Lawrence Bender Producer. Lucy Walker Director. A letter from the filmmakers

Similar documents
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty: Background and Current Developments

High-level action needed to promote CTBT s entry into force. Interview with Carl Bildt, the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Sweden

THE CONGRESSIONAL COMMISSION ON THE STRATEGIC POSTURE OF THE UNITED STATES

"The Nuclear Threat: Basics and New Trends" John Burroughs Executive Director Lawyers' Committee on Nuclear Policy, New York (

ASEAN and the commitment to end nuclear testing

PROVISIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE TEST BAN TREATY

A New Non-Proliferation Strategy

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 7 December [on the report of the First Committee (A/70/460)]

Keynote by the Executive Secretary Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization.

STATEMENT. H.E. Ms. Laila Freivalds Minister for Foreign Affairs of Sweden

ASEAN and the commitment to end nuclear testing Page 1

Summary of Policy Recommendations

APPENDIX XIV: SUMMARY OF THE COMPREHENSIVE NUCLEAR- TEST-BAN TREATY (CTBT)

Regional Conference for South East Asia, the Pacific and Far East. Jakarta, Indonesia - 19 May 2014

Facilitating the. Treaty s Entry into Force. CONDITIONS FOR ENTRy INTO FORCE. ExPRESSIONS OF STRONG SuPPORT. NEw york, 2009.

Statement on the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty for

United States Statement to the NPT Review Conference, 3 May 2010 US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

Ontario Model United Nations II. Disarmament and Security Council

A GOOD FRAMEWORK FOR A GOOD FUTURE by Jonathan Granoff, President of the Global Security Institute

Montessori Model United Nations. Distr.: Middle School Thirteenth Session Sept First Committee Disarmament and International Security

Not an official UN document. For information purposes only. Ambassador Sérgio de Queiroz Duarte President, NPT Review Conference

The CTBT in the NPT Review Process

Implementing the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons: Non-proliferation and regional security

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the First Committee (A/58/462)]

Institute for Science and International Security

ADVOCACY GUIDE Second preparatory committee of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty 22 april - 3 may

2010 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non- Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons 3 May 2010

International Seminar: Countering Nuclear and Radiological Terrorism. Small Hall, Russian State Duma September 27, 2007

Remarks at the 2015 Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Review Conference John Kerry Secretary of State United Nations New York City, NY April 27, 2015

Arms Control in the Context of Current US-Russian Relations

NPT/CONF.2015/PC.III/WP.29

KAZAKHSTAN. Mr. Chairman, We congratulate you on your election as Chair of the First Committee and assure you of our full support and cooperation.

PS 0500: Nuclear Weapons. William Spaniel /

EXISTING AND EMERGING LEGAL APPROACHES TO NUCLEAR COUNTER-PROLIFERATION IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY*

PS 0500: Nuclear Weapons. William Spaniel

and note with satisfaction that stocks of nuclear weapons are now at far lower levels than at anytime in the past half-century. Our individual contrib

Lesson Title: Working for Nuclear Disarmament- Understanding the Present Status

Address by Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov at Plenary Meeting of Conference on Disarmament, Geneva, March 7, 2009

Nuclear doctrine. Civil Society Presentations 2010 NPT Review Conference NAC

Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web

EU S POLICY OF DISARMAMENT AS PART OF ITS NORMATIVE POWER Roxana HINCU *

MODEL DRAFT RESOLUTION

FLAWS IN THE CONCEPT OF NUCLEAR DETERRENCE by John Scales Avery University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Implications of South Asian Nuclear Developments for U.S. Nonproliferation Policy Nuclear dynamics in South Asia

US Code (Unofficial compilation from the Legal Information Institute)

THE COMPREHENSIVE NUCLEAR TEST BAN TREATY: PROMOTION OF ENTRY INTO FORCE AND UNIVERSALISATION

Brazil, Egypt, Ireland, Mexico, New Zealand and South Africa: draft resolution

The Case for Highly Enriched Uranium-Free Zones

Conference Urges States to Ratify nuclear Test Ban Page 1

Running Head: THREAT OF TERRORISM 1. Threat of Terrorism from the Russian Nuclear Stockpile. Thomas N. Davidson

Adopted by the Security Council at its 6191st meeting, on 24 September 2009

Christian Peacemaking: Eliminating the Nuclear Scandal The Challenge of Getting to Zero Part II

Lessons Learned from Nonproliferation Successes and Failures

United Nations General Assembly 1st

Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Documents & Reports. The Impact of the U.S.-India Deal on the Nonproliferation Regime

Global Security Institute

United action towards the total elimination of nuclear weapons

A Guide for. Non-Governmental Organizations and Campaigners. Produced by NUCLEAR AGE PEACE FOUNDATION Committed to a World Free of Nuclear Weapons

MULTILATERAL NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT VERIFICATION AND NORTH KOREA Kuala Lumpur, 26 November 2013

Interview with Annalisa Giannella, Personal Representative on

STATEMENT OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY,MR TIBOR TÓTH OntheOccasionoftheScientificSymposium 31August2006 Hofburg,Vienna,Austria

Secretary of State Saudabayev, Your Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen,

Re: Appeal and Questions regarding the Japan-India Civil Nuclear Cooperation Agreement

Implications of the Indo-US Growing Nuclear Nexus on the Regional Geopolitics

AGENCY FOR THE PROHIBITION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN

The South Asian Bomb: Forum

Dr. Sameh Aboul-Enein Minister Plenipotentiary and Deputy Head of Mission of Egypt to the UK

(Nagasaki University, January 20, 2014)

Mr KIM Won-soo Acting High Representative for Disarmament Affairs United Nations

General Assembly First Committee. Topic B: Compliance with Non-Proliferation, Arms Limitations, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments

Interviews. Interview With Ambasssador Gregory L. Schulte, U.S. Permanent Representative to the In. Agency

Nuclear Policy and the Presidential Election Henry Sokolski

Union of Concerned of Concerned Scientists Press Conference on the North Korean Missile Crisis. April 20, 2017

The US Second Line of Defense: Preventing Nuclear Smuggling Across Russia's Borders

Disarmament and Deterrence: A Practitioner s View

"Status and prospects of arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation from a German perspective"

Version re-submitted for issue of May/June CTBT Monitoring: a Vital Activity for Our Profession

Montessori Model United Nations MMUN 2012

Describe the causes and results of the arms race between the United States and Soviet Union.

Ambassador Dr. Sameh Aboul-Enein. Ronald Reagan Building - Washington DC

Eighth United Nations-Republic of Korea Joint Conference on Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Issues

Strengthening the International Non-Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime: Promoting a Successful NPT Review Conference in 2010

Debate on 21st January: Prospects for Nuclear Disarmament and Strengthening Non-Proliferation

Tuesday, 4 May 2010 in New York

Preparatory Committee for the 2020 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) - EU Statement

The 25 years since the end of the Cold War have seen several notable

NPT/CONF.2005/PC.II/25

ACHIEVING A WORLD WITHOUT NUCLEAR WEAPONS

General Assembly 1st (DISEC)

MONGOLIA PERMANENT MISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS

Permanent Mission of Japan to the United Nations

AS DELIVERED. EU Statement by

The outreach activities of the Commission aim to encourage the OUTREACH HIGHLIGHTS IN 2016

2010 Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference: Key Issues and Implications

The Roadmap to Total Nuclear Disarmament

THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 5, 2009 REMARKS BY PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA

CHAPTER 3 NUCLEAR 1914: THE NEXT BIG WORRY. Henry D. Sokolski

Conflict on the Korean Peninsula: North Korea and the Nuclear Threat Student Readings. North Korean soldiers look south across the DMZ.

Statement. His Excellency LIBRAN N. CABACTULAN Permanent Representative Permanent Mission of the Philippines to the United Nations

Transcription:

Discussion Guide

A letter from the filmmakers Three years ago, we began the journey of making this film. We wanted to make a movie about one of the greatest threats to humanity, the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Nuclear security is an issue that affects every one of us, regardless of nationality, religion or political affiliation. Our goal with this film is to make this issue something people will talk about and demand action. We also knew that the issue of nuclear security hasn t been fully in the public conscience since the days of the Cold War and the height of the Soviet/U.S. arms race. While there are many that remember the days of duck and cover classroom drills, there are new generations of Americans and people around the world that think of nuclear weapons as a distant threat from a bygone era. They could not be further from the truth. The globalization of the 21st century has produced positive and peaceful exchanges between peoples and nations, but it has also witnessed the dawn of the age of global terrorism. Today an accidental nuclear attack or terrorists acquiring nuclear materials and using them are all-too-real possibilities. We wanted to make a film that helps people understand the reality of today s nuclear threat and motivates them to do something about it. Everyone s voices need to be heard to demand that our leaders pursue policies that lead to the elimination of nuclear weapons. This guide offers resources and information to advocate going to zero. Please also visit TakePart.com/Zero to learn more about the issue and organizations involved in the film s Social Action campaign. Thank you, Lucy Walker Director and Lawrence Bender Producer Antenna, scene from COUNTDOWN TO ZERO 2

Countdown To Zero: Movie and a Conversation How to Start the Conversation When you host a Movie and a Conversation you help to make a difference by starting a dialogue about a critical issue none of us can afford to ignore. Nuclear weapons pose the greatest threat to humanity in the 21st century, but collectively we can change this situation. The first step is using this guide to host a converstation. Here are tips to help you organize your event: Blasting ring, NYC scene from COUNTDOWN TO ZERO Purchase a DVD of the film and host a house party screening and conversation at your house! If you are hosting the screening in a public place, please contact Swank (motionp@swank.com) for licensing rights. They can also provide a DVD. Invite your friends, family and colleagues to see the film as a group and join you for a post-movie conversation. Use the enclosed questions and discussion topics to guide your conversation. Get involved with the organizations associated with the campaign. See page 8 for listing. Join the campaign and take action at TakePart.com/Zero. 3

Lead A Discussion About The Film Get Informed What are the threats of nuclear proliferation and how do we stop them? There are more than 23,000 nuclear weapons in the world enough to destroy the world hundreds of times over. Russia and the U.S. possess the vast majority of these weapons. Russia keeps about 12,000 and the U.S. has approximately 9,613 total, though not all of these are active. Nuclear weapons are kept by three other countries, officially. China has approximately 240 total, France has approximately 300 and the United Kingdom has approximately 160. There are three other countries we know have nuclear warheads, Israel, India and Pakistan, although they have never officially declared this under the international treaty. India has approximately 100; Israel approximately 75-200 and Pakistan approximately 70-90. The existence of each of these stockpiles is a threat to domestic and international security. The U.S. and Russia keep thousands of their nuclear weapons ready to launch on a moment s notice. If even one of these weapons were to be launched through accident or miscalculation the consequences would be catastrophic. The greatest nuclear threat today is a nuclear weapon in the hands of a terrorist who uses it to kill hundreds of thousands of people. Terrorist groups like al Qaeda have pledged to acquire nuclear weapons and use them. Nuclear weapons are found in countries involved in bitter regional conflicts, countries with weak central governments and/or security measures that make these deadly weapons vulnerable to theft. In the last two decades, there have been 25 instances of nuclear explosive materials being lost or stolen and those are just the instances we know of. Scene from COUNTDOWN TO ZERO 4

Lead A Discussion Suggested questions for your discussion? 1. What did you think of the movie? 2. What did you think was the most interesting element in the movie? 3. Did the movie convince you that this is an issue we should be more concerned about? 4. If you had to describe this movie to a friend at a cocktail party, what would you say? 5. What would you say to people to convince them to see the movie? 6. Which part of the movie stands out to you and why? 7. From the information you received from the movie, which country do you feel poses the biggest threat? How should we address that threat? 8. Which expert in the movie did you feel made the most compelling case for nonproliferation? 9. In light of what you learned from the movie, what actions do you think the U.S. can take right now to reduce the threat of nuclear weapons? 10. What do you see as the biggest danger posed by nuclear weapons? 11. How do you think we could reduce the threat from these weapons? 12. How can we spread awareness about this issue? 13. Experts have suggested nuclear terrorism is today s greatest threat. How do you think we should guard against this? 14. How should we deal with countries who are potentially seeking nuclear weapons today? 15. What do you feel you can personally do to take action on this issue? 5

Get Involved And Take Action Stay engaged and informed at TakePart.com/Zero Sign the Global Zero Declaration at TakePart.com/Zero Become a fan on Facebook at facebook.com/countdowntozero Join the movement on Twitter #DemandZero Join the call for the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty http://www.projectforthectbt.org/involvement (details on page 9) Take action to ensure that all loose fissile material is secured in four years: http://www.psr.org/1more4zero (details on page 10) Tell you friends and family to host house parties to watch the film and take action with our campaign organizations! 6

Getting to ZERO How Can We Get to Zero? Important steps must be taken to achieve a world free of nuclear weapons: Ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, first in the U.S. Senate and then in the remaining holdout nations. Eliminate short-range, tactical nuclear weapons in future arms control treaties with Russia. Establish a regime to secure and control all fissile material. Negotiate a Fissile Materials Cutoff Treaty to halt production of fissile materials. Work with the U.S., Russia, Britain, France, China, India, Pakistan and Israel to gradually reduce each nation s arsenal. Convince Iran and North Korea, using all aspects of international persuasion to convince them to stop proliferation by halting any weapons production, and reducing and giving up any current arsenal. Negotiate a verifiable treaty prohibiting nuclear weapons. 7

Get Involved With Our Campaign Alliances Two Futures Project American Friends Service Committee Americans for Informed Democracy Arms Control Association British American Security Information Council (BASIC) Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Campaign for a Nuclear Weapons Free World Campus Progress (Center for American Progress) Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation Center for New American Security Coalition for Peace Action Center for Public Leadership at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government Colorado Coalition for the Prevention of Nuclear War Connect U.S. Fund CorpWatch Council for a Livable World Council on Foreign Relations CSRwire Daisy Alliance Friends Committee on National Legislation Georgia WAND Global Zero Global Security Institute Government Accountability Project Harvard Kennedy School's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Heal Utah Interfaith Council for Peace and Justice Justice Through Music Living Liberally Mainstream Media Moms Rising MoveOn Civic Action National Security Network North Suburban Peace Initiative Nuclear Age Peace Foundation Nuclear Watch of New Mexico Off the Mat into the World Peace Action Peace Action West Physicians for International Prevention of Nuclear War People for Peace and Justice of Utah Planetary Security Ploughshares Fund Prague Project Project for Nuclear Awareness Physicians for Social Responsibilitt RVLDP Southwestern Research and Information Center ThinkProgress (Center for American Progress) Tri-Valley CAREs United Nations Association of New York Women's Action for New Developments (WAND) 8

Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty C T B T What is the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty? The CTBT bans all nuclear explosions. The treaty was negotiated by the countries of the world in 1994 and opened for signature on September 24, 1996. It was originally signed by 71 nations, including the five nuclear-weapon States (U.S., Russia, UK, France, and China). There are currently 178 Signatories. In order for the treaty to come into effect, it must be signed and ratified by 44 specific countries. 41 of those countries have currently signed the treaty, though only 31 have ratified. The last three countries that must sign the treaty are India, North Korea and Pakistan. China, North Korea, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, Pakistan and the United States all must ratify the treaty before it enters into force. Why ban nuclear testing? Nuclear testing is responsible for environmental damage and negative health effects for Americans. An estimated 80,000 Americans who lived in or were born in the United States between the years 1951 and 2000 will contract cancer as a result of the fallout caused by atmospheric nuclear weapons testing, according to an analysis of government studies by the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research. Also, nuclear testing encourages development of new and potentially more destructive weapons. It s unnecessary recent scientific reports including one by [the JASON group] an independent group of scientists that regularly advise the U.S. government, show that our nuclear stockpile can remain reliable indefinitely with current maintenance practices. We do not need to test to maintain an effective stockpile. It s not in the best security interests of the U.S. If other countries are allowed to test nuclear weapons, they will be able to increase the capability of their weapons to the point where those weapons could reach U.S. soil. We should ban testing and use the monitoring and penalty systems of the treaty to ensure that no country will develop possession of a bomb, capable of reaching our shores. What does the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) do? The CTBT bans all nuclear testing, and establishes an International Monitoring System (IMS) and an International Data Center (IDC). This monitoring system and data center enables participants in the treaty to detect any militarily significant test explosion in the world. The IMS network currently consists of 225 certified monitoring facilities all over the globe, including seismic, infrasound, hydroacoustic and radionuclide monitoring stations as well as radionuclide laboratories. The Treaty foresees the completion of 337 IMS facilities in all. What s the status of the CTBT? The U.S. has had a self-imposed moratorium on nuclear testing since 1992 in recognition of the potentially dangerous effects of testing and was the first to sign the treaty in 1996, but has yet to ratify the treaty. The CTBT will enter into force 180 days after it has been ratified by the 44 nations listed in its Annex 2. These 44 countries represent all who possess either nuclear power or research reactors. Of the 44, 41 nations have signed the Treaty and 35 have ratified it. China, North Korea, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, Pakistan, and the United States are at present the last hold-outs for ratification. Of the Annex 2 nations, only North Korea, India and Pakistan have neither signed nor ratified the Treaty. What can you do? The U.S. is already a signatory to the Treaty. Now the Senate needs to vote in favor of ratification. Go to http://www. projectforthectbt.org/involvement and join the call for the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. 9

Securing All Vulnerable Fissile Materials In Four Years Demonstrating that it would only take a tennis ball sized amount of uranium to destroy a city. What is Fissile Material? Fissile material is highly enriched uranium (HEU) and plutonium, the essential ingredients for building nuclear weapons and powering nuclear reactors. Without this material, it s impossible to produce a nuclear weapon. Thus, effective control and elimination of fissile material is an essential step toward nuclear disarmament. Roughly 1600 metric tons of HEU and 500 metric tons of plutonium have been produced around the globe. In mid-2009, the global stockpile of nuclear materials was large enough to build more than 120,000 nuclear bombs (that s five times the entire current global stockpile). From the perspective of nuclear terrorism, the most dangerous of the two nuclear weapons materials is HEU because it can be used in a gun-type bomb. A gun-type weapon requires 50-60 kilograms of HEU and is able to deliver a devastating yield. While much of this material can be found in the five official nuclear weapons countries (U.S., Russia, China, UK, and France), a portion of the world s fissile materials lies outside of these nations in more unstable regions of the globe. Terrorist groups, including al Qaeda, have expressed a serious interest in acquiring weapons of mass destruction, which would include fissile material. With enough materials available worldwide to build 120,000 nuclear bombs, the possibility that a terrorist network could buy or steal such material is far too great. Failure to recognize the gravity of this threat could have devastating consequences. What is the status of securing all loose fissile material? The U.S. has been working with Russia and the former Soviet states since 1994 to secure their stockpiles of nuclear material. The National Nuclear Security Administration recently estimated that approximately 92% of the job is completed. All security upgrades have been completed for 210 out of 250 buildings with weapons-usable nuclear material in Russia and the Eurasian states. Security upgrades have been completed for 97 out of the established 110-130 nuclear warhead sites in Russia. All weapons-usable nuclear material has been removed from more than 47 sites outside of the U.S. and Russia. However, there is still a great deal of work to be done. President Obama recently called for accelerating this mission so that all vulnerable nuclear material in the world will be secured in four years. To meet this goal, a significant push is required by the U.S. and countries across the world. The current net dismantlement rate for Russia and the U.S. is estimated at approximately 200-300 warheads a year. At these rates, it would take decades for the U.S. and Russia to dismantle the approximately 1000 total warheads each, compared to the 1990s when the average yearly dismantlement rate was 1300 for the U.S. and 2000 for Russia. What can you do? Go to http://www.psr.org/1more4zero and take action to ensure that all loose fissile material is secured in four years. 10

For public licensing information, contact Swank at: motion@swank.com