IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC

Similar documents
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner, vs.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NOS.: SC , SC & SC PALM BEACH COUNTY vs. KATHERINE HARRIS, ET CANVASSING BOARD

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ANDRE FLADELL, ET AL. vs. PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, ETC., ET AL.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC BEVERLY ROGERS, et. al. v. THE ELECTIONS CANVASSING COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA. Petitioners, DCA Case No.: 1D Lower Court Case No

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 1D CIRCUIT COURT CASE NO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RESPONDENT, CITY OF LARGO, ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION IN RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S AMENDED BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.SC PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY

Filing # E-Filed 11/10/ :27:26 PM

RESPONDENT S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT THEREOF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC LOWER COURT NO.: 4D JACK LIEBMAN. Petitioner. vs.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC04- EDNA DE LA PENA, Petitioner, vs. SUNSHINE BOUQUET COMPANY and HORTICA, Respondents.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CLEO LECROY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC: 4 th DCA CASE NO: 4D STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. SALVATORE BENNETT,

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC Lower Tribunal Case No.: 08-1 THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Appellant/Petitioner,

Case 1:04-cv JLK Document 213 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2007 Page 1 of 5

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THREE-YEAR CYCLE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RESPONSE TO COMMENTS OF HONORABLE PETER D. WEBSTER TO PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO RULE 1.420

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA. N. JAMES TURNER JQC Case No.: /

No IN THE. Supreme Court of the United States GEORGE W. BUSH, ET AL., Petitioners, ALBERT GORE, JR., ET AL., Respondents.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC ANDRE FLADELL, ET AL., vs. PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, ET AL.,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. : SC MICHAEL A. PIZZI, JR., Individually, Petitioner, -vs.-

Filing # E-Filed 06/02/ :24:30 PM

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Appellant, CASE NO. SC v. Lower Tribunal No CFAWS RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

AMENDED JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT BOB WHITE, SHERIFF OF PASCO COUNTY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC TIMOTHY SCOTT HARRIS, Petitioner. vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JAMES LEVOY WATERS, Petitioner, SHERIFF, ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA, Respondent. CASE NO. SC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC13-968; SC LT Case Nos. 1D , 2010CA2918

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA INTEGRA CORPORATION, Petitioner, DOR 90-1-FOF vs. CASE NO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER BRIEF. THE STANDING COMMITTEE on the Unlicensed Practice of Law of The

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC HARVEY JAY WEINBERG and KENNETH ALAN WEINBERG,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D VINCENT MARGIOTTI. Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent.

RESPONSE TO JQC S REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA PLAINTIFF'S EXPEDITED MOTION FOR REHEARING

STATE OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT. CASE NO. 5D Lower Tribunal Case No CF AXXX-XX

IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC BEST DIVERSIFIED, INC. and PETER HUFF. Petitioners, vs.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC11- THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY a Florida Corporation,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Sup. Ct. case no. SC07- DCA case no. 1D LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC04- L.T. Case No. 3D CITY OF MIAMI. Petitioner. vs. SIDNEY S. WELLMAN, ET AL.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC BRIAN MEATON

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC R.H., G.W., T.L., juveniles, Petitioners, vs.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC L.T. No. 3D PHILIP MORRIS USA INC.,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NOS. SC , SC & SC FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC vs. MICHAEL MCDERMOTT,

Filing # E-Filed 07/31/ :00:16 PM

OF FLORIDA. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Daryl E. Trawick, Judge.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, CHARLES FRATELLO, Respondent. Case No. SC07-780

Filing # E-Filed 09/24/ :52:23 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA APPEAL NO.: 01-57AP JOHN SHARPE. Appellant-Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC. Petitioner, V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC. Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC IN RE: ADVISORY OPINION TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE: ADDITIONAL HOMESTEAD TAX EXEMPTION

THE SUPREME COURT FLORIDA AMENDED RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT. Special Counsel to the Judicial Qualifications Commission

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ROBERT RANSONE, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION FLORIDA SECRETARY OF STATE S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC (4 th DCA 4D ) MALCOLM HOSWELL, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D LT. CASE NO.: CA-13

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. JORGE LUIS DOMINGUEZ, Respondent.

In the Supreme Court of Florida. CUSTOM SCREENING & CRUSHING INC., and CUSTOM CRUSHING & MATERIAL, INC. Petitioners, vs. GLOBETEC CONSTRUCTION, LLC

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. ERIC S. SMITH, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. THIRD DCA CASE NO.: 3D Respondent. /

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF

Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. Plaintiffs, MATTHEW CALDWELL and THE CAMPAIGN TO ELECT MATT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case Nos. SC and SC IN RE: PRO BONO ACTIVITIES BY JUDGES AND JUDICIAL STAFF ATTORNEYS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT. Appellant, v. Case No. 4D L.T. No.: MM000530A STATE OF FLORIDA,

Case 1:11-cv CKK-MG-ESH Document 10 Filed 08/30/11 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC IN RE: 2002 JOINT RESOLUTION OF REAPPORTIONMENT AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE NO , JUDGE JOHN RENKE, III

Henry Diaz, SC Case No.: SC Petitioner, DCA Case No.: 1D

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC Lower Tribunal No.: 3D LATAM INVESTMENTS, LLC., a Florida Liability Company, vs.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No CV-ORL

CASE NO. 1D Robert A. Harper, Jr., Harper Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Defendant, Frank Avellino ( Avellino ), files this response to Plaintiff s Supplemental

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-49 ADAM W. MASON, Petitioner, vs. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC. and ROCHE LABORATORIES INC., Respondents.

Transcription:

CYNTHIA McCAULEY, Plaintiff IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA vs. CASE NO. SC00-2462 MARC NOLEN, RICHARD STEWART, THE HONORABLE THOMAS WELCH, in their official capacities as members of the BAY COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD; Secretary of State KATHERINE HARRIS, Secretary of Agriculture BOB CRAWFORD, and the Director of the Division of Elections L. CLAYTON ROBERTS in their official capacities and as the FLORIDA ELECTIONS CANVASSING COMMISSION; GEORGE W. BUSH; and DICK CHENEY, Defendants RESPONSE TO NOLEN S SUGGESTION OF MOOTNESS AND GEORGE BUSH S MOTION TO DISMISS Appellant, CYNTHIA McCAULEY, through her undersigned attorney responds to the Suggestion of Mootness of Appellees Marc Nolen, Richard Stewart, The Honorable Thomas Welch in their official capacities as members of the Bay County Canvassing Board and the Motion to Dismiss of George W. Bush and states as follows: 1. The argument is made because December 12, 2000, has come and gone, the contest action is moot. The date of December 12 is not established in Florida Statutes. The December 12, 2000, date existed as a buffer to create time in which to identify Florida electors for the Electoral College by December 18, 2000. Both of these dates are significant to identify the Florida electors selected to be counted by the United States Congress on or about January 5, 2001. Obviously, the Florida judiciary has and probably should continue to work to expedite contest actions to serve the

public policy of electoral finality. However, there is no basis in the law for dismissing a contest action by declaring it moot because of delay. Moreover, the more significant deadline for purposes of deciding Florida s electors is the meeting of the United States Congress on or about January 5, 2001. Any Florida judicial decisions after January 5, 2001, may conflict with federal laws governing the procedures for selection of the President and inauguration. Prior to January 5, 2001, however, the resolution of Florida judicial matters and their impact on the chosen electors from the State of Florida would merely mean that two competing slates of electors are in place on January 5, 2001. Competing slates of electors were created after December 12 by the State of Hawaii in the 1960 Presidential race between John F. Kennedy and Richard M. Nixon. U.S. News & World Report, December 11, 2000, When is a deadline not a deadline, page 38. 2. If this Court determines that the McCauley appeal has merit and should be remanded, the broad range of remedies available under Fla. Stat. Section 102.168 are all still fully available to the Circuit Court. Under current equal protection jurisprudence, it would be a denial of equal protection to dismiss McCauley s contest rights as moot simply because the lower court made errors of law or delayed the appellant s right to an immediate hearing. Certainly, there is a denial of equal protection due to the two tier electoral system created when Governor Jeb Bush of the executive branch of Florida offered selected segments of the population, mostly Republicans, the convenience of voting from their own home and did not make an equal offer to the remainder of Florida citizens. 3. George Bush makes the additional argument that Appellant s lawsuit should be dismissed because Vice-President Al Gore made a concession speech on December 13, 2000. Of course, there is no legal basis for dismissing the lawsuit because of Al Gore s withdrawal or concession. The political decisions affecting Vice-President Al Gore s speech should not affect the

contest rights of Appellant Cynthia McCauley. Appellant Cynthia McCauley s complaint sought a wide range of judicial remedies including injunctions, declarations of law, up to and including the validation of certain absentee votes. Regardless of the posture of the presidential race, these remedies remain availing. 4. Furthermore, the issues of this case as recognized by the First District Court of Appeals include issues of great public importance. An exception to the doctrine of mootness exists concerning issues of great public importance. In Re Dubreuil, 629 So.2d 819 (Fla. 1993). Moreover, the issues presented in this case are likely to reoccur with each election. If the political parties believe that they can convert Florida to a mail-in ballot state through widespread use of absentee ballot voting, those with the money and resources to do so, will take advantage of this method of increasing their get out the vote. 5. It is apparent from the answer briefs of George W. Bush and Katherine Harris, that there is no direct response to this Court s holding in Boardman v. Esteva that to be in substantial compliance an absentee voter must in some sense be absent. This Court s ruling in this case will likely therefore have a substantial impact on how future elections in the State of Florida are conducted. For the foregoing reasons, the Appellant Cynthia McCauley respectfully requests this Court to deny the Suggestion of Mootness of the Bay County Canvassing Board and the Motion to Dismiss of George W. Bush and requests such further relief as this Court deems proper.

Respectfully submitted, By: ALVIN L. PETERS McCAULEY & PETERS 36 Oak Avenue Panama City, FL 32401 (850) 769-0276 Fla. Bar No. 0473030

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CYNTHIA MCCAULEY, Appellant, vs. MARC NOLEN, et al., Appellees ===================================================================== CASE NO. SC00-2462 DCA CASE NO. 1D00-4825 Circuit Case No. 00-2802 APPELLEE CYNTHIA MCCAULEY S RESPONSE TO NOLEN S SUGGESTION OF MOOTNESS AND GEORGE BUSH S MOTION TO DISMISS ALVIN L. PETERS McCAULEY & PETERS 36 Oak Avenue Panama City, FL 32401 (850) 769-0276 Fla. Bar No. 0473030

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by fax and U.S. mail to the following on this day of December, 2000. MICHAEL S. BURKE Burke & Blue, P.A. 221 McKenzie Avenue Panama City, FL 32404 Fax: (850)784-0857 JOSEPH P. KLOCK, JR. Steel Hector & Davis 200 S. Biscayne Blvd., Suite 4000 Miami, FL 33131-2310 Fax: 222-8410 VICTORIA WEBER JONATHAN SJOSTROM Steel, Hector & Davis 215 South Monroe Street, Ste. 601 Tallahassee, FL 32301-1804 Fax: 222-8410 DEBORAH K. KEARNEY 400 S. Monroe Street, PL 02 Tallahassee, FL 32399 Fax: 922-5763 BARRY RICHARD Greenberg Traurig, P.A. P.O. Drawer 1838 Tallahassee, FL 32302 Fax: 681-0207 ALVIN L. PETERS

McCauley & Peters