All Made by the same Creator:God Sovereignty! The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. 28FEB17 President Trump s address to Congress in joint session protect the interests of We On Feb 28, 2017, at 12:41 PM, Dejuremike@yahoo.com wrote: On Monday, February 27, 2017 11:54 PM, "dejuremike@yahoo.com" <dejuremike@yahoo.com> wrote: Dear Mrs. Jenkins BAR #271432, when you accepted service from Mr. Charles Frank (One of the People) on behalf of Colonel Bryan Hunt (One of the People) with myself as a Witness Under California Business and Professions Code 6068 Duties of Attorney, and as an Officer of the Court, you have an Oath of Office to protect the interests of We http:// www.citizensactionnetworks.com/index.php/en/ attorney/code- section-6068 In good faith, please withdraw your Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. I will list the reasons below. 1- Cara L. Jenkins hasnt proven Jurisdiction on the Record in violation of Title 5 USC 556 (d) (Proof of Jurisidiction requirements are a front and back copy of CARA L. JENKINS BAR Card to practice law, A Certified Original Copy of Certificate of Standing,a form 700 for herself and
each named defendant, a FARA Registration Statement (22 U.S.C. 611 et seq. Please print, complete and return this PDF by mail. http:// www.citizensactionnetworks.com/ images/pdf_files/ contract_counsel2012.pdf To: Michael C. School 12795 La Barr Meadows Rd. Grass Valley California. 95945 (Only wet ink originals will be accepted) Page - 1 The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated as an Officer of the Court, you have an Oath of Office to protect the interests of We 2-The Affidavit of Cara L. Jenkins sworn to before a Notary with a Jurat form attached as to why her "Clients" are the named Defendants, not the People? The People are entitled to a response by each named defendant as an affirmative answer as to why Laws are being ignored in violation of the Supreme Laws of the Land. [See Sambor v. Kelley, 271 Ga. 133, 134(3) ( 516 S.E.2d 295) (1999) (an a davit not sworn to before a notary public is invalid); Schmidt v. Feldman, 230 Ga. App. 500 ( 497 S.E.2d 23) (1998) (an an affidavit cannot be sworn to by long distance telephone but must be sworn to in the physical presence of the notary public).sood v. SMEIGH 259 Ga.App. 490, 492 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003).] "Every State law must conform in the first place to the Constitution of the United States, and then to the subordinate constitutions of the particular state; and if it infringes upon the provisos of either, it is so far void." Houston v. Moore, 18 US 1, 5 L.Ed 19 (1840). 3-Please supply the contracts and fee retainer schedules between you and your Clients. Please also supply the W-9 information for each party 4- Has Cara L. Jenkins been appointed Guardian Ad Litem by a Court of Record regarding the Wards of the Court she is presuming to represent? Please provide the paperwork for our review.
5- If Cara L. Jenkins cannot Mediate in good faith, a Complaint will be filed with the State BAR Office of Chief Trial Counsel and you will be named by Joinder as a defendant. (In the future 10 business days notice is required) https://www.law.cornell.edu/ Page - 2 The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated protect the interests of We uscode/text/18/4 6- A certified original Oath of Office with a certified original of the Bond policy for each named defendant. *BAR Attorneys to provide Misconduct Policy Claims agent information. Guardians Ad Litem (GAL) About Guardian ad litem (GAL) literally means guardian for the suit. A guardian ad litem is an attorney appointed by a judge to assist the court in determining the circumstances of a matter before the court. It is the fundamental responsibility of the guardian ad litem to provide independent recommendations to the court about the client s best interests, which can be different from advocating for what the client wants, and to bring balance to the decision- making process. The GAL may conduct interviews and investigations, make reports to the court, and participate in court hearings or mediation sessions. The Office of the Executive Secretary, Supreme Court of each State, administers, maintains and distributes lists of attorneys who are qualified guardians ad litem. There are two separate guardian ad litem programs: one for children and one for incapacitated persons. The children s program qualifies attorneys for appointment as guardians ad litem for
children in juvenile and domestic relations district courts and circuit courts. The incapacitated persons (adult) program qualifies attorneys for appointment as guardians ad litem for incapacitated persons in circuit courts. "Clients are also called "wards of the court" in regard to their relationship with their attorneys."spilker v. Hankin, 158 F.2d 35, Page - 3 The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated protect the interests of We 58U.S.App.D.C. 206. (Wards of court. are Infants and persons of unsound mind). Davis Committee v. Loney, 290 Ky. 644, 162 S.W.2d 189, 190. Why has Edmund G. Brown become incapacitated and why has he not been removed as Governor? Why is another BAR Attorney claiming to be his Guardian Ad Litem when this case is in a District Court, not a Circuit Court? The Supreme Court recognizes that even with an attorney present coercion may be exercised. Miranda, supra, 384 U.S. at 470, and see 475-476, 86 S.Ct. 1602. UNITED STATES V. POOLE United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. 495 F.2d 115 (D.C. Cir. 1974) Contact Information Cara L Jenkins - #271432 Current Status: Active This member is active and may practice law in California. See below for more details. Profile Information The following information is from the official records of The
State Bar of California. Bar Number: 271432 Page - 4 The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated protect the interests of We Address: County: District: Sections: Office of Legislative Counsel 925 L St Fl 7 Sacramento, CA 95814 Map it Sacramento District 3 Litigation Public Law Phone Number: Fax Number: e-mail: Undergradua te School: Law School: (916) 341-8245 Not Available cara.jenkins@l c.ca.gov Univ of California Santa Barbara; CA McGeorge SOL Univ of the Pacific; CA Status History Effective Date Present 12/1/2010 Status Change Active Admitted to The State Bar of California Explanation of member status Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law in California Disciplinary and Related Actions Overview of the attorney discipline system.
This member has no public record of discipline. Administrative Actions This member has no public record of administrative actions. Page - 5 The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated protect the interests of We Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss is denied for the following reason(s) No Authority,. ****** Until "Counsel" proves by Written Sworn Statement, as a Witness, on the Record with full and complete disclosure in good faith with clean hands you cannot enter Motions without first incurring Joinder to the lawsuit as a defendant for RICO.(*Combination by Officers of the Court and past or present members of the BAR Associations in a criminal conspiracy to overthrow the Government of the State of California.) Terms and conditions of *Settlement. 1-Settlement of the outstanding ledger balance by the defendants 2- Nullify ANY AND ALL 2nd Amendment Infringements 3- Grant the 31st Field Force recognition by the State of California as Constitutionally Compliant and allocate resources to establish a viable cohesive network as first responder volunteers in each County of the State. Please respond with a Counter Offer (I:E Mediation) Thank you in advance for your consideration in this matter. Michael C. School 2nd Chair to Colonel Bryan Hunt Pro Se' Litigant Title 42 USC 1988 Private Attorney General Citizensactionnetworks.com http:// peoplevsstates.mikrei.com/aboutus Page - 6 The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated
protect the interests of We On Monday, February 27, 2017 6:59 PM, bryan hunt <colonel_b.hunt51@yahoo.com> wrote: Dear Madam, I'm sorry I have not gotten in touch with you as Colonel of Militia forces Calif I was involved in an assessment of the storm area Northern Calif. and dropped my phone in either the snow or in the flood areas. Now you may file any motion you please, the fact remains your bosses including the Governor has violated the law multiple times should you find a judge to dismiss we have notified all 58 county Grand Juries. What we are asking for is to be heard before a Federal Grand Jury.which underneath the 7th amendment is the right of every American. I have sent this email to my legal department notifying them of your intentions.you may call me to discuss in three days Sincerely yours, Col B Hunt 31st Field Lightfoot Forces From: "Jenkins, Cara" <Cara.Jenkins@LegislativeCounsel.ca.gov> To: "colonel_b.hunt51@yahoo.com" <colonel_b.hunt51@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 10:49 AM Subject: RE: Hunt v. Brown, et al. (Case No. 2:16-cv-08543- Page - 7 The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated as an Officer of the Court, you have an Oath of Office to protect the interests of We SVW-RAO) Mr. Hunt: This is a follow-up email to the voice message I left for you earlier today. I have left you several messages in an attempt to discuss your lawsuit, Hunt v. Brown, et al. (Case No. 2:16- cv-08543-svw-rao), but have not heard back from you. I
represent the current and former Members of the California State Legislature whom you have named as defendants in the case. I intend to file a motion to dismiss the lawsuit today on behalf of my clients, and will send you copies of the motion via overnight delivery. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me by telephone or email. Best regards, Cara L. Jenkins Deputy Legislative Counsel Office of Legislative Counsel 1315 10 th Street, Room 3021 Sacramento, CA 95814 916-341-8245 cara.jenkins@legislativecounsel.ca.gov ------------------------------------ Confidentiality Notice ------------------------------------ This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any review, use, disclosure, or distribution not authorized by the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. The distribution of this message by e-mail to persons outside of the Legislature or the Office Of Legislative Counsel may not be secure and could result in unauthorized access. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. From: Jenkins, Cara Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 12:49 PM To: colonel_b.hunt51@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Hunt v. Brown, et al. (Case No. 2:16-cv-08543-SVW-RAO) Mr. Hunt: Page - 8 The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated protect the interests of We This email is to confirm that I left you a voicemail earlier today requesting that you contact me to discuss the abovereferenced case. If you cannot reach me on my office line, please contact me via my cell phone at 916-802-8478. Best regards, Cara Jenkins Deputy Legislative Counsel Office of Legislative Counsel 916-341-8245 From: Jenkins, Cara
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 11:27:50 AM To: colonel_b.hunt51@yahoo.com Subject: FW: Hunt v. Brown, et al. (Case No. 2:16-cv-08543- SVW-RAO) Hello Mr. Hunt: I am following up on a voice message that I left for you earlier today. I have been trying to reach you in order to discuss issues related to the complaint you filed in the above-referenced case. As mentioned in my voice mail, our office intends to file a motion to dismiss this case on Monday, February 27, 2017, on behalf of our clients. Prior to doing so, we are required by Local Rule 7-3 to meet and confer with you in an effort to reach a possible resolution. If I do not hear back from you prior to Monday, February 27, 2017, our office intends to move forward with filing the aforementioned motion. Page - 9 The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated protect the interests of We Please call me at 916-341-8245 to discuss the above. Best regards, Cara L. Jenkins Deputy Legislative Counsel Office of Legislative Counsel 1315 10 th Street, Room 3021 Sacramento, CA 95814 916-341-8245 cara.jenkins@legislativecounsel.ca.gov ------------------------------------ Confidentiality Notice ------------------------------------ This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any review, use, disclosure, or distribution not authorized by the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. The distribution of this
message by e-mail to persons outside of the Legislature or the Office Of Legislative Counsel may not be secure and could result in unauthorized access. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. From: Jenkins, Cara Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 5:38 PM To: 'colonel_b.hunt51@yahoo.com' Subject: Hunt v. Brown, et al. (Case No. 2:16-cv-08543-SVW-RAO) Mr. Hunt: My name is Cara Jenkins, and I am an attorney with the Office of Legislative Counsel. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, I have been trying to reach you by telephone the past few days and have left several messages for you in an effort to discuss the details of the above referenced lawsuit. Page - 10 The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated protect the interests of We Please contact me at your earliest convenience so we may discuss your complaint, and our office s intention to file a motion to dismiss on behalf of our clients by the required response deadline. My telephone number is 916-341-8245. Best regards, Cara L. Jenkins Deputy Legislative Counsel Office of Legislative Counsel 1315 10 th Street, Room 3021 Sacramento, CA 95814 916-341-8245 cara.jenkins@legislativecounsel.ca.gov ------------------------------------ Confidentiality Notice ------------------------------------ This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any review, use, disclosure, or distribution not authorized by the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. The distribution of this message by e-mail to persons outside of the Legislature or the Office Of Legislative Counsel may not be secure and could result in unauthorized access. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Page - 11 The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated