Taking Action When Things Go Wrong

Similar documents
Qualifications Wales Bill

Sanctions Policy August 2016

Economy, Transport and Environment. Enforcement Policy

REGULATORY SERVICES Compliance and Enforcement Policy

CONSULTATION ON DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF A VARIABLE MONETARY PENALTY

October Guideline to Disciplinary Committee for Determining Disciplinary Orders

Q1) Do you agree or disagree with the Council s approach to the distinction between a principle and a purpose of sentencing?

Enforcement and prosecution policy

Part 1 The awarding body 1. Section A Governance 1. Section B The awarding body and Qualifications Wales 8. Section C Third parties 13

Guidance on consumer enforcement CAP 1018

Asylum Support Partnership response to Oversight of the Immigration Advice Sector consultation

SUPPLEMENTARY MEMORANDUM CONCERNING THE DELEGATED POWERS IN THE BILL FOR THE DELEGATED POWERS AND REGULATORY REFORM COMMITTEE

FIRE SAFETY ENFORCEMENT POLICY

Administrative Sanctions: imposing warnings and fines

Police and crime panels. Guidance on confirmation hearings

Consultation on the Draft Restriction Policy

Ethics Committee Terms of Reference

Good decision making: Investigating committee meetings and outcomes guidance

Consultation Response

BRAEMAR SHIPPING SERVICES PLC ( the Company ) TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Structure of Self-employed Practice Consultation paper

IPCC Police Staff 6/5/05 5:25 pm Page 1. You and the police complaints system

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES

Private Sector Housing Civil Penalties Policy

Indicative Sanctions Guidance Note

Anti-bribery and corruption policy & guidelines. December 2011

LOBBYING PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

ENFORCEMENT GUIDE STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES & GUIDANCE ON THE EXERCISE OF ENFORCEMENT POWERS. September

Introduction for non-party campaigners

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

Review of Ofcom list of major political parties for elections taking place on 22 May 2014 Statement

Regulatory enforcement proceedings

Enforcement Proceedings Framework for Enforcement Sanctions and Costs

Feedback from FIA on European Commission EMIR Review Proposal Part 2 (authorisation and recognition of CCPs)

Rules Notice Request for Comment

POLICY ON UNACCEPTABLE ACTIONS BY COMPLAINANTS

Guidance on the use of enforcement action June 2016

The Bribery Act Adequate procedures.

Customer Compliments and Complaints Policy

Data Protection Bill, House of Lords second reading Information Commissioner s briefing

The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street, London WC2N 6AU. Severe Reprimand and costs to ACCA in the sum of

EU (Withdrawal) Bill- Committee stage

Sanctions Policy (Audit Enforcement Procedure)

Declarations guidance for fullyqualified

Decision of the Election Committee on a due impartiality complaint brought by the Respect Party in relation to The London Debate

Freedom of information regulatory action policy

Declarations guidance for student registrants

Good decision making: Fitness to practise hearings and sanctions guidance

ENFORCEMENT POLICY. Water Supply (Water Fittings) Regulations 1999

1.2 The ABC will apply the following criteria in determining proportionate complaint handling:

Covert Human Intelligence Sources Code of Practice

3. The Town and Country Planning (Referrals and Appeals) (Written Representation Procedure) (Wales) Regulations 2015

8. Part 4 (General) contains general and supplemental provisions.

The Real Estate Institute of New Zealand Incorporated. The Real Estate Agents Act 2008 Exemption Request:

The Lobbying Act 2014

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee

Guide to Managing Breaches of the Code of Conduct

SPEED ENFORCEMENT GUIDELINES

Transparency of Lobbying, Non Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill 2013 House of Commons Report Stage and Third Reading

Guidelines: Consumer protection test for telephone number allocation

Safeguarding your drinking water quality

NRPSI INDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE

Submission by the Scottish Legal Services Ombudsman

Accountancy Scheme Sanctions Guidance

Minutes of Investigation Committee (Oral) hearing

GAS SAFE REGISTER. Sanctions Policy. February 2018 P001_SAN001 V3.3

The Enforcement Guide

Council meeting 15 September 2011

JERSEY GAMBLING COMMISSION. Policy Statement for the Conduct and Regulation of Hosting Providers for Gambling Firms in Jersey

Central Bank of Bahrain Rulebook. Volume 1: Conventional Banks ENFORCEMENT MODULE

Recruiting ex offenders policy

The LTE Group. Anti-Bribery Policy Produced by. The LTE Group. LTEG anti-bribery policy v4 06/2016

Housing and Planning Act Civil Penalties

THE EXECUTIVE COUNSEL TO THE FINANCIAL REPORTING COUNCIL. -and-

Compass Group PLC (the Company) Audit Committee Terms of Reference. Adopted by the Board on 21 September 2016

Media Regulation Roundtable:

Memorandum of Understanding. between. The Legal Aid Agency (LAA) and. Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)

Rules. 1. Purpose. 2. Complaints Covered. 3. Complaints Not Covered

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS NOTES OF GUIDANCE FOR RELEVANT BODIES

TED BAKER PLC (the "Company") AUDIT COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

Procedures for investigating breaches of competition-related conditions in Broadcasting Act licences. Guidelines

VOLUNTARY REGISTER OF DRIVING INSTRUCTORS GOVERNING POLICY

STARTING UP. Constitution of a Charitable Incorporated Organisation with voting members other than its charity trustees

Audit Committee Terms of Reference

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

EDUCATION AND SKILLS BILL

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS NOTES OF GUIDANCE FOR RELEVANT BODIES

Indicative Sanctions Guidance

Guidance on Undertakings

Cirencester Housing Limited Complaints Policy

BUSINESS INTEGRITY POLICY

Digital Economy Bill: Parts 1 4

FCA Mission: Our Approach to Enforcement. March 2018

Employee Discipline Policy

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

Safeguarding your drinking water. Our policy for the enforcement of the Water Supply (Water Fittings) Regulations 1999

Universiteto. That being registered under the Medical Act 1983, as amended:

Our Enforcement Policy

Guidance for the Practice Committees including Indicative Sanctions Guidance

1. Miss Musaji had not responded at all to the Notice of Hearing. The Panel therefore proceeded on the basis that the above charge was not admitted.

Transcription:

Regulatory Document REGULATORY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Taking Action When Things Go Wrong June 2016 Version control This version (1.1) of Qualifications Wales Taking Action When Things Go Wrong policy was approved on 25 June 2016 by the Qualifications Wales Board. Section 47(1) of the Qualifications Wales Act 2015 (the Act ) requires Qualifications Wales to publish a statement of its policy with respect to enforcement. Qualifications Wales will keep its policy statements prepared under section 47 of the Act under review, and if it considers it appropriate in consequence of a review, prepare revised statements. Qualifications Wales will review this document at least once every 3 years. Such a review may consider the effectiveness of the policy and its ongoing applicability. The next review of this statement is due to take place no later than 30 September 2019. Feedback on this policy is welcomed at any time. Please send any comments to policy@qualificationswales.org. Please note that only comments regarding the generality of this document, rather than specific situations will be considered as part of that review.

General Principles of the Taking Action When Things Go Wrong policy This policy is for recognised awarding bodies and for members of the public to enable them to understand how Qualifications Wales might use its enforcement and sanctions powers defined in Part 7 (Enforcement Powers of Qualifications Wales) and Schedule 3 (Further provision about recognition of awarding bodies) of the Act. Qualifications Wales sets out Standard Conditions of Recognition for awarding bodies and monitors compliance against these and other published conditions. Enforcement action will therefore be taken in line with published conditions. Qualifications Wales will be mindful of the demand that regulation may place on awarding bodies and have developed this policy in line with the principles of transparency, consistency, proportionality, accountability and targeting. In order to ensure proportionality, this policy also outlines the stages that will be used before implementation of enforcement powers as defined by the Act. This policy only relates to the application of enforcement powers, the Regulatory Appeals policy outlines how regulatory decisions including the application of enforcement powers may be appealed. CONTENTS Context Actions Qualifications Wales Could Take Factors Qualifications Wales Would Take Into Account 1

CONTEXT 1. The qualifications system is complex and, whilst Qualifications Wales will take risk based efforts to prevent problems, on occasions problems will occur that affect the qualifications awarded or about to be awarded. In such situations Qualifications Wales will consider our actions carefully, taking into account the circumstances and in particular the cause of the problem. Where appropriate Qualifications Wales will use the powers we have to determine the actions necessary to prevent a recurrence of the problem and to put matters right. This policy sets out the ways that we intend to deal with failures and use its enforcement and sanction powers. ACTIONS QUALIFICATIONS WALES COULD TAKE 2. The options available to Qualifications Wales as defined in the Act are: To direct the awarding body to take a particular action or to achieve a particular outcome (Section 37- Power to give directions) To impose a fine (Section 38- Power to impose monetary penalties) To impose additional requirements, as specific conditions of recognition, on an awarding body (Schedule 3 Section 4- Special conditions to which recognition may be subject) To remove the awarding body s recognition (Schedule 3 Section 19- Withdrawal of Recognition) Prior to or following the application of enforcement powers, Qualifications Wales may as appropriate: Agree an action plan proposed by an awarding body Accept a formal undertaking from the awarding body Communicate an issue publicly 3. Given the principal aim of Qualifications Wales to ensure that both the qualifications and the Welsh qualification system are effective for meeting the reasonable needs of learners Qualifications Wales may, where it can be anticipated, intervene to prevent a problem occurring by directing an awarding body to take, or refrain from taking, specified steps in order to secure 2

compliance with the relevant conditions of recognition. Otherwise, Qualifications Wales may take action after an event to direct an awarding body to take action in order to prevent further failures. 4. In some instances, Qualifications Wales may decide to use more than one of the options below to achieve its outcome. The options below may be used in escalation but are not intended to be indicative of defined stages. Removal of recognition Fine Direction Impose Condition Undertaking Action Plan Additional guidance / informal influence FACTORS QUALIFICATIONS WALES WOULD TAKE INTO ACCOUNT 5. Qualifications Wales will aim to use its enforcement powers where necessary in a proportionate, transparent and targeted way to achieve compliance by an awarding body where problems have occurred and to encourage compliance by other bodies too. 6. The factors Qualifications Wales will take into account in determining its course of action will include: The timing and the manner in which the issue was first brought to the attention of Qualifications Wales. For example did the awarding body report 3

the issue or did Qualifications Wales identify it as a result of a complaint or monitoring activity. The nature of the breach including whether it was deliberate or intentional. The likelihood, in the judgement of Qualifications Wales, of a repeat of this issue or something similar. The urgency of the actions required. Whether an awarding body has failed or is likely to fail to comply with a condition. The seriousness of the problem. Serious might be measured by, for example, the number of students affected, the time period of a problem, or the consequence for individuals or other people/organisations affected. The root cause of the problem: whether the awarding body was aware, or not, of the risks being taken; whether or not Qualifications Wales had already provided guidance in this area; and whether that was complied with; and whether it was a one off occurrence or the result of some wider systemic failure. The response of the awarding body when the problem came to light The impact the action will have on students studying for qualifications with the same awarding body. The impact on public confidence. 7. Qualifications Wales will endeavour to be proportionate, appropriate, and mindful of risks in taking enforcement action. Qualifications Wales will also be mindful of any other actions being taken by other regulators in respect of the same issue. 8. Should Qualifications Wales decide to use any of the enforcement tools available to us, we will do so, where possible, with the full knowledge of the awarding body concerned. That body will have an opportunity to comment, in private, on the findings of any investigation and proposed course of action and to propose an alternative course of action. The time available for such engagement with the awarding body concerned will depend on the urgency of the action. Enforcement decisions taken by Qualifications Wales can be 4

appealed within 20 working days of the communication of the decision through the Regulatory Appeals Policy. 9. In the unlikely event that an awarding body is unwilling to provide the information or access Qualifications Wales requires, the Qualifications Wales Act gives Qualifications Wales the power to gain entry and inspection of an awarding body s premises. If Qualifications Wales believes that it is necessary to undertake this action we would apply to a justice of the peace for permission to proceed, setting out the justification for doing so. We would only do this where not to do so would, in our view, bear a significant risk of disadvantage to learners to the qualification system. 10. Qualifications Wales will review the actions taken in the event of taking any enforcement action in order to consider lessons learnt. 11. Qualifications Wales may at its discretion publish details of enforcement action taken either in the annual report to the Assembly or on the Qualifications Wales website. 5