Missouri Marijuana Arrests

Similar documents
Illinois Marijuana Arrests

Arkansas Marijuana Arrests

Missouri Sentencing Advisory Commission. Annual Report on Sentencing and Sentencing Disparity Fiscal Year 2015

Connecticut Marijuana Arrests

Tennessee Marijuana Arrests

Maryland Marijuana Arrests

BYLAWS OF MISSOURI BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATION. ARTICLE I Name, Object, Officers and Directors. The objects and purposes of this association shall be:

Vermont Marijuana Arrests

Oregon Marijuana Arrests

Pennsylvania Marijuana Arrests

Washington Marijuana Arrests

Louisiana Marijuana Arrests

Wisconsin Marijuana Arrests

AMENDED AND RESTATED Articles of Incorporation. The Missouri School Nutrition Association A Non-Profit Organization.

Oklahoma Marijuana Arrests

Georgia Marijuana Arrests

Bylaws of The Missouri State Chiropractors Association. Division Topic Page. Article I Name 2. Article II Offices 2. Article III Duration 2

Missouri Transportation Disparate Impacts

Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss

Justice Reinvestment in Missouri

2009 County Central Committee Total Contributions

The Protection and Advocacy System for Indiana Member: National Disability Rights Network

Your rights as a debtor in Illinois -- Supplement. Board of Trustees, Southern Illinois University

What happens if you are sued for foreclosure in Illinois -- Supplement

2018 General Election Illinois State Bar Association. Judicial Evaluations Outside Cook County

BY-LAWS OF THE ILLINOIS FAMILY SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION

MASON-DIXON TENNESSEE POLL

~ IIU ~ 8 E E 78* English CE Document Title: Document Date: United States -- Indiana. Document Country: Document Language: IFES 74 IFES IO:

Indiana County Voter Registration Offices

How to change the name of a minor in Illinois- Supplement {tc "How to change the name of a minor in Illinois- Supplement " \l 3}

Missouri Federation of Square N Round Dance Clubs Standing Rules Table of Contents Revised October 2015

County. Record. Missouri. There she stands, proud in all her glory. Spring Lawrence County Courthouse, Mt. Vernon, Mo.

Probation Officers Professional Association of Indiana, Inc.

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION of the INDIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, INC.

THE IOWA CAUCUS. First in the Nation A COUNTY CHAIR'S GUIDE TO ORGANIZING THE IOWA CAUCUSES

Bylaws of the Iowa Emergency Medical Services Association

ARTICLE II Purpose. ARTICLE III Membership

OUR VISION OUR MISSION

MASON-DIXON MISSISSIPPI POLL

Indiana Beef Cattle Association 2018 By-Laws

MASON-DIXON MISSISSIPPI POLL

County. Missouri Record. There she stands, proud in all her glory. Winter Moniteau County Courthouse, California, Mo.

BYLAWS OF THE KENTUCKY FLORISTS ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED

State of Missouri Public Defender Commission

StateofWel-Being. Tennesee. State,City&CongresionalDistrictWel-BeingReport

BY-LAWS ARKANSAS JUNIOR CATTLEMEN S ASSOCIATION, INC.

DIRECTIVE October 16, All County Boards of Elections Directors, Deputy Directors, and Board Members SUMMARY

TGFOA 2017 Fall Conference. John Greer, Utilities Specialist Comptroller of the Treasury

Patterns in Tennessee s Black Population,

Guardianship Supplement

Bylaws of the University of Kentucky College of Agriculture & Human Environmental Sciences Alumni Association

By-Laws of the. Dexter Cattle Club of Tennessee

LSP In-Class Activity 5 Working with PASW 20 points Due by Saturday, Oct. 17 th 11:59 pm ANSWERS

By-Laws of the Association of Illinois Soil and Water Conservation Districts

People System Conditions Safety Capital Program. Critical Success Factors SFY 2016 Q4

14. GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND ELECTIONS

Tourist Oriented Directional Signing (TODS) Program (Excludes freeways or interstate highway use)

Key Facts. There are 2,057 secure detention beds in Florida. 55,170 youth were admitted to secure detention.

BY-LAWS OF NORTHWEST MISSOURI AREA AGENCY ON AGING, INC.

Missouri s Complex Fence Law

DETENTION SERVICES. There are 2,057 secure detention beds currently in operation in the State of Florida.

MICROFORMS OTHER RECORDS MISSISSIPPI ROOM. History of Bolivar County, compiled by Florence Warfield Sillers, and Imperial Bolivar

Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter

Foreclosure Sales Report: Iowa

Missouri s Complex. Looking at Missouri s 2 Fence Laws. Disclaimer. Where Missouri is at right now... Local Option Law Counties

`By-Laws Missouri Valley Masters Swim Association

Members of the Arkansas Senate 91st General Assembly Jonathan Dismang, President Pro Tempore

MASON-DIXON GEORGIA POLL

BYLAWS OF ASSOCIATION OF INDIANA SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS, INC. ARTICLE I GENERAL

Illinois Pharmacists Association. Bylaws. Revised: June 19, 2015

Current Trends in Juvenile Incarceration. Presented by Barry Krisberg April 25, 2012

Kentucky Association Of Chiefs of Police, Incorporated

DETENTION SERVICES. Detention Services. detention facilities with 1,302. beds in operation in the State. of Florida.

IC Department established Sec. 4. The state police department is established. As added by P.L , SEC.2.

Arkansas General Assembly Roster

DETENTION SERVICES Detention Services. Julia Strange Assistant Secretary for Detention Services (850)

DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT

MISSISSIPPI QUARTER HORSE ASSOCIATION, INC. BY-LAWS

Tennessee Counties Named from Patriots

Name Date. How did the counties in Illinois get their names? Use the attached research sheet to find out!

Alabama. Alaska. Arizona. Arkansas. California. Colorado. Connecticut. Delaware

CALL FOR COMMITTEE NOMINATIONS

CONSTITUTION OF THE KENTUCKY DIRECTORS OF PUPIL PERSONNEL STATE OF KENTUCKY Revised on September 2012

No one is surprised that an

Economic Trends Report: Miami County

Health Planning Chapter STATE HEALTH PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ALABAMA STATE HEALTH PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

Health Planning Chapter STATE HEALTH PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ALABAMA STATE HEALTH PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

Kentucky State Data Center

Internal Control and Compliance Assessment Legislative Joint Auditing Committee State Agencies Financial and Compliance Audit Section

PHIL BRYANT STATE AUDITOR SPECIAL REPORT SCHOOL DISTRICT NONCOMPLIANCE WITH SECTION (3)(A)(III), MISSISSIPPI CODE ANNOTATED (1972)

ILLINOIS 99 TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVES

Economic and Demographic Trends

Expansion and Reform. (Early 1800s-1861) PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES. By Daniel Casciato

DIRECTIVE April 20, All County Boards of Elections Directors, Deputy Directors and Board Members

Microfilm Drawer 1. Springfield Daily News Jan 2, 1860-Dec 31, Springfield Daily News Jan 3, 1861-Dec 31, 1861

Nebraska s Foreign Born and Hispanic/Latino Population

Iowa State Dance/Drill Team Association

FOCUS. Native American Youth and the Juvenile Justice System. Introduction. March Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency

BYLAWS OF THE KENTUCKY SOCCER ASSOCIATION, Inc. PART I GENERAL

American Presidential Elections. The American presidential election system has produced some interesting quirks, such as...

Transcription:

Working to Reform Marijuana Laws The NORML Almanac of Marijuana Arrest Statistics Missouri Marijuana Arrests Marijuana Arrests 1995-2002 (Summary) Marijuana Possession Arrests-2002 (Demographics) Marijuana Sales Arrests-2002 (Demographics) Marijuana Arrests by County 1998-2002

Introduction The NORML Almanac of Marijuana Arrest Statistics provides detailed data on the distribution and composition of marijuana arrests to supplement the analysis and data contained in NORML s 2005 report Crimes of Indiscretion: Marijuana Arrests in the United States. The data used for these tables were produced by the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) program of the Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation. Local police agencies report data to state agencies, which compile and report it to the national program office. Some local agencies do not participate in the program, and neither do some states. Florida, Illinois, and Washington D.C. did not report data to the UCR program in 2002, though some Illinois data was obtained directly from the state for this report. This report relies on two UCR data sets. UCR County Level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data have been used to generate state and county level arrest totals and rates, generally for the years 1995 to 2002. Countylevel data are reported along with codes that indicate 9 categories of population sizes. Generally the largest arrest rates reported are for small jurisdictions with significant numbers of arrests of non residents, such as in a popular vacation area. The UCR Age, Sex, and Race file has been used along with US Census population data to produce arrest rates by demographic category for marijuana possession and sales arrests in 2002. The four categories used for race based data in the UCR program are White, Black, Indian (Native American), and Asian. The race based data are also subdivided by general age group: adult, juvenile, and all. Age/sex data are presented in two formats. The primary presentation utilizes five year age categories for males, females, and both. Age/sex data are also presented using single year categories for age 15 to age 24 to highlight the impact of marijuana arrests on these specific age groups. All arrest rates reported in these tables are per 100,000 population. Some arrests rates may vary due to differences in the data sets; for example the arrest rate for possession derived from the county level file may be 200 while the same arrest rate derived from the age, sex and race file may be 192. Data reported in these tables may also differ from reports from state criminal justice agencies; UCR files are frequently updated at the state level. State sections include the following additional data: marijuana arrests as a percentage of drug arrests, marijuana arrests as a percentage of all arrests, the 2002 Census population, 2002 reporting coverage for demographic data, and the maximum state penalties for possession or sale of 1 ounce of marijuana. Marijuana arrests as a percentage of all drug arrests indicate the resources marijuana offenses take away from other drug control efforts. Marijuana arrests as a percentage of all arrests provide an index of the cost of marijuana enforcement in a state; the percentage of all arrests indicates a general percentage of overall criminal justice costs that can be attributed to marijuana. The maximum penalties indicate the potential severity of punishment for marijuana offenses; these data also help characterize the potential cost of state marijuana laws under conditions of maximum enforcement. Jon B. Gettman, Ph.D. National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Page 1

Key to Almanac Tables Marijuana Arrests 1995 2002 Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: County level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data. [Computer File] All: Both adults and juveniles. Adults: Age 18 and older. Juvenile: Under age 18. Arrests: Total marijuana arrests, possession and sales arrests combined. Rate: The arrest rate per 100,000 for all marijuana offenses is calculated by dividing the number of arrests by the coverage population and multiplying the result by 100,000. Pct of Drug Arrests: The percent of drug arrests represented by marijuana arrests. This figure is calculated by dividing the number of marijuana arrests by the number of all arrests for drug offenses. Pct of All Arrests: The percentage of all arrests represented by marijuana arrests. This figure is calculated by dividing the number of marijuana arrests by the number of arrests for all criminal offenses. Marijuana Sales/Possession Arrests 2002 Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race. [Computer File] Population: The total population estimated by the U.S. Census. population. This figure is calculated by dividing the coverage population by the census population for a region. Poss. Max: The maximum penalty for possession of 1 ounce of marijuana. Sales. Max: The maximum penalty for sales of one ounce of marijuana. Arrest Rate: The arrest rate per 100,000 population, calculated by dividing the number of arrests by the population served by the arresting police agencies and multiplying the result by 100,000. Adults: Individuals age 18 and older. Juveniles: Individuals under the age of 18. Rate: The demographic composition of coverage populations has been estimated using U.S. Census data and used to calculate arrest rates for marijuana offenses per 100,000 population for specific demographic groups. Arrest Pct.: The percentage of arrests for the offense accounted for by the demographic group. Pop. Pct.: The estimated percentage of the regional population accounted for by the demographic group. Ratio: The ratio produced by dividing Arrest Pct by Pop. Pct. by the population percentage. A group that accounts for equal shares of marijuana possession arrests and the general population will have a ratio of 1.0. Coverage: The percentage of the total population represented by the coverage Page 2 www.norml.org

Marijuana Arrests by County 1998 2002 Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: County level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data. [Computer File] Population Size: Nine categories are used to distinguish counties of similar population size. Special circumstances are more likely to disproportionately affect arrest rates in counties with smaller resident populations, such as high numbers of vacation visitors for beach and mountain resort areas. Arrests: Total marijuana arrests, possession and sales arrests combined. Arrest Rates: The arrest rate per 100,000 for all marijuana offenses is calculated by dividing the number of arrests by the coverage population and multiplying the result by 100,000. Rank (Rates): Ranking among all the counties in the State, from highest (1) to lowest. Population Size Codes Size 1 Population < 2,500 Size 2 Population 2,500 to 9,999 Size 3 Population 10,000 to 24,999 Size 4 Population 25,000 to 49,999 Size 5 Population 50,000 to 99,999 Size 6 Population 100,000 to 249,999 Size 7 Population 250,000 to 499,999 Size 8 Population 500,000 to 999,999 Size 9 Population 1,000,000 + Notes on the Calculation of Age and Race Specific Arrest Rates at the County, State, and National Level 1. County level Totals and Arrest Rates. Local agency data from the UCR Age, Sex, and Race file are combined to produce county level totals and arrest rates for the overall population. While the agency level file provides data on the number of blacks arrested by each agency, for example, it does not provide data on the local black population. However calculation of the arrest rate for blacks can take place at the county level through the use of Census Bureau data on county level populations. 2. State, and National Level Totals and Arrest Rates. County level data are combined to produce state, and national level totals of coverage populations and arrests by offense, providing a basis for calculating the arrest rate for the overall coverage population. 3. Demographic based Arrest Rates. The coverage population for Blacks in each region, for example, can be estimated using Census data on the overall Black population of the region. If Blacks comprise 65% of the population of a county, for example, these tables are based on the premise that Blacks also comprise 65% of the coverage population reported in the UCR data for that county. The estimation of the Black population within the overall coverage population provides a basis for calculating the arrest rates for Blacks in the region. 4. Coverage Indicators. A comparison of the coverage population of the reporting local agencies and the overall census population produces a coverage indicator indicating the extent the reported data represents a particular region and its diversity. National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Page 3

Missouri Marijuana Arrests 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 All Arrests 12,602 13,060 14,538 15,000 14,861 14,540 13,748 18,279 All Rate 236.70 243.70 269.12 275.79 271.78 259.87 244.20 322.23 All Pct. Of Drug Arrests 50.47% 46.23% 44.89% 45.10% 46.62% 46.43% 38.43% 45.91% All Pct. Of All Arrests 3.72% 3.82% 4.08% 4.10% 4.43% 4.50% 4.27% 5.26% Adult Arrests 10,756 10,965 12,439 12,734 12,600 12,047 11,482 16,058 Adult Rate 202.03 204.61 230.27 234.12 230.43 215.31 203.95 283.08 Adult Pct. Of Drug Arrests 43.08% 38.82% 38.41% 38.29% 39.53% 38.47% 32.09% 40.33% Adult Pct. Of All Arrests 3.17% 3.21% 3.49% 3.48% 3.76% 3.73% 3.57% 4.62% Juvenile Arrests 1,837 2,083 2,094 2,258 2,248 2,488 2,269 2,222 Juvenile Rate 34.50 38.87 38.76 41.51 41.11 44.47 40.30 39.17 Juvenile Pct. Of Drug Arrests 7.36% 7.37% 6.47% 6.79% 7.05% 7.94% 6.34% 5.58% Juvenile Pct. Of All Arrests 0.54% 0.61% 0.59% 0.62% 0.67% 0.77% 0.70% 0.64% Missouri Marijuana Possession Arrests 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 All Arrests 10,435 11,604 13,436 13,507 13,689 13,202 12,428 16,604 All Rate 196.00 216.53 248.72 248.34 250.35 235.95 220.76 292.71 All Pct. Of Drug Arrests 41.79% 41.08% 41.49% 40.61% 42.95% 42.16% 34.74% 41.70% All Pct. Of All Arrests 3.08% 3.40% 3.77% 3.69% 4.08% 4.09% 3.86% 4.78% Adult Arrests 8,779 9,723 11,473 11,500 11,591 10,893 10,356 14,490 Adult Rate 164.89 181.43 212.38 211.44 211.98 194.68 183.95 255.44 Adult Pct. Of Drug Arrests 35.16% 34.42% 35.42% 34.58% 36.37% 34.78% 28.95% 36.39% Adult Pct. Of All Arrests 2.59% 2.85% 3.22% 3.14% 3.46% 3.37% 3.22% 4.17% Juvenile Arrests 1,657 1,877 1,965 2,006 2,091 2,307 2,074 2,119 Juvenile Rate 31.12 35.03 36.38 36.88 38.24 41.23 36.84 37.36 Juvenile Pct. Of Drug Arrests 6.64% 6.64% 6.07% 6.03% 6.56% 7.37% 5.80% 5.32% Juvenile Pct. Of All Arrests 0.49% 0.55% 0.55% 0.55% 0.62% 0.71% 0.64% 0.61% Missouri Marijuana Sales Arrests 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 All Arrests 2,167 1,456 1,102 1,493 1,172 1,338 1,320 1,675 All Rate 40.70 27.17 20.40 27.45 21.43 23.91 23.45 29.53 All Pct. Of Drug Arrests 8.68% 5.15% 3.40% 4.49% 3.68% 4.27% 3.69% 4.21% All Pct. Of All Arrests 0.64% 0.43% 0.31% 0.41% 0.35% 0.41% 0.41% 0.48% Adult Arrests 1,977 1,242 966 1,234 1,009 1,154 1,126 1,568 Adult Rate 37.13 23.18 17.88 22.69 18.45 20.62 20.00 27.64 Adult Pct. Of Drug Arrests 7.92% 4.40% 2.98% 3.71% 3.17% 3.68% 3.15% 3.94% Adult Pct. Of All Arrests 0.58% 0.36% 0.27% 0.34% 0.30% 0.36% 0.35% 0.45% Juvenile Arrests 180 206 129 252 157 181 195 103 Juvenile Rate 3.38 3.84 2.39 4.63 2.87 3.23 3.46 1.82 Juvenile Pct. Of Drug Arrests 0.72% 0.73% 0.40% 0.76% 0.49% 0.58% 0.55% 0.26% Juvenile Pct. Of All Arrests 0.05% 0.06% 0.04% 0.07% 0.05% 0.06% 0.06% 0.03% Page 4 www.norml.org

Missouri Marijuana Possession Arrests - 2002 Population 5,672,579 Arrest Rate Adults White Black Indian Asian Coverage 99.46% 2000 180.21 Rate 269.92 456.49 65.86 75.53 Poss. Max. 12 months 2001 214.29 Arrest Pct. 70.28% 16.58% 0.10% 0.30% Sales Max. 180 months 2002 284.34 Pop. Pct. 65.48% 7.85% 0.34% 0.97% Ratio 1.07 2.11 0.29 0.31 All White Black Indian Asian Juveniles White Black Indian Asian Rate 305.15 600.74 83.15 87.80 Rate 154.72 144.59 15.22 35.66 Arrest Pct. 81.17% 18.42% 0.11% 0.34% Arrest Pct. 10.90% 1.85% 0.01% 0.04% Pop. Pct. 85.50% 11.47% 0.46% 1.27% Pop. Pct. 20.02% 3.63% 0.12% 0.30% Ratio 0.95 1.61 0.24 0.27 Ratio 0.54 0.51 0.08 0.13 Total Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 1,131.94 1,132.72 592.50 381.94 311.83 224.37 117.48 55.20 17.31 6.58 Arrest Pct. 28.90% 28.24% 13.02% 9.16% 8.04% 6.35% 3.07% 1.27% 0.32% 0.10% Pop. Pct. 7.26% 7.09% 6.25% 6.82% 7.33% 8.04% 7.42% 6.52% 5.32% 4.31% Ratio 3.98 3.98 2.08 1.34 1.10 0.79 0.41 0.19 0.06 0.02 Male Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 1,853.98 1,879.38 992.40 599.86 468.09 331.69 193.27 93.99 27.69 11.25 Arrest Pct. 24.29% 23.51% 10.86% 7.17% 5.99% 4.64% 2.47% 1.05% 0.25% 0.08% Pop. Pct. 3.72% 3.56% 3.11% 3.40% 3.64% 3.98% 3.64% 3.17% 2.56% 2.05% Ratio 6.53 6.60 3.49 2.11 1.65 1.17 0.68 0.33 0.10 0.04 Female Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 371.08 380.49 196.00 165.29 157.65 119.43 44.52 18.52 7.70 2.35 Arrest Pct. 4.61% 4.73% 2.16% 1.99% 2.04% 1.71% 0.59% 0.22% 0.07% 0.02% Pop. Pct. 3.53% 3.53% 3.14% 3.42% 3.69% 4.07% 3.78% 3.35% 2.76% 2.26% Ratio 1.31 1.34 0.69 0.58 0.55 0.42 0.16 0.07 0.03 0.01 Total Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 327.30 716.41 1,163.53 1,753.41 1,675.77 1,513.97 1,219.07 1,091.47 951.94 846.96 Arrest Pct. 1.64% 3.64% 6.03% 9.01% 8.58% 7.79% 6.34% 5.59% 4.60% 3.93% Pop. Pct. 1.42% 1.44% 1.47% 1.46% 1.46% 1.46% 1.48% 1.46% 1.37% 1.32% Ratio 1.15 2.52 4.09 6.17 5.89 5.32 4.29 3.84 3.35 2.98 Male Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 518.33 1,131.15 1,952.39 2,885.91 2,741.32 2,495.34 2,021.95 1,809.07 1,574.28 1,426.89 Arrest Pct. 1.33% 2.96% 5.19% 7.61% 7.20% 6.48% 5.28% 4.62% 3.83% 3.31% Pop. Pct. 0.73% 0.74% 0.76% 0.75% 0.75% 0.74% 0.74% 0.73% 0.69% 0.66% Ratio 1.82 3.98 6.87 10.15 9.64 8.78 7.11 6.36 5.54 5.02 Female Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 127.36 275.77 333.38 558.58 554.47 513.94 409.30 376.85 321.88 266.34 Arrest Pct. 0.31% 0.68% 0.84% 1.40% 1.38% 1.31% 1.06% 0.97% 0.77% 0.62% Pop. Pct. 0.70% 0.70% 0.72% 0.71% 0.71% 0.72% 0.74% 0.73% 0.68% 0.66% Ratio 0.45 0.97 1.17 1.96 1.95 1.81 1.44 1.33 1.13 0.94 National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Page 5

Missouri Marijuana Sales Arrests - 2002 Population 5,672,579 Arrest Rate Adults White Black Indian Asian Coverage 99.46% 2000 23.92 Rate 27.13 47.43 7.75 6.99 Poss. Max. 12 months 2001 22.03 Arrest Pct. 75.34% 18.06% 0.12% 0.25% Sales Max. 180 months 2002 28.75 Pop. Pct. 65.48% 7.85% 0.34% 0.97% Ratio 1.15 2.30 0.35 0.26 All White Black Indian Asian Juveniles White Black Indian Asian Rate 33.08 66.20 10.39 7.32 Rate 7.70 6.84 0.00 5.94 Arrest Pct. 80.70% 18.93% 0.12% 0.31% Arrest Pct. 5.36% 0.86% 0.00% 0.06% Pop. Pct. 85.50% 11.47% 0.46% 1.27% Pop. Pct. 20.02% 3.63% 0.12% 0.30% Ratio 0.94 1.65 0.26 0.24 Ratio 0.27 0.24 0.00 0.20 Total Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 73.49 105.27 69.49 49.89 41.13 27.77 17.67 12.24 5.33 3.29 Arrest Pct. 18.56% 25.96% 15.10% 11.84% 10.48% 7.77% 4.56% 2.77% 0.99% 0.49% Pop. Pct. 7.26% 7.09% 6.25% 6.82% 7.33% 8.04% 7.42% 6.52% 5.32% 4.31% Ratio 2.56 3.66 2.42 1.74 1.43 0.97 0.61 0.42 0.19 0.11 Male Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 119.92 176.38 117.36 77.65 61.37 41.46 28.72 21.82 10.38 4.33 Arrest Pct. 15.54% 21.82% 12.70% 9.19% 7.77% 5.73% 3.64% 2.40% 0.92% 0.31% Pop. Pct. 3.72% 3.56% 3.11% 3.40% 3.64% 3.98% 3.64% 3.17% 2.56% 2.05% Ratio 4.18 6.13 4.08 2.70 2.13 1.44 1.00 0.76 0.36 0.15 Female Age 15-19 Age 20-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-34 Age 35-39 Age 40-44 Age 45-59 Age 50-54 Age 55-59 Age 60-64 Rate 24.57 33.63 22.03 22.28 21.15 14.38 7.03 3.17 0.64 2.35 Arrest Pct. 3.02% 4.13% 2.40% 2.65% 2.71% 2.03% 0.92% 0.37% 0.06% 0.18% Pop. Pct. 3.53% 3.53% 3.14% 3.42% 3.69% 4.07% 3.78% 3.35% 2.76% 2.26% Ratio 0.86 1.17 0.76 0.77 0.73 0.50 0.24 0.11 0.02 0.08 Total Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 16.18 35.58 50.54 123.77 139.95 128.49 136.65 93.80 87.71 75.29 Arrest Pct. 0.80% 1.79% 2.59% 6.29% 7.09% 6.54% 7.03% 4.75% 4.19% 3.45% Pop. Pct. 1.42% 1.44% 1.47% 1.46% 1.46% 1.46% 1.48% 1.46% 1.37% 1.32% Ratio 0.56 1.24 1.76 4.31 4.87 4.47 4.75 3.26 3.05 2.62 Male Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 26.77 61.92 82.13 198.54 227.85 220.95 222.01 161.13 146.15 123.61 Arrest Pct. 0.68% 1.60% 2.16% 5.18% 5.92% 5.67% 5.73% 4.07% 3.51% 2.84% Pop. Pct. 0.73% 0.74% 0.76% 0.75% 0.75% 0.74% 0.74% 0.73% 0.69% 0.66% Ratio 0.93 2.15 2.86 6.91 7.93 7.69 7.72 5.60 5.08 4.30 Female Age 15 Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age24 Rate 5.09 7.59 17.29 44.89 47.45 34.26 50.56 26.74 28.55 26.90 Arrest Pct. 0.12% 0.18% 0.43% 1.11% 1.17% 0.86% 1.29% 0.68% 0.68% 0.62% Pop. Pct. 0.70% 0.70% 0.72% 0.71% 0.71% 0.72% 0.74% 0.73% 0.68% 0.66% Ratio 0.18 0.26 0.60 1.56 1.65 1.19 1.76 0.93 0.99 0.94 Page 6 www.norml.org

Missouri Marijuana Arrests by County Rank Population Arrests Arrest Rates (Rates) Size 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2002 Adair 4 44 20 26 36 86 179.85 81.90 104.10 143.25 339.63 50 Andrew 3 30 29 31 29 58 194.43 185.34 187.97 174.76 346.89 47 Atchison 2 7 0 3 7 22 97.41 0.00 46.66 108.19 337.48 55 Audrain 4 57 72 74 83 91 240.21 303.77 286.23 319.08 347.18 46 Barry 4 74 77 63 125 151 210.99 216.19 173.86 342.83 411.02 32 Barton 3 40 31 19 7 28 332.47 255.27 151.50 55.48 220.23 88 Bates 3 59 57 45 20 49 369.72 359.49 270.22 119.36 292.33 71 Benton 3 45 57 21 15 100 270.40 332.69 122.24 86.78 574.15 18 Bollinger 3 25 23 19 28 25 215.68 198.69 157.95 231.35 204.99 92 Boone 6 445 428 462 540 713 344.46 329.73 341.08 396.22 519.20 23 Buchanan 5 115 78 150 225 297 139.65 94.86 174.42 260.03 340.74 48 Butler 4 131 131 96 110 148 321.99 321.21 234.91 267.52 357.21 45 Caldwell 2 19 17 29 8 21 217.12 191.31 323.34 88.65 230.95 85 Callaway 4 108 122 153 86 115 290.44 324.11 375.54 209.80 278.42 75 Camden 4 86 60 84 73 222 256.89 175.76 226.59 195.72 589.14 15 Cape Girardeau 5 170 243 220 175 234 255.79 364.44 320.27 253.19 336.00 56 Carroll 3 28 27 25 2 5 273.12 262.82 243.07 19.33 47.95 114 Carter 2 14 13 9 0 104 219.16 202.43 151.49 0.00 1,726.71 2 Cass 5 325 192 223 198 362 417.79 239.06 275.61 243.21 440.65 27 Cedar 3 16 35 24 11 27 121.97 263.42 174.76 79.61 193.92 95 Chariton 2 19 17 13 22 16 214.59 196.12 154.06 259.13 187.68 99 Christian 5 63 28 29 26 77 133.24 56.84 53.43 47.61 139.92 107 Clark 2 16 15 49 6 21 211.78 199.79 660.73 80.41 279.29 74 Clay 6 495 511 517 433 592 481.26 504.02 516.10 429.60 583.35 16 Clinton 3 25 23 22 83 82 169.12 153.28 151.81 569.19 559.84 20 Cole 5 169 159 160 131 140 243.92 228.17 224.02 182.29 193.35 96 Cooper 3 76 34 39 74 98 469.02 210.96 233.95 441.19 579.88 17 Crawford 3 45 42 33 26 372 215.25 201.39 153.63 120.30 1,708.15 3 Dade 2 35 29 12 14 21 437.61 365.47 151.46 175.61 261.42 77 Dallas 3 32 31 24 24 59 209.96 202.24 153.25 152.30 371.58 39 Daviess 2 31 24 34 11 56 395.31 304.38 424.15 136.39 689.06 9 De Kalb 3 36 39 43 39 52 237.80 253.92 267.35 241.01 318.90 58 Dent 3 43 76 139 81 63 303.35 535.97 931.20 539.32 421.35 31 Douglas 3 26 25 21 8 17 209.97 200.16 160.50 60.77 128.17 108 Dunklin 4 93 100 90 28 72 281.55 304.15 271.45 83.94 214.20 91 Franklin 5 221 124 209 250 346 237.95 132.34 219.69 261.18 358.74 44 Gasconade 3 36 35 30 13 34 242.20 233.77 195.54 84.21 218.59 90 Gentry 2 15 22 8 3 12 217.30 315.37 116.60 43.46 172.51 101 Greene 6 531 653 559 433 1,481 233.80 286.40 232.53 179.02 607.74 14 Grundy 3 41 43 21 9 20 397.56 420.95 201.30 85.75 189.11 97 Harrison 2 19 17 14 2 51 224.77 198.76 158.19 22.46 568.37 19 Henry 3 52 41 31 35 76 245.17 192.06 140.31 157.44 339.27 51 Hickory 2 19 17 14 8 33 218.52 196.21 156.60 88.94 364.12 41 Holt 2 12 12 9 9 59 211.71 214.90 168.19 167.16 1,087.56 5 Howard 3 23 24 14 18 32 233.74 245.05 137.09 175.18 308.23 65 Howell 4 91 99 88 89 137 254.12 275.21 236.32 237.54 362.89 42 National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Page 7

Missouri Marijuana Arrests by County Rank Population Arrests Arrest Rates (Rates) Size 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2002 Iron 3 27 24 20 23 17 243.42 219.56 186.97 213.70 156.77 105 Jackson 8 3,743 3,726 3,688 3,647 3,132 497.18 488.00 476.05 467.87 398.77 34 Jasper 6 341 280 244 289 346 330.93 267.61 222.31 261.70 310.94 61 Jefferson 6 225 225 267 278 338 115.66 114.36 134.78 139.47 168.29 104 Johnson 4 165 140 136 201 247 346.06 292.25 281.82 413.96 504.85 24 Knox 2 10 9 7 10 24 227.38 205.53 160.51 227.89 542.86 21 Laclede 4 154 125 100 71 123 502.91 400.65 308.38 217.61 374.13 38 Lafayette 4 48 62 45 59 296 146.58 188.84 136.60 178.01 886.28 6 Lawrence 4 76 73 67 47 85 245.85 235.58 203.17 141.65 254.24 80 Lewis 3 5 6 15 14 36 48.88 58.51 142.94 132.59 338.38 52 Lincoln 4 47 42 45 35 118 132.69 114.27 115.55 89.32 298.87 68 Linn 3 25 41 24 18 56 177.78 295.30 174.49 130.07 401.61 33 Livingston 3 30 35 29 32 34 207.61 245.99 199.20 218.46 230.35 86 McDonald 3 42 40 34 16 98 211.34 200.04 156.82 73.34 445.84 26 Macon 3 41 39 37 35 47 266.63 253.87 234.74 220.69 294.12 70 Madison 3 25 23 19 44 43 214.41 199.24 161.02 370.59 359.44 43 Maries 2 18 17 14 14 23 214.59 199.55 157.25 156.28 254.82 79 Marion 4 104 108 122 108 66 368.86 382.30 427.43 376.06 232.19 84 Mercer 2 0 0 0 0 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 183.78 100 Miller 3 88 83 117 68 165 386.86 368.15 499.10 288.31 694.27 8 Mississippi 3 55 35 53 14 46 404.98 259.88 394.73 103.63 337.91 54 Moniteau 3 21 33 32 17 16 158.00 247.45 215.82 113.96 106.44 111 Monroe 2 20 18 7 7 26 220.00 198.46 75.18 74.72 261.23 78 Montgomery 3 51 28 24 49 87 427.60 230.64 197.76 401.28 707.14 7 Morgan 3 40 37 20 25 76 219.77 199.62 103.58 128.68 390.18 37 New Madrid 3 49 47 37 36 59 237.12 229.47 197.42 190.90 310.49 62 Newton 4 62 112 130 41 60 137.50 249.62 273.31 85.67 124.42 109 Nodaway 3 58 27 34 36 63 275.48 129.24 155.17 163.29 283.59 73 Oregon 3 21 21 17 44 48 209.48 205.48 164.35 422.75 457.71 25 Osage 3 27 25 20 7 16 214.03 200.11 153.12 53.26 120.83 110 Ozark 2 3 10 15 18 127 30.99 100.49 157.20 187.48 1,312.80 4 Pemiscot 3 32 44 32 26 63 147.69 203.38 159.62 128.90 309.98 63 Perry 3 9 29 63 67 55 51.14 165.67 347.45 367.24 299.21 66 Pettis 4 91 98 83 79 124 245.68 262.93 211.16 199.76 311.18 60 Phelps 4 140 126 116 234 173 361.50 324.72 291.27 583.96 428.47 29 Pike 3 45 45 44 45 59 276.89 273.77 239.77 243.72 317.12 59 Platte 4 100 112 98 175 155 238.33 265.71 250.29 444.20 390.47 36 Polk 4 50 43 51 34 54 195.10 167.51 188.94 125.19 197.33 93 Pulaski 4 84 92 91 90 155 218.54 237.62 220.06 216.30 369.71 40 Putnam 2 11 10 8 1 10 221.15 202.47 153.17 19.03 188.86 98 Ralls 2 19 17 14 4 60 218.12 199.20 149.38 42.42 631.51 11 Randolph 4 61 65 95 63 106 253.62 269.08 385.19 253.88 423.93 30 Ray 3 50 55 49 27 52 216.06 232.81 211.42 115.78 219.95 89 Reynolds 2 15 14 10 10 43 222.29 210.21 149.50 148.59 617.64 13 Ripley 3 30 29 21 9 86 214.52 204.96 155.45 66.22 627.92 12 St Charles 7 628 799 834 1,236 851 236.01 291.77 293.78 432.72 295.66 69 Page 8 www.norml.org

Missouri Marijuana Arrests by County Rank Population Arrests Arrest Rates (Rates) Size 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2002 St Clair 2 20 18 15 3 15 218.70 197.15 155.41 30.89 153.28 106 Ste Genevieve 3 19 28 22 31 56 109.62 159.10 123.30 172.68 309.60 64 St Francois 5 149 144 123 78 143 271.05 257.97 221.06 139.33 253.50 81 St Louis 9 2,340 2,287 2,377 1,712 1,751 231.58 227.75 233.88 167.42 169.94 102 Saline 3 67 125 50 50 82 290.71 547.60 210.47 209.19 340.46 49 Schuyler 2 5 1 3 2 3 113.53 22.39 71.94 47.66 70.97 113 Scotland 2 10 9 8 6 12 205.68 185.95 160.55 119.66 237.58 83 Scott 4 100 107 97 93 104 246.38 264.32 234.07 223.05 247.54 82 Shannon 2 17 8 2 19 146 206.99 96.42 24.03 226.87 1,744.74 1 Shelby 2 15 16 11 13 30 218.50 233.95 161.79 190.03 435.22 28 Stoddard 4 64 73 58 30 158 214.98 245.09 195.25 100.37 524.66 22 Stone 4 57 39 25 45 83 213.75 144.69 87.24 156.06 285.67 72 Sullivan 2 15 14 11 5 20 223.75 197.77 152.38 68.83 273.26 76 Taney 4 105 144 107 78 79 307.06 415.07 269.50 195.25 196.26 94 Texas 3 48 45 36 36 76 212.43 200.19 156.50 155.54 326.74 57 Vernon 3 48 43 65 40 62 248.78 220.04 317.79 194.36 298.98 67 Warren 3 75 68 51 49 84 315.29 274.91 207.95 198.57 338.19 53 Washington 3 100 83 35 41 40 437.81 359.43 149.93 174.56 169.01 103 Wayne 3 27 27 21 35 91 208.54 205.62 158.38 262.35 676.93 10 Webster 4 8 11 16 22 70 27.93 37.58 51.54 70.43 222.19 87 Worth 1 5 0 3 0 0 212.86 0.00 125.94 0.00 0.00 115 Wright 3 42 39 28 17 72 214.27 198.12 155.95 94.10 392.69 35 St Louis city 7 576 511 350 287 254 167.37 149.93 100.52 81.92 71.95 112 State Total 15,000 14,861 14,540 13,748 18,279 275.79 271.78 259.87 244.20 322.23 National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Page 9