Case 2:15-cv RSM Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 9

Similar documents
Case 2:15-cv RSM Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:10-cv JLR Document 1 Filed 02/08/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Case No.

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

Case 2:11-cv RAJ -FBS Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:10-cv CMH -TRJ Document 1 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 3:12-cv-686

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:18-cv JJT Document 1 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Defendant.

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

COMPLAINT FOR DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 4:10-cv Y Document 23 Filed 04/21/10 Page 1 of 8 PageID 156

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 1:16-cv BMC Document 8 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 93 PageID #: 73 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. Civil Action No JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case5:14-cv PSG Document1 Filed10/10/14 Page1 of 10. Attorneys for Plaintiff ENPHASE ENERGY, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 3:16-cv N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:16-cv DSC Document 1 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/16/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants. COMPLAINT

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:08-cv WMS Document 1 Filed 12/08/08 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:16-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 21. Case No.

Case 3:13-cv M Document 60 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1778

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISON COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 2:15-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Transcription:

Case :-cv-00-rsm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 0 PACIFIC BIOSCIENCE LABORATORIES, INC., a Washington corporation, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Plaintiff, COREANA COSMETICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation, Defendant. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT, TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT, STATE UNFAIR COMPETITION AND COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION JURY DEMAND Plaintiff Pacific Bioscience Laboratories, Inc. ( PBL ), for its Complaint for Patent Infringement against Defendant Coreana Cosmetics Co., Ltd., ( Coreana ), hereby alleges, by and through its attorney, on personal knowledge as to its own actions and on information and belief as to the actions of others, as follows: I. INTRODUCTION. Plaintiff PBL dramatically changed the market for skin cleansing products when it introduced its innovative Clarisonic Sonic Skin Cleansing System (the Clarisonic System ) in 00. The Clarisonic System employs motion and forces at sonic frequencies to cleanse, soften, and smooth skin. COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION -0/LEGAL. Phone: 0..000 Fax: 0..000

Case :-cv-00-rsm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 0. Prior to the introduction of the Clarisonic System, there were no sonic facial cleansing devices on the market. PBL created today s market for such products.. The Clarisonic System has been an enormous success and has achieved national recognition and awards. In 00, PBL was named one of Inc. 0 s Fastest Growing Private Companies.. PBL received broad protection for its innovations, including utility and design patents. However, PBL s innovations have been the subject of widespread imitation by others, who have attempted to capitalize on PBL s success.. Defendant Coreana is one such imitator. After seeing PBL s success, Coreana introduced its Coreana D Motion facial cleansing system ( Coreana D Motion ). Coreana has made the Coreana D Motion work and look like PBL s products, thereby infringing PBL s patents.. Coreana sells or has sold the Coreana D Motion throughout the United States at least through Amazon.com, http://www.amazon.com/coreana-senite-motion-cleanser- Korean/dp/B00HHGR0Y.. PBL seeks to stop Coreana s infringing conduct and obtain compensation for the violations that have occurred thus far. II. PARTIES. Plaintiff PBL is a Washington corporation incorporated in January 00, with its principal place of business at NE th Court, Redmond, WA 0.. In December 0, PBL was acquired by L Oréal S.A., a French société anonyme ( L Oréal ). L Oréal is the owner, and PBL is the exclusive U.S. licensee with the right, inter alia, to bring suit, of protectable patent rights as described herein. 0. On information and belief, Coreana Cosmetics Co., Ltd. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Korea with its principal place of business at 0- Jeongchon-ri, Seonggeo-eup, Seobuk-gu, Cheonan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea. COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION -0/LEGAL. Phone: 0..000 Fax: 0..000

Case :-cv-00-rsm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 0. On information and belief, Coreana manufactures, markets, and sells electric skin care devices under the name Coreana D Motion. III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This case arises under the patent laws of the United States, U.S.C. 0 et seq.. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this case pursuant to U.S.C.,, and.. PBL has its principal place of business in this District, and makes its Clarisonic devices available for sale in this District.. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Coreana because, on information and belief, Coreana has committed and continues to commit the acts violating PBL s intellectual property described herein within the State of Washington, including in this District, and places infringing products into the stream of commerce, with the knowledge or understanding that such products are sold in the State of Washington, including in this District.. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to U.S.C. (b), (c), and U.S.C. 0(b) because, inter alia, PBL s principal place of business is within this District and PBL suffered harm in this District, because a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims against Coreana occurred and are occurring in this District, and because Coreana transacts business within this District and offers for sale in this District products that infringe PBL s intellectual property. IV. BACKGROUND. Since the early 000s, PBL has designed, developed, manufactured, marketed, and sold in the United States (and worldwide) its innovative Clarisonic System, which is a line of skin care products including a number of Sonic Cleansing Brushes and accessories, the Clarisonic Opal Sonic Infusion System, and targeted treatment solutions. Examples of Clarisonic products are pictured below: COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION -0/LEGAL. Phone: 0..000 Fax: 0..000

Case :-cv-00-rsm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 0. The Clarisonic System was developed by PBL over many years at great expense and effort and represents a breakthrough in devices and methods for treatment of early stage acne and for effective cleansing of skin. Those devices and methods employ motion and forces at sonic frequencies to cleanse, soften, and smooth skin. They alleviate clogged pores and remove debris from skin more gently and effectively than alternative devices or methods, such as manual cleansing.. The innovations embodied in the Clarisonic System are protected by numerous United States and foreign intellectual property rights, including rights deriving from patents. 0. Prior to the introduction of the Clarisonic System, there were no sonic facial cleansing devices on the market. Indeed, before development of the Clarisonic System, no market existed for sonic skin care devices. PBL expended considerable resources to create the sonic skin care market and to educate the public regarding facial cleansing, as well as to market its sonic facial cleansing devices.. Since its introduction, the Clarisonic System has become widely acclaimed by professionals and consumers, and has garnered many media awards from sources such as authoritative magazines in the beauty industry, Oprah s Favorite Things in 00 on the Oprah COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION -0/LEGAL. Phone: 0..000 Fax: 0..000

Case :-cv-00-rsm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 0 Winfrey Show, Best of Sephora in 00 and 00, and QVC Customer Choice in 00, 00, and 00.. The success of the Clarisonic System has spurred a large number of imitations, such as Coreana D Motion, pictured below. V. PBL S PATENTS U.S. Patent No.,0,. U.S. Patent No.,0, ( the patent ) issued on January, 00, and is entitled Apparatus and Method for Acoustic/Mechanical Treatment of Early Stage Acne. The inventors are Kenneth A. Pilcher, David Giuliani, and Stephen M. Meginniss.. A copy of the patent is attached as Exhibit.. PBL is the exclusive licensee having all substantial rights in and to the patent, with the rights to bring enforcement actions for past, present and future infringement and to collect damages for past infringement.. The patent has been reexamined pursuant to Reexamination Request Nos. 0/00, and 0/0,. The patentability of all of the originally issued claims - of the COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION -0/LEGAL. Phone: 0..000 Fax: 0..000

Case :-cv-00-rsm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 0 patent was confirmed pursuant to these reexamination requests, and claims - were added. A reexamination certificate issued on September 0, 0. See Exhibit.. The patent is valid, enforceable, and currently in full force and effect. U.S. Patent No.,,0. U.S. Patent No.,,0 ( the 0 patent ) issued on June, 00, and is entitled Oscillating Brushhead Attachment System for a Personal Care Appliance. The inventors are Dane M. Roth, Stephen M. Meginniss, III, Kenneth A. Pilcher, Richard A. Reishus, and David Giuliani.. A copy of the 0 patent is attached as Exhibit. 0. PBL is the exclusive licensee having all substantial rights in and to the 0 patent, with the rights to bring enforcement actions for past, present and future infringement and to collect damages for past infringement.. The 0 patent is valid, enforceable, and currently in full force and effect. CLAIM I INFRINGEMENT OF THE PATENT. PBL hereby incorporates and realleges Paragraphs - as if fully set forth herein.. Coreana has been and/or is directly infringing one or more claims of the patent pursuant to U.S.C. (a), literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling in the United States and/or importing into the United States, products, devices, or systems that are covered by the patent, including the Coreana D Motion.. PBL has consistently and continuously marked its products with the patent number pursuant to U.S.C. and has provided constructive notice of the patent. PBL seeks monetary and all other damages permitted by statute.. Coreana s infringement of the patent has been and will continue to be willful and deliberate, by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling in the United States and/or COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION -0/LEGAL. Phone: 0..000 Fax: 0..000

Case :-cv-00-rsm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 0 importing into the United States, infringing devices despite that such actions constitute infringement and despite being at least on constructive notice that its actions constitute infringement.. Coreana s infringement of the patent has caused and will continue to cause PBL substantial and irreparable injury, for which PBL is entitled to all of the relief provided by U.S.C.,,, and, including but not limited to injunctive relief, compensatory damages not less than the amount of a reasonable royalty, interest, costs, enhanced damages, and reasonable attorney s fees, as the court deems just and appropriate. CLAIM II INFRINGEMENT OF THE 0 PATENT. PBL hereby incorporates and realleges Paragraphs - as if fully set forth herein.. Coreana has been and/or is directly infringing one or more claims of the 0 patent pursuant to U.S.C. (a), literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling in the United States and/or importing into the United States, products, devices, or systems that are covered by the 0 patent, including the Coreana D Motion.. PBL has consistently and continuously marked its products with the 0 patent number pursuant to U.S.C. and has provided constructive notice of the 0 patent. PBL seeks monetary and all other damages permitted by statute.. Coreana s infringement of the 0 patent has been and will continue to be willful and deliberate, by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling in the United States and/or importing into the United States, infringing devices despite that such actions constitute infringement and despite being at least on constructive notice that its actions constitute infringement.. Coreana s infringement of the 0 patent has caused and will continue to cause PBL substantial and irreparable injury, for which PBL is entitled to all of the relief provided by COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION -0/LEGAL. Phone: 0..000 Fax: 0..000

Case :-cv-00-rsm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 0 U.S.C.,,, and, including but not limited to injunctive relief, compensatory damages not less than the amount of a reasonable royalty, interest, costs, enhanced damages, and reasonable attorney s fees, as the court deems just and appropriate. VI. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Pursuant to Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, PBL respectfully requests a trial by jury of all issues properly triable by jury. VII. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, PBL prays for relief, as follows: A. A judgment that Coreana has infringed one or more claims of the patent; B. A judgment that Coreana has infringed one or more claims of the 0 patent; C. An order and judgment preliminarily and permanently enjoining Coreana and its officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, affiliates, attorneys, and all others acting in privity or in concert with them, and their investors, partners, parents, subsidiaries, divisions, successors, and assigns, from further acts of infringement of PBL s asserted patents; D. A judgment awarding PBL all damages adequate to compensate for Coreana s infringement of PBL s asserted patents, and in no event less than a reasonable royalty for Coreana s acts of infringement, including all pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the maximum rate permitted by law; E. A judgment declaring that Coreana s infringement of the asserted patents has been willful and deliberate; F. A judgment awarding PBL all damages, including treble damages, as a result of Coreana s willful and deliberate infringement of the asserted patents, pursuant to U.S.C., together with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest; G. A judgment declaring that this case is exceptional and awarding PBL its expenses, costs, and attorney s fees in accordance with U.S.C. and and Rule (d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION -0/LEGAL. Phone: 0..000 Fax: 0..000

Case :-cv-00-rsm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 0 H. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. DATED: May, 0 COUNSEL: Robert M. Masters (pro hac to be submitted) Timothy P. Cremen (pro hac to be submitted) Lisa Y. Leung (WSBA No. 0) PAUL HASTINGS LLP th St. NW Washington, D.C. 000 Tel: (0) -00 Fax: (0) -0 robertmasters@paulhastings.com timothy cremen@paulhastings.com lisaleung@paulhastings.com Robert L. Sherman (pro hac to be submitted) Natalie G. Furman (pro hac to be submitted) PAUL HASTINGS LLP East th Street New York, NY 00 Tel: () -000 Fax: () 0- robertsherman@paulhastings.com nataliefurman@paulhastngs.com By: s/ Ramsey M. Al-Salam Ramsey M. Al-Salam WSBA # Tel: (0) -000 Fax: (0) -000 Email: RAlsalam@perkinscoie.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Pacific Bioscience Laboratories, Inc. COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION -0/LEGAL. Phone: 0..000 Fax: 0..000