BRIBERY IN OFFICIAL AND POLITICAL MATTERS (BRIBE RECIPIENT) (N.J.S.A. 2C:27-2) Count of the indictment charges defendant with the crime of bribery.

Similar documents
STALKING (N.J.S.A. 2C:12-10b) (Cases arising after March 21, 2009)

STALKING. (N.J.S.A. 2C:12-10b) (Cases arising after March 21, 2009) of this indictment charges defendant with the crime of stalking.

ENDANGERING INJURED VICTIM (N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1.2)

CORRUPTING OR INFLUENCING A JURY (N.J.S.A. 2C:29-8) 1

OBSCENITY FOR PERSONS UNDER 18 (ADMITTING TO EXHIBITION OF AN OBSCENE FILM) N.J.S.A. 2C:34-3c(2)

HINDERING APPREHENSION OR PROSECUTION FOR TERRORISM (N.J.S.A. 2C:38-4)

VANDALIZING RAILROAD CROSSING DEVICES (N.J.S.A. 2C: ) Count of the indictment provides as follows: [READ COUNT OF THE INDICTMENT]

Revised 5/8/06. SIMPLE ASSAULT (Bodily Injury)(Lesser Included Offense) (N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1a(1))

CERTAIN PERSONS NOT TO HAVE ANY WEAPONS 1 [N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7a]

AGGRAVATED ASSAULT - SIGNIFICANT BODILY INJURY N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1b(7) 1

POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE 1 (BATH SALTS) 2 (N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5.3a)

RACKETEERING 1 (N.J.S.A. 2C:41-2c)

ATTEMPT (N.J.S.A. 2C:5-1) ALTERNATIVE I [To be used when defendant is charged with Attempt]

OBSCENITY FOR PERSONS UNDER 18 (ADMITTING TO EXHIBITION OF AN OBSCENE FILM) N.J.S.A. 2C:34-3c(1)

S 0556 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT IN THE COURSE OF A FELONY: CONSENT ALLEGED 1 N.J.S.A. 2C:14-2a(3) [READ COUNT OF INDICTMENT]

AGGRAVATED CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONTACT N.J.S.A. 2C:14-3a [2C:14-2a(6)]

N.J.A.C. 17: Causes for debarment of a firm(s) or an individual(s)

AGGRAVATED ASSAULT DIRECT CARE WORKER (ATTEMPTING TO CAUSE OR PURPOSELY, KNOWINGLY OR RECKLESSLY CAUSING BODILY INJURY) (N.J.S.A.

DATE ISSUED: 2/18/ of 6 UPDATE 107 DBD(LEGAL)-P

ENDANGERING THE WELFARE OF A CHILD (PORNOGRAPHY) (Applies to crimes committed after August 14, 2013) N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4b(5)(b)

DATE ISSUED: 1/16/ of 6 UPDATE 112 DBD(LEGAL)-P

CAUSING OR RISKING WIDESPREAD INJURY OR DAMAGE (HAZARDOUS WASTE) N.J.S.A. 2C:17-2(a)(2)

CAUSING OR RISKING WIDESPREAD INJURY OR DAMAGE (HAZARDOUS WASTE) N.J.S.A. 2C:17-2(a)(2).

CHAPTER Section 1 of P.L.1995, c.408 (C.43:1-3) is amended to read as follows:

DRAFT CHAPTER 94. CPJC 94.1 General Comments on Credit Card or Debit Card Abuse CPJC 94.2 Instruction Credit Card or Debit Card Abuse...

UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE (SYNTHETIC CANNABINOID) (N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5.3c) 1

MURDER, PASSION/PROVOCATION AND AGGRAVATED/RECKLESS MANSLAUGHTER 1 N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3a(1) and (2); 2C:11-4a, b(1) and b(2)

ASSEMBLY, No. 186 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION

Mock Trial Practice Law Test

Fiji: Proceeds of Crime Act 1997 (as amended)

CHAPTER XIV DISCIPLINARY ACTION AND APPEAL. Rule 14.1 DISCIPLINARY ACTION - SUSPENSION, DEMOTION AND DISMISSAL

FAILURE TO REGISTER AS A SEX OFFENDER (N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2a)

The 2013 Florida Statutes

- Towards a Design of Good Practice - Mathias Nell. Article 244. Proposals for remuneration made to officials holding a public office

PETITION FOR MEMBER OF THE NEW JERSEY GENERAL ASSEMBLY

CODE OF ETHICS FOR PARLIAMENTARIANS INCLUDING MINISTERS

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN

#353 ELECTION ACT BAND 12, TREATY 6

STIPULATED JURY INSTRUCTIONS State v. Manny Rayfield Curr County Circuit Court Case No State of New Maine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Criminal No

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY CRIMINAL DIVISION. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) V. ) Case No. ) ) GUILTY PLEA COLLOQUY

CHAPTER. Criminal Trial. Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458

VILLAGE OF HEISLER BYLAW IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA

Grand jury; proceedings and operation in general

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

68 From the Committee on Model Criminal Jury Instructions

Crimes (Foreign Incursions and Recruitment) Act 1978

Phase 2 follow up: Additional written report by Russia

Cape Coral Social Club By Laws Bylaws as revised 2017 MISSION STATEMENT

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL

Case 2:10-cr MHT-WC Document 1814 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 13

Ordinance No. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS: 1.

The Criminal Court System. Law 521 Chapter Seven

CITY OF YUBA CITY CANDIDATE S GUIDE FOR MUNICIPAL OFFICE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF COBB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA. Defendant. STATE S REQUESTS TO CHARGE

trial preparation packet

National Public Service Ethics Act Act No. 129 of 1999

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO GRAND JURY [YYYY] The [Day, i.e. 12th] Day of [Month, Year] Plaintiff.

1. The location or site where a criminal offence has taken place is called a(n)?

1. If several suspected offenders are involved in the same criminal. accusation or indictment, no defense attorney shall be allowed to represent

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Order Adopting Amendments to the North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct

Third Evaluation Round

ARTICLE I Name. The name of this organization shall be the Association of Supervisors and Administrators of the Great Neck Educational Staff.

Case 2:11-cr HH-FHS Document 133 Filed 08/16/12 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

ACT ON THE RESPONSIBILITY OF LEGAL PERSONS FOR THE CRIMINAL OFFENCES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

GREATER NANAIMO CHAMBER OF CONFERENCE By-laws and Constitution May 21, 2015

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I. In the Matter of the Publication and Distribution of the Hawai'i Pattern Jury Instructions - Criminal

JUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS

The Judicial Branch. Three Levels of Courts in the U.S.

NOMINATING PETITION FOR PRIMARY CANDIDATES

15A-903. Disclosure of evidence by the State Information subject to disclosure. (a) Upon motion of the defendant, the court must order:

MINNESOTA JUDICIAL TRAINING UPDATE

NOMINATING PETITION FOR PRIMARY CANDIDATES

NOMINATING PETITION FOR GENERAL ELECTION INDEPENDENT CANDIDATES

THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1947

NOMINATING PETITION FOR PRIMARY CANDIDATES

NC General Statutes - Chapter 75D 1

District of Columbia False Claims Act

Florida Elections Commission Statutes and Rules

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED NOVEMBER 26, 2018

Closing Arguments. Jury Instructions:

BERMUDA BRIBERY ACT : 47

DEFERRED PROCEEDINGS

Cuyahoga County Ethics Ordinance

PART 25-GOVERNMENTWIDE DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION (NONPROCUREMENT) AND GOVERNMENTWIDE REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (GRANTS) Subpart A-General

RATIFICATION OF THE CONSTITUTION, FEDERALISTS VERSUS ANTI- FEDERALISTS AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS ELISEO LUGO III

Orange group anti-corruption policy

LEGAL AD. Invitation to Bid Bid No For the purchase of 1 new Motor Grader

Felony Cases. Police Investigation. Associate Circuit Court. Felony Versus Misdemeanor

STUDENT GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON

Where did the law of evidence come from/why have the law of evidence? Check on the power of executive government (Guantanamo Bay).

2015 GUIDELINES MANUAL

Learning Station #5 LEVEL ONE-13

Chapter 293. Defamation Act Certified on: / /20.

CHARACTERS IN THE COURTROOM

FORM 4. RULE 26(f) REPORT (PATENT CASES) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Transcription:

Revised 2/14/11 BRIBERY IN OFFICIAL AND POLITICAL MATTERS Count of the indictment charges defendant with the crime of bribery. [READ COUNT OF INDICTMENT] That statute reads in pertinent part as follows: A person is guilty of bribery if he directly or indirectly solicits, accepts or agrees to accept from another: (a) Any benefit as consideration for a decision, opinion, recommendation, vote or exercise of discretion as a public servant, party official or voter on any public issue or in any public election. (b) Any benefit as consideration for a decision, vote, recommendation or exercise of official discretion in a judicial or administrative proceeding. (c) Any benefit as consideration for a violation of an official duty of a public servant or party official. (d) Any benefit as consideration for the performance of official duties. In order for you to find the defendant guilty of the crime of bribery, the State must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1. That the defendant directly or indirectly solicited, accepted or agreed to accept a benefit from another. 2. CHOOSE AS APPROPRIATE Page 1 of 5

That the defendant did so as consideration for a decision, opinion, recommendation, vote or exercise of official discretion of (defendant himself/herself or a third party) as a public servant (party official) (voter) on a public issue or in any public election. that the defendant did so as consideration for a decision, vote, recommendation or exercise of official discretion of (defendant himself/herself or a third party) in a (judicial) or (administrative) proceeding. himself/herself or a third party), as a public servant (party official) violating an official duty. or a third party) s performance of official duties. 3. That defendant acted purposely. The first element that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that the defendant directly or indirectly solicited, accepted or agreed to accept a benefit. Benefit means gain or advantage, or anything regarded by the beneficiary as gain or advantage, including a pecuniary benefit or a benefit to any other person or entity in whose welfare he/she is interested. 1 Benefit as consideration means any benefit not authorized by law. [CHARGE IF PECUNIARY BENEFIT IS ALLEGED] Pecuniary benefit is benefit in the form of money, property, commercial interests or anything else the primary significance of which is economic gain. 2 [CHARGE IF APPLICABLE] It is no defense to bribery that a person who solicited, accepted or agreed to accept a benefit 1 2 N.J.S.A. 2C:27-1a. N.J.S.A. 2C:27-1f. Page 2 of 5

did so as a result of conduct by another constituting theft by extortion or coercion or an attempt to commit either of those crimes. The second element that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is: [CHOOSE AS APPROPRIATE] That the defendant did so as consideration for a decision, opinion, recommendation, vote or exercise of official discretion of (defendant himself/herself or a third party) as a public servant (party official) (voter) on a public issue or in any public election. that the defendant did so as consideration for a decision, vote, recommendation or exercise of official discretion of (defendant himself/herself or a third party) in a (judicial) or (administrative) proceeding. himself/herself or a third party), as a public servant (party official) violating an official duty. himself/herself or a third party) s performance of official duties. Consideration means some right, interest or profit accruing to one party. 3 [CHOOSE AS APPLICABLE] Public servant means any officer or employee of government, including legislators and judges, and any person participating as juror, advisor, consultant or otherwise, in performing a governmental function, but the term does not include witnesses. 4 Government means any branch, subdivision or agency of the government of the state or any locality within it. 5 Party official means a person who holds an elective or appointive post in a political party in the United States by virtue of which he/she directs or conducts, or participates in directing or 3 4 Black s Law Dictionary (5th ed). N.J.S.A. 2C:27-1e. Page 3 of 5

conducting party affairs at any level or responsibility. 6 Administrative proceeding means any proceeding, other than a judicial proceeding, the outcome of which is required to be based on a record or documentation prescribed by law, or in which law or regulation is particularized in application to individuals. 7 [CHARGE IN ALL CASES] The third element that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that defendant acted purposely. A person acts purposely with respect to the nature of his/her conduct or a result thereof if it is his/her conscious object to engage in conduct of that nature or to cause such a result. Purpose, with purpose, and similar words have the same meaning. In other words, in order for you to find that the defendant acted purposely, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it was the defendant's conscious object at the time he/she committed an unlawful act. Purpose is a state or a condition of the mind which cannot be seen and can only be determined by inferences from conduct, words or acts. A state of mind is rarely susceptible of direct proof, but must ordinarily be inferred from the facts. Therefore, it is not necessary, members of the jury, that witnesses be produced to testify that an accused said he/she had a certain state of mind when he/she engaged in a particular act. His/Her state of mind may be gathered from his/her acts and his/her conduct, and from all he/she said and did at the particular time and place, and from all of the surrounding circumstances. If you find that the State has proved each of these three elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you must find the defendant guilty of bribery. If the State has failed to prove any of these elements 5 6 7 N.J.S.A. 2C:27-1b. N.J.S.A. 2C:27-1g. N.J.S.A. 2C:27-1h. Page 4 of 5

beyond a reasonable doubt, you must find the defendant not guilty. [IF THE STATE ALLEGES THAT THE BENEFIT IS PECUNIARY, ADD] 8 If the State has proved each element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, you must determine the value of the pecuniary benefit involved. Pecuniary benefit is benefit in the form of money, property, commercial interests or anything else the primary significance of which is economic gain. The State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the value of the pecuniary benefit involved [IF APPROPRIATE, ADD: for each specific instance concerning which you have reached a verdict of guilty] exceeds $200. 8 If a particular case involves an allegation of receipt of a pecuniary benefit and a non-pecuniary benefit, there should be separate interrogatories on the verdict sheet as to each type of benefit. This is because bribery is a crime of the second degree unless the value of the pecuniary benefit is $200 or less. Page 5 of 5