Affirmative Action Report October 2016 Prepared by: Jessica Holmes, Director, Education Initiatives and Research Adrienne Walters, Program Assistant, Education Initiatives and Research Purpose For purposes of the Affirmative Action Policy and Plan of the Council on Social Work Education (CSWE), under-represented groups, include but are not limited to: Women; African Americans/other Blacks; Asian Americans, Pacific Islanders; Chicano/Mexican Americans, Puerto Ricans, other Latino(a)/Hispanics; Native Americans/American Indians; Persons with disabilities; and Gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender persons. The By-laws of CSWE specify that a minimum of 50% of the Board must be representatives of these under-represented groups. For purposes of this report, the minimum of 50% was used to assess compliance with the affirmative action plan for representation of under-represented groups in the membership of the Board, National Nominating Committee, Commissions, Councils, CSWE staff, and JSWE Editorial Advisory Board. In addition, the composition of each CSWE unit was examined to determine the distribution of each of the under-represented groups within it. Finally, the composition of each unit was compared with overall membership data. Data Collection For each CSWE unit, the most recent data were selected for use. Membership in each underrepresented group was determined through examination of demographic data from membership application forms (see the application form in Appendix 1). The demographic data collected on the membership application form includes gender, ethnicity, disability, and sexual orientation. When asked to identify gender, members were given the choice of Woman, Man, Intersex, Transgender/Gender Queer/Two-Spirit. Members identified ethnicity by selecting all that applied from the list of: African American/Other Black, American Indian/Native American, Asian American, Pacific Islander, Chicano/Mexican American, Puerto Rican, Other Latino(a)/Hispanic, White (non-hispanic), and Other Group(s). Members could identify themselves as a Person with a Disability and as Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Heterosexual, or Other by selecting the corresponding boxes. 1
Data reported in the membership section of this report includes CSWE members on June 30, 2016. All volunteers with elected terms for the Board of Directors or National Nominating Committee or appointed terms on any Commission or Council between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016 were included in the data analysis. Data for the CSWE staff section was gathered through an anonymous web based survey that was distributed via email. Of the 34 staff members working at CSWE on June 30, 2016, 32 responded to the survey (94.1%). It should be noted that all of the data presented comes from members who elected to report their demographic information to CSWE. For many commissions and councils there were members who did not report information or selected choose not to answer. Data Analysis The under-represented groups in the CSWE Affirmative Action Plan are not mutually exclusive categories. In this report, therefore, data are presented to reflect the representation of an underrepresented group and, to the greatest extent possible, to indicate the percentage of its representation. The ethnicity categories on the membership form are more detailed than the categories in the CSWE Affirmative Action Plan. As a result, Asian American category in the Affirmative Action Plan consists of both the Asian American and Pacific Islander categories from the membership form and Chicano/Mexican American, Puerto Rican, and other Latino(a)/Hispanics from the Affirmative Action Plan consists of Mexican American, Other Latino(a)/Hispanic, and Puerto Rican from the membership form. Multiple responses to the Affirmative Action ethnicity categories were reported as multiple ethnicity and are detailed in another table. In the report, responses were also summed to determine the overall percentage of the presence of ethnic identities. The data for disability and sexual orientation pose a similar challenge in computing percentages for this report. Those who respond in one or both of these categories are also included in the data reported for gender and ethnicity. Therefore, to determine a percentage of the presence of under-represented persons with disabilities and gay, lesbian, and bisexual persons, the computations were calculated as if these identities were the only ones reported. For the Total row, only those individuals who Membership data as of June 30, 2016 and social work education faculty data from the 2015 Annual Survey of Social Work Programs is presented for purposes of comparison. The row titled Ethnicity Total displays the total percentage of under-represented ethnicity groups. The next rows are the percentage of the remaining females and transgender persons who did not identify in one of the previous ethnicity categories. The row titled Subtotal adds the three previous categories which are mutually exclusive and, though they do not include all of the under-represented groups, they do give us a percentage by which to assess whether the unit has reached the minimum 50% requirement in the Affirmative Action Plan. Any unit that does not meet the 50% minimum in the Subtotal line can be further analyzed by reviewing the persons who identify with a disability or as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or other that was not included in the rows above. Those individuals have been added to the Total line in Table 1. 2
Summary All of the CSWE governance groups met the goal of at least 50% representation from the underrepresented groups defined in the affirmative action plan. All of the groups met this goal in the ethnicity and gender identity subtotal with the exception of the Council on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity and Expression (CSOGIE) (40.7%); when adding in the additional underrepresented groups CSOGIE was at 59.2% from underrepresented groups. 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 CSWE Governance Groups and Staff: Percent from Underrepresented Groups Comparison with Membership Data All of the CSWE governance groups exceeded the membership total (46.5%). The percentage of members who identify as one of the under-represented ethnicity groups (see row labeled Ethnicity Total ) comprises 17.2% of the CSWE membership. Some of the CSWE units have a percentage of under-represented ethnicity groups that is lower: Council on Practice Methods and Specialization (7.1%), Council on Field Education (15.0%), Council on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity and Expression (14.8), Council on Leadership Development (15.4%), and Council on Publications (11.1%). Recommendations 1. There was a notable amount of missing data this year. As we transition to a new membership database, it may be a good time to encourage our members to update their profiles, including demographic information. 2. DEIR Staff will be working with the Board Affirmative Action Committee to revise the Affirmative Action Policy and Plan (last updated in 2006). Recommendations will be made to the Board in the Spring 2017 meeting. 3
Social Work Educators1 Membership Board of Directors National Nominating Committee Commission on Accreditation Commission on Educational Policy Council on Practice Methods and Specialization Council on Field Education Commission on Diversity & Social and Economic Justice Council on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity and Expression Council on Racial, Ethnic, and Cultural Diversity Council on the Role and Status of Women in Social Work Education Council on Disability and Persons with Disabilities Commission on Global Social Work Education Council on Global Social Issues Council on Global Learning and Practice Commission on Membership and Professional Development Council on Conferences and Faculty Development Council on Leadership Development Council on Publications Commission on Research CSWE Staff JSWE Editorial Advisory Board Table 1: Board of Directors, National Nominating Committee, Commissions, Councils, Staff, and JSWE Editorial Advisory Board N 12,990 2,390 21 11 24 17 14 20 17 27 21 27 14 18 15 16 12 13 9 12 32 African American/Other Blacks 14.9 8.1 23.8 60.0 16.7 5.9 0.0 5.0 35.3 7.4 38.1 11.1 21.4 11.1 13.3 12.5 25.0 15.4 0.0 0.0 21.9 Native America/American Indian 0.7 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 Asian American and Pacific Islander 4.5 4.1 0.0 10.0 4.2 5.9 0.0 5.0 29.4 3.7 9.5 3.7 0.0 16.7 13.3 6.3 8.3 0.0 0.0 16.7 9.4 Chicano/Mexican American, Puerto Rican, Other Latino(a)/Hispanic 6.5 3.2 9.5 0.0 12.5 5.9 0.0 5.0 11.8 3.7 4.8 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 11.1 8.3 9.4 Multiple Ethnicity 0.8 1.2 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.5 3.7 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 9.4 Ethnicity Total 27.4 17.2 38.1 70.0 33.4 17.7 7.1 15.0 82.4 14.8 66.7 18.5 28.6 33.4 26.7 25.1 33.3 15.4 11.1 33.3 53.1 Females who selected: White, Other Groups, or no Ethnicity Category -- 27.1 42.9 20.0 33.3 35.3 42.9 65.0 5.9 22.2 9.5 55.6 28.6 38.9 26.7 37.5 25.0 46.2 55.6 41.7 43.8 Transgendered Persons who selected: White, Other Groups, or no Ethnicity Category -- 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Subtotal [Ethnicity + Females and Transgendered Persons who selected: White, Other Groups, or no Ethnicity Category] -- 44.5 81.0 90.0 66.7 53.0 50.0 80.0 88.3 40.7 76.2 74.1 57.2 72.3 ** 53.4 62.6 58.3 61.6 66.7 75.0 96.9 ** Person with Disability 3 -- 3.3 9.5 0.0 8.3 5.9 0.0 10.0 5.9 7.4 4.8 11.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 30.8 33.3 0.0 0.0 Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, or Other 3 -- 6.0 19.0 0.0 0.0 11.8 21.4 5.0 5.9 55.6 4.8 11.1 0.0 11.1 0.0 12.5 0.0 7.7 0.0 16.7 0.0 TOTAL (unduplicated) -- 46.5 85.8 90.0 70.9 58.9 50.0 80.0 88.3 59.2 76.2 74.1 57.2 72.3 ** 53.4 68.9 58.3 61.6 66.7 83.3 96.9 ** 4
1 Data in this column are full-time faculty from the 2015 Annual Survey of Programs. The Annual Survey does not collect data of individual faculty member's gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability status, so there is no comparison data for the categories other than ethnicity. 2 These ethnicity and gender categories are mutually exclusive. The total reflects an unduplicated count of individuals who selected an underrepresented ethnicity and/or gender group. 3 This is not a mutually exclusive category. Individuals who selected this option may have been counted in the under-represented ethnicity and/or or gender groups as well. **Too few members provided demographic information, so it is not included here. 5
Appendix 1. 2015-2016 Membership Form 6
7