Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/03/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2

Similar documents
Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 4:07-cv JLH Document 1 Filed 06/29/2007 ( Page 1 of 6

Case 1:11-cv LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION. Nature Of The Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~,~,~,,.c~...,... ~~"~ ~ " FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLI~ SEP -9 ;i ~ [~: 0~ CBA~OTTE OIVlSlON

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:06-cv JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:04-cv RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

This is an action under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:14-cv MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6

) I ClV a S - BUN. 18 This is an action under Title VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil

Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

)

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION

Case 7:17-cv KMK Document 1 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 4:04-cv LLP Document 1 Filed 12/28/2004 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HA WAIl. Case No.: NATURE OF THE ACTION AND JURISDICTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS eu,:".' IJ~:'LD~~?~:~~URT EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

5:06cv1684 JUDGE HICKS MAG. JUDGE HORNSBY

IN TI-[E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. ..-ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION n/k/a DISH, LTD.,

)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintitl, Defendants. COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demand)

Case 9:06-cv RHC Document 1 Filed 02/28/2006 Page 1 of 7

Case 4:05-cv CLS Document 1 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 1 of 6

Case 6:10-cv TC Document 1 Filed 09/24/10 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 2:05-cv JES-SPC Document 47 Filed 04/24/2006 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR~A I FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINO~ STRA~ E EASTERN DIVISION 0~U ) ) tl0v 1 0 7_604 ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

FILED. , #, Case 5:05-cv WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 JUN COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ALICIA MANSEL, Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:13-cv LEK-KSC Document 1 Filed 12/18/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case5:11-cv EJD Document28 Filed09/09/11 Page1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 1:06-cv LTB-CBS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT OF THE UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DIVISION OF OHIO EASTERN DISTRICT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Introduction. Jurisdiction. Parties

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

Case 1:08-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/16/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 1:14-cv KAM-JO Document 8 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 36

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT PIERCE DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. No.: Defendants.

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

Case 4:10-cv CW Document 1 Filed 10/13/10 Page 1 of 8

Kanter v. California Administrative Office of the Courts Doc. 10 Case 3:07-cv MJJ Document 10 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 13

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626

Case3:13-cv NC Document1 Filed12/09/13 Page1 of 18

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

Case 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:14-cv KMT Document 1 Filed 09/24/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Transcription:

Case: 1:-cv-01 Document #: 1- Filed: 0/0/0 Page 1 of PageID #: WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, SBN 0 JONATHAN T. PECK, SBN (VA) LINDA S. ORDONIO-DIXON, SBN 0 U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Francisco District Office 0 Tbe Embarcadero, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA -0 Telephone No. (1) - Fax No. (1) - Attorneys for Plaintiff EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, E-filing UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PJ 1 1 1 1 Plaintiff, v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC., Defendant. COMPLAINT- CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION U.S.C. t(a). JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF THE ACTION This is an action under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 0 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1 to correct unl.awful employment practices on the basis of disability and to provide appropriate relief to charging parties Joel Boswell, Margaret Bucaro, Patricia Hernandez, Mary Price, Rosemary Verga and similarly-situated disabled employees of defendant United Air Lines, Inc. who were adversely affected by such practices. Defendant unlawfully denied the charging parties and similarly-situated disabled employees the reasonable accommodation of reassignment to a vacant position for which they were qualified, and which they needed in order to accommodate their respective disabilities. COMPLAINT

Case: 1:-cv-01 Document #: 1- Filed: 0/0/0 Page of PageID #: 1 1 1 1.. jurisdiction AND VENUE 1. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to U.S.C. 1,, 1, 1, and 1. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Section (a) of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 0 ("ADA"), U.S.C. 1(a), which incorporates by reference Section 0(f)(l) and () oftitle V ofthe Civil Rights Act of ("Title V"), U.S.C. 00e-(f)(1) and () and pursuant to Section of the Civil Rights Act of 1, U.S.C. 1 a.. The employment practices alleged to be unlawful were and are now being committed within the state of California, County of San Mateo, which is within the jurisdiction of this court. Similar alleged unlawful employment practices were committed by Defendant throughout the United States. INTRADISTRICT ASSIGNMENT. Tnis action is appropriate for assignment to San Francisco/Oakland because the unlawful employment practices alleged which involve Joel Boswell, Patricia Hernandez and Rosemary Verga, were and are being committed in San Mateo County. PARTIES. Plaintiff, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), is the agency of the United States of America charged with the administration, interpretation, and enforcement of Title I of the ADA and is expressly authorized to bring this action by Section (a) of the ADA, U.S.C. 1(a), which incorporates by reference Sections 0(f)(l) and () of Title V, U.S.C. 00e-(f)(1) and ().. At all relevant times, Defendant United Airlines, Inc. (UAL) has continuously been a Delaware Corporation, doing business in the State of California, in the County of San Mateo, and has continuously had at least fifteen employees.. At all relevant times, Defendant UAL has continuously been an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce under Section 1() of the. ADA, U.S.C. 1(), and Section COMPLAINT.,

Case: 1:-cv-01 Document #: 1- Filed: 0/0/0 Page of PageID #: 1 1 1 1 1() of the ADA, U.S.C. 1(), which incorporates by reference Sections 0l(g) and (h) of Title V, U.S.C. 00e(g) and (h).. At all relevant times, Defendant UAL has been a covered entity under Section 1() of the ADA, U.S.C. 1(). STATEMENT OF CLAIMS. More than thirty days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, charging parties Joel Boswell, Margaret Bucaro, Patricia Hernandez, Mary Price, Rosemary Verga filed charges with the EEOC alleging violations of Title I of the ADA by Defendant. All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled.. Since at least June of 0, Defendant UAL has engaged in unlawful employment practices at its facilities located nationwide in violation of Section (a) and (b)()(a) of the ADA, U.S.C. 1(a) and (b)()(a). Specifically Defendant UAL has instituted and maintains policies, and practices which fail to accommodate individuals with disabilities and which require disabled employees to compete for reassignment into vacant positions for which they are minimally qualified and to which they need transfer in order to accommodate their respective disabilities.. The effect of the practices complained of in paragraph above has been to deprive charging parties Joel Boswell, Margaret Bucaro, Patricia Hernandez, Mary Price, Rosemary Verga and similarly-situated disabled employees of equal employment opportunities and otherwise to adversely affect their status as employees because of their respective disabilities.. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph above were and are intentional.. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph above were and are done with malice and/or reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of charging parties Joel Boswell, Margaret Bucaro, Patricia Hernandez, Mary Price, Rosemary Verga and similarly-situated disabled employees. COMPLAINT.

Case: 1:-cv-01 Document #: 1- Filed: 0/0/0 Page of PageID #: PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the EEOC respectfully requests that this Court: A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant UAL, its officers, successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in the conduct described in paragraph above and any employment practice which discriminates on the basis of disability. B. Order Defendant UAL to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs which provide equal employment opportunities for qualified individuals with disabilities, and which 'eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices. c. Order Defendant UAL to make whole charging parties Joel Boswell, Margaret 1 1 Bucaro, Patricia Hernandez, Mary Price, Rosemary Verga and similarly-situated disabled employees, by providing appropriate lost income with prejudgment interest, in amounts to be determined at trial, and other affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the effects of its unlawful employment practices, including rightful-place hiring and/or reinstatement. 1 I D. Order Defendant UAL to make whole charging parties Joel Boswell, Margaret 1 i 1 Bucaro, Patricia Hernandez, Mary Price, Rosemary Verga and similarly-situated disabled employees by providing compensation for past and future pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described above, including medical expenses, with interest, in amounts to be determined at trial. E. Order Defendant UAL to make whole charging parties Joel Boswell, Margaret Bucaro, Patricia Hernandez, Mary Price, Rosemary Verga and similarly-situated disabled employees by providing compensation for past and future non-pecuniary losses resulting from the above unlawful employment practices, including pain and suffering, emotional distress, indignity, loss of enjoyment of life, loss of self-esteem, and humiliation, in amounts to be determined at trial. F. Order Defendant UAL to pay charging parties Joel Boswell, Margaret Bucaro, Patricia Hernandez, Mary Price, Rosemary Verga and similarly-situated disabled employees punitive damages for its malicious and reckless conduct described above, in amounts to be determined at COMPLAINT.

Case: 1:-cv-01 Document #: 1- Filed: 0/0/0 Page of PageID #: trial. G. Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper in the public interest. H. Award the EEOC its costs in this action. JURY TRIAL DEMAND The EEOC requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by its complaint. Respectfully submitted, JAMES LEE Deputy General Counsel U. S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 1 OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 01 L Street, N.W. 1 Washington, D.C. 0 1 May, 0 1 Attorneys for Plaintiff EEOC U. S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Francisco District Office 0 The Embarcadero, Suite 00 San Francisco, California -0 COMPLAINT.