Syllabus (Preliminary) Election Law: Voting Rights, Districts and Dollars

Similar documents
VOTING RIGHTS AND ELECTION LAW

Regulating Elections: Districts /252 Fall 2012

Regulating Elections: Districts /252 Fall 2008

Paul Smith, Attorney at Law Jenner and Block Washington, DC. Gerry Hebert, Attorney at Law Washington, DC

2. Identify the factors of political socialization. Rank them from #1 (most important) to #5 (least important). Then, explain your ranking.

Partisan Gerrymandering

Congressional Redistricting and the Voting Rights Act: A Legal Overview

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts

Clearing the Political Thicket: Why Political Gerrymandering for Partisan Advantage is Unconstitutional

Congressional Redistricting and the Voting Rights Act: A Legal Overview

Partisan Gerrymandering

Understanding Election Law and Voting Rights

LEGAL PRINCIPLES. A. The One-Person, One-Vote Standard

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Electoral Districts

Regulating Elections: Districts /252 Spring 2015

The Journey From Census To The United States Supreme Court Linda J. Shorey

Redistricting in Michigan

GUIDE TO DISTRICTING LAW PREPARED FOR THE CHULA VISTA DISTRICTING COMMISSION

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

The Supreme Court s Shrinking Election Law Docket, : A Legacy of Bush v. Gore or Fear of the Roberts Court? Richard L.

How to Draw Redistricting Plans. That Will Stand Up in Court. Contents

Redistricting Virginia

Supreme Court of the United States

Congressional Redistricting and the Voting Rights Act: A Legal Overview

LAW REVIEW NEW YORK UNIVERSITY STATE COURTS AND DEMOCRACY: THE ROLE OF STATE COURTS IN THE BATTLE FOR INCLUSIVE PARTICIPATION IN THE ELECTORAL PROCESS

MARGARET DICKSON, et al., ROBERT RUCHO, et al., RESPONDENTS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI. No

Courts and Civil Liberties Pol Sci 344

Cooper v. Harris, 581 U.S. (2017).

The 2020 Census, Gerrymandering, and Voter Suppression

Civil Liberties Group Presentations Questions

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

REDISTRICTING IN LOUISIANA

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Redistricting & the Quantitative Anatomy of a Section 2 Voting Rights Case

Sued If You Do, Sued If You Don't: Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act as a Defense to Race-Conscious Districting

Civil Liberties Bad-tendency rule curtail speech or other 1 st Amd. If it might lead to an evil (Gitlow)

New Developments in the Meaning of the Voting Rights Act. Nate Persily Beekman Professor of Law and Political Science Columbia Law School

Case 1:10-cv JDB Document 67 Filed 01/14/11 Page 1 of 41 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Supreme Court of the United States

REDISTRICTING IN LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. Educational Presentation December 15, 2010

In the Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA. No. Court of Appeals Cause No. 49A CV-00040

How to Draw Redistricting Plans. That Will Stand Up in Court

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Reapportionment. In 1991, reapportionment and redistricting were the most open, democratic, and racially

THE PARTY S OVER: PARTISAN GERRYMANDERING AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT DAVID SCHULTZ

Claremont McKenna College April 21, 2010 Douglas Johnson Ian Johnson David Meyer

Democracy DeLayed: The High Court Distorts Voting Rights Principles to Thwart Partially the Texas Republican Gerrymander

Case 1:10-cv LG-RHW Document 220 Filed 07/25/13 Page 1 of 12

REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR SUMMARY ANALYSIS

Supreme Court of the United States

SCOTUS Comparison Cases

G. J. Jacobsohn Fall 2011 Mezes Ph: Government 357M Unique CONSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURES OF POWER

COMPACTNESS IN THE REDISTRICTING PROCESS

Case 3:14-cv REP-GBL-BMK Document 73 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 33 PageID# 844

Back to the Drawing Board: Equal Protection Clashes with the Voting Rights Act in Shaw v. Reno, 113 S. Ct (1993)

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Established judicial review; "midnight judges;" John Marshall; power of the Supreme Court

New Districts in Place for 2002 Elections

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

A Shared Existence: The Current Compatibility of the Equal Protection Clause and Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act

Robinson Everett Redistricting Cases Papers and undated (bulk ) Collection Overview

Supreme Court of the United States

Parties and Elections. Selections from Chapters 11 & 12

Purposes of Elections

1 pt. 2pt. 3 pt. 4pt. 5 pt

Conquered Provinces? The Voting Rights Act and State Power

Summer Assignments for AP Government

APPORTIONMENT AND FAIR REPRESENTATION When Equal Population Isn t Fair or Equal March 5, 2004 CLARK BENSEN 1

In The Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. MARGARET DICKSON, et al., ROBERT RUCHO, et al.,

Supreme Court of the United States

G. J. Jacobsohn Fall 2010 (T, Th, 12:30 1:45) Mezes Ph: Office Hours: T, Th, 10-11, Th, 2-3

In The Supreme Court of the United States

A Practical Guide to Understanding the Electoral System. Courtesy of:

Case No. WD82110 IN THE WESTERN DISTRICT, MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS. PAUL RITTER et. al., Respondents / Cross-Appellants,

UC Irvine CSD Working Papers

Legal & Policy Criteria Governing Establishment of Districts

TUFTS UNIVERSITY. U R B A N & E N V I R O M E N T A L POLICY AND P L A N N I N G L e g a l F r a m e w o r k s of S o c i a l P o l i c y

ELECTION UPDATE Tom Davis

LEGISLATIVE APPORTIONMENT IN MICHIGAN * *** * CITIZENS RESEARCH COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN

The Voting Rights Act of 1965: All Bark, No Bite?

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Regulating Elections: Districts /252 Spring 2016

House Apportionment 2012: States Gaining, Losing, and on the Margin

SUPER-MAJORITIES AND EQUAL PROTECTION

SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA **************************************************** PENDER COUNTY, DWIGHT STRICKLAND, )

AP UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT & POLITICS SUPREME COURT REVIEW

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 411 Filed 10/07/11 Page 1 of 84

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

Supreme Court of the United States

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

Election Laws and Voting Rights

Case: 1:18-cv TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 136 Filed: 01/08/19 Page: 1 of 43 PAGEID #: 3536

Constitutional Law, the Political Process, and the Bondage of Discipline

The Constitutional Imperative of Proportional Representation

Moreover, it is hard to understand how plaintiffs could be irreparably harmed should the

The Implications of Legistlative Power: State Constitutions, State Legislatures, and Mid-Decade Redistricting

SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION. MARGARET DICKSON, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs ) Civil Action No. 11 CVS ) ) v. ) ) ROBERT RUCHO, et al., ) ) Defendants.

Transcription:

Syllabus (Preliminary) Election Law: Voting Rights, Districts and Dollars The goal of this course is to introduce students to the legal underpinnings of today s democratic politics, the historical struggle over the structure and processes of democratic institutions, and the practical consequences that follow from different institutional arrangements. Specifically, students will examine the history, case law and current legal and policy debates regarding the right to vote, the administration of elections, the districting and apportionment process (including partisan and racial gerrymandering), and the financing of campaigns and independent expenditures. Casebook: Dimino, Smith & Solimine, Voting Rights and Election Law (2010) Schedule: Class meets Wednesdays, 4:30 p.m.-6:30 p.m., Room 100A Professors: David Pepper (dpepper@blankrome.com), the Honorable Nathaniel Jones Assistant: Jen Gehring Week 1 Aug. 22 Election Law: Origins - The United States Constitution (*please review for any provisions dealing with elections and voting) - Hardcopy Packet (* please pick up from Cheryl Delvecchio, Dean s Suite Room 200; available week of August 13) o James Madison, The Federalist # 10 o Wood, 168-170, 178-181 o Michael Schudson (excerpt) o Richard Bensel (excerpt) o Whitman (excerpt) o Williams v. Mississippi o Minor o Pope v. Williams o Giles v. Harris o Breedlove v. Suttles

Week 2 Aug. 29 Election Law: Evolution/Revolution - Casebook, 103-129, 444-455 - Myrdal excerpt (TWEN) - Warren, 388-392 (TWEN) - Grovey - Smith v. Allwright - Guinn v. United States (TWEN) - Lane v. Wilson (TWEN) - Colegrove v. Green - Lassiter - Gomillion - Baker v. Carr Week 3 Sept. 5 Voting Rights 1: Who participates? - Casebook, 1-45, 60-70 - Karlan, Ballots and Bullets, 1-20 (TWEN) - Caro, ix-xii (TWEN) - Warren, 457-463 (TWEN) - LBJ VRA Speech (TWEN) - Lassiter - Harper - Kramer v. Union Free School District

- South Carolina v. Katzenbach - Morgan v. Katzenbach Week 4 Sept. 12 Voting Rights 2: Who participates? - Casebook, 45-60, 70-102 - Richardson v. Ramirez - Hunter v. Underwood - Salyer Land - Holt Civic Club - Carrington v. Rash - Dunn v. Blumstein - Marston v. Lewis Week 5 Sept. 19 Voting Rights 3: Who participates? - Casebook, 1081-1096 - Voter identification materials (TWEN) - Crawford v. Marion County Election Board - Current challenges (Pennsylvania, Texas, S. Carolina) Week 6 Sept. 26 Voting Rights 4: Counting the Votes - Casebook, 1115-1135

- Bush v. Gore - Stewart v. Blackwell (TWEN) - Hunter v. Williams (TWEN) Week 7 Oct. 3 What is the playing field? One Person, One Vote - Casebook, 161-215 - Warren, 423-425 (TWEN) - Gomillion v. Lightfoot - Baker v. Carr - Gray v. Sanders - Wesberry - Reynolds v. Sims - Kirkpatrick v. Preisler - Mahan v. Howell - Gafney v. Cummings - Cox v. Larios Week 8 Oct. 17 What is the playing field? VRA and Vote Dilution - Casebook, 225-235, 248-272, 285-349 - Allen v. State Board of Elections - Beer v. United States - Reno v. Bossier Parish

- Georgia v. Ashcroft - Whitcomb v. Davis - White v. Regester - UJO v. Carey - City of Mobile v. Bolden - Thornburg v. Gingles - Johnson v. DeGandy - Quilter v. Voinovich (TWEN) Week 9 Oct. 24 What is the playing field? Limitations - Casebook, 379-442 - Shaw v. Reno - Miller v. Johnson - LULAC v. Perry - Bartlett v. Strickland - Easley v. Cromartie (TWEN) - Davis v. Bandemer (TWEN) - Veith (TWEN) Week 10 Oct. 31 Political Speech - Casebook, 597-617, 659-680, 688-702, 766-785 - NY Times v. Sullivan

- Brown v. Hartlage - Brown v. Socialist Workers 74 Campaign Committee - McIntyre - Meyer v. Grant - Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation - Rep. Party of Minnesota v. White - Burson v. Freeman (TWEN) Week 11 Nov. 7 Campaign Finance Buckley v. Valeo - Casebook, 785-880 - Auto Workers - Buckley v. Valeo - California Medical Association - Citizens Against Rent Control - National Right to Work Committee - National Conservative Political Action Committee - Nixon v. Shrink Missouri PAC - Randall v. Sorrell Week 12 Nov. 14 Campaign Finance Independent Expenditures, Corporate $$$ - Casebook, 887-958 - Colorado Republican I - Colorado Republican II

- CLITRIM - Furgatch - Christian Action Network - Bellotti - Massachusetts Citizens for Life - Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce Week 13 Nov. 21 Campaign Finance Law reform and Citizens United - Casebook, 958-1053 - McConnell v. FEC - Wisconsin Right to Life - Davis v. FEC (TWEN) - Citizens United Week 14 Nov. 28 Judging elections: the debate Readings TBD Week 15 Dec. 5 Wrap up