FLORIDA S DEPENDENCY BENCHBOOK BENCHCARD: INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL

Similar documents
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA

Supreme Court of Florida

A The following shall be assigned to the appellate division:

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF FLORIDA APPEAL NO. 1D AHMAD J. SMITH Appellant-Petitioner,

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 45C 1

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 2389

CASE NO. SC THEODORE SPERA, STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER S INITIAL BRIEF

Uniform Arbitration Act. Md. Courts & Judicial Proceedings COURTS AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS TITLE 3. COURTS OF GENERAL JURISDICTION

Rules of the Court of Appeals of Virginia (not including forms)

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

LA. REV. STAT. ANN. 9:

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Criminal SHORT Form 2018 Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court Appointed Attorney Registry

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

SENTENCING HEARING TO CONSIDER THE IMPOSITION OF A LIFE SENTENCE FOR JUVENILE OFFENDERS

CITY OF BELLINGHAM HEARING EXAMINER RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

CASE NO. 1D James Carter appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We

Proposed Form Motion Claiming Ineffective Assistance of Court- parental Rights

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION AGAINST REPEAT VIOLENCE

Case 3:08-cv HES-MCR Document 9 Filed 01/13/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 2:9. MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

JUDICIAL PRACTICE PREFERENCES FOR CIRCUIT FAMILY

Rules for Qualified & Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators

Uniform Arbitration Act; Mediation or Arbitration of Trust Instruments; HB 2571

APPENDIX A. FORM PETITION READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE PREPARING THE PETITION

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 20, 2016

SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. It is ORDERED that the attached amendments to Rules 3:22-4, 3:22-6A,

SOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

Supreme Court of Florida

CHAPTER 61B-80 THE ARBITRATION RULES OF PROCEDURE GOVERNING RECALL AND ELECTION DISPUTES IN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

RULES OF PROCEDURE. For Applications & Appeals

VIRGIN ISLANDS SUPREME COURT RULES (as amended November 2, 2011)

61B-80 The Arbitration Rules of Procedure Governing Recall and Election Disputes in Homeowners Associations

Spring Juvenile Dependency Application 2018 Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court Appointed Attorney Registry INSTRUCTIONS

RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION BUREAU OF TENNCARE

CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH Request for City Commission Agenda

BY v. Case No.: SC13- L.T. Case No.: 1D STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / PETITIONER'S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA

RULES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS (Revised effective January 1, 2011)

Supreme Court of Florida

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. Appellee, No v. N.D. Okla. JIMMY LEE SHARBUTT, ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

Michigan Appellate Assigned Counsel System. Knowing Your Appellate Deadlines Court Rules and Procedure

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION AGAINST STALKING

RICHARD L. DUGGER, etc., Respondent. [March 31, 19941

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER ON HEARINGS ON PERMIT APPLICATIONS AND OTHER HEARING MATTERS Policy & Procedure 921

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 1960

Nos. 76,769, 76,884. ROY CLIFTON SWAFFORD, Petitioner, RICHARD L. DUGGER, etc., Respondent... ROY CLIFTON SWAFFORD, Appellant,

CASE NO. 1D Linda A. Bailey, of Law Office of Linda A. Bailey, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D Petition alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel Original Jurisdiction.

OFFICE OF THE CLERK B

UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT 1955 ACT. An Act relating to arbitration and to make uniform the law with reference thereto

Appealing Plea Cases: Substantive Claims and New Developments

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FLORIDA SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORM (f) PETITION FOR INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION AGAINST REPEAT VIOLENCE (11/15)

Strickland v. Washington 466 U.S. 668 (1984), still control claims of

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Attorneys are expected to read and follow the Florida Bar Family Section Bounds of Advocacy that can be found at

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jay Kubica, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. Appellant, v. Case No. 5D

RULES OF PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COWLITZ COUNTY HEARINGS EXAMINER

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Office of the Clerk. After Opening a Case Pro Se Appellants (revised December 2012)

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 12, 2016

When should this form be used? IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING E-FILING. What should I do next?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC (4 th DCA 4D ) MALCOLM HOSWELL, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

SECTION 3. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments Page 1

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO CV. FREDERICK DEWAYNNE WALKER, Appellant

Supreme Court of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Effective January 1, 2016

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

HON. G. KEITH CARY FAMILY LAW DIVISION - A 1700 MONROE STREET FORT MYERS FLORIDA Telephone Number Fax Number

205 CMR: MASSACHUSETTS GAMING COMMISSION

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

APPENDIX F. NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY APPELLATE PRACTICE FORMS 1. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION CIVIL CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT

Cite as 2018 Ark. App. 477 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,910 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. HARLAN E. MCINTIRE, Appellant, STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC MUHAMMAD RAHEEM TAQWA EL SUPREME KALIFA. Petitioner. GRADY JUDD, SHERIFF, et. al.

Supreme Court of Florida

Be sure to look up definitions present at the beginning for both sections. RULES OF PROCEDURE IN TRAFFIC CASES AND BOATING CASES

Transcription:

FLORIDA S DEPENDENCY BENCHBOOK BENCHCARD: INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL Items in bold font are required by Florida Statutes. Introductory remarks. Explain purpose of the hearing. State the number of days the child has been in care and the number of placements to date. Swear in the parties, participants, and relatives. (See Parties and Participants, Section 8) Representation and appointment of counsel. If the court permits an attorney to withdraw, the court must expeditiously appoint appellate counsel for indigent parents pursuant to law. Rule 8.517(c)(emphasis supplied). Be aware though that an indigent parent is not entitled to a court-appointed attorney to assist the parent in preparing, filing, or litigating a motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. However, a parent may independently obtain an attorney to represent the parent in pursuing the motion. Rules 8.517(c) & 8.530(d)(1). An indigent parent is otherwise entitled to a court-appointed attorney as provided by law in both the trial and appellate court in a termination of parental rights proceeding, and is entitled to a court-appointed attorney concerning appellate review of the trial court s order on the motion for ineffective assistance of counsel. Rule 8.530(d)(2). Parties and notices. Have all parties identify themselves for the record with full name and permanent address. 39.0131. See also 39.402(8)(g) & 39.506(4). Advise parties that the court will use the address for notice purposes until notified otherwise in writing. (Note: Do not openly identify the address when one or more of the parents is party to an injunction for protection against domestic violence.) Confirm that the parent claiming ineffective assistance of counsel served the motion on all parties to the termination of parental rights proceedings and on the attorney the parent claims provided ineffective assistance. Rule 8.530(k). Confirm that the court issued a notice of hearing on the motion to the parties and participants of the termination of parental rights proceeding and to the attorney who the parent claimed provided ineffective assistance. Rule 8.530(n)(2). The notice must state the issues to be determined and that the moving parent is required to present evidence at the hearing on the motion. Rule 8.530(n)(2). Timeliness and legal sufficiency of motion. Confirm that the motion was timely filed. A motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel must be filed within 20 days of the date the court entered the written order terminating parental rights. Rule 8.530(e).

The court must enter an order within 5 days from the date the motion or amended motion was filed summarily denying with prejudice any motion filed after the 20 day limitation for filing. The order shall be considered the final order for purposes of appeal. Rule 8.530(l)(1). Determine whether the motion was amended. If the motion is timely filed, the parent may file amended motions without permission of the court within 20 days from the date the court entered the written order terminating parental rights. The court may order the moving parent to file an amended motion as provided in Rule 8.530. Rule 8.530(h). If the motion or amended motion is legally insufficient as alleged, the court may either: Enter an order summarily denying the motion within 5 days from the date the motion or amended was filed; Rule 8.530(l)(2); OR Enter an order within 5 days from the date the motion, or amended motion, was filed authorizing the moving parent to file an amended motion within 10 days of the date the written order permitting amendment. Rule 8.530(m). A motion is legally insufficient when the allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel during the termination of parental rights proceedings, if taken as true, did not prejudice parent s rights would not have been terminated. Rule 8.530(l)(2). The order denying a motion as legally insufficient must set forth the basis for the conclusion the motion is legally insufficient. The court must not summarily deny a motion as insufficient for reasons other than legally insufficient allegations claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. Rule 8.530(l)(2). If the court denies the motion as legally insufficient and does not direct the filing of an amended motion, then the order shall be considered the final order for purposes of appeal. Rule 8.530(l)(2). Evidentiary hearing on the motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. If the motion is timely and contains sufficient allegations, conduct an evidentiary hearing as expeditiously as possible in light of the other time limitations in Rule 8.530. Rule 8.530(n)(1). If necessary, the court may order an expedited record for review, which may include an electronic recording in lieu of a transcript, of the TPR adjudicatory hearing. Rule 8.530(n)(3). If the judge conducting the motion hearing is different from the judge who presided at the TPR adjudicatory hearing, the court must order an expedited record for review, which may include an electronic recording in lieu of a transcript, of the TPR adjudicatory hearing. Rule 8.530(n)(3). Proceed through the regular course of the evidentiary hearing.

The moving parent has the burden of presenting evidence and the burden of proving specific acts or omissions of an attorney s representation of the parent during the TPR proceedings that constituted a failure to provide reasonable, professional assistance, and how the errors or omissions prejudiced the parent s case to such an extent that but for counsel s deficient performance the parent s rights would not have been terminated. Rule 8.530(n)(4). All other parties may present evidence regarding the claims raised. Rule 8.530(n)(4). Complete a written order. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court must enter an order granting or denying the motion within 5 days from the evidentiary hearing. Rule 8.530(n)(5). INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL MOTION HEARING SUPPLEMENT Burden of evidence and standard of proof. The moving parent has the burden of presenting evidence and the burden of proving specific acts or omissions of an attorney s representation of the parent during the TPR proceedings that constituted a failure to provide reasonable, professional assistance, and how the errors or omissions prejudiced the parent s case to such an extent that but for counsel s deficient performance the parent s rights would not have been terminated. Rule 8.530(n)(4). Granting the motion. If the court determines that the attorney during the TPR proceedings failed to provide reasonable, professional assistance and that the errors or omissions prejudiced the parent s case to such an extent that but for counsel s deficient performance the parent s right would not have been terminated, the court must enter an order granting the motion stating the reasons for granting the motion and vacating the order terminating parental rights without prejudice. Rule 8.530(n)(5)(A). If the court grants the motion, appoint an attorney to represent the parent in further proceedings as provided by law. Rule 8.530(n)(5)(A). Denying the motion. If the court determines that the attorney during the TPR proceedings provided reasonable, professional assistance or determines that no errors or omissions prejudiced the parent s case in the termination proceedings to such an extent that but for counsel s deficient performance the parent s rights would not have been terminated, the court must enter an order denying the motion, stating the reasons for denial. Rule 8.530(n)(5)(B).

The order denying the motion resolves all the claims raised in the motion and shall be considered the final order for purposes of appeal. Rule 8.530(n)(5)(B). Requirements of written order. State the facts upon which the decision was made. If the motion is granted, schedule an adjudicatory hearing on the TPR petition to take place no later than 45 days from the order granting the motion. Rule 8.530(n)(5)(A). If the motion is granted, appoint an attorney to represent the parent in further proceedings, as provided by law. Rule 8.530(n)(5)(A). If the motion is granted, state the reasons for granting the motion and vacating the order terminating parental rights without prejudice. Rule 8.530(n)(5)(A). If the motion is denied, state the reasons for denial in the order. Rule 8.530(n)(5)(B). Ensure that the order clearly sets forth the witnesses that testified. What must I include in the order? The order denying a motion as legally insufficient must set forth the basis for the conclusion the motion is legally insufficient. The court must not summarily deny a motion as insufficient for reasons other than legally insufficient allegations claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. Rule 8.530(l)(2). If the court denies the motion as legally insufficient and does not direct the filing of an amended motion, then the order shall be considered the final order for purposes of appeal. Rule 8.530(l)(2). If the court granted the motion, the order must state the reasons for granting the motion and vacating the order terminating parental rights without prejudice. Rule 8.530(n)(5)(A). If the court denied the motion, the order must state the reasons for denial. Rule 8.530(n)(5)(B). Are there specific requirements for a motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel? Yes. The motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel must: be in writing and under oath stating that all of the facts stated are true and correct; contain the case name and number and identify the date the written order terminating parental rights was entered; contain the current mailing address and e-mail address, if any, and the phone number(s) of the parent filing the motion for the purpose of receiving notices and orders; and identify specific acts or omissions in the attorney s representation of the parent during the termination of parental rights proceedings that constituted a failure to provide reasonable, professional assistance and explain how the acts or omissions prejudiced parent s rights would not have been terminated. Rule 8.530(g)(1)-(4).

What is standard for the IAC hearing? The moving parent has the burden of presenting evidence and the burden of proving specific acts or omissions of an attorney s representation of the parent during the TPR proceedings that constituted a failure to provide reasonable, professional assistance, and how the errors or omissions prejudiced parent s rights would not have been terminated. Rule 8.530(n)(4). Isn t that standard different than the criminal IAC standard set forth in Strickland v. Washington? Yes. The standard is different. The Florida Supreme Court has explicitly rejected the Strickland standard. J.B. v. Department of Children and Families, 170 So. 3d 780, 792 (Fla. 2015)(creating interim procedure for bringing claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in termination of parental rights cases). How quickly should I rule on the IAC motion? At the conclusion of the hearing, the court must enter an order granting or denying the motion within 5 days from the evidentiary hearing. Rule 8.530(n)(5). What happens if I fail to enter an order? If the court does not enter an order granting or denying the motion within 50 days from the date the court entered the written order terminating parental rights, the motion shall be deemed denied with prejudice. Rule 8.530(o). Does anyone need to be served with the order? Yes. The clerk of the court must serve any order entered on the parties, including to the moving parent at the parent s address on file with the clerk, within 48 hours from the rendition of the order indicating the date of service by an appropriate certificate of service. Rule 8.530(p). Is the parent permitted to file an additional motion after the initial/amended motion? No second or successive motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel shall be allowed except as provided in Rule 8.530. Rule 8.530(q). Can the parent request a rehearing on the motion? No motion for rehearing shall be allowed in response to the court s ruling on the motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. Rule 8.530(q). Cite the specific provision of 39.0136 when granting continuances.