Encyclopedia of Politics of the American West

Similar documents
RECLAMATION PROJECTS AUTHORIZATION AND ADJUSTMENT ACT OF 1992 TITLE XVIII -- GRAND CANYON PROTECTION SECTION SHORT TITLE.

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress of the United States of America

Robert T. Anderson, Professor, University of Washington School of Law Seattle, WA. April 2018

When used in sections 371, 376, 377, 412, 417, 433, 462, 466, 478, 493, 494, 500, 501, and 526 of this title

In The Supreme Court of the United States

Water Law Senior College Jonathan Carlson

Guide to the A. J. Shaver Papers

NEW MEXICO S EXPERIENCE WITH INTERSTATE WATER AGREEMENTS

Water. Low levels of water and drought are seen as greater problems than the economy in the West today.

Supreme Court of the United States

SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN IN NEW MEXICO NAVAJO NATION WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

The Rio Grande flows for approximately 1,900 miles from the

Law of the River Apportionment Scheme Short Summary of Laws. (January, 2012)

CHIPPEWA CREE TRIBE OF THE ROCKY BOY S RESERVATION INDIAN RESERVED WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT AND WATER SUPPLY ENHANCEMENT ACT OF 1999

No. 137, Original STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF WYOMING. and. STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA Defendants.

Nambé, Pojoaque, San Ildefonso, and Tesuque Pueblos Settlement

In the Supreme Court of the United States

The Aamodt case is a complex, long-running adjudication of water

Referred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections

US Code (Unofficial compilation from the Legal Information Institute) TITLE 43 - PUBLIC LANDS CHAPTER 32B COLORADO RIVER FLOODWAY

U.S. Department of the Interior Office of Inspector Genera AUDIT REPORT WITHDRAWN LANDS, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Vague and Ambiguous. The terms market and marketing are not defined.as such, the

Columbia River Treaty Review

a GAO GAO INDIAN ISSUES Analysis of the Crow Creek Sioux and Lower Brule Sioux Tribes Additional Compensation Claims

In the Supreme Court of the United States

CRS Report for Congress

Wyoming s Big Horn River Adjudication

Defend and Develop: Why the Colorado Water Conservation Board Was Created. By Bill McDonald and Tom Cech

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. THE STATE ENGINEER, AB-07-1 Claims of Navajo Nation

Pamela Williams, Director Secretary s Indian Water Rights Office. WSWC Spring Meeting March 21, 2019 Chandler, AZ

SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 17, 2017 MINUTES

New Mexico Water Law Case Capsules 2-1

Pueblos and tribal reservations are located within most of the larger stream

The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA): Protections, Federal Water Rights, and Development Restrictions

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION BOULDER CANYON PROJECT

Subject: Opinion on Whether Trinity River Record of Decision is a Rule

In re Crow Water Compact

FOREWORD. Senator Jon Kyl & Ryan A. Smith

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

WYOMING S COMPACTS, TREATIES AND COURT DECREES

2014 Arkansas River Basin Water Forum

Indian Water Rights, the Missouri River, and the Administrative Process

Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies: Overview of FY2019 Appropriations

UTE INDIAN WATER COMPACT. Purpose of Compact. Legal Basis for Compact. Water

RIO GRANDE COMPACT VIOLATIONS. New Mexico s ever increasing water use and groundwater pumping below Elephant

End of a Long Dry Road: Federal Court Of Claims Rejects Klamath Farmers Takings Claims. Douglas MacDougal Marten Law PLLC

COLORADO CANYONS NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA AND BLACK RIDGE CANYONS WILDERNESS ACT OF 2000

Part 34. The Failure of the Florence- Casa Grande Project PART 1. Pima-Maricopa Irrigation Project Education Initiative

Congressional Record -- Senate. Thursday, October 8, 1992 (Legislative day of Wednesday, September 30, 1992) 102nd Cong. 2nd Sess.

COMMITTEE REPORTS. 106th Congress, 2d Session. Senate Report S. Rpt. 479 GREAT SAND DUNES NATIONAL PARK ACT OF 2000

SOUTHEASTERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT MINUTES

A Federal-State Compact for Missouri Basin Development

Updating the Colorado River compact

MANDAN, HIDATSA & ARIKARA NATION Three Affiliated Tribes * Fort Berthold Indian Reservation

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby direct the following:

Native American Senate Documents 60th Congress (1908) 94th Congress (1975)

INTERSTATE WATER MANAGEMENT IN THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN IN THE UNITED STATES JEROME C. MUYS MUYS & ASSOCIATES, P.C. WASHINGTON, D.C.

NAVAJO WATER RIGHTS: PULLING THE PLUG ON THE COLORADO RIVER?

DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY: The United States responses to interrogatories of the Cities of Aztec and Bloomfield

In The Supreme Court of the United States

The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and Federal Water Rights

Public Law Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled.

Review of Certain National Monuments Established Since 1996; Notice of Opportunity for

Supreme Court of the United States

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION BOULDER CANYON PROJECT

COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY & WOTUS RULES UPDATES. Henry s Fork Watershed Council Jerry R. Rigby Rigby, Andrus & Rigby Law, PLLC

340.. OCTOBER TERM, 1963.

(2) MAP. The term Map means the map entitled Proposed Pine Forest Wilderness Area and dated October 28, 2013.

Selected Federal Water Activities: Agencies, Authorities, and Congressional Committees

One Hundred Fifth Congress of the United States of America

III. SUMMARY OF TULE RIVER TRIBE'S HISTORIC AND FUTURE MONEY DAMAGES CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES

US Code (Unofficial compilation from the Legal Information Institute) TITLE 43 - PUBLIC LANDS CHAPTER 12B COLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJECT

US Code (Unofficial compilation from the Legal Information Institute) TITLE 43 - PUBLIC LANDS CHAPTER 32A COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL

Decision Memo San Antonio Mountain Communication Site Lease Project

New Era of Arizona Water Challenges

Supreme Court of the United States

Idaho Water Law: Water Rights Primer & Definitions. A. What is a Water Right?

Arkansas River Compact Kansas-Colorado 1949 ARKANSAS RIVER COMPACT

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. THE STATE ENGINEER, AB-07-1 Claims of Navajo Nation

Central Arizona Project;

Secretary Bruce Babbitt Speech at the National Press Club Washington, DC June 8, 2011

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL BUREAU

Western Regional Partnership (WRP) Charter

Federal Land Ownership: Overview and Data

Dan Keppen, P.E. Executive Director

Senior College Session 2 Classic and Modern Water Law Cases

RECLAMATION PROJECTS AUTHORIZATION AND ADJUSTMENT ACT OF 1992

Report on, Discussion and Consideration of Action for Domestic Agreements Necessary to Implement Minute 323 of the 1944 Mexican Water Treaty

AGENDA WEDNESDAY, MARCH 03, :00 AM. DIRECTORS PRESENT: Guglielmana Lloyd Ryan Wicke Williams

Montana Land and Water Alliance, Inc P.O. Box 1061 Polson, Montana

Western Interstate Water Compacts

[Discussion Draft] [DISCUSSION DRAFT] H. R. ll

The Montana Reserved Water Rights Compact Commission

8th Annual Conservation in the West Poll Finds Strong Support for Protecting Land and Water; Voters Reject National Monument Attacks

No. 137, Original STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF WYOMING. and. STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA Defendants.

Public Policy Agenda Number 4. Attachment 1. Federal Legislative Update. Federal Update. Public Policy Committee October 5, 2017

Power Marketing Administrations: Background and Current Issues

Albert Bierstadt, painting of Hetch Hetchy Valley

Public Law th Congress An Act

In This Issue: INDIAN WATER RIGHT NEGOTIATIONS INTERIOR S CONSIDERATIONS WHEN APPOINTING FEDERAL NEGOTIATION TEAMS.

Transcription:

Encyclopedia of Politics of the American West Contributors: Steven L. Danver Print Pub. Date: 2013 Online Pub. Date: May 21, 2013 Print ISBN: 9781608719099 Online ISBN: 9781452276076 DOI: 10.4135/9781452276076 Print pages: 570-572 This PDF has been generated from. Please note that the pagination of the online version will vary from the pagination of the print book.

10.4135/9781452276076.n339 Population increases and economic development in the West during the late nineteenth century led to the recognition that dependable water access was crucial to the sustenance of human life and economic activity. This period saw Congress enact legislation promoting irrigation projects and authorizing studies of irrigation potential in the West. These efforts culminated in June 1902 when Congress and President Theodore Roosevelt's administration enacted legislation (Pub. L. 57 161) creating, within the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the U.S. Reclamation Service (USRS). This was later renamed the Bureau of Reclamation (USBR). USRS was given responsibility for developing and ratifying interstate compacts governing stream-flow sharing between states and international treaties governing such sharing with Canada and Mexico. USRS's organic statute also directed it not to interfere with state or territorial water appropriation, control, distribution, or use laws. Other key agency emphases included the following: users who benefited from federal funding of reclamation water projects would repay the government; those projects would remain federal property even after users repaid their share of the costs; project construction work usually would be contracted to the private sector; agency employees administering contracts and inspecting construction would ensure contractor work met government specifications; and hydroelectric power revenues would be used to repay project construction charges. USRS separated from USGS in 1907 to become an independent Interior Department bureau, and USRS was renamed the Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) in 1923. The 1928 congressional authorization of the Boulder Canyon Project (Hoover Dam) saw authorization of large amounts of federal funds to USBR, which authorized construction of the dam and ratified the Colorado River Compact. During the Great Depression, Congress authorized USBR to construct nearly forty additional water projects, including California's Central Valley Project and Colorado's Big Thompson Project, which promoted infrastructure development and created public works jobs. Through 1968, USBR undertook more than 180 construction projects, including the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program, Grand Coulee Dam, and Central Arizona Project. These projects delivered agricultural water, irrigating nearly 10,000,000 acres in the West; this Page 2 of 5

represented about one-third of western irrigated acreage and one-third of water used in the West. These projects were funded through the adroit use of congressional earmarks by legislators such as Sen. Carl Hayden (1877 1972), D-Ariz., who served as a key figure on the Senate Appropriations Committee. Funding for these projects was facilitated by Congress's lumping them into a single bill, making it difficult for legislators to vote against bad projects because the good projects were in the same bill and forcing the president to either accept or veto all the projects at the same time. Interest groups including federal bureaus, congressional committees, agribusinesses, construction companies, and local interests favored these projects regardless of other partisan or ideological differences, and that helped facilitate their development. While they have enhanced western water supply, these USBR projects have also caused controversy. In the USBR's early years, concern existed that reclamation water projects would injure American Indian water rights. The 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision Winters v. United States, 207 U.S. 564, delayed development of Montana's Milk River project for several years. It also established the Winters Doctrine, which maintained that tribes with reservations possessed reserved water rights in sufficient quantities to meet reservation needs and that these rights dated from the day when the treaty or executive order establishing the reservation had gone into effect. Consequently, congressionally authorized, federally funded reclamation projects could not take precedence over reserved tribal water rights. Environmental controversy also affected USBR projects. Between 1908 and 1912, public opposition over plans to [p. 570 ] build a dam on Lake Tahoe, as part of the Newlands Project, resulted in the dam not being built. During the 1950s, controversy over construction of the Echo Park Dam in Dinosaur National Monument increased public awareness of problems involved with dam construction in a national park. During the 1960s, written works such as Rachel Carson's Silent Spring and legislation such as the 1964 Wilderness Act (Pub. L. 88 577), the 1966 National Historic Preservation Act (Pub. L. 89 665), and the 1973 Endangered Species Act (Pub. L. 93 205) reflected public concern over adverse environmental impacts of reclamation projects, including negative impacts on animal habitats, water temperatures, and historical and archaeological treasures. Page 3 of 5

Illustration from 1919 showing the principal irrigation projects in the western part of the United States Today, USBR manages many outdoor recreation properties and provides flood control and drought mitigation services. Farmers whose lands are watered by reclamation [p. 571 ] projects produce 60 percent of U.S. vegetables. The bureau's influence and staffing has declined since the Clinton administration (1993 2001), and the bureau's main focus today is on water management projects. Albert T. Chapman 10.4135/9781452276076.n339 See also Further Readings Page 4 of 5

Pisani, Donald J. The Bureau of Reclamation and the West, 1945 2000. Nevada Historical Society Quarterly vol. 43, no. 4 (2000): pp. 363 83. Pisani, Donald J. Water and American Government: The Reclamation Bureau, National Water Policy, and the West, 1902 1935. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002. Storey, Brit Allan. Brief History Bureau of Reclamation. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, 2011. http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/ gpo6027/2011newbriefhistoryv1.pdf (accessed September 8, 2011). Page 5 of 5