FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/09/ :30 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/09/2017

Similar documents
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2016

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/22/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/22/2016. Exhibit D {N

FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 10/13/ :12 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/13/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/11/ :17 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 85 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2017

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/24/ /31/ :26 08:31 PM AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 637 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/24/2017

DEFENDANTS' VERIFIED ANSWER

)(

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/30/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 60 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/30/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/02/ :41 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/02/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/23/ /09/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/23/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2016

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/11/ :43 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/17/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/17/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/28/ :02 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 74 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/28/2017

FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 01/23/ :02 PM

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :23 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 164 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2018

Defendant, Prevost Car (US) Inc., Individually and as. Successor to Nova Bus, by its attorneys, MAIMONE & ASSOCIATES,

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/21/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/09/ :55 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2018

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/28/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/28/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/19/ :38 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/19/2016

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/30/ :09 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/30/2017

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/10/ :35 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/10/2018 EXHIBIT 4

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/02/ :13 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/02/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/18/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 74 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/18/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/08/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/08/2013

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/25/ :15 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/25/2017

FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2013

Plaintiff, Yonkers Contracting Company, Inc. ("Yonkers"), and Zurich American Insurance Company

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/12/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/12/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/05/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 54 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/05/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/24/ :09 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2016

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/28/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/28/2017

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 11/11/ :28 PM INDEX NO /2015E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/11/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/30/ :41 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/30/2016

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/28/ :35 PM INDEX NO /2015E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/28/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/08/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 223 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/08/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/ /30/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/19/2012 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 135 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/19/2012

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/29/ :02 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/29/2018 EXHIBIT "B"

INDEPENDENT NATIONAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/31/ :46 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 112 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2017

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/13/ :25 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/13/2016

PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANTS GORDON RAMSAY'S AND G.R. US LICENSING'S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/06/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2006 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2016. Exhibit 21

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/19/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 168 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/19/2018

FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 09/15/ :46 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/15/2015. Plaintiffs,

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/01/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 24 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/01/2014

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/06/ :01 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/06/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/05/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/05/2014

FILED: MONROE COUNTY CLERK 05/22/ :57 PM

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/15/ :02 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 302 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/15/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/07/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 64 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/07/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/ :24 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2015

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/16/ :13 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 59 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/16/2017

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 08/02/ :03 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/02/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/11/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2016

FILED: ALBANY COUNTY CLERK 03/08/ :09 PM INDEX NO NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/08/2017

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/25/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 44 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/25/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/18/ :03 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 59 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/18/2016

FILED: NYS COURT OF CLAIMS 07/13/ :49 AM CLAIM NO NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/13/2016

FILED: ALBANY COUNTY CLERK 01/05/ :51 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/05/2016

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

Case5:02-cv JF Document3 Filed11/06/02 Page1 of 14

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 11/09/ :43 PM

Case 1:16-cv LGS Document 21 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 4:10-cv TSH Document 4 Filed 02/24/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Consolidated Class Action Complaint ( Complaint ) filed by Plaintiffs JAMES E. ELIAS and GENERAL DENIAL

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/09/ :16 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/09/2016

Case5:09-cv JW Document106 Filed04/22/10 Page1 of 9

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 01/27/ :26 PM

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/28/ :51 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/28/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/08/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 85 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/08/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/29/ :13 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/29/2016

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 03/30/ :14 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 62 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/30/2018

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/12/ :04 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 175 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/12/2015

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA * * *

Case3:13-cv SI Document11 Filed03/26/13 Page1 of 17

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (hereinafter FedEx Ground ), by and

2. Denies knowledge and information suffrcient to form a belief with respect to

ALL STATE INTERIOR DEMOLITION INC. WITH CROSS-CLAIMS

NOTICE YOU ARE IN DANGER OF LOSING YOUR HOME

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/30/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 69 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/30/2016

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 07/16/2014 INDEX NO /2013E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/16/2014

FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/21/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/21/2017

Topic 4: The Constitution

Case 3:15-cv RGJ-KLH Document 38 Filed 11/25/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 257 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/03/2010 INDEX NO /2007 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/03/2010

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/03/ :34 AM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/03/2014

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

DOCKET NO. the City of Millville, County of Cumberland and State of New Jersey, by way of FIRST COUNT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Transcription:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X 115 KINGSTON AVENUE LLC, and 113 KINGSTON LLC, Plaintiffs, VERIFIED ANSWER -against- Index No.: 654456/16 MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, NORTHFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC, HKS CONSTRUCTION CORP., KINGS COUNTY DEMOLITION, INC., Defendants. X The Defendant, KINGS COUNTY DEMOLITION, INC., by its attorneys, SHAYNE, DACHS, SAUER, & DACHS, LLP, answering the Complaint of the Plaintiffs herein, sets forth and alleges as follows: FIRST: Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs of the Complaint marked "1," "2," "3," "4," "5," "6," "7," "10, "13," "14," "17," "18, "19," "20," "21," "22," "23," "24," "27," "28," "29," "30," "31," "32," "36," "37," "38" and "39." SECOND: Admits the allegations contained in paragraphs "8," "33," "40" and "41" of the Plaintiffs' Complaint. THIRD: Paragraph 9 is a summary of the action, to which no response is required. To the extent that a response is deemed necessary, KINGS refers to the underlying Complaint for the allegations contained therein, without admitting the truth thereof. 1 of 10

FOURTH: Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs of the Complaint marked "11," and "12," and refers to the contract between Plaintiffs and BLACKSTONE for the terms and conditions thereof. FIFTH: As to paragraphs "15" and "16" of the Plaintiffs' Complaint, admits that BLACKSTONE and KINGS entered into a subcontract for the performance of work at the Project, and refers to the subcontract for the terms and conditions thereof. SIXTH: Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in paragraph of the Complaint marked "25," and refers to the Complaint in the underlying action for the allegations contained therein. SEVENTH: Admits the allegations contained in paragraph "26" of the Plaintiffs' Complaint, and refers to the Third-Party Complaint for the allegations contained therein. EIGHTH: Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs of the Complaint marked "34" and "35," and refers to the policy for the terms and conditions thereof, and refers legal issues to the Court. ANSWERING THE ALLEGED FIRST CAUSE NINTH: Repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every denial set forth in paragraphs of the answer marked "FIRST" through "EIGHTH" with respect to paragraph of the Complaint marked "42" with the same force and effect as though fully set forth herein at length. -2-2 of 10

TENTH: Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs of the Complaint marked "43," "44," "45," "46," "47," "48" and "49 11. ANSWERING THE ALLEGED SECOND CAUSE ELEVENTH: Repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every denial set forth in paragraphs of the answer marked "FIRST" through "TENTH" with respect to paragraph of the Complaint marked "50" with the same force and effect as though fully set forth herein at length. TWELFTH: Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs of the Complaint marked "51," "52," "53" and 54". ANSWERING THE ALLEGED THIRD CAUSE THIRTEENTH: Repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every denial set forth in paragraphs of the answer marked "FIRST" through "TWELFTH" with respect to paragraph of the Complaint marked "55" with the same force and effect as though fully set FOURTEENTH: Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs of the Complaint marked "56," "57" and "58." 3 of 10

ANSWERING THE ALLEGED FOURTH CAUSE FIFTEENTH: Repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every denial set forth in paragraphs of the answer marked "FIRST" through "FOURTEENTH" with respect to paragraph of the Complaint marked "59" with the same force and effect as though fully set SIXTEENTH: Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs of the Complaint marked "60," "61" and "62." ANSWERING THE ALLEGED FIFTH CAUSE SEVENTEENTH: Repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every denial set forth in paragraphs of the answer marked "FIRST" through "SIXTEENTH" with respect to paragraph of the Complaint marked "63" with the same force and effect as though fully set EIGHTEENTH: Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs of the Complaint marked "64," "65," "66," "67, "68," 69" and "70." ANSWERING THE ALLEGED SIXTH CAUSE NINETEENTH: Repeats, reiterates and realieges each and every denial set forth in paragraphs of the answer marked "FIRST" through "EIGHTEENTH" with respect to paragraph of the Complaint marked "71" with the same force and effect as though fully set 4 of 10

TWENTIETH: Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs of the Complaint marked "72," "73," "74" and 75." ANSWERING THE ALLEGED SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT TWENTY-FIRST: Repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every denial set forth in paragraphs of the answer marked "FIRST" through "TWENTIETH" with respect to paragraph of the Complaint marked "76" with the same force and effect as though fully set TWENTY-SECOND: Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs of the Complaint marked "77," 78" and "79." ANSWERING THE ALLEGED EIGHTH CAUSE TWENTY-THIRD: Repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every denial set forth in paragraphs of the answer marked "FIRST" through "TWENTY-SECOND" with respect to paragraph of the Complaint marked "80" with the same force and effect as though fully set TWENTY-FOURTH: Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs of the Complaint marked "81," "82" and "83." 5 of 10

ANSWERING THE ALLEGED NINTH CAUSE TWENTY-FIFTH: Repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every denial set forth in paragraphs of the answer marked "FIRST" through "TWENTY-FOURTH" with respect to paragraph of the Complaint marked "84" with the same force and effect as though fully set TWENTY-SIXTH: Admits the allegations contained in paragraphs "85," "86," "87," "88," "89," "90" and "91" of the Plaintiffs' Complaint. ANSWERING THE ALLEGED TENTH CAUSE TWENTY-SEVENTH: Repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every denial set forth in paragraphs of the answer marked "FIRST" through "TWENTY-SIXTH" with respect to paragraph of the Complaint marked "92" with the same force and effect as though fully set TWENTY-EIGHTH: Admits the allegations contained in paragraphs "93," "95" and "96" of the Plaintiffs' Complaint. TWENTY-NINTH: Denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in paragraph of the Complaint marked "94." ANSWERING THE ALLEGED ELEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT THIRTIETH: Repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every denial set forth in paragraphs of the answer marked "FIRST" through "TWENTY-NINTH" with respect to 6 of 10

paragraph of the Complaint marked "97" with the same force and effect as though fully set THIRTY-FIRST: Denies each and every allegation contained in paragraphs of the Complaint marked "98, "99" and "100." ANSWERING THE ALLEGED TWELFTH CAUSE OF ACTION ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT THIRTY-SECOND: Repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every denial set forth in paragraphs of the answer marked "FIRST" through "THIRTY-FIRST" with respect to paragraph of the Complaint marked "101" with the same force and effect as though fully set THIRTY-THIRD: Denies each and every allegation contained in paragraphs of the Complaint marked 1 102," "103" and "104." THIRTY-FOURTH: Denies each and every other remaining allegation of the Plaintiffs' Complaint not herein before specifically admitted or otherwise denied. AS AND FOR A FIRST, SEPARATE AND THIRTY-FIFTH: There is another action pending between Plaintiffs and the answering Defendant for the same cause(s) of action asserted against Defendant herein. AS AND FOR A SECOND, SEPARATE AND THIRTY-SIXTH: Defendant will rely upon the doctrine of res judicata and/or collateral estoppel in connection with any determinations adverse to Plaintiffs rendered in 7 of 10

any judicial, quasi-judicial, administrative or arbitration forum arising out of the accident sued upon herein. THIRTY-SEVENTH: Defendant will rely upon the doctrine of estoppel against inconsistent positions in connection with any determination made in Plaintiffs' favor in any judicial, quasi-judicial, administrative or arbitration forum in which Plaintiffs take a position different from or inconsistent with the position taken in this action. AS AND FOR A THIRD, SEPARATE AND BEHALF OF THIS ANSVVER1NG DEFENDANT. THIRTY-EIGHTH: Plaintiffs failed to take all reasonable measures to reduce, mitigate and/or minimize the damages alleged. AS AND FOR A FOURTH, SEPARATE AND THIRTY-NINTH: Plaintiffs are covered by an insurance policy/insurance policies other than the policy issued to the answering Defendant as a named insured. AS AND FOR A FIFTH, SEPARATE AND FORTIETH: Pursuant to CPLR Section 4545, any recovery by Plaintiffs should be reduced in whole or in part, by reason of and the amount of Plaintiffs' indemnification and/or reimbursement from any other insurance company or other collateral source. 8 of 10

AS AND FOR A SIXTH, SEPARATE AND FORTY-FIRST: Plaintiffs have an adequate remedy at law, thereby making their requests for a declaratory judgment against the answering Defendant improper. AS AND FOR A SEVENTH, SEPARATE AND FORTY-SECOND: Defendant reserves its right to assert any and all additional defenses which may have been omitted from the Answer in the event that further information becomes available to it through discovery and/or further investigation. WHEREFORE, Defendant, KINGS COUNTY DEMOLITION, INC., demands judgment in its favor dismissing the Complaint as against it, together with the costs and disbursements of this action, and for such other and further relief as the court may deem just and proper. Yours, etc. SHAYNE, DACHS, AUER & DACHS, LLP BY: 1, 11; J4 NATHAN A. DACHS Attorneys for Defendant, KINGS COUNTY DEMOLITION, INC. 114 Old Country Road, Suite 410 Mineola, New York 11501-4410 (516) 747-1100 9 of 10

JONATHAN A. DACHS, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is a member of the firm of SHAYNE, DACHS, SAUER & DACHS, LLP, attorneys for Defendant, KINGS COUNTY DEMOLITION, INC., herein; that he has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof; and that the same is true to his own knowledge, except as to those matters therein stated to be alleged upon information and belief, and as to those matters he believes them to be true. Affirmant further says that the reason this verification is made by affirmant and not by the Defendant, KINGS COUNTY DEMOLITION, INC., herein, is because the said Defendant, does not reside within the county where your affirmant maintains his office. Affirniant further says that the source of his knowledge and the grounds of his belief as to all matters therein so stated upon his knowledge are books, papers, records and documents maintained by deponent. Dated: Mineola, New York June 9, 2017 10 of 10