Defendant: PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY COURT USE ONLY Counsel for Plaintiff: Marc R. Levy, #11372

Similar documents
Order: Stipulated (Between Defendant KONE Inc. and Plaintiff) Motion for a Continuance of Trial (also filed on behalf of Plaintiff)

MOTION FOR TELEPHONE TESTIMONY OF W. SCOTT ROCKEFELLER WITH REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED RULING

MOTION FOR ATTORNEY S FEES AND COSTS FROM CITY OF FORT COLLINS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

PARTIALLY-UNOPPOSED MOTION TO INTERVENE

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

DEFENDANT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF. PARK ( Park County ) by its attorneys Hayes, Phillips, Hoffmann & Carberry, P.C.

INTRODUCTION JURISDICTION VENUE

DEFENDANT RTD S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

Plaintiff. The State Board of the Great Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund, Defendant. COURT USE ONLY Case No.

MOTION TO STRIKE, IN PART; FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND TO DISMISS, IN PART, FOR LACK OF RIPENESS

INTERVENOR-DEFENDANT COLORADO COMMON CAUSE S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM

ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM OF DEFENDANTS PINE TREE HOMES, LLC AND SANTIAGO JOHN JONES

ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

INDIVIDUAL, COLLECTIVE, AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs, through their attorneys Montgomery Little & Soran, P.C., in response to

DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 56

COMPLAINT (With Application for Show Cause Order)

CHAPTER 4 JURY DELIBERATIONS; VERDICT FORMS

This matter comes before the Court on a motion for partial summary judgment and preliminary injunction and cross motion for partial summary judgment.

VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

SUNBELT RENTALS, INC S FORTHWITH MOTION TO INTERVENE. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. ( Sunbelt ), by its attorneys at Darling Milligan Horowitz PC,

Case 1:16-cv MEH Document 1 Filed 09/20/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:19-cv PAB-KMT Document 9 Filed 01/28/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

DEFENDANT CITY OF FORT COLLINS ANSWER WITH CROSS-CLAIM

Shirley S. Joondeph; Brian C. Joondeph; and CitiMortgage, Inc., JUDGMENT REVERSED AND CASE REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS

DEFENDANT CITY OF LOVELAND S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

NOTICE OF APPEAL. Plaintiff-Appellant John Cox, by and through his attorneys of record,

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Division V Opinion by JUDGE GRAHAM Russel and Lichtenstein, JJ., concur. Announced June 10, 2010

Case 4:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/18/10 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Information or instructions: Plea in abatement motion & Order to quash service Alternate Form

RECEIVER S MOTION TO ESTABLISH CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION PROCEDURE AND TO SET CLAIMS BAR DATE

District Court, Adams County, State of Colorado

DISTRICT COURT CITY & COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado Plaintiff Appellee: SECURITY CAPITAL FUNDING CORP.

Defendant(s): August William Ritter, Jr., et al. COURT USE ONLY Case Number: 08CV9453 ORDER

2018COA126. No. 17CA0741, Marchant v. Boulder Community Health Creditors and Debtors Hospital Liens Lien for Hospital Care

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street, Denver, Colorado 80202

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 164 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2018

MEDIA INTERVENOR RESPONDENTS MOTION TO INTERVENE TO BE HEARD IN RESPONSE TO PETITION

Case 1:17-cv RDB Document 17 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 6. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Baltimore Division ANSWER

COMES NOW, Russell Weisfield, by and through his attorneys, Schlueter,

Information or instructions: Motion Consent of Client & Order to substitute counsel PREVIEW

COMES NOW, Marc Anayas, appearing for a specific and limited purpose only, by

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

MOTION TO DISMISS COLORADO OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION S AND AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE S JOINT COMPLAINT

Case: 3:18-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/16/18 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 1

DISTRICT COURT, LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO. 201 La Porte Avenue, Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO Phone: (970) Plaintiff:

District Court, Adams County, Colorado 1100 Judicial Center Drive Brighton, Colorado Safeway, Inc.; and Michael Arellano, Plaintiffs,

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT YOUTH VOLLEYBALL OFFICIATING

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/03/ :34 AM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/03/2014

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY STATE OF COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street, Room 256 Denver, CO (720)

Colorado Court of Appeals 2 East 14 th Avenue Denver, CO District Court, Saguache County 2015 CV30020

Upon consideration of the Petition for Injunction, the Order to Show Cause

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS. This Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement (this Agreement ) is made and entered into

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2013 COA 128. Henry Block and South Broadway Automotive Group, Inc., d/b/a Quality Mitsubishi, Inc., JUDGMENT AFFIRMED

Union Pacific petitioned for review of the court of. appeals judgment in Martin v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 186 P.3d

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/07/ :51 PM

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL AND MOTION TO CONTINUE

Order: Order Regarding Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim

Roger T. Castle 1888 Sherman Street, Suite 415 Denver, CO DEFENDANT S MOTION TO COMPEL

thejasminebrand.com thejasminebrand.com

Case AJC Doc 250 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 3. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DVISION

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO. Court Address: 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202

Denver, Colorado 80202

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. 2:04-cv-47-FtM-33SPC (LAG)

SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT S FIRST MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA

ORDER RE DEFENDANT S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS

COLORADO SUPREME COURT 1300 Broadway Denver, Colorado Original Proceeding Pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat (2) Appeal from the Title Board

Colorado PUC E-Filings System

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Division I Opinion by JUDGE FOX Taubman and Sternberg*, JJ., concur. NOT PUBLISHED PURSUANT TO C.A.R. 35(f) Announced July 25, 2013

Case Document 1590 Filed in TXSB on 03/16/12 Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. 2:04-cv-47-FtM-29 SPC

RECEIVED ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MILLCREEK COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY AND BOARD OF EDUCATION OF GRANITE SCHOOL DISTRICT RECITALS

mg Doc 5847 Filed 11/18/13 Entered 11/18/13 19:33:43 Main Document Pg 1 of 10

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/28/ :51 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/28/2017

The following rules are Amended and Adopted as of June 28, 2001:

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/25/ /09/ :37 12:27 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/25/2016

Case 1:19-cv PAB Document 1 Filed 01/04/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

COMPLAINT FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF AGENCY ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA

news Colorado Judicial Branch Michael L. Bender, Chief Justice Gerald Marroney, State Court Administrator

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF S REQUEST FOR ADMISSION OF FACTS

B. The Parties wish to avoid the expense and uncertainty of further litigation without any

DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF S RULE 60 MOTION; and DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY S FEES

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY PENDING SUPREME COURT PROCEEDINGS

Plaintiffs Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County, Colorado and the City of Lafayette allege as follows:

AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM

Case 5:07-cv C Document 27 Filed 12/19/2007 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY, MISSOURI

Transcription:

GRANTED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on any pro se parties, pursuant to CRCP 5, and file a certificate of service with the Court within 10 days. Dated: May 27, 2010 DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock St., Rm. 256 Denver, Colorado 80202 R. Michael Mullins District Court Judge DATE OF ORDER INDICATED ON ATTACHMENT Plaintiff: NORMAN UTLEY CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. Defendant: PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY COURT USE ONLY Counsel for Plaintiff: Marc R. Levy, #11372 Case No.: 2009CV9741 Brian J. Waters, # 24836 Joshua R. Proctor, #33835 Courtroom: 19 LEVY, MORSE & WHEELER, P.C. Plaza Tower One, Suite 900 6400 S. Fiddlers Green Cir. Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Phone: (303) 796-2900 Fax: (303) 796-2081 Email: mlevy@levymorsewheeler.com, bwaters@levymorsewheeler.com, jproctor@levymorsewheeler.com PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT S DESIGNATION OF NON- PARTY AT FAULT PLAINTIFF, Norman Utley Construction, Inc. ( Utley ), through counsel, submits its Motion to Strike Defendant s Designation of Non-party at Fault, and states as follows: Certification Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 121 1-15(8) Undersigned counsel for Plaintiff certifies that they conferred with defense counsel about this motion and are advised that Defendant opposes the relief requested herein. 1. On February 19, 2010, Defendant filed a non-party designation designating Bituminous Insurance as a non-party at fault pursuant to C.R.S. 13-21-111.5(3)(b). See Defendant Progressive s Designation of Non-party at Fault Pursuant to C.R.S. 13-21- 111.5(3)(b).

2. As an initial matter, Defendant s non-party designation should be stricken as untimely. Plaintiff commenced this action on October 14, 2009. By statute, Defendant s nonparty designation was required to be filed within 90 days following commencement of the action. C.R.S. 13-21-111.5(3)(b). Defendant was served with the Complaint on October 15, 2009. However, Defendant did not file its non-party designation until February 19, 2010, 128 days after the commencement of the action. Defendant neither sought nor received leave of court to file it late. Defendant s designation of non-party should be stricken as untimely. 3. Defendant s non-party designation should also be stricken on its merits. In this case, Plaintiff is suing Defendant for breach of insurance contract. As a matter of law, Defendant s non-party designation is invalid with respect to Plaintiff s breach of contract claim. Broderick v. McElroy and McCoy, Inc., 961 P.2d 504, 507 (Colo.App. 1997). 4. The damages Plaintiff seeks in this case are those benefits to which it is entitled under Defendant s insurance contract. Bituminous Insurance, the non-party designated by Defendant, has nothing to do with Defendant s performance of the contract or Defendant s fulfillment of its own contractual obligations to Plaintiff. Accordingly, Defendant s designation of Bituminous Insurance as a non-party at fault is invalid as a matter of law, and must be stricken. 5. Defendant s non-party designation is also deficient because it does not include any facts upon which Bituminous could be found liable for causing any of Plaintiff s damages. Unlike the Defendant here, Bituminous Insurance fulfilled its contractual obligations to Plaintiff by defending and indemnifying Plaintiff in the underlying personal injury lawsuit. Non-party designations are to be strictly construed. See Redden v. SCI Colorado Funeral Services, Inc., 38 2

P.3d 75, 80 (Colo. 2001). A proper non-party designation connects alleged facts with the established elements of negligence. Id. at 81. When a court does not believe a defendant has established legal culpability against an alleged non-party, the designation is properly disallowed. Id. On its face, Defendant s non-party designation should be disallowed because there is nothing in the designation upon which legal culpability against Bituminous Insurance could be established. WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff respectfully requests the Court enter an Order GRANTING this motion and STRIKING Defendant s Designation of Non-party at Fault, filed February 19, 2010. Respectfully submitted, LEVY, MORSE & WHEELER, P.C. Original signature on file at Levy, Morse & Wheeler, P.C. By: s/ Joshua R. Proctor Marc R. Levy, #11372 Brian J. Waters, # 24836 Joshua R. Proctor, #33835 Attorneys for Plaintiff Norman Utley Construction, Inc. 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on April 9, 2010, a true and correct copy of the foregoing PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT S DESIGNATION OF NON- PARTY AT FAULT was e-filed through LexisNexis File & Serve and served electronically on the following: Franklin D. Patterson, Esq. Adam B. Kehrli, Esq. Patterson, Nuss & Seymour, P.C. 5613 DTC Parkway, Suite 400 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Original signature on file at the offices of Levy, Morse & Wheeler, P.C. /s/ Lou Ann Berlin 4

Court: CO Denver County District Court 2nd JD Judge: Ronald M Mullins File & Serve Transaction ID: 30511081 Current Date: May 27, 2010 Case Number: 2009CV9741 Case Name: NORMAN UTLEY CONSTR INC vs. PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INS CO /s/ Judge Ronald M Mullins