IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO. :

Similar documents
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO. :

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO. :

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR SANTA ROSA COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiffs, CASE NO. :

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR SANTA ROSA COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiffs, CASE NO. :

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION -

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

HOMEWARD BOUND SERVICES OF NORTH AMERICA MARC ORTH

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - Plaintiff CASE NO.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA -CIVIL DIVISION-

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

Filing # E-Filed 05/08/ :47:12 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO: COMPLAINT

Filing # E-Filed 07/13/ :52:45 AM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR SARASOTA, MANATEE, DESOTO COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

CRS Report for Congress

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

South Carolina Code of Laws (Unannotated) Current through the end of the 2008 Session DISCLAIMER

Filing # E-Filed 03/07/ :02:15 AM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 0:17-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12

Filing # E-Filed 04/10/ :26:28 AM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, Case No.: (09)

Filing # E-Filed 12/01/ :28:55 PM

Chapter 4 Home Sales, Brokerage, and Repairs. 4.1 Complaint for Damages and Cancellation Regards Sale of Mobile Home

Filing # E-Filed 06/13/ :25:39 PM

Superior Court of California

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, ( PLAINTIFF or the ATTORNEY GENERAL ),

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROW ARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

WikiLeaks Document Release

Filing # E-Filed 07/11/ :27:15 PM

Case 8:16-cv JDW-JSS Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION -

Courthouse News Service

Case 3:13-cv JE Document 1 Filed 12/20/13 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#: 1

Case 5:18-cv TLB Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. CASE NO: 1:15-cv RNS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS CITY STATE OF MISSOURI

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF TOOELE, TOOELE DEPARTMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION. vs. DIVISION: A

"~'J;' v" 02li 34r...,;;

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CA XXXXAB CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT

Case 3:17-cv DMS-RBB Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 20

Filing # E-Filed 02/03/ :01:59 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

RELIEF FOR VIOLATIONS OF: SOLARCITY CORPORATION,

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 9:11-cv KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Case 8:14-cv CEH-MAP Document 8 Filed 08/27/14 Page 1 of 22 PageID 56

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF YOLO. Plaintiff, Defendant. JEFF W. REISIG, District Attorney of Yolo County, by LARRY BARLLY, Supervising

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI. Div. CLASS ACTION PETITION

Case 3:16-cv LB Document 1 Filed 06/11/16 Page 1 of 14

JURISDICTION AND VENUE. 2. This Court has original federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331

Courthouse News Service

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

Case 3:16-cv SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 23

CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REGULAR WORKSHOP JUNE 2, 2015 IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE COMMISSION MEETING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE COUNTY COURT, IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff, JOSE GILBERTO SERRANO, Pro Se, hereby files this Response to the Motion to. Introduction

PlainSite. Legal Document. New York Western District Court Case No. 6:14-cv McCracken et al v. Verisma Systems, Inc. et al.

Case 2:18-cv JTM-MBN Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

CRS Report for Congress

Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVE THOMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE THOMA

(212) (212) (fax) Attorneysfor Named Plaintiff proposed FLSA Collective Plaintiffs, and proposed Class

STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE

Case 2:13-cv KOB Document 1 Filed 02/05/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

Filing # E-Filed 11/10/ :27:26 PM

Case 0:10-cv MJD-FLN Document 1 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Court File No.

STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,

Case 9:17-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2017 Page 1 of 20

Case 1:16-cv KBF Document 39 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COUNTY COURT, IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT

Courthouse News Service

CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VERIFIED COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Defendant.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE

Transcription:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, vs. Plaintiff, CASE NO. : SUN STATE TREES & PROPERTY MAINTENANCE, INC. a/k/a A SUN STATE TREE SERVICE & PROPERTY MAINTENANCE, INC. Defendant. / COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTION, DAMAGES, CIVIL PENALTIES AND OTHER STATUTORY RELIEF This is an action for injunctive relief, declaratory judgment, damages, costs, attorneys fees, and penalties brought under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Chapter 501, Florida Statutes (2004). The State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs (Attorney General), sues the Defendant, Sun State Trees & Property Maintenance, Inc., a/k/a A Sun State Tree Service & Property Maintenance, Inc., and alleges: THE PARTIES 1. The Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs, is the statutorily empowered enforcing authority for Florida s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. 2. Section 501.160(8), Florida Statutes (2004) specifically empowers the Attorney General to enforce the prohibition against unconscionable pricing of commodities during an official state of emergency. 3. Attorney General Charlie Crist has reviewed this matter and determined that this

enforcement action serves the public interest. A copy of the determination of public interest is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 4. The Defendant, Sun State Trees & Property Maintenance, Inc. a/k/a A Sun State Tree Service & Property Maintenance, Inc. (Sun State) is engaged in trade and commerce within Florida, within the meaning of Section 501.203(8), Florida Statutes (2004). Sun State is in the tree service and removal business. 5. Sun State is located at 295 Lyman Road, Casselberry, Seminole County, Florida. Sun State has conducted business since at least May 15, 1999. 6. Sun State offers goods, services, and other things of value to consumers of the State of Florida. During the State of Emergency declared on August 10, 2004 by Governor Bush to protect the citizens of the State of Florida, Sun State has offered tree service and removal services to consumers in Seminole and Orange County. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 7. Section 26.012, Florida Statutes (2004) grants this court jurisdiction over this action for equitable and legal relief. 8. This court has personal jurisdiction over Sun State because it does business in Florida and is located in Florida. 9. This court has subject matter jurisdiction. This action seeks equitable relief, a declaratory judgment, penalties, damages, costs and attorney s fees. DEFENDANT S UNLAWFUL COURSE OF BUSINESS 10. On August 10, 2004, the Governor of the State of Florida, Jeb Bush, signed Executive Order 04-182, declaring a sixty day State of Emergency throughout the State of Florida -2-

declaring that then Tropical Storms Charley and Bonnie threatened Florida with a major disaster. Section 8 of Executive Order 04-182 provides: In accordance with Sections 501.160(2) and 501.160(3), Florida Statutes, I hereby place all persons on notice that it is unlawful for any person to rent or sell, or offer to rent or sell at an unconscionable price, any essential equipment, services, or supplies whose consumption or use is necessary because of the emergency. Such services shall include, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, any rental of hotel, motel, or other transient lodging facilities, and any rental of storage facilities. In accordance with Sections 501.160 (1)(b), Florida Statutes, any price exceeding the average price for such essential equipment, services, or supplies for the thirty (30) days immediately proceeding the date of this Executive Order shall create a presumption that the price is unconscionable unless such increase is caused by actual costs incurred in connection with such essential equipment, services, or supplies, or is caused by national or international economic trends. (Executive Order No. 04-182, attached as Exhibit B ). 11. On August 13, 2004, Hurricane Charley struck Florida with winds exceeding 145 miles per hour, crossing Florida from coast to coast leaving devastation in its wake. Homes were destroyed. People were killed. Hospitals and nursing homes were critically damaged. Almost two million citizens were evacuated. Thousands of people were without electricity or water. Hurricane Charley followed Tropical Storm Bonnie which struck Florida only a day before. 12. During a State of Emergency, services like removal of damaged trees, repair of roofs, and home repair are necessary as a result of the emergency. 13. During this State of Emergency, Sun State has engaged, and continues to engage in unconscionable pricing practices, and unconscionable, deceptive and unfair acts and practices in trade and commerce by charging unconscionable prices for tree removal -3-

services. 14. For example, on August 15, 2004, Jeff Anderson, a Sun State employee, examined hurricane-damaged trees at the homes of Bruce Stephenson and his neighbor, Charles Modell in Winter Park, Orange County, Florida. One tree, located on Mr. Modell s property, had fallen through the roof of Mr. Stephenson s house. Two trees, located in Mr. Stephenson s back yard, were resting on Mr. Stephenson s roof. A fourth tree, located in Mr. Stephenson s front yard, was partially split and a portion of that tree was on the ground. 15. Mr. Stephenson and Mr. Modell asked Mr. Anderson to provide an estimate for the removal of these four trees. 16. Sun State required $30,000 to provide the service. Mr. Anderson gave Mr. Stephenson an invoice in the amount of $15,000 and gave Mr. Modell an invoice in the amount of $15,000, splitting the cost of the service between the two neighbors. (See attached Exhibits C [Mr. Stephenson s invoice] and D [Mr. Modell s invoice]. 17. Sun State proceeded to remove Mr. Modell s tree from Mr. Stephenson s house on August 15, 2004, and arranged to come back to Mr. Stephenson s house the next day to remove the remaining trees. 18. On August 16, 2004, Mr. Stephenson and Mr. Modell confronted Mr. Anderson by telephone about the cost of Sun State s services. Mr. Stephenson and Mr. Modell informed Mr. Anderson that they believed the cost of $30,000 for Sun State s services was price gouging and insurance fraud. Mr. Anderson told Mr. Stephenson and Mr. Modell that he would talk with his supervisor. -4-

19. Later that morning, Mr. Stephenson and Mr. Modell met with Joel Choate, Mr. Anderson s supervisor. They informed Mr. Choate that they believed the cost of $30,000 for Sun State s services was price gouging and insurance fraud. Mr. Choate then offered to complete the job by removing the two trees still resting on Mr. Stephenson s roof for a total cost of $11,000 - $19,000 less than the original charge. The price of $11,000 included the cost of the removal of Mr. Modell s tree from Mr. Stephenson s house by Sun State on August 15, 2004. 20. Mr. Choate prepared a second invoice for Mr. Stephenson in the amount of $11,000 for the removal of the three trees, backdating the invoice to August 15, 2004. (A copy of the second invoice is attached as Exhibit E ). This invoice replaced the invoices in the amount of $15,000 originally given to Mr. Stephenson and Mr. Modell by Sun State. 21. Mr. Choate wrote void on Mr. Modell s invoice for $15,000. (See Exhibit D ). 22. The average price in the Central Florida trade area during the 30 day period preceding the declaration of the State of Emergency for the service of removing the three trees was approximately $3,359.14. COUNT I - PRICE GOUGING ($30,000 OFFER). 23. The Attorney General re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 22. 24. Florida s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, in Section 501.204(1), Florida Statutes (2004), declares unconscionable acts in the conduct of any trade or commerce unlawful. 25. Florida s Price Gouging law, Section 501.160 (2), Florida Statutes (2004) makes it unlawful for: -5-

a person or her or his agent or employee to rent or sell or offer to rent or sell at an unconscionable price within the area for which the state of emergency is declared, any essential commodity including, but not limited to, supplies, services, provisions, or equipment that is necessary for consumption or use as a direct result of the emergency. This prohibition remains in effect until the declaration expires or is terminated. 26. "Commodity" means any goods, services, materials, merchandise, supplies, equipment, resources, or other article of commerce, and includes, without limitation, food, water, ice, chemicals, petroleum products, and lumber necessary for consumption or use as a direct result of the emergency. Sec. 501.160(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004). 27. Tree removal service is a commodity during the State of Emergency. 28. The price for a commodity is prima facie unconscionable if the amount charged grossly exceeds the average price at which the same or similar commodity was readily obtainable in the trade area during the 30 days immediately prior to a declaration of a state of emergency, and the increase in the amount charged is not attributable to additional costs incurred in connection with the sale of the commodity or national or international market trends. 501.160(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2004) 29. Sun State s original offer to charge $30,000 for removal of trees at the homes of Mr. Stephenson and Mr. Modell is unconscionable. It grossly exceeds the price at which the same service was readily obtainable in the Central Florida trade area in the 30 days immediately prior to the declaration of the State of Emergency. 30. Sun State s conduct in charging unconscionable prices for tree removal to Mr. Stephenson and Mr. Modell demonstrates that Sun State s regular practice is to violate -6-

Florida s price gouging and other laws. 31. Unless this court enjoins Sun State from charging unconscionable prices during the State of Emergency, Sun State s continued activities will result in irreparable injury to the consuming public. WHEREFORE, the State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs, prays for judgment: A. Permanently enjoining Sun State from charging or attempting to charge unconscionable prices for commodities during the State of Emergency. More specifically, the Department of Legal Affairs asks the court to temporarily and permanently enjoin Sun State from charging a price for tree removal services that exceeds the average price at which the same or similar service was readily obtainable in the Central Florida trade area during the 30 days immediately prior to a declaration of a state of emergency; B. Awarding the Department of Legal Affairs actual damages and interest on behalf of consumers injured by the unfair competition or deceptive or unfair acts or practices of Defendants in accordance with section 501.207(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2004); C. Assessing against Defendant Sun State civil penalties in the amount of one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each violation of section 501.160, Florida Statutes (2004) in accordance with section 501.164, Florida Statutes (2004); D. Assessing against Defendant Sun State civil penalties in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for each violation of Chapter 501, Part II, pursuant to section 501.2075, Florida Statutes (2004) and civil penalties in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for each violation victimizing a senior citizen; -7-

E. Awarding reasonable attorney s fees and costs to the Department of Legal Affairs pursuant to sections 501.2105, and 501.2075, Florida Statutes (2004); F. Awarding restitution for consumers injured by Sun State s unlawful actions; G. Requiring that Defendant Sun State disgorge all revenue generated as a result of the unconscionable, unfair and deceptive practices set forth in this complaint; H. Declaring the practices described in this complaint unlawful; and I. Granting such other relief as this court deems just and proper. COUNT II - PRICE GOUGING ($11,000 CHARGE). 32. The Attorney General re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 28. 33. Sun State s charge of $11,000 for removal of trees at the homes of Mr. Stephenson and Mr. Modell is unconscionable. It grossly exceeds the price at which the same service was readily obtainable in the Central Florida trade area in the 30 days immediately prior to the declaration of the State of Emergency. 34. Sun State s conduct in charging unconscionable prices for tree removal to Mr. Stephenson demonstrates their regular practice is to violate Florida s price gouging and other laws. 35. Unless this court enjoins Sun State from charging unconscionable prices during the State of Emergency their continued activities will result in irreparable injury to the consuming public. WHEREFORE, the State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs, prays for judgment: A. Permanently enjoining Sun State from charging or attempting to charge -8-

unconscionable prices for commodities during the State of Emergency. More specifically, the Department of Legal Affairs asks the court to temporarily and permanently enjoin Sun State from charging a price for tree removal services that exceeds the average price at which the same or similar service was readily obtainable in the Central Florida trade area during the 30 days immediately prior to a declaration of a state of emergency; B. Awarding the Department of Legal Affairs actual damages and interest on behalf of consumers injured by the unfair competition or deceptive or unfair acts or practices of Defendants in accordance with section 501.207(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2004); C. Assessing against Defendant Sun State civil penalties in the amount of one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each violation of section 501.160, Florida Statutes (2004) in accordance with section 501.164, Florida Statutes (2004); D. Assessing against Defendant Sun State civil penalties in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for each violation of Chapter 501, Part II, pursuant to section 501.2075, Florida Statutes (2004) and civil penalties in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for each violation victimizing a senior citizen; E. Awarding reasonable attorney s fees and costs to the Department of Legal Affairs pursuant to sections 501.2105, and 501.2075, Florida Statutes (2004); F. Awarding restitution for consumers injured by Sun State s unlawful actions; G. Requiring that Defendant Sun State disgorge all revenue generated as a result of the unconscionable, unfair and deceptive practices set forth in this complaint; H. Declaring the practices described in this complaint unlawful; and I. Granting such other relief as this court deems just and proper. -9-

COUNT III - UNFAIR AND DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES. 36. The Attorney General re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 22. 37. Section 501.204(1), Florida Statutes (2004), declares unconscionable acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce to be unlawful. 38. Exploiting the desperate need for services to cure the damages created by the wide spread devastation of a major hurricane to extract prices grossly in excess of the value or normal charge for a service is an unconscionable act and practice. 39. Sun State has committed acts or practices in trade or commerce that shock the conscience, engaged in representations, acts, practices or omissions that are material, and that are likely to mislead consumers acting reasonably under the circumstances; or Sun State has committed acts or practices in trade or commerce which offend established public policy and are unethical, oppressive, unscrupulous or substantially injurious to consumers. Thus, Sun State has engaged in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of trade or commerce in violation of section 501.204(1), Florida Statutes (2004). 40. The acts and practices of Sun State have injured and will likely continue to injure and prejudice the public. 41. Sun State has willfully engaged in the acts and practices when Sun State knew or should have known that said acts and practices were unfair or deceptive or prohibited by rule. 42. Unless the court enjoins Sun State from engaging further in the acts and practices described in this complaint, Sun State s continued activities will irreparably injure the -10-

public. There is no adequate remedy at law for the injuries. RELIEF REQUESTED WHEREFORE, the State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs, prays for judgment: A. Permanently enjoining Sun State from charging or attempting to charge unconscionable prices for tree removal services; B. Awarding the Department of Legal Affairs actual damages and interest on behalf of consumers injured by the unfair competition or deceptive or unfair acts or practices of Defendants in accordance with section 501.207(1)(c), Florida Statutes (2004); C. Assessing against Sun State civil penalties in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for each violation of Chapter 501, Part II, pursuant to section 501.2075, Florida Statutes (2004) and civil penalties in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for each violation victimizing a senior citizen; D. Awarding reasonable attorney s fees and costs to the Department of Legal Affairs pursuant to sections 501.2105, and 501.2075, Florida Statutes (2004); E. Awarding restitution for consumers injured by Sun State s unlawful actions; F. Requiring that Defendant Sun State disgorge all revenue generated as a result of the unconscionable, unfair and deceptive practices set forth in this complaint; G. Declaring the practices described in this complaint unlawful; and H. Granting such other relief as this court deems just and proper. -11-

Respectfully submitted, CHARLES J. CRIST, JR Attorney General JORIE L. TRESS Assistant Attorney General Florida Bar No. 0179401 Office of the Attorney General Economic Crimes Division 135 W. Central Blvd., Suite 1000 Orlando, Florida 32801 (407) 245-0833 -12-