Case 6:16-cv AA Document 1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 6

Similar documents
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON COMPLAINT

Case 6:18-cv MC Document 1 Filed 01/04/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:17-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:17-cv AC Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:17-cv SB Document 7 Filed 05/01/17 Page 1 of 16

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Adv. Proc. No. COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

Case fra Doc 3 Filed 11/21/13 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2/13/ :36 PM 19CV07131 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT. Negligence FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Eastern DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT

Case 3:18-cv AC Document 1 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:16-cv YY Document 1 Filed 07/10/16 Page 1 of 5

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT. Negligence

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.: Plaintiff, v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

[Additional Attorneys on Signature Page]

Case 3:18-cv SB Document 1 Filed 07/13/18 Page 1 of 20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:15-cv PGS-TJB Document 15 Filed 06/15/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1/1/2019 4:52 PM 19CV00011 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

Case 3:12-cv GPC-KSC Document 1 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 9

U.S. DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MARION COUNTY

12/4/ :33 PM 17CV52549 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT

Case tmr Doc 1 Filed 02/18/13 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Attorneys for Plaintiff Betty Gregory and the Putative Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2018 Page 1 of 10. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No.

Case 2:18-cv SGC Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

United States District Court Eastern District Of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO : : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/15/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

FILED 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/28/2018 Page 1 of 13

[Other Attorneys of Record Listed on Signature Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Adv. Proc. No. COMPLAINT

Case 3:14-cv ST Document 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

BANKRUPTCY LAW CENTER, APC Abbas Kazerounian, Esq. [SBN: ] Ahren A. Tiller, Esq. [SBN ]

HART WAGNER^ TRIAL ATTORNEYS

Case 2:16-cv SGC Document 1 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv JO Document 9 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 1

Case 3:16-cv TJC-JBT Document 44 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 13 PageID 890

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 8 Filed: 08/30/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:20

PlainSite. Legal Document. Florida Southern District Court Case No. 1:13-cv Lardner v. Diversified Consultants, Inc. Document 42.

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 06/24/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY, TRENTON DIVISION. Plaintiff, Hon. Freda L. Wolfson

Case 6:13-cv AA Document 20 Filed 03/18/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 132

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

[Other Attorneys of Record Listed on Signature Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 0:18-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/09/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:15-cv JMA-SIL Document 34 Filed 02/22/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 221 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:18-cv KJM-DB Document 1 Filed 09/21/18 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:17-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 08/18/17 Page 1 of 15

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 1 Filed: 05/10/16 Page: 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

4/2/2018 2:16 PM 18CV12858 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

Case 3:17-cv YY Document 1 Filed 08/26/17 Page 1 of 18

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA WHEELING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

similarly situated, seeks the recovery of unpaid wages and related damages for unpaid minimum wage and overtime hours worked, while employed by Bab.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY, TRENTON DIVISION. Case No.:

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Adv. Proc. No. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demanded)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. This matter is before the Court on the parties cross-motions for Summary

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

cij;'l~jl NO~ AC..

Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1

Case 6:16-cv CEM-GJK Document 42 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID 161 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/17/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv PK Document 9 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:18-cv ES-MAH Document 1 Filed 07/01/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/16/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 03/15/17 Page 1 of 7

April 6, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission th Street, SW Washington, DC

Case 1:19-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2019 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

NOW THAT THE TCPA DUST HAS SETTLED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 18 Filed: 02/01/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:365

Case 1:17-cv CBS Document 1 Filed 06/29/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 5:16-cv AB-DTB Document 43 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:192 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:18-cv LY-AWA Document 12 Filed 04/18/18 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 0:17-cv BB Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/27/2017 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 8:16-cv EAK-TGW Document 46 Filed 08/03/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID 335

Case 1:16-cv SS Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the putative class.

Case 2:12-cv Document 1 Filed 12/06/12 Page 1 of 14

Transcription:

Case 6:16-cv-01986-AA Document 1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 6 Michael Fuller, OSB No. 09357 Attorney for Plaintiff Olsen Daines PC US Bancorp Tower 111 SW 5th Ave., Suite 3150 Portland, Oregon 97204 michael@underdoglawyer.com Direct 503-201-4570 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION Lisa Butts, Case No. 6:16-cv-1986 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT v. Collecto, Inc. dba EOS CCA, 47 U.S.C. 227(c)(5) Demand for jury trial Defendant. COMPLAINT Page 1 of 6

Case 6:16-cv-01986-AA Document 1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 2 of 6 1. JURISDICTION AND THE PARTIES This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331 because the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) is a federal consumer protection law. 2. Plaintiff Lisa Butts (Butts) is an individual consumer residing in Salem, Oregon. 3. Defendant Collecto, Inc. dba EOS CCA (Collecto) is a Massachusetts corporation. 4. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391 because Collecto made unwanted calls to Butts cell phone while she resided in Oregon. 5. This complaint s allegations are based on personal knowledge as to Butts conduct and made on information and belief as to the acts of others. 6. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS In August 2012, Collecto bought a portfolio of junk debts allegedly arising from old AT&T consumer accounts for pennies on the dollar. COMPLAINT Page 2 of 6

Case 6:16-cv-01986-AA Document 1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 3 of 6 7. In December 2015, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau entered a $1,850,000 civil penalty judgment against Collecto based on Collecto s collection practices pertaining to its portfolio of junk AT&T debts. See CFPB v. Collecto, Inc. d/b/a EOS CCA, Case No. 1:15-cv- 14024, Doc. # 4 (D. Mass. Dec. 8, 2015). 8. Butts was one of thousands of consumers harassed by Collecto to pay a disputed AT&T debt she did not owe. 9. In a letter dated May 14, 2014, Butts revoked consent to receive any future calls from Collecto. 10. Beginning in or around May 2014 and continuing into June 2016, Collecto used an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS) as that term is defined at 47 U.S.C. 227, to harass Butts with multiple unwanted calls to her cell phone that served no legitimate purpose, that Collecto knew or should have known violated the TCPA, after Butts had revoked any prior consent to receive future calls from Collecto. See In re Collecto, Inc., 999 F. Supp. 2d 1373 (J.P.M.L. 2014) (order consolidating various TCPA actions against Collecto). COMPLAINT Page 3 of 6

Case 6:16-cv-01986-AA Document 1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 4 of 6 11. The phone numbers Collecto used to autodial Butts are consistent with the phone numbers associated with Collecto s collection letters. 12. Butts even registered on the national Do Not Call list but Collecto s autodialed calls continued. COMPLAINT Page 4 of 6

Case 6:16-cv-01986-AA Document 1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 5 of 6 13. Collecto s calls to Butts were made automatically using a telephone dialing system that took a pause to transfer Butts to one of Collecto s call center agents who was available when Butts voice came on the line. Many of Collecto s autodialed calls that Butts intentionally did not verbally answer went directly to voicemail. The volume and sequence of Collecto s calls over the time period alleged above is indicative of systematic dialing. Collecto s unwanted calls caused Butts significant annoyance, stress, and anxiety consistent with telephonic harassment. 14. CAUSE OF ACTION (47 U.S.C. 227(c)(5)) Butts incorporates the allegations above by reference. 15. Collecto willfully violated 47 U.S.C. 227(b) as alleged in this complaint and Butts is entitled to maximum statutory damages and costs under 47 U.S.C. 227(c)(5). 16. Demand for jury trial. COMPLAINT Page 5 of 6

Case 6:16-cv-01986-AA Document 1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 6 of 6 17. PRAYER FOR RELIEF After a determination that Collecto s unwanted calls willfully violated the TCPA, Butts seeks relief as follows: A. Order and Judgment in favor of Butts against Collecto for maximum statutory damages, and costs. Butts also seeks any equitable relief this Court may determine is just and proper. As she learns more information, Butts reserves her right and may intend to bring claims, including class action allegations, against Collecto under the laws governing debt collection. October 13, 2016 RESPECTFULLY FILED, s/ Michael Fuller Michael Fuller, OSB No. 09357 Attorney for Plaintiff Olsen Daines PC US Bancorp Tower 111 SW 5th Ave., Suite 3150 Portland, Oregon 97204 michael@underdoglawyer.com Direct 503-201-4570 COMPLAINT Page 6 of 6