India-ASEAN Economic Relations: Examining Future Possibilities

Similar documents
REFERENCE NOTE. No.5/RN/Ref./March/2018 INDIA AND ASEAN

Economic Development: Miracle, Crisis and Regionalism

ASEAN. Overview ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS

External Partners in ASEAN Community Building: Their Significance and Complementarities

China ASEAN Relations: Opportunities and Challenges for Development

ASEAN and the EU. Political dialogue and security cooperation. Working closely for 40 years. Wednesday, 11 May, :22

Turning Trade Opportunities and Challenges into Trade: Implications for ASEAN Countries

BIMSTEC: Relevance and Challenges Amitendu Palit, Rahul Choudhury and Silvia Tieri

FRAMEWORK FOR COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN THE ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS AND JAPAN

REGIONAL COOPERATION AND INTEGRATION ANALYSIS. A. Role of Regional Cooperation and Integration in Myanmar s Development

JEL Classification: O18, R11, R41

The Asia-Pacific as a Strategic Region for the European Union Tallinn University of Technology 15 Sep 2016

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Shuji Uchikawa

DOHA DECLARATION On the Occasion of the 5 th ACD Ministerial Meeting Doha, Qatar, 24 May 2006

AFTA as Real Free trade Area

Look East and Look West Policy. Written by Civil Services Times Magazine Monday, 12 December :34

Country Update. Manufactured products exports: Technical Barriers to Trade faced by exporters from Vietnam VIET NAM. Provided by

VISIONIAS

Be Happy, Share & Help Each Other!!! Study-IQ education

Pradumna B Rana Associate Professor

Present by Mr. Manothong VONGSAY Deputy Director General of Investment Promotion Department Ministry of Planning and Investment Seoul, 20 June 2012

Deepening Economic Integration

The Nanning-Singapore Economic Corridor:

Twenty-Ninth ASEAN Ministerial Meeting Jakarta, July 1996 JOINT COMMUNIQUÉ

Building an ASEAN Economic Community in the heart of East Asia By Dr Surin Pitsuwan, Secretary-General of ASEAN,

TOWARD AN INTEGRATED ASEAN LABOR MARKET FOR ASEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY: PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES FOR CLML COUNTRIES AND THE ROLE OF TAIWAN

ADB s Initiatives for Transport and Trade Facilitation in South Asia and beyond

India-ASEAN FTA in Services and Investments: Countdown to Implementation

ASEAN ANALYSIS: ASEAN-India relations a linchpin in rebalancing Asia

INTRODUCTION The ASEAN Economic Community and Beyond

Science and Technology Diplomacy in Asia

CHAIRMAN S STATEMENT OF THE 15 TH ASEAN-INDIA SUMMIT 14 November 2017, Manila, Philippines. Partnering for Change, Engaging the World

The RCEP: Integrating India into the Asian Economy

VIETNAM FOCUS. The Next Growth Story In Asia?

THE AEC PROGRESS, CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS

FRAMEWORK FOR COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN JAPAN AND THE ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH EAST ASIAN NATIONS

Decent Work for All ASIAN DECENT WORK DECADE

ASEAN Community in a Global Community of Nations BALI, INDONESIA, 18 NOVEMBER 2011

Towards ASEAN Economic Community 2025!

The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue: An Alignment of Policies for Common Benefit Ambassador Anil Wadhwa Vivekananda International Foundation

ASEAN Cooperation on Trade in Health Services. Prince Mahidol Award Conference 2008

Mizuho Economic Outlook & Analysis

CLMV and the AEC 2015 :

1. RECENT FOREIGN TRADE AGREEMENTS

Trans-Pacific Trade and Investment Relations Region Is Key Driver of Global Economic Growth

ASEAN FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT FOR THE INTEGRATION OF PRIORITY SECTORS

ADB s Initiatives for Transport and Trade Facilitation in South Asia and Beyond

SINO-ASEAN ECONOMIC INTEGRATION AND ITS IMPACT ON INTRA-ASEAN TRADE

India-Myanmar Relations: Context of Contemporary Geographical Routes and Linkages. Lipi Ghosh 1

SECTION THREE BENEFITS OF THE JSEPA

Myanmar Private Sector Perspective

Intellectual Property and Seed: Concerns & Caveats

PROTOCOL TO IMPLEMENT THE TENTH PACKAGE OF COMMITMENTS ON AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES UNDER THE ASEAN FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON SERVICES

AEC AND CHINA-ASEAN CONNECTIVITY PLAN IN THE REGION

CHAPTER 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS. Article 1.1 Objectives. The objectives of this Framework Agreement are to:

Cambodia During Economic Integration Issues and Challenges

The Aspiration for Asia-Europe Connectivity. Fu Ying. At Singapore-China Business Forum. Singapore, 27 July 2015

RECOGNISING the importance of capacity building through human resource development to face challenges of globalisation; and

Lao People s Democratic Republic

Trade Facilitation and Better Connectivity for an Inclusive Asia and Pacific

Opportunities for enhancing connectivity in Central Asia: linking ICT and transport

Dr. Biswajit Dhar Professor Centre for Economic Studies and Planning Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi

Saowaruj Rattanakhamfu* Senior Research Fellow, Thailand Development Research Institute

Chapter 5: Internationalization & Industrialization

IN COOPERATION WITH BUSINESS SENTIMENT SURVEY 2015

Study on the Impact of an

The Development of Sub-Regionalism in Asia. Jin Ting 4016R330-6 Trirat Chaiburanapankul 4017R336-5

1.3. Rankings: imports, exports and overall trade volume Philippines trade with EU Member States Structure and trends by product

CICP Policy Brief No. 8

Seminar on Trade Facilitation in East Asia November 2004, Shanghai, China

Chairman s Statement of the 4 th East Asia Summit Cha-am Hua Hin, Thailand, 25 October 2009

CHINA AND MEKONG SUB-REGIONAL COOPERATION: A PERSPECTIVE FROM VIETNAM

Indonesia and The Implementation of ASEAN Economic Community

Multilateral Advocacy for Development of Co-operatives in ASEAN 25 July 2018

ASEAN 2015: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES

ASEAN ECONOMIC BULLETIN January 2016

Presentation on TPP & TTIP Background and Implications. by Dr V.S. SESHADRI at Centre for WTO Studies New Delhi 3 March 2014

Mega-Regionalism in Asia: 5 Economic Implications

Hinrich Foundation Sustainable Trade Index Country overview: Singapore

OVERVIEW ASEAN-RUSSIA DIALOGUE RELATIONS

Bangkok Declaration 2 nd Asia Cooperation Dialogue (ACD) Summit One Asia, Diverse Strengths 9 10 October 2016, Bangkok, Kingdom of Thailand

Joint Statement of the 16th ASEAN-China Summit on Commemoration of the 10th Anniversary of the ASEAN-China Strategic Partnership

Regional Integration. Ajitava Raychaudhuri Department of Economics Jadavpur University Kolkata. 9 May, 2016 Yangon

CHAIRMAN S STATEMENT OF THE 14 TH ASEAN-INDIA SUMMIT 8 September 2016, Vientiane, Lao PDR Turning Vision into Reality for a Dynamic ASEAN Community

China and ASEAN: Together for a Shared Future in the New Era H.E. Mr. HUANG Xilian Ambassador of People's Repubulic of China to ASEAN

SOUTH-EAST ASIA. A sprightly 83 year-old lady displaced by Typhoon Haiyan collects blankets for her family in Lilioan Barangay, Philippines

BRIDGING THE GAP Trade and Investment Capacity Building for Least Developed and Landlocked Developing Countries

Indonesia s Chairmanship of ASEAN 2011 and Future Relations of ASEAN-Australia

Trade and the Barcelona process. Memo - Brussels, 23 March 2006

Southeast Asian Economic Outlook: With Perspectives on China and India Thematic focus: Narrowing development gaps 2013 edition

Delhi Dialogue IV India and ASEAN: Partners for Peace, Progress and Stability

Proliferation of FTAs in East Asia

Life is 10% what happened to us and 90% how we react to it. Study-IQ education

Issue Papers prepared by the Government of Japan

Proposal to the General Shareholder Meeting Regarding the Approval of Vietinbank s strategy in expanding oversea networks

Southeast Asian Economic Outlook With Perspectives on China and India, 2013

ASEAN-CHINA STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP VISION 2030

Current Development Cooperation (DC) in the ASEAN Region

Push and Pull Factors for Japanese Manufacturing Companies Moving Production Overseas

Hurdles towards the ASEAN Community

Transcription:

JANUARY 2018 ISSUE NO. 221 India-ASEAN Economic Relations: Examining Future Possibilities PREETY BHOGAL ABSTRACT India and Southeast Asia share a long cultural history, which over the years has helped shape economic and commercial relations between them. This partnership garnered an impetus following the launch of India s Look East Policy in the early 1990s, rechristened Act East in 2015. This brief analyses the trade and investment relations between India and the member states of ASEAN. It highlights the various challenges in the relationship in the areas of physical, institutional and people-to-people connectivity, which have restricted the integration of India in the regional value chain. The brief stresses the crucial role played by enhanced India-ASEAN connectivity for regional growth and prosperity. INTRODUCTION As India progressed towards a more open and liberal trade-investment regime in the early 1990s, its interest in collaborating with its Eastern and South-Eastern neighbours deepened. India and the member nations of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations 1 (ASEAN) share colonial and cultural linkages that have evolved since their independence. During the Nehru era in India, various efforts were made by the country to build closer partnerships with the countries of Southeast Asia. The Conference on Indonesia organised in New Delhi in 1949 and the Bandung Conference in 1955 were only some of the various initiatives undertaken during that period. However, these efforts failed to reinforce the economic, political or strategic partnership between India and ASEAN. This was mainly due to the dominance of Chinaborn communities in many Southeast Asian countries, which encouraged these nations to engage more actively with China and, as a Observer Research Foundation (ORF) is a public policy think-tank that aims to influence the formulation of policies for building a strong and prosperous India. ORF pursues these goals by providing informed analyses and indepth research, and organising events that serve as platforms for stimulating and productive discussions. ISBN 978-93-87407-48-0 2018 Observer Research Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, copied, archived, retained or transmitted through print, speech or electronic media without prior written approval from ORF.

corollary, side-lining Indian interests in the 2 region. The launch of India s Look East Policy in 1992, which was later rechristened the Act East Policy, was a watershed event; it ushered in an era of reinvigorated partnership between India and Southeast Asia. Indian policymakers had long ago realised the strategic importance of the ASEAN region. The Act East Policy was a push in the right direction, focused on strengthening relations through greater economic and cultural exchanges. This brief examines how economic relations between India and ASEAN, especially in the areas of trade and investment, have changed over time. Although India and ASEAN share a dynamic relationship that goes well beyond economics, the easy movement of goods, services, and capital across borders remains the foremost concern for both. It is thus necessary to review the value-chain integration between them, which enables greater economic cooperation given adequate connectivity links. There are a few challenges in terms of physical, institutional and peopleto-people connectivity that could jeopardise the economic growth of these two regions. These barriers need immediate consideration by policymakers. PRESENT ENGAGEMENTS India-ASEAN relations have evolved over time, with India graduating from the Southeast Asian grouping s Sectoral Dialogue 3 Partner in 1992 to a Summit-level Partner in 2002. Since then, both sides have been actively engaged in fostering economic, security, political, and cultural cooperation. In 2012, during the first ever Commemorative Summit of India and ASEAN, the leaders of all the countries involved decided to elevate their engagement to one of a strategic partnership. The year 2017 marked 25 years of dialogue partnership between India and ASEAN, and five years of the strategic partnership. India has engaged with ASEAN at both regional and sub-regional levels by signing economic cooperation agreements with its different members. A framework agreement on comprehensive economic cooperation was signed in Bali in October 2003 between India and ASEAN, which was expected to eliminate tariff barriers among all the members and eventually establish a free trade area in goods, services and investment. This was followed by a final agreement on trade in goods signed in Bangkok in 2009 and another on services and investments in New Delhi in 2015, but not all barriers have as yet been removed. Bilateral agreements with various other members such as Thailand, Singapore, and Malaysia have also been signed, all of them aimed at deepening economic integration with the region. ECONOMIC RELATIONS: TRADE AND INVESTMENT LINKAGES Between 1995 and 2016, trade between India and ASEAN grew at a compound average growth rate (CAGR) of about 11.9 percent. Of total trade of nearly US$ 64.3 billion in 2016, Indian imports from ASEAN countries accounted for a dominant share of 59 percent, with exports to ASEAN economies accounting for the remaining share. Indian imports from ASEAN witnessed a robust growth of 12.3 percent during this period while Indian exports to ASEAN recorded a CAGR of 11.4 percent. This indicates that the balance of 2 ORF ISSUE BRIEF No. 221 ljanuary 2018

Figure 1: Trends in Indian Exports to and Imports from ASEAN countries, 1995-2016 Source: UNCTAD Statistics trade has been in favour of ASEAN member countries throughout the reference period. Figure 1 shows the trends in Indian exports to, and imports from, ASEAN member countries over the period 1995-2016. There are a few Southeast Asian countries such as Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand that have emerged as major export destinations for India. The main export items to Singapore include mineral fuels, oils and bituminous substances, ships, boats and floating structures. Indian imports from Singapore include organic chemicals, nuclear reactors, boilers, machinery and mechanical appliances, electrical machinery and equipment and parts, among others. India also imports agricultural products from Malaysia. Since there are trade complementarities between India and Southeast Asian countries in areas such as agriculture, machinery and minerals, among others, trade relations have continued to expand, barring a few periods of East Asian crisis such as 1997-98 and the global financial crisis of 2008-09. Meanwhile, in investments, India received nearly US$13.8 billion as foreign direct investment (FDI) from ASEAN economies in 2015-16. The major Southeast Asian economies investing in India are Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand. Over 99 percent of total FDI inflows into India are from Singapore, with other Southeast Asian countries accounting for less than one percent. The India- Singapore Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement has provided an impetus to growing partnership 4 between the two countries. Conversely, Indian outflows to ASEAN economies were recorded at US$ 1.2 billion in 2015, up from US$ 0.6 billion the previous year. However, outward investments from India have followed a downward trajectory after 2012. Even earlier, in 2011, Indian investment in these countries dropped by US$ 1.9 billion. Table 1 shows the investment flows between India and ASEAN for the period 2010-2015. ORF ISSUE BRIEF No. 221 ljanuary 2018 3

Table 1: Investment flows between India and ASEAN in US$ billion, 2012-2015 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 FDI Inflows into ASEAN from India 3.80-1.96 6.63 2.10 0.61 1.25 FDI Outflows from ASEAN into India 3.02 1.76 5.29 2.59 6.14 6.97 Source: ASEAN Investment Report, 2016; FDI Statistics for different years from DIPP Website Note: FDI Outflows from ASEAN into India only include data points for a few Southeast Asian countries namely Indonesia, Singapore, Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand, Myanmar and Vietnam. For others, no data is available. In 2015, India accounted for only 1.3 percent of total net inflows into ASEAN. India invested largely in the financial and insurance industries across Southeast Asia (60 percent), followed by wholesale and retail trade (nine percent) and real estate activities (eight 5 percent). Many Indian banks, such as Bank of Baroda, Indian Overseas Bank, and Andhra Bank, have established branches in the ASEAN region. This is essential to integrating banking and financial services between the two regions. INDIA-SOUTHEAST ASIA REGIONAL VALUE CHAIN Regional value chains strengthen economic cooperation by expanding market access among nations. Integrating with regional value chains leads to benefits such as reduced cost of manufacturing and trading for the 6 participating countries. The benefits accrue from outsourcing and fragmentation of production in various locations. There are a range of policy measures including trade facilitation, liberalisation of goods, services and capital, competition policy, and infrastructure quality, which promote value 7 chain integration. FDI flow is one of the major factors that enable integration of economies by linking them to regional and global value chains. At a Business Conclave in Jaipur in February 2017, the then Indian Commerce and Industry Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, highlighted how textiles manufacturers in India could benefit by engaging with less developed countries such as Cambodia, Laos, 8 Myanmar and Vietnam. There is potential to create value chains in textiles between India and a few ASEAN economies, as the latter import cotton yarn (an input used in manufacturing of textiles) from India. Creating a value chain in fibres is another area of possible collaboration between India and ASEAN. Myanmar, for instance, is open to FDI in sectors such as garments, textiles and agriculture, which are conducive to creating a 9 value chain between India and Southeast Asia. The free trade in goods agreement signed between India and ASEAN in 2009 has also facilitated the development of supply chains and production networks in many products such as electronics and automobiles, including vehicle and component manufacturing. However, there remain certain challenges to establishing a supply chain, such as non-tariff barriers, poor connectivity, and quality of 10 infrastructure, among others. CONNECTING INDIA WITH SOUTHEAST ASIAN ECONOMIES Key to the task of strengthening economic relations between India and the Southeast Asian nations is fostering three kinds of 4 ORF ISSUE BRIEF No. 221 ljanuary 2018

connectivity: physical, institutional, and people-to-people. Physical/Infrastructure Connectivity Better transport connectivity is critical to India-ASEAN relations. After all, the seamless movement of goods and services across borders is highly dependent on effective transportation links. The reality is that transport and infrastructure barriers exist between India and Southeast Asia including poor quality of roads, missing railway links, inadequate maritime and port facilities, and lack of customs cooperation. These all have implications for any potential integration between India and Southeast Asia. India s northeast is fundamental to efforts towards regional connectivity with ASEAN countries, given its strategic location. Myanmar, for one, shares a land border with India s northeast, thereby providing a bridge between Indian and Southeast Asian markets. Similarly, improving maritime connectivity between India and Myanmar is fundamental to their mutual growth and development. So far, the projects that have been undertaken by India with Myanmar include the Kaladan Multimodal Transit Transport Project and the India- Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Highway. T he K aladan Multimodal Transit Transport Project is the first major project undertaken by India in Southeast Asia. When completed, this project will connect Kolkata with Sittwe port in Myanmar, facilitating the movement of cargo across the India-Myanmar border through the sea route. This project will 11 also provide an alternative transit route between India s northeastern region and Myanmar by establishing new road, and inland 12 water connectivity links between them. The multimodal transit project includes various segments, starting with linking Kolkata to Sittwe across the Bay of Bengal, and going on to connect Sittwe to Paletwa town in Myanmar along the Kaladan River. There are also plans to connect Paletwa to the India-Myanmar border by road, which will further be extended to Lawngtlai town in Mizoram. Work on this project is expected to be completed by 2020. It is expected to revolutionise the transit system for goods and tradable services between India and Myanmar, later extending to other Southeast Asian nations such as Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam. Institutional Connectivity To deepen connectivity between India and ASEAN nations, it is essential to build effective institutional connectivity by harmonising trade, investments, and financial policies. Physical connectivity (transportation and soft infrastructure requirements such as telecommunications) has to be built in tandem with proper institutional arrangements to achieve improved cross-regional connectivity. According to a 2015 report by the Asian Development Bank, there are ample opportunities for energy trading between 13 India and Myanmar. Given the vast natural resources and hydropower reserves of Myanmar, it becomes a potential source of energy for India. However, due to lack of adequate physical and institutional infrastructure between India and Southeast Asia, energy trading remains underutilised. 14 Moreover, the presence of non-tariff barriers 15 and restrictive institutional arrangements hinder the movement of goods and services. Trade facilitation measures to reduce the volume of documentation required and thereby the time of transit are necessary to improve economic exchanges between India and Southeast Asian countries. ORF ISSUE BRIEF No. 221 ljanuary 2018 5

People-to-people Connectivity India has a long history of people-to-people connectivity with Southeast Asian countries, particularly with Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia, which are home to large populations of the Indian diaspora. Indians comprise nine percent of Singapore s population and seven percent of Malaysia s. India and the member countries of ASEAN jointly organise regular exchange programmes for students, farming communities, diplomats, and business and media personnel, among 1 6 others. However, there are certain restrictions on the movement of professionals and labour between India and Southeast Asia. Under the agreement on trade in services signed in 2015, India and ASEAN have agreed to liberalise trade in a few areas such as telecommunications and financial and insurance services, while regulating the movement of natural persons. It is known that for the growth of the less-developed ASEAN countries (Laos, Cambodia, and Myanmar), skilled labour and professionals are required. This is one area where India can play an important role. CONCLUSION Notwithstanding the massive promise carried by stronger connectivity between India and Southeast Asia, there are various barriers that hobble such integration. For one, the delay in completing infrastructure projects including road, rail, seaports, and highways due to various political and financial constraints, has impeded the progress of economic cooperation. Keeping in mind its interest in collaborating with Southeast Asia for potential benefits in varied sectors such as agriculture, energy, and gas, India has undertaken initiatives to enhance crossregional cooperation. For instance, India invited Myanmar to join the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) in 17 December 1997, as it has a locational advantage that can be leveraged to integrate India with Southeast Asia. It is suggested that India and ASEAN identify their common challenges and shared interests as it will help them promote cooperation. Trade in services remains largely protected in ASEAN member countries. As India has a comparative advantage in the services sector, especially information technology services, domestic regulations in ASEAN economies need to be liberalised to promote cross-regional cooperation. The challenges of inadequate physical connectivity (road and rail linkages), along with infrastructural bottlenecks (nontariff barriers) need to be addressed to strengthen India-ASEAN partnership. Further, ASEAN member countries and India have been working towards ratifying the R e g i o n a l C o m p re h e n s i v e E conomic Partnership Agreement, which is expected to improve trade and investment among all member countries. This process needs to be expedited. Greater progress is envisioned in India-ASEAN relations upon liberalisation of the services trade (particularly Mode 4 movement of natural persons), and other areas of common interest and potential. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Preety Bhogal is a former Junior Fellow at Observer Research Foundation and a PhD candidate in the Department of Economics at Kansas State University. 6 ORF ISSUE BRIEF No. 221 ljanuary 2018

ENDNOTES 1. ASEAN is a regional grouping of 10 member states, namely, Indonesia, Singapore, Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, Thailand, Cambodia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, and Vietnam. 2. I. Rao, 2012, 'Emerging India's Policy towards Southeast Asia during the Post-Cold War Era', Area Studies, vol. 6, no. 2 (July-Dec 2012), 90-109. 3. Sectoral partner status entails discussions on sectors such as trade, investment, tourism, and science and technology. For more details on engagement of India-ASEAN, please see Sen et al., 2004, 'ASEAN-India Economic Relations: Current Status and Future Prospects', Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 39, no. 29 (Jul. 17-23, 2004), 3297-3308. 4, About 1,295 Indian firms have established base in Singapore (ASEAN Investment Report 2017, UNCTAD). 5. According to the ASEAN Investment Report (2016), about $1.03 billion has been invested by India in financial and insurance activities, and $0.2 billion in real estate activities, in ASEAN economies. The figures in parentheses represent the share of these activities in total FDI flows from India into ASEAN and have been sourced from the latest ASEAN Investment Report (2017). 6. A. Mukherjee and T. Goyal, 2015, 'Reinvigorating India's manufacturing sector: Integrating the services value chain with Southeast Asia', International Growth Centre Blog. 7. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 'The Participation of Developing Countries in Global Value Chains: Implications for Trade and Trade Policy', April 2015, OECD. 8. Kirtika Suneja, "Create value chains with nations getting US, EU sops: Government to companies', Economic Times, February 28, 2017, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/ policy/create-value-chains-with-nations-getting-us-eu-sops-government-to-companies/ articleshow/57382370.cms. 9. 'India can be reliable source of fibres for ASEAN: Smriti Irani', The Pioneer, July 2, 2017, http://www.dailypioneer.com/business-and-finance/india-can-be-reliable-source-of-fibres-forasean-smriti-irani.html. 10. 'ASEAN-India Strategic Partnership: Perspectives from the ASEAN-India Network of Think Tanks', 2012, Proceedings of the first roundtable on ASEAN-India Network of Think Tanks organized on 7-8 August 2012 in New Delhi. 11. A new transit (sea and inland water transportation) route will be provided, which will be an alternative to the existing and overused land route via Siliguri in West Bengal. 12. Press Information Bureau, Government of India, 'Implementation of the Kaladan Multi Modal Transit Transport Project in Myanmar at the Revised Cost Estimate of Rs 2904.04 Crore', 2015. 13. 'Connecting South Asia and Southeast Asia', 2015, joint study by Asian Development Bank and Asian Development Bank Institute, Japan. 14. Non-tariff barriers here include number of documents required and time taken for trading, cumbersome customs procedures, among others. ORF ISSUE BRIEF No. 221 ljanuary 2018 7

15. Institutional arrangements include all legal and institutional mechanisms that may facilitate or restrict the movement of goods, services and persons across borders. This includes alimited list of tradable products, different modes of payment settlement, and absence of standard operating procedures at border checkpoints. 16. Projects launched by India for promoting people-to-people connectivity with ASEAN include training programmes for ASEAN diplomats, exchange of Parliamentarians, ASEAN-India Network of Think Tanks, exchange of farmers and agricultural scientists, etc. Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, 'India-ASEAN Relations', 2016. Available at: https://www.mea.gov.in/portal/ ForeignRelation/India_2016.pdf 17. See no.13. 20, Rouse Avenue Institutional Area, New Delhi - 110 002, INDIA Ph. : +91-11-43520020, 30220020. Fax : +91-11-43520003, 23210773. E-mail: contactus@orfonline.org Website: www.orfonline.org