Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff, MOTION TO AMEND PLEADINGS

Similar documents
Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. SHEPARD FAIREY and OBEY GIANT ART, INC., Case No.

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc. Doc. 52

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION C.A. NO. 1:16-CV TCB

Case 3:14-cv L-NLS Document 60 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 3

Case3:12-cv VC Document46 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 5

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv TSC Document 113 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

Case 2:08-cv RBS Document 15 Filed 10/06/2008 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Information or instructions: Motion Consent of Client & Order to substitute counsel PREVIEW

Case 5:08-cv JW Document 49 Filed 02/05/2009 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN JOSE DIVISION

PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION. Case 2:13-cv KJM-DAD Document 80 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ORDER

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case3:12-cv VC Document70 Filed06/23/15 Page1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:12-cv RWZ Document 21 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1777 Filed08/15/12 Page1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 12 Filed 07/10/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 104

Case 1:13-cv TSC-DAR Document 104 Filed 06/24/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

Case3:12-cv VC Document28 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISON COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case3:14-cv RS Document66 Filed09/01/15 Page1 of 9

Case: 4:15-cv CAS Doc. #: 34 Filed: 10/13/15 Page: 1 of 5 PageID #: 503

Case 9:17-cv KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2017 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:16-md VC Document 419 Filed 08/03/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOTCONNECTAFRICA TRUST,

Case: Document: 180 Page: 1 07/01/ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, 2012

Case4:12-cv JSW Document34 Filed09/19/14 Page1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:12-cv TSZ Document 21 Filed 08/06/12 Page 1 of 5 The Honorable Mary Alice Theiler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:03-cv JP Document 608 Filed 10/28/14 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:14-cv TSC Document 70 Filed 01/22/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv RLH -PAL Document Filed 02/27/12 Page 1 of 16

Case 5:16-cv OLG Document 106 Filed 05/17/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT AND INVALIDITY

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, Counterclaim-Defendants. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned

Notice of Motion and Motion to Consolidate Related Actions Against

Case hdh Doc 97 Filed 01/09/18 Entered 01/09/18 21:23:39 Page 1 of 8

Case3:12-cv JCS Document47 Filed09/28/12 Page1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 1:04-cv WHP Document 165 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:15-cv HEH Document 64 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 445

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

Case 2:12-cv SVW-PLA Document 21 Filed 05/24/12 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:204

Case 2:13-mc SRB Document 6 Filed 04/18/13 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:17-cv RS Document 11 Filed 01/20/17 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:17-cv WES-PAS Document 20 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 227 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

Case bjh11 Doc 338 Filed 01/11/19 Entered 01/11/19 16:18:50 Page 1 of 2

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 8:11-cv FMO-AN Document 193 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:4291

Case 1:14-cv TSC-DAR Document 51 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

United States District Court District of Utah

Case 1:15-cv LMB-JFA Document 37 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 374

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES CASE NO: 2: RGK-E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiffs,

Case4:11-cv YGR Document22 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 5

Case 3:17-cv RS Document 380 Filed 04/19/18 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:07-cv PJH Document 73 Filed 04/08/2008 Page 1 of 7

Case 4:14-md CW Document 615 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 9

U.S. District Court Southern District of Illinois (East St. Louis) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:07 cv JPG CJP

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Civil Division : : : : : : : : : PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES

Case 1:10-cv EGS Document 44 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:17-cv SVW-AGR Document Filed 08/30/18 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:2261

SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG 08 CVS 4259

Case 4:11-cv SBA Document 93 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 5

Kanter v. California Administrative Office of the Courts Doc. 10 Case 3:07-cv MJJ Document 10 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 13

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 1:13-cv MMS Document 294 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 82 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:06-cr LAB Document 378 Filed 09/01/07 Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case5:08-cv PSG Document519 Filed08/22/13 Page1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 3:16-cv PK Document 486 Filed 07/24/17 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT YAKIMA

U.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14 cv JDB

Case3:14-mc VC Document1 Filed11/04/14 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 276 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 1:09-cv-01123-AKH Document 41 Filed 10/16/2009 Page 1 of 5 Anthony T. Falzone (admitted pro hac vice) Julie A. Ahrens (JA0372) Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, CA 94305 Telephone: (650) 736-9050 Facsimile: (650) 723-4426 Email: falzone@stanford.edu Mark Lemley (admitted pro hac vice) Joseph C. Gratz (admitted pro hac vice) Durie Tangri LLP 332 Pine Street, Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 362-6666 Email: mlemley@durietangri.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SHEPARD FAIREY and OBEY GIANT ART, INC., -against- Plaintiffs, Case No.: 09-01123 (AKH) ECF Case THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, -against- Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff, MOTION TO AMEND PLEADINGS SHEPARD FAIREY, OBEY GIANT ART, INC., OBEY GIANT LLC and STUDIO NUMBER ONE, INC. And Counterclaim Defendants,

Case 1:09-cv-01123-AKH Document 41 Filed 10/16/2009 Page 2 of 5 MANNIE GARCIA, v. Defendant, Counterclaim Plaintiff and Cross-claim Plaintiff/Defendant, SHEPARD FAIREY AND OBEY GIANT ART, INC., Counterclaim Defendants, And THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, Cross-claim Plaintiff/Defendant. Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants Shepard Fairey ( Fairey ) and Obey Giant Art, Inc. and Counterclaim Defendants Obey Giant LLC and Studio Number One, Inc. by and through their attorneys, respectfully request leave to amend the following pleadings: (A) Plaintiffs Fairey and Obey Giant Art, Inc. s Complaint; (B) Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants Fairey and Obey Giant Art, Inc. and Counterclaim Defendants Obey Giant LLC and Studio Number One Inc. s Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Counterclaims of Defendant The Associated Press ( The AP ); and (C) Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants Fairey and Obey Giant Art, Inc. and Counterclaim Defendants Obey Giant LLC and Studio Number One Inc. s Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims to the Counterclaims of Defendant Mannie Garcia ( Garcia ). Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants ( Plaintiffs ) move to amend these pleadings to reflect new information Plaintiffs counsel first learned on October 2, 2009 relating to the identity of the photograph Mr. Fairey used as a reference to create the Obama Works at 2

Case 1:09-cv-01123-AKH Document 41 Filed 10/16/2009 Page 3 of 5 issue in this case. The pleadings, with redlining indicating the proposed amendments, are attached to this motion as Exhibits A through C, respectively. The AP stated that it would not oppose this motion as long as Plaintiffs provide the Court with a full explanation as to why the amendment is necessary. Mr. Garcia s counsel informed Plaintiffs counsel that Mr. Garcia does not oppose the motion so long as he is granted an additional 60 days for discovery. In Plaintiffs original complaint for declaratory judgment and in their answers to claims alleged against them by The AP and Mannie Garcia, Plaintiffs alleged that Mr. Fairey used a photograph of George Clooney and Barack Obama (identified in the original Complaint as the Garcia Photograph and identified by The AP in its Counterclaims as the Clooney Photograph ) as a photographic reference to create the illustration of Barack Obama that appears in the Obama Works at issue in this case. In addition, Plaintiffs denied that Mr. Fairey used a photograph of Barack Obama alone (identified by The AP in its counterclaims as the Obama Photograph ) as the photographic reference he used. On October 2, 2009, counsel for Plaintiffs learned new information revealing that Plaintiffs assertions were incorrect. Mr. Fairey was apparently mistaken about the photograph he used when his original complaint for declaratory relief was filed on February 9, 2009. After the original complaint was filed, Mr. Fairey realized his mistake. Instead of acknowledging that mistake, Mr. Fairey attempted to delete the electronic files he had used in creating the illustration at issue. He also created, and delivered to his counsel for production, new documents to make it appear as though he had used the Clooney photograph as his reference. On October 9, 2009, Plaintiffs counsel sent a letter to counsel for The AP and counsel for Mannie Garcia notifying them of the situation and of the need to amend Plaintiffs pleadings accordingly. Plaintiffs counsel enclosed proposed amendments with that letter, and 3

Case 1:09-cv-01123-AKH Document 41 Filed 10/16/2009 Page 4 of 5 specifically advised counsel for The AP and Mr. Garcia that Plaintiffs no longer contend Mr. Fairey used the Clooney Photograph in creating the Obama Works at issue in this case and that Plaintiffs do not deny he used the Obama Photograph. In this letter, Plaintiffs counsel also informed opposing counsel that Plaintiffs no longer contend that certain documents Plaintiffs produced in discovery (bearing Bates numbers FAIREY00669 through FAIREY00672) were used in the creation of the Obama Works, and that Mr. Fairey had created these documents in 2009, after the original complaint was filed in this matter. Plaintiffs counsel also produced additional documents (bearing Bates numbers FAIREY104735 through FAIREY104766) and explained that Mr. Fairey had attempted to delete some or all of these documents at or around the same time he created the documents bearing Bates numbers FAIREY00669 through FAIREY00672, but that he had been unsuccessful in deleting all copies of them. Finally, the letter corrected certain misstatements Plaintiffs counsel had previously made (understanding them to have been true at the time) while meeting and conferring on discovery. Plaintiffs therefore respectfully request that the Court grant their motion to amend their pleadings in light of the information above. DATED: October 16, 2009 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Anthony T. Falzone (admitted pro hac vice) Julie A. Ahrens (JA0372) Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, CA 94305 Telephone: (650) 736-9050 Facsimile: (650) 723-4426 Email: falzone@stanford.edu 4

Case 1:09-cv-01123-AKH Document 41 Filed 10/16/2009 Page 5 of 5 Mark Lemley (admitted pro hac vice) Joseph C. Gratz (admitted pro hac vice) Durie Tangri LLP 332 Pine Street, Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 362-6666 Email: mlemley@durietangri.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants 5