Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/24/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Similar documents
Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

case 3:14-cv TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:14-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:10-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/05/10 Page 1 of 20

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 1

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 1:19-cv PKC Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/13/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISON COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/02/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 8:15-cv SDM-TGW Document 1 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

cij;'l~jl NO~ AC..

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

COMPLAINT FOR DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/14/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

Case 1:16-cv BMC Document 8 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 93 PageID #: 73 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. Civil Action No JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/15/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

Case: 4:16-cv DDN Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/15/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 1:10-cv CMH -TRJ Document 1 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

Case 1:15-cv WMS-LGF Document 54 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 8. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:15-cv WMS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case3:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

3 James A. McDaniel (Bar No ) 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Attorneys for Plaintiff Kirker Enterprises, Inc. Document Filed Electronically UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 2:17-cv-06392 Document 1 Filed 08/24/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 Harris A. Wolin Myers Wolin, LLC 100 Headquarters Plaza North Tower, 6 th Floor Morristown, New Jersey 07960 Telephone: (973) 401-7159 Email: harris.wolin@myerswolin.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Bitro Group Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY BITRO GROUP INC. v. Plaintiff, ADVANCED LIGHTING CONCEPTS, INC., D/B/A ENVIRONMENTALLIGHTS.COM, Case No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Defendant. Bitro Group Inc. ( Bitro ), by its undersigned attorneys, as and for its complaint against defendant Advanced Lighting Concepts, Inc., says: THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Bitro is a New Jersey Corporation that maintains its principal place of business at 300 Lodi St., Hackensack, NJ 07601. Bitro is a leading provider of professional grade LED lighting products. 2. Upon information and belief, defendant Advanced Lighting Concepts, Inc. d/b/a environtmentallights.com ( Environmental ) is a corporation organized under the laws of California, having a principal place of business at 11235 W Bernado Ct., San Diego, CA 92127.

Case 2:17-cv-06392 Document 1 Filed 08/24/17 Page 2 of 6 PageID: 2 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This is an action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 1, et seq. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). 4. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b). THE PATENT-IN-SUIT 5. On August 18, 2015, the United States Patent and Trademark Office ( PTO ) duly and legally issued United States Patent No. 9,113,558 B2 ( the 558 patent ), entitled LED Mount Bar Capable of Freely Forming Curved Surfaces Thereon, to Seong Gon Baik ( Baik ). Baik, in turn, assigned all rights, title, and license in the 558 patent to LEDZONE CO., a foreign corporation in Korea with a business address at 112-20, Tongil-ro 1018, Deokyang-gu, Goyang-si, Kyeonggi-do, Korea ( LEDZONE ). Bitro is an exclusive licensee of all right, title and interest in the 558 patent, including the sole right to sue for infringement, by virtue of a license agreement executed in October of 2015. A true and correct copy of the 558 patent is attached as Exhibit A to this Complaint. 6. Traditional LED tape light strips provide lighting at regular intervals along a linear strip, but are not flexible in the direction of their width. Such LED tape light strips therefore cannot easily be used to provide lighting for custom shapes and letters. 7. The 558 patent describes and claims an LED tape light strip with a unique structure that allows it to be bent in the direction of its width, and is therefore ideal for lighting that must conform to unique shapes.

Case 2:17-cv-06392 Document 1 Filed 08/24/17 Page 3 of 6 PageID: 3 PLAINTIFF S ON-GOING BUSINESS IN THE U.S. UNDER THE 558 PATENT 8. Bitro has been regularly and continually making, marketing, using and selling LED tape light strips made in accordance with the 558 patent in the U.S. since December of 2012. These activities include, but are not limited to, displaying such patented lighting systems at tradeshows throughout the U.S. and designing and installing such systems for customers. 9. Bitro has found that its uniquely flexible LED tape light strips, as well as installations incorporating the LED tape light strips, actively and successfully attract new customers and retain existing customers, who ultimately engage Bitro for installations incorporating all of Bitro s lighting products and services. As such the Bitro LED tape light strips utilizing the patented technology have become an important and valuable continuing source of business attraction and growth for Bitro. INFRINGEMENT BY DEFENDANT 10. Bitro realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1-9, inclusive, as though fully set forth in this paragraph. 11. Defendant Environmental displays on its website, and, upon information and belief, sells into this judicial district, its CurrentControl Bendable ZigZag LED Strip Lights, as seen at https://www.environmentallights.com/led-strip-lights/single-color-led-striplights/currentcontrol-bendable-zigzag-led-strip-lights.html (Last viewed on August 24, 2017). A screen capture is attached as Exhibit B to this complaint. 12. Defendant Environmental has been and is currently infringing the 558 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271 by, among other things, designing, making, importing,

Case 2:17-cv-06392 Document 1 Filed 08/24/17 Page 4 of 6 PageID: 4 using, selling, and/or offering for sale at least its product CurrentControl Bendable ZigZag LED Strip Lights in and into the United States, and in this judicial district, that infringe one or more of the claims of the 558 patent. 13. Upon information and belief, these infringing activities of Environmental are causing attraction to Environmental and other Environmental products in the marketplace. As such, and upon information and belief, by Environmental s display and marketing of products infringing upon the 558 patent, Environmental is attracting and directing customers to itself that would otherwise first be attracted to and seek business with Bitro. 14. Upon information and belief, defendant Environmental transacts business within this district, derives substantial revenues from intra-state and inter-state commerce and has committed tortious acts of patent infringement within this district and also without this district having injurious consequences within this district, and defendant Environmental is otherwise within the jurisdiction of this Court. 15. In particular, upon information and belief, defendant Environmental is offering for sale and/or selling into this district at least one product that infringes upon Bitro s 558 patent, and/or is actively doing business in this district and thereby is, and has been, regularly availing itself of the benefits of doing business in this district. 16. Due to these infringing activities, Bitro has sustained damages and suffered irreparable harm in and to its existing and prospective business, and will continue to sustain such damages and irreparable harm unless Environmental is permanently enjoined from infringing the 558 patent. 17. Environmental had knowledge of and willfully, deliberately, and intentionally infringed the claims of the 558 patent, rendering this an exceptional case pursuant

Case 2:17-cv-06392 Document 1 Filed 08/24/17 Page 5 of 6 PageID: 5 to 35 U.S.C. 285, and entitling Bitro to enhanced damages and attorneys fees, along with a permanent injunction. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Bitro seeks judgment in its favor and against Environmental as follows: a. Adjudging and decreeing that Environmental has infringed the 558 patent; b. Permanently enjoining Environmental, its officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with it from infringing the 558 patent; c. Damages as allowed by law to compensate Bitro for Environmental s infringement, together with prejudgment interest and costs of suit; d. Adjudging Environmental a willful infringer and awarding Bitro treble damages under 35 U.S.C. 284; e. Declaring that this is an exceptional case under 35 U.S.C. 285, and awarding reasonable attorneys fees and expenses to Bitro; f. Adjudging Environmental an infringer of the 558 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 289, and awarding damages to Bitro to the extent of Environmental s total profit; g. For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and appropriate.

Case 2:17-cv-06392 Document 1 Filed 08/24/17 Page 6 of 6 PageID: 6 JURY DEMAND Bitro requests a jury trial on all issues triable by jury. Dated: August 24, 2017 By: /s/ Harris A. Wolin Harris A. Wolin Trial Counsel Myers Wolin, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff Bitro Group Inc.