-cv CRW-CFB Document 1 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:19-cv GPC-LL Document 4 Filed 03/22/19 PageID.16 Page 1 of 10

How to Use Torts Tactically in Employment Litigation

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION

0F can? 35 west Granite JEIIIIIFI LR ERNST-3H. Fax: _.,. ' FILED BY M Attorney for Plaintiff

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SPRINGFIELD MISSOURI DIVISION. Plaintiff, pro se ) ) Defendant.

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY OF MILWAUKEE CIVIL DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 5:09-cv JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 2:07-cv RCJ-GWF Document 1 Filed 12/26/2007 Page 1 of 6

9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 3:14-cv B Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 18 PageID 1

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

Courthouse News Service

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL I. INTRODUCTION

1. Rice and Chau are residents of Cook County, Illinois, and respectively the

Plaintiffs OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS v. Defendants JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION, JURY DEMAND AND REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/03/ :48 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014

Intentional Torts. What Is a Tort? Tort Recovery

Chapter 6. Disparagement of Property 8/3/2017. Business Torts and Online Crimes and Torts. Slander of Title Slander of Quality (Trade Libel) Defenses

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Plaintiff, ) ) ANSWER, COUNTERCLAIM, AND ) THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT v. )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

ELEMENTS OF LIABILITY AND RISK

CAUSE NO. COMES NOW, Plaintiff, Colin Shillinglaw, and files this Original Petition, complaining

Case 1:17-cv CSM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and JURY DEMAND. 1. Plaintiff, Aldo Lamberti, (hereinafter "Plaintiff) is a Massachusetts resident

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PROVIDING FIRST RESPONDER SERVICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 1995 STEPHEN MICHAEL DOWNS

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:16-cv S-LDA Document 3 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR DUBUQUE COUNTY. Plaintiffs, Case No: PETITION THE PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

1.1.1 True, accurate, current and complete information about Yourself or Your company or institution.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

Transcription:

Mikel Moore Jay T. Johnson CHRISTENSEN, MOORE, COCKRELL, CUMMINGS & AXELBERG, P.C. P.O. Box 7370 Kalispell, MT 59904-037 0 Telephone: (a06) 75 1-6000 Facsimile: (406) 756-6522 Attomeys for Plaintiffs / MONTANA ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, FLATHEAD COUNTY JOHN A. CORAPI and SANTA CRUZ MEDIA, [NC., Plaintiffs, Cause No. COMPLAINT AIYD DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Defendant. DAVID M ORTLEY COMES NOW Plaintiffs, John A. Corapi and Santa Cruz Media,Inc., by and through their counsel, and for their cause of action against Defendants state and allege as follows: GENERAL ALLEGATIONS l. John A. Corapi (Corapi) is an individual currently residing in Whitefish, Montana. 2. Santa Cruz Media, Inc., is a Nevada corporation that is authorized to transact business in Montana, with a principal place of business at 450 Corporate Drive, Suite 108, Kalispell, Montana. 3. is an individual currently residing in COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Page I

4. I is a former employee of Santa Cruz Media, Inc. 5. John A. Corapi is an ordained Priest in the Catholic Church, who was ordained on May 26,199r. 6. Corapi is a member of The Society Of Our Lady Of The Most Holy Trinity (SOLT). The SOLT is overseen by the Diocese of Corpus Christi, Texas. 7. Corapi performs his priestly ministry and shares his teachings and message through the creation and distribution of various media including, without limitation, books, audio programs, video, television shows on the EWTN network, radio shows on stations across the country and through conferences at which he is invited to speak. 8. The effectiveness and success of Corapi's ministry depends on his reputation and his position as a Priest in good standing with the Catholic Church. 9. Santa Cruz Media, Inc., is the owner of all intellectual property rights for Corapi's audio, video, written and other protectable intellectual property interests. 10. Santa Cruz Media, Inc,, produces and sells for profit the media through which Corapi performs his priestly ministry and books all speaking and other engagements in which Corapi participates. 11. The creation, production, distribution and sale of Corapi's media and other products and the booking of Corapi's speaking and other engagements is the only business in which Santa Cruz Media, Inc., is engaged. 12. Santa Cruz Media, Inc.'s revenues and success depend on Corapi's reputation, his position as a Priest in good standing with the Catholic Church and the presence of his television and radio prograrnming on the EWTN television network and radio stations across the country. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FORJURY TRIAL Page2

COUNT I LIBEL (John A. Corapi) i3. Corapi hereby re-alleges and incorporates all of the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-12 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. 14. On or about February 1.1.,201.1,I sent a letter that was received by the intended recipients containing a number of false, malicious and unprivileged statements about Corapi to numerous third parties including the Chancellor of the Diocese of Corpus Christi, Our Lady of Corpus Christi (SOLT), the Archdiocese of Chicago and the Archdiocese of Boson (the "Letter'). 15. li Lefter contained numerous false, malicious and unprivileged statements about Corapi including, among others: (a) Corapi met fwhen she was sent to meet him by an escort service whom Corapi had contacted; (b) Corapi was a regular drug purchaser and user who used drugs witfr f acts and sexual intercourse *itn l](d) and did drugs with three of her sisters; (c) Corapi engaged in sexual Corapi engaged in sexual intercourse with one of I sisters; (d) Corapi punched lin the face; and (e) Corapi currently has a "new mistress." 16. All of the alleged events giving rise to the false, malicious and unprivileged statements included in J Lefier allegedly took place during the time that Corapi was an ordained Priest in the Catholic Church. 17. {; publication of the Letter was unprivileged and made with knowledge of its falsity and with reckless disregard of the truth. These acts constitute actual malice. 18. eretter has caused actual damages to Corapi. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Page 3

19. As a result of;publication of the Letter, the Catholic Church has placed Corapi on adminishative leave from priestly ministry for allegedly behaving in a manner unbecoming of a priest. 20. The SOLT released a statement regarding Corapi being placed on administrative leave from priestly ministry for allegedly behaving in a manner unbecoming of a priest. 2I. The SOLT's statement and the Church's placing Corapi on administrative leave has been reported by media outlets across the country. 22. As a result oflpublication of the Letter, Corapi's regularly scheduled television shows were removed from EWTN television network and Corapi's regularly scheduled radio programs were removed from radio stations across the country. 23. tpublication of the Letter has caused permanent and irreparable damage to Corapi's good name, reputation and to his ability to perform his occupation. 24. Corapi is entitled to punitive damages due to Letter with knowledge of its falsity and with reckless disregard of the truth, COUNT II BREACH OF CONTRACT (Corapi and Santa Craz Media,Inc.) - actual malice in publishing the 25. Corapi and Santa Cruz Media, Inc., hereby re-allege and incorporate all of the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-24 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. 26. Santa Cruz Media, Inc., terminated t for cause effective September 30,2009. 27. Santa Cruz Media, Inc., Corapi *d I entered into a Separation Agreement and Release of claims related *o rtermination on october 2g,200g. 28. Section 12 of the Separation Agreement and Release of Claims (a true and accurate copy of which is attached hereto and filed under seal) states: COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Page 4

29. 12. Agreement Not to Interfere or Trespass li agrees not to interfere with, disparage or otherwise cast a negative light upontantacruz or John Corapi or their ictivities.lt will not at:nd Santa Cruz seminars or other events or take any actions totiscoura,ge or dissuade others from attending Santa Cruz seminari or other events. I shall not enter the premises of any property of Santa Craz or Corapi for anleason whatsoever. For a period of 5 years from the date of this Agfeement, J will not contact, communicate with or harass Santa Cruz or Corapi ottffipective_agents or employees, except thut lf rnay commumcate wrth her spou=e,f -wiro n-ra-' perioirr-,,e work or senrices for Santa Cruz as an in6eleii6t contractor, or any of her children who may perform servicfl for Santa Craz, so long as the :"mt:ffi ' ji *l#:#g";"::ffi #;*JH ffiiil?;i 3 ill: Cruz or Corapi regarding this Agreement. It breached the Separation Agreement and Release of Claims by publishing the Letter. 30. unprivileged publication of the Letter interfered with, disparaged and cast a negative - light on Corapi and Santa Cruz Media, Inc. 31. {; unprivileged publication of the Letter discouraged or dissuaded others from attending Santa Cruz Media, Inc., seminars and events. 32. C unprivileged publication of the Letter constitutes harassment of Corapi and Santa Cruz Media, Inc. 33. As a result of ;breach of the Separation Agreement and Release of Claims, Catholic Charities cancelled an event featuring Corapi which Santa Cruz Media, Inc., had booked for Corapi in DeKalb, Illinois, which was scheduled for March 26,20t1. 34. Santa Cruz Media, Inc., sells significant amounts of Corapi related merchandise at and following such events. 35. As a result of fbreach of the Separation Agreement and Release of Claims, Santa Cruz Media, Inc., is unable to book any Church related speaking engagements for Corapi until such time as Corapi's priestly faculties are restored by the Catholic Church. COMPLAINTAND DEMAND FORJURY TRIAL Pagc 5

36. As a result ofj breach of the Separation Agreement and Release of Claims, Corapi has suffered damages in his occupation, business and to his reputation in an amount to be proven attial. 37. As a result of loreach of the Separation Agreement and Release of Claims, Santa Cruz Media, Inc., has suffered damages to its business and reputation in an amount to be proven attnal 38. Section 13.e of the Forbearance Agreement and Release of Claims provides that the prevailing party in any dispute or legal or equitable action arising from the Forbearance Agreement and Release of Claims shall be entitled to their attorney's fees and costs. 39. As a result ofll breach of the Forbearance Agreement and Release of Claims, Corapi and Santa Cruz Media, Inc., have initiated these proceedings to enforce the terms of the Separation Agreement and Release of Claims and have obligated themselves to pay attorney's fees and costs. COUNT III BREACH OF THE IMPLIED COVENAIYT OF GOOD F'AITH AI\D FAIR DEALING (Corapi and Santa Craz Media,Inc.) 40. Corapi and Santa Cruz Media, Inc., hereby re-allege and incorporate all of the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-39 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. 41. l;publication of the Letter is a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing which is implied in all conhacts in Montana. 42.Gbreachoftheimp1iedcovenantofgoodfaithandfairdealinghascaused damages to Corapi and Santa Cruz Media, Inc., in an amount to be proven atfral WHEREFORE, John A. Corapi prays for judgment as follows: 1. For damages in an amount to be proven at kial; COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FORJURY TRTAL Page 6

2. For punitive damages; 3. For his reasonable attorney's fees and costs; 4. For his costs of suit; and 5. For such other relief that this Court may deem just. AND WHEREFORE santa cruz Media, Inc., prays forjudgment as follows: 1. For damages in an amount to be proven at trial; 2. For its reasonable attorney's fees and costs; 3. For its costs of suiq and 4. For such other relief that this Court may deem just. DATED this 4th day of April,20ll. CHRISTENSEN MOORE, COCKRELL, CUMMINGS & AXELBERG, P.C. Mikel L. Moore Jay T. Johnson Attorneys for Plaintiff P.O. Box 7370 Kalispell, Montana 59904-037 0 Demand for Jurv Trial Pursuant to M.R.Civ.P., Rule 38(a), Plaintiffs hereby demand atialby jury of all issues that are triable by jury under Montana law. Dated this 4th day ofapril,z0ll. /// /// /// COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR rury TRIAL PageT

CHRISTENSEN, MOORE, COCKRELL, CUMMINGS & A)GLBERG, P.C. Mikel L. Moore JayT. Johnson Attorneys for Plaintiff P.O. Box 7370 Kalispell, Montana 59904-037 0 COMPT /AJNT AND DEMAND FOR ILJRY TRIAL Pagc 8