DIRECTIVE 98/71/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Similar documents
CONSOLIDATED VERSION. Registered Designs Act 1949 (c.88) An Act to consolidate certain enactments relating to registered designs

REGISTERED DESIGNS ACT /221

Denmark. Claus Barrett Christiansen Bech-Bruun

TURKEY Industrial Design Law Decree-law No. 554 as amended by Law No of November 7, 1995 ENTRY INTO FORCE: November 7, 1995

Contributing firm. Author Henning Hartwig

Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Designs. Germany Henning Hartwig BARDEHLE PAGENBERG Partnerschaft mbb. A Global Guide

First Council Directive

EUROPEAN UNION Council Regulation on the Community Trade Mark No. 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 ENTRY INTO FORCE: April 13, 2009

COMMUNITY TRADE MARK ORDER 2014

Council of the European Union Brussels, 28 October 2015 (OR. en)

DESIGN PROTECTION AND EXAMINATION EUROPEAN APPROACH FRANCK FOUGERE ANANDA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIMITED

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) REGULATIONS

law of intellectual property (pp-ii) by pari n. S. Katkar s.y. ll.m

SWEDEN PATENTS ACT No.837 of 1967 in the version in force from July 1, 2014

The Community Design System The Latest Developments in Examination and Invalidity Procedure. By Eva Vyoralová

ETHIOPIA A PROCLAMATION CONCERNING INVENTIONS, MINOR INVENTIONS AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS PROCLAMATION NO. 123/1995 ENTRY INTO FORCE: May 10, 1995

TRADE MARKS ACT 1996 (as amended)

1 OJ L 3, , p. 1

FINLAND Patents Act No. 550 of December 15, 1967 as last amended by Act No. 101/2013 of January 31, 2013 Enter into force on 1 September 2013

The Consolidate Utility Models Act 1)

Official Journal of the European Union

ACT ON TRADE MARKS PART ONE TRADE MARKS CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 20 December 2017 *

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 7 April /09 Interinstitutional File: 2000/0177 (CNS) PI 28

CZECH REPUBLIC Trademark Act No. 441/2003 Coll. of December 3, 2003 ENTRY INTO FORCE: April 1, 2004

Law on Trademarks and Indications of Geographical Origin

Adopted text. - Trade mark regulation

MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS THE URUGUAY ROUND

having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2013)0161),

C 337 E/278 Official Journal of the European Communities Proposal for a Council Regulation on the Community patent (2000/C 337 E/45)

Council Decision of 10 March 2011 authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection (2011/167/EU)

The Consolidate Trade Marks Act 1)

AZERBAIJAN Law on Patent Date of Text (Enacted): July 25, 1997 ENTRY INTO FORCE: August 2, 1997

GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION OF REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS

REGULATION (EC) No 764/2008 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. of 9 July 2008

EN Official Journal of the European Union L 157/ 45. DIRECTIVE 2004/48/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 29 April 2004

LAW ON THE PROTECTION OF INVENTIONS. No. 50-XVI of March 7, Monitorul Oficial nr /455 din * * * TABLE OF CONTENTS.

The Ministry of Justice March 5, 2013 Stockholm

Law No LAW ON TRADEMARKS AND OTHER DISTINCTIVE SIGNS. Courtesy translation provided by WIPO 2012

Questionnaire on Exceptions and Limitations to Patent Rights. The answers to this questionnaire have been provided on behalf of:

DECISION 486 Common Intellectual Property Regime (Non official translation)

[English translation by WIPO] Questionnaire on Exceptions and Limitations to Patent Rights

GUIDELINES FOR THE PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO A DECLARATION OF INVALIDITY OF A REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGN

The Consolidate Trade Marks Act 1)

Act No. 8 of 2015 BILL

HUNGARY Patent Act Act XXXIII of 1995 as consolidated on March 01, 2015

Law On Trade Marks and Indications of Geographical Origin

LATVIA Patent Law adopted on 15 February 2007, with the changes of December 15, 2011

Council Decision of 10 March 2011 authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection (2011/167/EU)

Kingdom of Bhutan The Industrial Property Act enacted on July 13, 2001 entry into force: 2001 (Part III, Sections 17 to 23: May 1, 2009)

Questionnaire on Exceptions and Limitations to Patent Rights. The answers to this questionnaire have been provided on behalf of:

CHAPTER TEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

ON TRADEMARKS LAW ON TRADEMARKS CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

NORWAY Trade Marks Act Act No. 4 of March 3, 1961 as last amended by Act No. 8 of March 26, 2010 Entry into force of last amending Act: July 1, 2013.

of Laws for Electronic Access SLOVAKIA Law on Inventions, Industrial Designs and Rationalization Proposals (No. 527 of November 27, 1990)*

IRELAND Trade Marks Act as amended up to and including the February 2, 2016

GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE ON REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS

Patent Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Delegations will find in the Annex a Presidency compromise proposal concerning the abovementioned

Questionnaire on Exceptions and Limitations to Patent Rights. The answers to this questionnaire have been provided on behalf of:

***I DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN 2011/0093(COD)

THE LAW ON TRADEMARKS 1. Article 1

OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOSOVA / No. 12 / 29 AVGUST 2011, PRISTINA. LAW No. 04/L-029 ON PATENTS LAW ON PATENTS

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

The methods and procedures described must be directly applicable to production.

WIPO INTRODUCTORY SEMINAR ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Law on the protection of inventions No. 50/2008 of the Republic of Moldova can be found at:

(As published in UPOV Gazette No. 94, December 2002) Republic of Moldova State Agency on Industrial Property Protection

Law on Trademarks and Geographical Indications

Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) (1994)*

OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE PROVISIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF SELF-GOVERNMENT IN KOSOVO / PRISHTINA: YEAR II / NO. 14 / 01 JULY 2007 Law No.

TITLE II CONCEPT OF A TRADEMARK AND REGISTRATION PROHIBITIONS

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 27 September /12 PI 113 COUR 66 WORKING DOCUMENT

Draft agreement on a Unified Patent Court and draft Statute - Revised Presidency text

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY ACT, No. 8 of 2010 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. PART II Patents

Questionnaire on Exceptions and Limitations to Patent Rights. The answers to this questionnaire have been provided on behalf of:

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

Act No. 435/2001 Coll. on Patents, Supplementary Protection Certificates and on Amendment of Some Acts as Amended (The Patent Act)

THE INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS ACT, 2016 PART IV

Chapter 16 of the above-mentioned Agreement establishes provisions relating to the need to respect and safeguard intellectual property rights;

The Patents Act 1977 (as amended)

CHAPTER 416 TRADEMARKS ACT

Article 30. Exceptions to Rights Conferred

REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW AMENDING THE LAW ON TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS. No of

THE PATENT LAW 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Article 1. This Law shall regulate the legal protection of inventions by means of patents.

LUXEMBOURG Patent Law as amended by the law of May 24, 1998 ENTRY INTO FORCE: June 21, 1998

Notwithstanding Article 29, any invention that is liable to injure public order, morality or public health shall not be patented (Article 32).

No. 30 of Patents and Industrial Designs Act Certified on: 19/1/2001.

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

MARRAKESH AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION ANNEX 1C: AGREEMENT ON TRADE-RELATED ASPECTS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS *

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 December 2012 (OR. en) 2011/0093 (COD) PE-CONS 72/11 PI 180 CODEC 2344 OC 70

ANNEX XVII REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 5 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

PROVISIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF SELF GOVERNMENT ON TRADEMARKS

ANNEX VII REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 25 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CROATIA AND SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO

OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS)

Layout-Designs of Integrated Circuits Protection Act

Transcription:

DIRECTIVE 98/71/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 13 October 1998 on the legal protection of designs THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community and in particular Article 100a thereof, Having regard to the proposal by the Commission (1), Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2), Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189b of the Treaty (3), in the light of the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee on 29 July 1998, (1) Whereas the objectives of the Community, as laid down in the Treaty, include laying the foundations of an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe, fostering closer relations between Member States of the Community, and ensuring the economic and social progress of the Community countries by common action to eliminate the barriers which divide Europe; whereas to that end the Treaty provides for the establishment of an internal market characterised by the abolition of obstacles to the free movement of goods and also for the institution of a system ensuring that competition in the internal market is not distorted; whereas an approximation of the laws of the Member States on the legal protection of designs would further those objectives; (2) Whereas the differences in the legal protection of designs offered by the legislation of the Member States directly affect the establishment and functioning of the internal market as regards goods embodying designs; whereas such differences can distort competition within the internal market; (3) Whereas it is therefore necessary for the smooth functioning of the internal market to approximate the design protection laws of the Member States; (4) Whereas, in doing so, it is important to take into consideration the solutions and the advantages with which the Community design system will provide undertakings wishing to acquire design rights; (5) Whereas it is unnecessary to undertake a full-scale approximation of the design laws of the Member States, and it will be sufficient if approximation is limited to those national provisions of law which most directly affect the functioning of the internal market; whereas provisions on sanctions, remedies and enforcement should be left to national law; whereas the objectives of this limited approximation cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States acting alone; (6) Whereas Member States should accordingly remain free to fix the procedural provisions concerning registration, renewal and invalidation of design rights and provisions concerning the effects of such invalidity; (1) OJ C 345, 23, 12. 1993, p. 14 and OJ C 142, 14. 5. 1996, p. 7. (2) OJ C 388, 31. 12. 1994, p. 9 and OJ C 110, 2. 5. 1995, p. 12. (3) Opinion of the European Parliament of 12 October 1995 (OJ C 287, 30. 10. 1995, p. 157), common position of the Council of 17 June 1997 (OJ C 237, 4. 8. 1997, p. 1), Decision of the European Parliament of 22 October 1997 (OJ C 339, 10. 11. 1997, p. 52). Decision of the European Parliament of 15 September 1998. Decision of the Council of 24 September 1998.

(7) Whereas this Directive does not exclude the application to designs of national or Community legislation providing for protection other than that conferred by registration or publication as design, such as legislation relating to unregistered design rights, trade marks, patents and utility models, unfair competition or civil liability; (8) Whereas, in the absence of harmonisation of copyright law, it is important to establish the principle of cumulation of protection under specific registered design protection law and under copyright law, whilst leaving Member States free to establish the extent of copyright protection and the conditions under which such protection is conferred; (9) Whereas the attainment of the objectives of the internal market requires that the conditions for obtaining a registered design right be identical in all the Member States; whereas to that end it is necessary to give a unitary definition of the notion of design and of the requirements as to novelty and individual character with which registered design rights must comply; (10) Whereas it is essential, in order to facilitate the free movement of goods, to ensure in principle that registered design rights confer upon the right holder equivalent protection in all Member States; (11) Whereas protection is conferred by way of registration upon the right holder for those design features of a product, in whole or in part, which are shown visibly in an application and made available to the public by way of publication or consultation of the relevant file; (12) Whereas protection should not be extended to those component parts which are not visible during normal use of a product, or to those features of such part which are not visible when the part is mounted, or which would not, in themselves, fulfil the requirements as to novelty and individual character, whereas features of design which are excluded from protection for these reasons should not be taken into consideration for the purpose of assessing whether other features of the design fulfil the requirements for protection; (13) Whereas the assessment as to whether a design has individual character should be based on whether the overall impression produced on an informed user viewing the design clearly differs from that produced on him by the existing design corpus, taking into consideration the nature of the product to which the design is applied or in which it is incorporated, and in particular the industrial sector to which it belongs and the degree of freedom of the designer in developing the design; (14) Whereas technological innovation should not be hampered by granting design protection to features dictated solely by a technical function; whereas it is understood that this does not entail that a design must have an aesthetic quality; whereas, likewise, the interoperability of products of different makes should not be hindered by extending protection to the design of mechanical fittings; whereas features of a design which are excluded from protection for these reasons should not be taken into consideration for the purpose of assessing whether other features of the design fulfil the requirements for protection; (15) Whereas the mechanical fittings of modular products may nevertheless constitute an important element of the innovative characteristics of modular products and present a major marketing asset and therefore should be eligible for protection; (16) Whereas a design right shall not subsist in a design which is contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality; whereas this Directive does not constitute a harmonisation of national concepts of public policy or accepted principles of morality; (17) Whereas it is fundamental for the smooth functioning of the internal market to unify the term of protection afforded by registered design rights;

(18) Whereas the provisions of this Directive are without prejudice to the application of the competition rules under Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty; (19) Whereas the rapid adoption of this Directive has become a matter of urgency for a number of industrial sectors; whereas full-scale approximation of the laws of the Member States on the use of protected designs for the purpose of permitting the repair of a complex product so as to restore its original appearance, where the product incorporating the design or to which the design is applied constitutes a component part of a complex product upon whose appearance the protected design is dependent, cannot be introduced at the present stage; whereas the lack of full-scale approximation of the laws of the Member States on the use of protected designs for such repair of a complex product should not constitute an obstacle to the approximation of those other national provisions of design law which most directly affect the functioning of the internal market; whereas for this reason Member States should in the meantime maintain in force any provisions in conformity with the Treaty relating to the use of the design of a component part used for the purpose of the repair of a complex product so as to restore its original appearance, or, if they introduce any new provisions relating to such use, the purpose of these provisions should be only to liberalise the market in such parts; whereas those Member States which, on the date of entry into force of this Directive, do not provide for protection for designs of component parts are not required to introduce registration of designs for such parts; whereas three years after the implementation date the Commission should submit an analysis of the consequences of the provisions of this Directive for Community industry, for consumers, for competition and for the functioning of the internal market; whereas, in respect of component parts of complex products, the analysis should, in particular, consider harmonisation on the basis of possible options, including a remuneration system and a limited term of exclusivity; whereas, at the latest one year after the submission of its analysis, the Commission should, after consultation with the parties most affected, propose to the European Parliament and the Council any changes to this Directive needed to complete the internal market in respect of component parts of complex products, and any other changes which it considers necessary; (20) Whereas the transitional provision in Article 14 concerning the design of a component part used for the purpose of the repair of a complex product so as to restore its original appearance is in no case to be construed as constituting an obstacle to the free movement of a product which constitutes such a component part; (21) Whereas the substantive grounds for refusal of registration in those Member States which provide for substantive examination of applications prior to registration, and the substantive grounds for the invalidation of registered design rights in all the Member States, must be exhaustively enumerated, HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: For the purpose of this Directive: Article 1 Definitions design means the appearance of the whole or a part of a product resulting from the features of, in particular, the lines, contours, colours, shape, texture and/or materials of the product itself and/or its ornamentation; product means any industrial or handicraft item, including inter alia parts intended to be assembled into a complex product, packaging, get-up, graphic symbols and typographic typefaces, but excluding computer programs;

(c) complex product means a product which is composed of multiple components which can be replaced permitting disassembly and reassembly of the product. Article 2 Scope of application 1. This Directive shall apply to: design rights registered with the central industrial property offices of the Member States; design rights registered at the Benelux Design Office; (c) design rights registered under international arrangements which have effect in a Member State; (d) applications for design rights referred to under, and (c). 2. For the purpose of this Directive, design registration shall also comprise the publication following filing of the design with the industrial property office of a Member State in which such publication has the effect of bringing a design right into existence. Article 3 Protection requirements 1. Member States shall protect designs by registration, and shall confer exclusive rights upon their holders in accordance with the provisions of this Directive. 2. A design shall be protected by a design right to the extent that it is new and has individual character. 3. A design applied to or incorporated in a product which constitutes a component part of a complex product shall only be considered to be new and to have individual character: if the component part, once it has been incorporated into the complex product, remains visible during normal use of the latter, and to the extent that those visible features of the component part fulfil in themselves the requirements as to novelty and individual character. 4. Normal use within the meaning of paragraph (3) shall mean use by the end user, excluding maintenance, servicing or repair work. Article 4 Novelty A design shall be considered new if no identical design has been made available to the public before the date of filing of the application for registration or, if priority is claimed, the date of priority. Designs shall be deemed to be identical if their features differ only in immaterial details. Article 5 Individual character 1. A design shall be considered to have individual character if the overall impression it produces on the informed user differs from the overall impression produced on such a user by any design which

has been made available to the public before the date of filing of the application for registration or, if priority is claimed, the date of priority. 2. In assessing individual character, the degree of freedom of the designer in developing the design shall be taken into consideration. Article 6 Disclosure 1. For the purpose of applying Articles 4 and 5, a design shall be deemed to have been made available to the public if it has been published following registration or otherwise, or exhibited, used in trade or otherwise disclosed, except where these events could not reasonably have become known in the normal course of business to the circles specialised in the sector concerned, operating within the Community, before the date of filing of the application for registration or, if priority is claimed, the date of priority. The design shall not, however, be deemed to have been made available to the public for the sole reason that it has been disclosed to a third person under explicit or implicit conditions of confidentiality. 2. A disclosure shall not be taken into consideration for the purpose of applying Articles 4 and 5 if a design for which protection is claimed under a registered design right of a Member State has been made available to the public: by the designer, his successor in title, or a third person as a result of information provided or action taken by the designer, or his successor in title; and during the 12-month period preceding the date of filing of the application or, if priority is claimed, the date of priority. 3. Paragraph 2 shall also apply if the design has been made available to the public as a consequence of an abuse in relation to the designer or his successor in title. Article 7 Designs dictated by their technical function and designs of interconnections 1. A design right shall not subsist in features of appearance of a product which are solely dictated by its technical function. 2. A design right shall not subsist in features of appearance of a product which must necessarily be reproduced in their exact form and dimensions in order to permit the product in which the design is incorporated or to which it is applied to be mechanically connected to or placed in, around or against another product so that either product may perform its function. 3. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, a design right shall, under the conditions set out in Articles 4 and 5, subsist in a design serving the purpose of allowing multiple assembly or connection of mutually interchangeable products within a modular system. Article 8 Designs contrary to public policy or morality A design right shall not subsist in a design which is contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality.

Article 9 Scope of protection 1. The scope of the protection conferred by a design right shall include any design which does not produce on the informed user a different overall impression. 2. In assessing the scope of protection, the degree of freedom of the designer in developing his design shall be taken into consideration. Article 10 Term of protection Upon registration, a design which meets the requirements of Article 3(2) shall be protected by a design right for one or more periods of five years from the date of filing of the application. The right holder may have the term of protection renewed for one or more periods of five years each, up to a total term of 25 years from the date of filing. Article 11 Invalidity or refusal of registration 1. A design shall be refused registration, or, if the design has been registered, the design right shall be declared invalid: (c) (d) if the design is not a design within the meaning of Article 1; or if it does not fulfil the requirements of Articles 3 to 8; or if the applicant for or the holder of the design right is not entitled to it under the law of the Member State concerned; or if the design is in conflict with a prior design which has been made available to the public after the date of filing of the application or, if priority is claimed, the date of priority, and which is protected from a date prior to the said date by a registered Community design or an application for a registered Community design or by a design right of the Member State concerned, or by an application for such a right. 2. Any Member State may provide that a design shall be refused registration, or, if the design has been registered, that the design right shall be declared invalid: (c) if a distinctive sign is used in a subsequent design, and Community law or the law of the Member State concerned governing that sign confers on the right holder of the sign the right to prohibit such use; or if the design constitutes an unauthorised use of a work protected under the copyright law of the Member State concerned; or if the design constitutes an improper use of any of the items listed in Article 6b of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, or of badges, emblems and escutcheons other than those covered by Article 6b of the said Convention which are of particular public interest in the Member State concerned. 3. The ground provided for in paragraph 1(c) may be invoked solely by the person who is entitled to the design right under the law of the Member State concerned. 4. The grounds provided for in paragraph 1(d) and in paragraph 2 and may be invoked solely by the applicant for or the holder of the conflicting right.

5. The ground provided for in paragraph 2(c) may be invoked solely by the person or entity concerned by the use. 6. Paragraphs 4 and 5 shall be without prejudice to the freedom of Member States to provide that the grounds provided for in paragraphs 1(d) and 2(c) may also be invoked by the appropriate authority of the Member State in question on its own initiative. 7. When a design has been refused registration or a design right has been declared invalid pursuant to paragraph 1 or to paragraph 2, the design may be registered or the design right maintained in an amended form, if in that form it complies with the requirements for protection and the identity of the design is retained. Registration or maintenance in an amended form may include registration accompanied by a partial disclaimer by the holder of the design right or entry in the design Register of a court decision declaring the partial invalidity of the design right. 8. Any Member State may provide that, by way of derogation from paragraphs 1 to 7, the grounds for refusal of registration or for invalidation in force in that State prior to the date on which the provisions necessary to comply with this Directive enter into force shall apply to design applications which have been made prior to that date and to resulting registrations. 9. A design right may be declared invalid even after it has lapsed or has been surrendered. Article 12 Rights conferred by the design right 1. The registration of a design shall confer on its holder the exclusive right to use it and to prevent any third party not having his consent from using it. The aforementioned use shall cover, in particular, the making, offering, putting on the market, importing, exporting or using of a product in which the design is incorporated or to which it is applied, or stocking such a product for those purposes. 2. Where, under the law of a Member State, acts referred to in paragraph 1 could not be prevented before the date on which the provisions necessary to comply with this Directive entered into force, the rights conferred by the design right may not be invoked to prevent continuation of such acts by any person who had begun such acts prior to that date. Article 13 Limitation of the rights conferred by the design right 1. The rights conferred by a design right upon registration shall not be exercised in respect of: (c) acts done privately and for non-commercial purposes; acts done for experimental purposes; acts of reproduction for the purposes of making citations or of teaching, provided that such acts are compatible with fair trade practice and do not unduly prejudice the normal exploitation of the design, and that mention is made of the source. 2. In addition, the rights conferred by a design right upon registration shall not be exercised in respect of: the equipment on ships and aircraft registered in another country when these temporarily enter the territory of the Member State concerned; the importation in the Member State concerned of spare parts and accessories for the purpose of repairing such craft;

(c) the execution of repairs on such craft. Article 14 Transitional provision Until such time as amendments to this Directive are adopted on a proposal from the Commission in accordance with the provisions of Article 18, Member States shall maintain in force their existing legal provisions relating to the use of the design of a component part used for the purpose of the repair of a complex product so as to restore its original appearance and shall introduce changes to those provisions only if the purpose is to liberalise the market for such parts. Article 15 Exhaustion of rights The rights conferred by a design right upon registration shall not extend to acts relating to a product in which a design included within the scope of protection of the design right is incorporated or to which it is applied, when the product has been put on the market in the Community by the holder of the design right or with his consent. Article 16 Relationship to other forms of protection The provisions of this Directive shall be without prejudice to any provisions of Community law or of the law of the Member State concerned relating to unregistered design rights, trade marks or other distinctive signs, patents and utility models, typefaces, civil liability or unfair competition. Article 17 Relationship to copyright A design protected by a design right registered in or in respect of a Member State in accordance with this Directive shall also be eligible for protection under the law of copyright of that State as from the date on which the design was created or fixed in any form. The extent to which, and the conditions under which, such a protection is conferred, including the level of originality required, shall be determined by each Member State. Article 18 Revision Three years after the implementation date specified in Article 19, the Commission shall submit an analysis of the consequences of the provisions of this Directive for Community industry, in particular the industrial sectors which are most affected, particularly manufacturers of complex products and component parts, for consumers, for competition and for the functioning of the internal market. At the latest one year later the Commission shall propose to the European Parliament and the Council any changes to this Directive needed to complete the internal market in respect of component parts of complex products and any other changes which it considers necessary in light of its consultations with the parties most affected.

Article 19 Implementation 1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive not later than 28 October 2001. When Member States adopt these provisions, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference on the occasion of their official publication. The methods of making such reference shall be laid down by Member States. 2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the provisions of national law which they adopt in the field governed by this Directive. Article 20 Entry into force This Directive shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Directive is addressed to the Member States. Done at Luxembourg, 13 October 1998. For the European Parliament The President J. M. GIL-ROBLES Article 21 Addressees For the Council The President C. EINEM