DeKalb County Pretrial Services. 2 Year Review

Similar documents
RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 5:21. CUSTODY, PRETRIAL DETENTION

Enhancing Pretrial Justice in Cuyahoga County: Results From a Jail Population Analysis and Judicial Feedback

State Court Processing of Domestic Violence Cases

Ventura County Probation Agency. Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiatives and Pretrial Services

Research Brief Exploring the Relationship Between Time in Pretrial Detention and Four Outcomes

Bail Right to bail; recognizance or unsecured appearance bond. Secured bonds. Factors to be considered in determining conditions of release.

July 10,2014 Webinar. Defenders as Agents of Change: Pretrial Justice Reform in Maryland

Report to the Governor and the Legislature

crossroads AN EXAMINATION OF THE JAIL POPULATION AND PRETRIAL RELEASE

Chester County Swift Alternative Violation Enforcement Supervision SAVE

PRETRIAL SERVICES. Why Sheriffs Should Champion Pretrial Services

75-SEP FEDPROB 30 Page 1 75-SEP Fed. Probation 30. Federal Probation September, Special Issue: Evidence-Based Practices in Action

Pretrial Release of Felony Defendants, 1992

Senate Committee on Criminal Justice (515) THE NEED FOR PRETRIAL DIVERSION

OVERVIEW OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM. Laura Lothman Lambert Director, Juvenile Division

Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction

Arkansas Current Incarceration Crisis

Pretrial Release and Detention: A First Look

BAIL REFORM CONSENSUS STUDY. Prepared for Winter Workshop January 26, 2019 Updated February 2019

COMPETITIVE SOLICITATION FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2000

Overcrowding Alternatives

NEW ORLEANS PRETRIAL SERVICES OVERVIEW

THE EFFECTIVENESS AND COST OF SECURED AND UNSECURED PRETRIAL RELEASE IN CALIFORNIA'S LARGE URBAN COUNTIES:

SUPERIOR AND DISTRICT COURT DIVISIONS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

(A) subject to the condition that the person not commit a Federal, State, or local crime during the period of release

Pretrial Detention and Case Processing Measures: A Study of Nine New Mexico Counties

PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY

KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC 2053 Woodbridge Ave. Edison, NJ Attorney for Defendant d1

Summit County Pre Trial Services

Jail: Who is in on bail?

The Florida House of Representatives

OFFICE OF THE MAGISTRATE Bruce Adam, Chief Magistrate

FREQUENCY OF SIGNATURE BONDS IN DANE COUNTY CRIMINAL CASES:

COUNTY OF ORANGE. PRETRIAL RISK ASSESSMENT PAPER PILOT STUDY 1 RESULTS SUMMARY (Pretrial Supervision Meeting)

MINNESOTA. Chapter Title: DOMESTIC ABUSE Section: 518B.01. As used in this section, the following terms shall have the meanings given them:

Safety and Justice Challenge: Interim performance measurement report

Assembly Bill No. 25 Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

Second Regular Session Seventy-first General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP SENATE SPONSORSHIP

CCJJ BAIL SUBCOMMITTEE. FY13-BL #1 Implement evidence based decision making practices and standardized bail release decision making guidelines

Male Initial Custody Assessment Procedures

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Comments of Circuit Judge Robert L. Doyel

KENTUCKY BAIL STATUTES

NEW INCARCERATION FIGURES: THIRTY-THREE CONSECUTIVE YEARS OF GROWTH

Minimum Standards for Local Detention Facilities in South Carolina HOME DETENTION STANDARDS HOME DETENTION

DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: March 22, 2016 FORCED RELEASES

Booking Process & Pretrial Services

County of Santa Clara Office of the District Attorney

Alaska Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Drivers

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2004 Session

State Policy Implementation Project

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECTION REPORT TO THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES RESOLUTION

Seek, Test, Treat and Retain for Criminal Justice Populations: Data Harmonization Measure

Dear Mayor Reed, Civil Rights Corps

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA FIRST APPEARANCE DIVISION

Assembly Bill No. 510 Select Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS

DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: March 10, 2016 TIME COMPUTATION

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR

Arkansas Parole Board Manual SOS Rule Number 158 Stricken Language New Language 3 - RELEASE REVOCATION

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 522

PC: , 457.1, 872, CVC: (C) TITLE 8: INMATE RELEASE I. PURPOSE:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Seventy-three percent of people facing

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 56 1

CHIEF JUDGE ORDER SETTING FORTH BOND GUIDELINES

The changes will affect three populations of youth differently depending upon their status on the day the bill was enacted on Oct.

APPENDIX C. PRETRIAL JUSTICE Criminal Investigation and Adjudication Committee October Commission on. North Carolina.

17th Circuit Court Kent County Courthouse 180 Ottawa Avenue NW, Grand Rapids, MI Phone: (616) Fax: (616)

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULES 3:26 BAIL

A Profile of Women Released Into Cook County Communities from Jail and Prison

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0094. Sponsored by: Joint Judiciary Interim Committee A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to criminal justice; amending provisions

42 Pa.C.S. 9729, 9763, 9773 and Chapter 98.

Probation and Parole in the United States, 2015

CERTIFICATION PROCEEDING

Department of Corrections

PAROLE AND PROBATION VIOLATIONS

Louisiana Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Trends. Justice Reinvestment Task Force August 11, 2016

MICHIGAN PRISONERS, VIOLENT CRIME, AND PUBLIC SAFETY: A PROSECUTOR S REPORT. PAAM Corrections Committee. Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN

v. Smith PC-AL IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

20 Questions for Delaware Attorney General Candidates

Order [setting conditions of release and appearance bond] for release on recognizance by designee. [No.] v. No.

Are Courts Required to Impose the Least Restrictive Conditions of Bail? Are Courts Required to Consider Community Safety When Imposing Bail?

The Family Court Process for Children Charged with Criminal and Status Offenses

MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL BOND

Citation. in Lieu of Arrest. Examining Law Enforcement s Use of Citation Across the United States INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHIEFS OF POLICE

Short-Term Transitional Leave Program in Oregon

Select Post-Conviction Moments in Adult Criminal Cases

Pretrial Services and Bail Funds Increasing Access to Justice

Protective Orders No-Trespass/No-Contact Order What happens after a police report is filed? Miscellaneous Criminal Justice Information

Maryland Laws on Bail Page D-1. Maryland Declaration of Rights

[Bail] Pretrial release. A. Hearing. (1) Time. The court shall conduct a hearing under this rule and issue an order setting conditions of

State Court Processing Statistics: Background, Current Findings, and Future Directions

Background: Focus on Public Safety Outcomes in Sentencing

Effective Dates For most provisions: June 8, 2011 Delayed effective dates for some provisions (noted later)

MECKLENBURG COUNTY PRETRIAL RISK ASSESSMENT & PRAXIS. Instruction Manual

AGENDA. If you plan to bring handouts to this meeting, bring at least 24 copies for committee members and the file

Transcription:

DeKalb County Pretrial Services 2 Year Review

What is Pretrial Services? Pretrial Services provides the court with verified criminal and social history about persons who have been arrested and charged with a crime to assist the court in making an informed decision regarding release based on identified risk of failure to appear and safety to the community. If the defendant is eligible, they are released and may be ordered to pretrial supervision. The defendant is then supervised to assure that they show up for all court dates, do not commit any new offenses, and comply with conditions of their release. *National Association of Pretrial Service Agencies: Standards on Pretrial Release, Third Edition. October 2004; pg. 7.

What is Pretrial Services? Why would we want to release people from jail prior to trial?

The Pretrial Population In Jail 1983 Jail Population 2009 Jail Population Convicted 60% Pretrial 40% Convicted 38% Pretrial 62% During this same time, average length of stay increased from 14 days to 23 days This trend has continued nationally, in 2014 the Pretrial Jail population in DeKalb County was approximately 80% *Subramanian, Ram et al. (2015) Incarceration s Front Door: The Misuse of Jails in America. New York, NY: The Vera Institute of Justice.

Impact of Pretrial Incarceration *Courtesy of Pretrial justice Institute

Impact of Pretrial Incarceration on Community Safety *Lowenkamp, C.T., VanNostrand, M., & Holsinger, A. (2013). The Hidden Costs of Pretrial Detention. Laura and John Arnold Foundation. New York City, NY.

DeKalb Statistics Data was collected on 548 defendants after their disposition, who were interviewed by Pretrial Services. Most defendants are immediately released into the community with or without some form of supervision upon disposition of their case. Defendants who are released at first appearance are less likely to be incarcerated as part of sentencing.

The Pretrial Process Arrest/incarceration Pretrial interview Verification/Criminal Background Check/Risk Assessment Bond report with recommendations submitted prior to Bond Call Determination by court to release or detain Release with/without Supervision or Detention

DeKalb Statistics June 9, 2014 - October 25, 2015 October 25, 2015 - June 1, 2016 748 cases held for bond reduction. 471 Bond reports were completed. 56% of defendants were released, after being detained for 3.4 days on average. 13.6% of released defendants are released on recognizance. 52% of defendants appropriate for a pretrial risk assessment were ordered to have a bond report completed. 71% of all newly detained defendants were released at first appearance. 53% of released defendants are released on recognizance. All new defendants at bond call had a pretrial bond report completed for first appearance, excluding weekend call.

Evaluation of Current Program Impact County jail population over 20 years prior to Pretrial Services Pretrial Services was introduced in mid June of 2014 and then this happened In less than 2 years the average population dropped by 25%

Impact on public safety A total of 664 defendants were released from custody either with or without Pretrial Supervision between June of 2014 and June of 2016. In that time: 92% appeared for all of their court dates 95% had no new arrests while out on bond Only 2.5% were arrested for a violent offense while on bond

Evaluation of Current Program Impact On 3/11/16 Pretrial Services implemented a Release Matrix, a decision making tool developed in collaboration with Judge Stuckert and Judge Montgomery. This instrument provides recommendations based on the defendant s risk of committing a violent crime if released from custody. Since implementation: The number of defendants deemed appropriate for release increased from 71% to 86% The number of defendants released at first appearance increased by 18%

Evaluation of Program Financial Impact An average jail population reduction of 25% translates to 35 fewer prisoners per day. At a cost of $60 per day per prisoner, it is estimated that this will result in an annual cost avoidance of $766,500 per year Additionally Pretrial Services completes an average of 128 domestic violence risk assessments annually. These are required to be considered by the court in domestic violence cases prior to the setting of bond. If completed by a private agency this would cost $150.00 per assessment. This yields an additional cost avoidance of $19,200 per year

Evaluation of Program Financial Impact Out of County Jail space rental in 2015 was $365,660 less than in 2014 From January June in 2016, rental cost were $62,580 less than it was from Jan June in 2015

Evaluation of Program Growth After the program began interviewing all defendants prior to first appearance, the daily number of bond reports completed has increased 41%. In 2016, nearly 1,000 bond reports will be completed, compared to the 531 completed in the 1 st year of operation. The increase in number of bond reports has also resulted in more cases on supervision. Pretrial Services currently supervises 282 defendants, and within 12 months it will exceed 400 defendants.

Evaluation of Additional Program Investment Unfortunately pretrial services is unable to supervise that number of defendants in addition to completing the current volume of bond reports, unless additional resources are allocated to fund an additional position. So how is spending more money on Pretrial Supervision an investment?

Evaluation of Additional Program Investment Benefits of Pretrial Supervision National research and data in DeKalb County shows that Pretrial Supervision saves additional costs by: Providing a mechanism for moderate to higher risk defendants to be safely released from custody pending trial 60% of defendants fall into this category, without supervision current rates of release will decrease Reducing failure to appear rates by more than 36% fewer resources needed to be expended on serving warrants less additional detention costs on defendants for missing court Reducing the number of new arrests by defendants pending trial by 19% Reducing the number of post disposition jail sentences by 32% Reducing the length of post disposition jail sentences by 66% *Restoring Accountability in Pretrial Release: The Philadelphia Pretrial Release Supervision Experiments; Goldkamp & White 2006 *State of the Science of Pretrial Release Recommendations and Supervision; VanNostran, Rose & Weibrecht 2011 *Investigating the Impact of Pretrial Detention on Sentencing Outcomes; Lowenkamp, VanNostrand & Holsinger - 2013 *Exploring the Impact of Supervision on Pretrial Outcomes; Lowenkamp & VanNostrand - 2013

Thank you for your time and support! Michael Venditti mvenditti@dekalbcounty.org