Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Satya Narayan, Attorney, Royse Law Firm, Palo Alto, Calif.

Similar documents
Drafting Trademark Settlement Agreements to Resolve IP Disputes

Deposing Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Witnesses

Leveraging USPTO Technology Evolution Pilot Program

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Defeating Liability Waivers in Personal Injury Cases: Substantive and Procedural Strategies

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

HIPAA Compliance During Litigation and Discovery

Provisional Patent Applications: Preserving IP Rights in First-to-File System

Summary Judgment Motions: Advanced Strategies for Civil Litigation

Defeating Rule 23(b)(3)'s Predominance Requirement Using Defenses and Counterclaims

Rendering Third-Party Legal Opinions on LLC Status, Power, Action, Enforceability and Membership Interests

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Michael A. Brusca, Shareholder, Stark & Stark, Lawrenceville, N.J.

Challenging Unfavorable ICANN Objection and Application Decisions

Mexico's New Anti-Corruption Laws and Implementing Regulations: Private Entities and Individuals in the Crosshairs

New Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: Impact on Chapter 7, 12 and 13 Secured Creditors

Environmental Obligations in Bankruptcy: Reconciling the Conflicting Goals of Bankruptcy and Environmental Laws

Strategic Use of Joint Defense Agreements in Litigation: Avoiding Disqualification and Privilege Waivers

Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Td Today s faculty features:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Patent Licensing: Advanced Tactics

Navigating Section 112 Issues in IPR Proceedings: Using Section 112 as a Sword or a Shield

Navigating Section 112 Issues in IPR Proceedings: Using Section 112 as a Sword or a Shield

Extraterritorial Reach of Lanham Act and Protection of IP Rights: Pursuing Foreign Infringers

Insurance Declaratory Judgment Actions and the Federal Abstention Doctrine: Strategies and Limitations

Structuring MOUs, LOIs, Term Sheets and Other Nonbinding Legal Documents

Preparing for and Navigating PTAB Appeals Before the Federal Circuit

Litigating Employment Discrimination

Appellate Practice: Identifying Issues for Appeal, Drafting Questions Presented, and Briefing the Issues

Navigating Jurisdictional Determinations Under the Clean Water Act: Impact of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes

Spoliation of Evidence in Personal Injury Claims: Mitigation and Prevention

Article III Standing and Rule 23(b)(3) Certification: Emerging Litigation Trends

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Wilson Chu, Partner, McDermott Will & Emery, Dallas

E-Discovery and Spoliation Issues: Litigation Pitfalls, Duty to Preserve, and Claw-Back Agreements

Law Amendment and the FCPA Best Practices for Responding to a Chinese Government Commercial Bribery Investigation

Evidentiary Disclosures in Parallel Criminal and Civil Proceedings

Standards Related Patents and Standard Setting Organizations Navigating the Challenges of SSOs: Licensing, Disclosure and Litigation

FCRA Class Actions in Employment on the Rise: Avoiding and Defending Claims

Structuring MOUs, LOIs, Term Sheets and Other Preliminary Agreements

Opinions of Counsel in Cross-Border Financial Transactions

UCC Articles 8 and 9 and the Hague Securities Convention: Investment Property Update

1. If you have not already done so, please join the conference call.

Third-Party Legal Opinions in Corporate Transactions

Managing Patent Infringement Risk in Product Development

Witness Examination Strategies in Employment Litigation Best Practices for Direct and Cross Examination of Lay Witnesses

E-Signatures and Electronic Loan Documentation: Complying with ESIGN/UETA, Interplay With the UCC

Solving the CERCLA Statute of Limitations and Preemption Puzzles

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Lay Witness and Expert Witness Depositions in Personal Injury Cases: Advanced Deposition Techniques

Qui Tam Actions: Guidance for Counsel for Managing Whistleblower Suits

Defending Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Depositions in Employment Litigation

Leveraging the AIA s Joinder Provision, Recent Decisions, and New Court Procedures in Defending Infringement Disputes

PRP Contribution Claims Under CERCLA Strategies for Cost Recovery Against Other Potentially Responsible Parties

Design Patents and IPR: Challenging and Defending Validity at the PTAB

IxANVL Binary License Agreement

FRCP 45 Third-Party Subpoenas: Using or Objecting to Subpoenas to Obtain Testimony and Evidence

Breach of Employment Contract Litigation: Contract Interpretation, Materiality of Breach, Defenses, Damages

Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Td Today s faculty features:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Leveraging Post-Grant Patent Proceedings Before the PTAB

Leveraging the AIA's Expanded Prior Use Defense for Patent Infringement Claims

Discovery Strategies in Wage and Hour Class and Collective Actions Before and After Certification of Putative Class

PURCHASE ORDER ATTACHMENT IP-006 ADDENDUM TO SOFTWARE LICENSES WITH RAYTHEON

Structuring Trademark Coexistence Agreements: Evaluating and Negotiating Agreements to Resolve Trademark Disputes

Lender Protections in Purchase Agreements: Negotiating Xerox Provisions

State Wage and Hour Class Actions Navigating Procedural and Substantive Challenges in Pursuing or Defending Dual Filed Claims

OZO LIVE EVALUATION SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT

Defending Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Depositions Responding to a Deposition Notice, Selecting and Preparing Witnesses

Effective Discovery Strategies in Class Action Litigation Leveraging Trends and Best Practices for Depositions, Expert Witnesses and E-Discovery

Pleading Standards, Affirmative Defenses and Motions to Dismiss in Federal Court

Patent Infringement Claims and Opinions of Counsel Leveraging Opinion Letters to Reduce the Risks of Liability and Enhanced Damages

Framework Contract for the provision of Reference Mapping Products

SDL Web Click Wrap DEVELOPER SOFTWARE AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT RESTRICTED TO USE BY DEVELOPERS. Terms and Conditions

NEXT GEAR SOLUTIONS, INC MASTER SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT

MAPR END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT Last updated: April 20, 2016

Agreement for iseries and AS/400 System Restore Test Service

SOFTWARE LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Expert Witnesses: Leveraging New Rule 26 Amendments Preserving Work Product Immunity for Expert Opinions and Reports

Trade Dress Rights Enforcement: Prosecuting Infringement Claims

TERMS OF SERVICE FOR SUPPORT NETWORK COMMUNITY HEART AND STROKE REGISTRY SITE Last Updated: December 2016

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

LICENSE AGREEMENT, TERMS OF USE AND NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT

TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING AGREEMENT

END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

OZO LIVE SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT. (Single or Multi-Node License Agreement) Version 2.0

Perfecting and Maintaining Article 9 Security Interests

Patent Reexamination: The New Strategy for Litigating Infringement Claims Best Practices for Pursuing and Defending Parallel Proceedings

RETS DATA ACCESS AGREEMENT

END-USER SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT

Protection of trade secrets through IPR and unfair competition law

Section 112 Issues in IPR Proceedings: Using Section 112 as a Sword or a Shield

SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT

BY USING THIS CLICK-THROUGH WEBSITE, YOU INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

TERMS OF SERVICE AND END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

LICENSE AND SUPPORT AGREEMENT

Green Freight Asia Privacy Policy

AON HEWITT DEFINED CONTRIBUTION NEXUS PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT

SOFTWARE SUBLICENSE AGREEMENT

COMMERCIAL EVALUATION LICENSE AGREEMENT PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION [ ] PRF Docket No.:

Software License Agreement

Transcription:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Drafting Nondisclosure Agreements for Information Technology Transactions Negotiating Key Provisions and Exclusions, Navigating Challenges for Information Disclosers and Recipients WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain 10am Pacific Today s faculty features: Satya Narayan, Attorney, Royse Law Firm, Palo Alto, Calif. D.C. Toedt, III, Attorney, On Contracts, Houston The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800- 926-7926 ext. 10.

Tips for Optimal Quality FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-570-7602 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.

Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar. A link to the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation will be in the thank you email that you will receive immediately following the program. For additional information about continuing education, call us at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35.

Program Materials FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps: Click on the ^ symbol next to Conference Materials in the middle of the left-hand column on your screen. Click on the tab labeled Handouts that appears, and there you will see a PDF of the slides for today's program. Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.

Drafting Nondisclosure Agreements for Information Technology Transactions D. C. Toedt III Satya S. Narayan Strafford Continuing Education Webinars Sept. 30, 2015

D. C. Toedt III (The last name is pronounced Tate it s German) www.oncontracts.com dc@toedt.com 6

Satya S. Narayan www.royselaw.com snarayan@rroyselaw.com 7

Clauses & extensive annotations: www.commondraft.org 8

Sources of law (in U.S.) Uniform Trade Secrets Act Enacted in 47 states Introduced in 2 more Common law 9

Testing effect 10

Audience question: Confidential Information definition What three basic things does the law (in the U.S.) generally require for information to be protectable? 11

A: The law (UTSA) requires: 1) Information has independent economic value 2) Not generally known to those who can derive econ. value from the information 3) Efforts to maintain secrecy of the information that are reasonable under the circumstances 12

Three Rules of Protecting Confidential Information ( Trigger warning : Rule #3 offended one recent CLE attender) 13

Rule 1: Lock It Up (Within reason) 14

Audience question: What simple things can be done to lock it up? 15

Simple steps to lock it up : Locked doors, file cabinets, etc. Computers & networks: Passwords Periodic security audits Employees get only need-to-know access 16

Rule 2: Label It (But don t go overboard) 17

Rule 3: Safe Sex 3A: Use caution in choosing a partner (a party to which you ll disclose information, or from which you ll receive information) 3B: Use protection, viz., an NDA 18

Drafting issues 19

Definition: A two-way NDA protects each party s Confidential Information A one-way NDA protects 20

Audience question: Which is likely to be signed sooner: a one-way NDA, or a two-way NDA? Why? 21

A: A two-way NDA is likely to be signed sooner 22

Speaker question: Limit the protected-disclosure period? 23

Speaker question: Limit the protectable- information categories? 24

Speaker question: What sort of ancillary information should the disclosing party want to protect too? 25

Protection of ancillary information Third-party information furnished by discl. party Receiving party s notes, summaries, etc. Affiliates information? 26

Speaker question: Include a laundry list of specific types of confidential information? 27

Laundry list: Common Draft example Algorithms; audit reports. Biological materials; business plans; business records. Circuit records; commercial information; compounds; computer programs; contracts; construction records. Data-center designs; designs; diagrams; documents; draft publications; drawings. Engineering records. Financial information; financial projections; financial statements; forecasts; formulas. Hardware items. Ideas; interpretations; invention disclosures. Leases. Machine-readable data; maps; market projections; marketing information; methods. Offers; operational data; opinions. Patent applications (unpublished); plans; pricing information; procedures; processes; product development plans; product information programs; projections; proposals. Research data; research plans. Samples; server-configuration designs; source code for computer programs; specifications; strategies. Tax bills; technical information; technical reports; technological developments; test data; title reports 28

Speaker question: Confidentiality of parties dealings? 29

Audience question: Name some standard exclusions from Confidential Information status (there are usually five) 30

Standard exclusions * (see Common Draft clause): 1. Previously known by RP 2. Provided by 3 rd P w/o breach 3. Independently developed by RP 4. Published w/o breach 5. Disclosed by DP to 3 rd P w/o comparable restrictions * Corroborating evidence required 31

FACTS: 1) Alice discloses Confidential Information to Bob. 2) Later, a third party serves Bob with a civil subpoena for the information. Audience question: Should Alice s information now be excluded from Confidential Information status? Why or why not? (Type your answers) 32

A: No: A subpoena alone shouldn t strip away Confidential-Information status 33

FACTS: All parts of Alice s Confidential Information can be found in public documents. Audience question: Should Alice s information therefore be excluded from confidentiality status? 34

A: No specific selections & combinations of information ( secret sauce ) can be confidential 35

FACTS: Alice wants all information that she discloses to Bob to be presumed confidential. Speaker question: Should Bob agree? 36

FACTS: Alice doesn t want to have to mark her Confidential Information as such. Speaker question: Should Bob agree? 37

A: Allow for a catch-up marking period? Exception for in-place information? Exception for recognizably confidential info? 38

Audience question: What three specific obligations must a disclosing party demand of the receiving party in an NDA? 39

Mandatory confidentiality obligations: 1. Precautions 2. Nonuse (absent permission) 3. Nondisclosure (ditto) 40

Audience question: What level(s) of precaution should an NDA require the receiving party to take?? 41

Precautions to require of Rcv. Party: 1. Not less than reasonable precautions 2. Not less than for own comparable info 3. Particular precautions? 42

Speaker question: What kinds of uses of Confidential Information might an NDA pre-authorize? 43

Authorized uses (from Common Draft): performing the Receiving Party's obligations under Agreement; exercising the Receiving Party's rights under Agreement; assessing whether to enter into another agreement with the Disclosing Party; and any Other Particular Authorized Uses expressly agreed to in writing by the parties 44

Speaker question: What kinds of disclosures of Confidential Information might an NDA pre-authorize? 45

Authorized disclosures (1) (from Common Draft): All disclosures are need-to-know only, I.C.W. an authorized use Employees Officers & directors (& equivalents) Other Authorized Recipients agreed to in writing (requires confidentiality agreements) 46

Authorized disclosures (2) (from Common Draft): Disclosure in response to subpoenas, search warrants, etc. RP must promptly notify DP unless prohibited by law RP must cooperate (at DP s expense) in attempting to limit disclosure Disclosure in public filings? 47

Speaker question: Should Confidential Information be returned or destroyed upon termination? 48

Return or destruction (from Common Draft): Required upon request by disclosing party (otherwise, requirement is likely to be overlooked) Exception for backup media, etc. (burdensome, expensive) Option: Retain archival copies (usually outside counsel only) Option: Only commercially-reasonable efforts required Confidentiality obligations still apply to retained copies 49

Speaker question: Are there any particularly-dangerous clauses that a contract reviewer should watch for in an NDA? 50

Dangerous clauses: Assignment of IP ownership Stanford Univ. v. Roche case Noncompetition covenant RP gets residuals rights in Confidential Information 51

Speaker question: What about litigation clauses in an NDA? 52

Litigation clauses: Forum selection DP might want to sue RP in RP s home court Governing law ditto Injunctive relief: Courts likely will enforce stipulation of irreparable harm be careful2 RP won t want to waive bond requirement 53

Audience question: What other kinds of provisions might a disclosing party want in an NDA? 54

Possible additional RP obligations (from Common Draft): RP cooperates w/ DP in going after misappropriators RP indemnifies DP for all misappropriation and all 3P claims resulting from RP use or disclosure of Confidential Information Any others? (Type your answers) 55

Audience question: What other kinds of provisions might a receiving party want in an NDA? 56

Possible additional RP provisions (from Common Draft): RP gets residuals rights DP warrants that it has the right to provide its Confidential Information to the RP Any others? (Type your answers) 57