TRAC. Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse Syracuse University. May 17, 2010

Similar documents
April 25, More specifically, we are requesting alien-by-alien anonymous data containing the following information:

Immigration Enforcement, Bond, and Removal

November 20, Acting Director U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. R. Gil Kerlikowske Commissioner U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Summary of the Issue. AILA Recommendations

Streamline: Measuring Its Effect on Illegal Border Crossing

April 3, 2018 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

The President s Budget Request: Fiscal Year (FY) 2019

SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS OF DHS MEMORANDUM Implementing the President s Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements Policies

Glossary, Forms, And Abbreviations Abbreviation or Form

INSTITUTE FOR THE ELIMINATION OF POVERTY & GENOCIDE 9 GAMMON AVENUE ATLANTA, GEORGIA OFFICE

IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT

Department of Homeland Security Delegation Number: Issue Date: 06/05/2003 DELEGATION TO THE BUREAU OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES

April 3, 2018 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

OVERVIEW OF THE DEPORTATION PROCESS

February 3, National Records Center (NRC) Freedom of Information Act division P.O. Box Lee's Summit, MO

Background on the Trump Administration Executive Orders on Immigration

Annual Report. Immigration Enforcement Actions: Office of Immigration Statistics POLICY DIRECTORATE

JTIP Handout:Lesson 34 Immigration Consequences

appeal: A written request to a higher court to modify or reverse the judgment of lower level court.

Piecing Together the US Immigrant Detention Puzzle One Night at a Time: An Analysis of All Persons in DHS-ICE Custody on September 22,

Alien Removals and Returns: Overview and Trends

April 3, 2018 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

Introduction to Homeland Security

Immigration Violations

Privacy Impact Assessment. April 25, 2006

STRIKING AMENDMENT TO PROPOSED ORDINANCE , VERSION. On page 1, beginning on line 15, strike everything through page 19, line 451, and insert:

CLINIC s Advocacy Section: How We Can Help You

Immigration Court Appearances Rates

Immigration 101. USCIS overview. AIFC Prescott, Arizona

Sample Non-Immigrant Response *** LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE *** IAQ RECEIVED: 04/10/ :20:43 AM

LOCAL ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION : GENERAL GUIDELINES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION ) STUDIES, ) 1629 K Street, NW, Suite 600, ) Washington, DC 20

GAO IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT. ICE Could Improve Controls to Help Guide Alien Removal Decision Making. Report to Congressional Requesters

SALEM COUNTY PROSECUTOR S OFFICE

Deportation of Parents of U.S.-Born Citizens

Question & Answer May 27, 2008

You may request consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals if you:

a GAO GAO BORDER SECURITY Additional Actions Needed to Eliminate Weaknesses in the Visa Revocation Process

Instructions for Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Accredited Representative

An Introduction to Federal Immigration Law for North Carolina Government Officials

U.S. Immigratio and Customs Enforcement

NCSL SUMMARY P.L (HR 4472)

Asylum Removal and Immigration Courts: Definitions to Know

Delegation ofauthority to the Assistant Secretary for u.s. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO ME?

ICE. I.C.E. Under D.H.S. Customs and INS Investigations DRO

Also filed through FOIA Online Portal,

November 5, Submitted electronically at Dear Assistant Director Seguin:

Office of Inspector General

Case 1:14-cv LGS Document 105 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 5

Security ( DHS ) officials including ICE officers in field offices, detention facilities and

RE: Freedom of Information Act Request Concerning the Sandusky Bay Station of the Customs and Border Patrol. Purpose. Request for Information

Documentation Guide for People Fleeing Persecution & Victims of Trafficking

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Executive Policies on Immigration Enforcement

Q&A: DHS Implementation of the Executive Order on Border Security and Immigration Enforcement

Defending Non-Citizens in Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin by Maria Theresa Baldini-Potermin

December 14, By Facsimile and U.S. Mail

Department of Homeland Security

CRS Report for Congress

Termination of the Central American Minors Parole Program

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Foreword...v Acknowledgments...ix Table of Decisions Index...367

December 31, Office of Management and Budget USCIS Desk Officer

Re: Expedited Request for Information under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)

Am. Sub. H.B. 49 As Passed by the Senate AGOCD15

Mariana s Story. Unaccompanied Children: The Journey from Home to Appearing before the Immigration Court in the United States

ORR GUIDE: DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT PROGRAM

Chapter 5: Verification of Immigration Status SAVE and FOIA

February 12, Dear USCIS Desk Officer,

SECRETARY NAPOLITANO AND ICE ASSISTANT SECRETARY MORTON ANNOUNCE NEW IMMIGRATION DETENTION REFORM INITIATIVES

8 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Office of Inspector General

HOW TO APPLY FOR ASYLUM, WITHHOLDING OF REMOVAL, AND/OR PROTECTION UNDER ARTICLE 3OF THE CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE

Do Lawyers Pay for Themselves?

Privacy Act of 1974; Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border

WHEN IMMIGRATION OFFICIALS ARRIVE AT YOUR WORKPLACE: A Know Your Rights Toolkit for Public Sector Workers

Department of Homeland Security 111 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, 3rd Floor Washington, DC DHS Docket No. USCIS

Recent Trends in Immigration Enforcement

ICE Scheduled Departure

BUILDING TRUST WITH COMMUNITIES, UPHOLDING DUE PROCESS SUPERVISING ATTORNEY IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER SEPTEMBER 2015

ARE YOU A UNITED STATES CITIZEN?

April 12, Dear FOIA Officer:

PRACTICE ADVISORY. April 21, Prolonged Immigration Detention and Bond Eligibility: Diouf v. Napolitano

Bond/Custody. I. Overview. A. Application Before an Immigration Judge. B. Time. C. Subsequent Hearing. D. While a Bond Appeal is Pending

Immigration Issues in New Mexico. Rebecca Kitson, Esq

=======================================================================

Immigration Violations

February 17, Kevin McAleenan Acting Commissioner U.S. Customs and Border Protection

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION. 1.1 What Is Parole?

J-1 Exchange Visitor Program Information For Academic Departments

TVPRA 2008 & UACs. Sponsored by Houston UAC Task Force. University of Houston Law Center Immigration Clinic, Joseph A.

Immigration Violations

BORDER SECURITY AND IMMIGRATION. Initial Executive Order Actions and Resource Implications

Secure Border Initiative

Case 2:18-cv MJP Document 15-6 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 7

PRO SE ASYLUM MANUAL

IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT. Immigration Detention Overview and Recommendations

8 USC 1365b. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

GAO. HOMELAND SECURITY Challenges to Implementing the Immigration Interior Enforcement Strategy

Transcription:

TRAC Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse Syracuse University May 17, 2010 Catrina Pavlik-Keenan, FOIA Director U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement 800 North Capitol St., NW 5th Floor, Suite 585 Washington, DC 20536 Re: FOIA request for specific information covering individuals arrested, detained, charged, returned or removed during the period October 1, 2004 to date Dear FOIA Director Pavlik-Keenan: Official statistics on the total number of individuals who are subject to arrest, detention, return, and removal from the United States are published each year by the Department of Homeland Security. Often as part of this process "charging documents" are issued by DHS officials seeking removal of individuals from this country. This request submitted under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act asks for copies of anonymous alien-by-alien data covered by the Enforcement Case Tracking System and related modules for individuals and events included in these statistics or on whom "charging documents" were issued. Period of Time Covered. More specifically we are requesting alien-by alien anonymous data covering the period October 1, 2004 to date. The data should include any individual: (i) who was detained or under supervision as of October 1, 2004, or (ii) who was on or after October 1, 2004 apprehended, detained/under supervision, deported/excluded/removed or took voluntary departure, or (iii) against whom a charging document was pending as of October 1, 2004 or issued by DHS on or after October 1, 2004. Should for any reason it be easier for your office to provide a longer time period, this would also be perfectly acceptable to us. Specific items of information requested. Attachment A provides a listing of the specific items of information requested. If any item on this list will not be made available either because you do not believe it is actually contained in your data or because you plan to withhold it we ask to be consulted prior to making copies so that other possibilities can be discussed and so that there is a clear understanding of the nature of the information being requested. Such a procedure is needed since the table schema to these database modules which we requested last January under FOIA that identify the fields where these information items are found have not yet been furnished to us as required by law. Scope of coverage. In the case of individuals who are detained, we understand that sometimes individuals included in the above referenced statistics were not directly under ICE's supervision, but transferred to or held at detention facilities administered (or contracted for) by the Office of Refugee Resettlement Office of the Department of State. Some detainees were also kept at Bureau of Prisons facilities and the Mexican Interior Repatriation Program (MIRP) facilities. Our request extends to any See, for example, URL Mt://www.dhs.erov/xlibrarv/assets/statisticsp ublications/enforcement ar 08..df. WWW : http :/ltrac.syr.edu E-mail : trac@syr.edu Syracuse, NY : (315) 443-3563 Washington, D.C. : (202) 518-9000 West Coast : (425) 746-6372 TRAC : 360 Newhouse II, Syracuse, NY 13244-2100

2 information maintained in any of the separate modules of ENFORCE that pertain to individuals counted as detained in DHS official statistics, regardless of the detention facility they were kept in or released from. Further, should detention information not be available or not relevant for a given individual, but other items of information the request covers are available, the request extends to whatever information on these individuals is recorded in ENFORCE. Linked tables, layout and format of copies provided. It is our understanding that multiple events and characteristics for individuals may be maintained in separate but linked tables and modules within the database systems containing this information. This linkage is accomplished by special fields that allow information on the same individual in different tables and modules to be associated. This makes it possible to link together any relevant information concerning arrest, detention/supervision, charge, adjudication, removal and/or return for a specific individual and his or her background in a single copy of a set of tables. We ask that the copy of the requested information retain this linked table structure, allowing us to associate the information about arrest, detention/supervision, charge, adjudication, removal and return together for each anonymous individual and his or her background. We also ask that all information be provided in machinereadable electronic form, and that we be consulted in advance concerning the specific formats and file structures to be used. Supplemental FOIA request for records used in making copies. We further specifically ask under the Freedom of Information Act to be provided with copies of all records indicating the method used -- including but not limited to scripts, commands, batch files, programs and queries -- to produce the copies of the information requested in this letter. We further request any outputs and logs prepared during the process of running these scripts/commands/programs and queries, or prepared to check that the copies are complete and accurate in all particulars. We request that we be classified as "a representative of the news media" under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, and as representatives of "an educational or noncommercial scientific institution, whose purpose includes scholarly, scientific research." TRAC is a research data center at Syracuse University which was founded in 1989. Under the direction of its co-directors, Professors Long and Burnham, the center carries out an active program of scholarly research. As its name implies, TRAC as part of its educational and service mission also serves as a clearinghouse and regularly responds to inquiries from the press, scholars, governmental bodies, public interest groups and other members of the public on where to find government information and the specific types of information available. One of our specialties is computerized federal databases maintained by agencies to record day-by-day activities required for managing the agency and reporting on its performance to various oversight bodies. TRAC further actively seeks to promote public understanding of the operation of the federal government's immigration enforcement programs through the gathering and dissemination of this information. At TRAC, we actively gather information of interest to the public, transform this information utilizing our editorial and research expertise into various works -- including computerized knowledge bases and reports -- and make these works available to the public. Recent TRAC reports on immigration issues can be viewed at : http://trac.syr.edu/immigrationlreports/. We also request a full waiver of fees. Disclosure of the requested information is in the public interest. Effective enforcement of current federal immigration laws through the apprehension, detention/supervision, and deportation of unlawful aliens has become a central issue in the public

3 debate over immigration reform. Providing humane treatment and due process as an integral part of all enforcement actions also figures prominently in the current public debate. The requested data are the official records of what the government is actually doing in enforcing our federal immigration laws. Access to this basic information is fundamental to the public's ability to become informed about these vital government activities. Further, the requested data is the source for key performance measures the agency is required to prepare, and is used in support of the agency's budget requests. TRAC has a distinguished research record assessing federal immigration enforcement practices. The requested records are being sought in an ongoing study examining whether current immigration enforcement practices are meeting the stated goals of this administration. Financial support to offset the costs of carrying out this research in the public interest has been provided by foundation grants, gifts, and the continuing support provided by Syracuse University. Study results will be made publicly available and widely distributed through publication on our widely acclaimed public web site (http://trac.syr.edu) through which the public also can access thousands of previously prepared TRAC reports and analyses. We have previously provided detailed information to support earlier classification and fee waiver requests, and we incorporate by reference in this request's justification all of the details contained in the August 1, 2006 letter sent on our behalf by our attorneys at Covington & Burling, LLP. Please let us know if you would like us to furnish an additional copy of this letter for your files. Finally, we call your attention to the strict time limits set for furnishing requested records under 5 U.S.C. 552. We would very much appreciate your prompt action and response on this request. Should you have any questions, or if we can be of any assistance, please feel free to contact us at (315) 443-3563 or by email at trac@syr.edu. Thank you very much. Since, u. Long Co-Director, TRAC and Associate Professor Martin J. Whitman School of Management Syracuse University Enclosure: List of Information Items Requested 2 UZ Gr-3~vt.n David Burnham Co-Director, TRAC and Associate Research Professor S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications Syracuse University

Attachment A List of Information Items Requested Concerning the alien's background: 1. nationality or country of citizenship 2. gender 3. age 4. number of children and their status (3 illegal children in US, 1 US citizen child, etc.) 5. parent status and kin relationship 6. marital status 7. date of original entry into the United States 8. nature of original entry (legal, without inspection, etc.) 9. legal permanent resident or not 10.each previous criminal charges- 1, 2, 3, 4, etc. (individually list available details on each particular charge) 11.status of each criminal charge 1, 2, 3, 4 etc. (for each charge listed, its status (convicted, not guilty, dismissed, pending, etc.) 12.aggravated felon code 13.subject to mandatory detention 14.current case category (voluntary departure-unexpired and unextended departure period, deportable under adjudication by IJ, deportable under adjudication by BIA, referred to investigations,... reinstated final order, etc.) Concerning the alien's apprehension or arrest: 15.date and time of day of each apprehension 16.location of each apprehension (city and state, etc.) 17.arresting authority for each apprehension (ICE, CBP, USCIS etc.) 18.program or area under which each apprehension took place (Criminal Alien Program, State and Local 287(g), Secure Communities, Fugitive Operations, Office of Investigations, Border Patrol Operation Streamline, etc.) 19.whether released to the arresting authority directly from jail or prison after serving time on a criminal conviction Concerning an alien's detention and supervised custody: 20. "charge-in" category 21."final-charge" category 22.classification (low custody, medium custody, high custody, etc.) 23.for each continuous period of an alien's detention: a. the initial book-in date and time of day b. ICE field and subfield office for initial book-in c. ICE Document Control Office (DCO) at time of initial book-in d. the detention facility where initially booked in (including any holding areas and staging facilities)

e. the release date and time of day (where applicable) f. ICE field and subfield office at time of release or currently g. ICE Document Control Office (DCO) at time of release or currently h. the detention facility where released, or if not yet released the current detention facility in which detained i. if released, the release type (removal, voluntary departure, released on bond, paroled, order of supervised release, died, escaped, etc.) 24. for each period of an alien's community-based ("alternatives to detention" (ATD)) supervision of a given type: a. the date and time of day of the initial start of the ATD supervision b. the type of ATD utilized (for example, "Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP), Enhanced Supervision Reporting (ESR), etc.) c. ICE field and subfield office at initial start of the ATD supervision d. ICE Document Control Office (DCO) at initial start of the ATD supervision e. ICE field and subfield office at end of supervision or currently f. ICE Document Control Office (DCO) at end of supervision or currently g. the date and time of day of the end of the ATD supervision h. the reason for ending the ATD supervision Concerning an alien's adjudicatory process: 25. date of each charging document seeking removal/exclusion/deportation etc. 26. details of removal charges included in each charging document 27. authority issuing each charging document (CBP, ICE, USCIS, etc.) 28. authority each charging document filed with (administrative, Immigration Court, etc.) 29. did alien stipulate to removal at time charging document issued or on or before charging document filed 30. location (city, state) for each authority charging document filed with 31. date final outcome determined on each charging document 32. authority determining each final outcome (administrative, Immigration Court, BIA, Court of Appeals, etc.) 33. location of authority determining each final outcome (city, state) 34. decision code for final outcome on each charging document 35. if applicable, date of "final order" 36. whether alien has applied for asylum 37. whether alien has been granted asylum 38. if applicable, date referred to federal prosecutor for criminal prosecution 39. authority referring alien to federal prosecutor for criminal prosecution (CBP, ICE, USCIS, etc.)

Concerning an alien's return or removal: 40. date and time of day of each recorded departure from the United States 41. departure cleared status for each recorded departure 42. departure location (city, state and port) 43. detailed classification for type of removal, etc. Current status of case: 44. case category 45. open/closed