UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. 1:12-CV FDS

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Courthouse News Service

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/26/16 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISON COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 2:16-cv MMD-CWH Document 1 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-50

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1

Case 1:14-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 44 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 457

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/14/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:16-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 10/28/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

Case 9:16-cv WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/18/2016 Page 1 of 20

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:13-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 03/15/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/25/16 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 4:17-cv RP-SBJ Document 1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1

Case 6:18-cv ADA Document 26 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/17 Page 1 of 23 PageID #: 1

Case 3:16-cv N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DECARATORY RELIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 3:13-cv M Document 60 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1778

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv TJW Document 1 Filed 10/12/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Transcription:

TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS vs. Civil Action No. 1:12-CV-11938 FDS SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR, LTD., SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., and SEOUL OPTODEVICE CO., LTD. Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND JURY DEMAND Plaintiff Trustees of Boston University, by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby plead the following claims of patent infringement against Seoul Semiconductor Ltd., Seoul Semiconductor, Inc. and Seoul Optodevice Co., Ltd. ( Defendants ) and allege as follows: PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Trustees of Boston University ( BU or the University ) is a non-profit educational institution with its principal place of business at One Silber Way, Boston, Massachusetts 02215. 2. The University is one of the largest private universities in the United States, and one of the largest employers in Boston with more than 10,000 faculty and staff and over 33,000 students. It conducts a diverse range of interdisciplinary, collaborative and innovative research projects across a broad spectrum of academic departments, programs, centers and institutes, including research in the field of electrical and computer engineering. BU has won five Nobel 1

Prizes and has been awarded hundreds of United States Patents, including U.S. Patent No. 5,686,738 (the 738 patent ) and U.S. Patent No. 6,953,703 (the 703 patent ). 3. Upon information and belief, Defendant Seoul Semiconductor, Ltd. ( Seoul Semiconductor ) is a Korean entity located at 148-29, Gasan-dong, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, South Korea. 4. Upon information and belief, Defendant Seoul Semiconductor, Inc. ( SSI ) is a California entity located at 5856 Corporate Avenue, Suite 240, Cypress, California, 90630. SSI s registered agent for service of process is Yiyoon Jun, 5856 Corporate Avenue, Suite 240, Cypress, CA 90630. 5. Upon information and belief, Defendant Seoul Optodevice Co., Ltd. ( SOC ) is a Korean entity located at 1B-36, 727-5 Wonsi-dong, Danwon-gu, Ansan-city, Kyunggi-do, Korea 425-851. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States of America, Title 35 of the United States Code. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the matters pled herein under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a) in that this is a civil action arising out of the patent laws of the United States of America. 7. The University is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendants regularly and deliberately engaged in and continue to engage in activities that result in using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing infringing products and products made by infringing processes in and/or into the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and this judicial district. These activities violate the University s United States patent rights under the 738 patent and the 703 patent pled herein. This Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendants because, among 2

other things, Defendants conduct business in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and in this judicial district, and thus enjoy the privileges and protections of Massachusetts law. 8. Venue is proper in the District of Massachusetts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), (c) and (d) and 1400(b). COUNT 1: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 5,686,738 9. The 738 patent, titled Highly Insulating Monocrystalline Gallium Nitride Thin Films, issued on November 11, 1997. A true and correct copy of the 738 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 10. Theodore D. Moustakas, Ph.D., Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at BU, is the named inventor of the 738 patent. The University owns by assignment the entire right, title, and interest in and to the 738 patent, including the sole right to sue for past and present patent infringements thereof. 11. The University is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendants product bearing part number STW8Q2PA-S5-EA includes a gallium nitride thin film semiconductor device claimed by the 738 patent and thus infringes one or more claims of the 738 patent. The University is informed and believes, and further alleges, that additional products of Defendants also constitute and/or include the claimed gallium nitride thin film semiconductor device and also infringe one or more claims of the 738 patent, including light emitting diodes ( LEDs ) and products bearing LEDs (collectively referred to as Accused Products ). 12. The University is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that the applicable requirements of 35 U.S.C. 287 have been satisfied. 3

13. The University is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendants have infringed, and continue to infringe, one or more claims of the 738 patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(a), by, among other things, making using, offering to sell, selling and/or importing in and/or into the United States, without authority or license from the University, the Accused Products falling within the scope of one or more claims of the 738 patent. 14. Defendants acts of infringement have caused and will continue to cause substantial and irreparable damage to the University. 15. As a result of the infringement of the 738 patent and the 703 patent by Defendants, the University has been damaged. The University is, therefore, entitled to such damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 in an amount that presently cannot be pled but that will be determined at trial. COUNT 2: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,953,703 16. The 703 patent, titled Method of Making a Semiconductor Device with Exposure of Sapphire Substrate to Activated Nitrogen, issued on October 11, 2005. A true and correct copy of the 703 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 17. Theodore D. Moustakas, Ph.D., Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at BU, is the named inventor of the 703 patent. The University owns by assignment the entire right, title, and interest in and to the 703 patent, including the sole right to sue for patent and present patent infringements thereof. 18. The University is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendants without authority imports into the United States and/or offers to sell, sells, and/or uses within the United States semiconductor devices which are made by processes covered by one or more claims of the 703 patent, including but not limited to the Accused Products and semiconductor 4

devices made by exposing sapphire substrate to activated nitrogen and depositing Group III nitride semiconductor material, said Accused Products and semiconductor devices not being materially changed by subsequent processes or becoming a trivial and nonessential component of another product. 19. The University is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that the applicable requirements of 35 U.S.C. 287 have been satisfied. 20. The University is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Defendants without authority have imported into the United States and/or have offered to sell, sold, and/or used within the United States semiconductor devices which are made by processes covered by one or more claims of the 703 patent, including but not limited to Accused Products and semiconductor devices made by exposing sapphire substrate to activated nitrogen and depositing Group III nitride semiconductor material, said Accused Products and semiconductor devices not being materially changed by subsequent processes or becoming a trivial and nonessential component of another product. 21. Defendants acts of infringement have caused and will continue to cause substantial and irreparable damage to the University. 22. As a result of the infringement of the 703 patent by Defendants, the University has been damaged. The University is, therefore, entitled to such damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 in an amount that presently cannot be pled but that will be determined at trial. 5

PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the University prays for entry of judgment against each Defendant as follows: A. That Defendants directly and/or indirectly infringed the 738 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(a) and the 703 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(g); B. That Defendants provide to the University an accounting of all gains, profits and advantages derived by each Defendant s direct and/or indirect infringement of the 738 patent and the 703 patent, and that the University be awarded damages adequate to compensate them for the wrongful infringement by each Defendant, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 284; C. That the University be awarded any other supplemental damages and interest on all damages, including, but not limited to attorney fees available under 35 U.S.C. 285; D. That the Court permanently enjoin Defendants and all those in privity with them from making, having made, selling, offering for sale, distributing and/or using products that infringe the 738 patent and the 703 patent, including the Accused Products, in the United States; and E. That the University be awarded such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper, including but not limited to equitable relief and all remedies available at law. 6

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38(b), the University hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues triable to a jury. Dated: March 6, 2013 Respectfully submitted, TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY By its attorneys, /s/ Ilan N. Barzilay Ilan N. Barzilay (BBO #643978) ibarzilay@seyfarth.com SEYFARTH SHAW LLP World Trade Center East Two Seaport Lane, Suite 300 Boston, Massachusetts 02210 Telephone: (617) 946-4800 Facsimile: (617) 946-4801 Of Counsel Alfonso Garcia Chan (Texas 24012408) Eve Henson (Texas 00791462) Andrew M. Howard (Texas 24059973) SHORE CHAN BRAGALONE DEPUMPO LLP 901 Main Street, Suite 3300 Dallas, Texas 75202 Telephone 214-593-9110 Facsimile 214-593-9111 Dated: March 6, 2013 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non-registered participants. /s/ Ilan N. Barzilay Ilan N. Barzilay 7