Drugs: evidence, testing and valuation Policy

Similar documents
PROCEDURE Simple Cautions. Number: F 0102 Date Published: 9 September 2015

Criminal Litigation Accreditation Scheme Standards of competence for the accreditation of solicitors representing clients in the magistrates court

Drug Offences Definitive Guideline

Some words in this paper may be hard to understand. We have written these words in bold blue text and have put a list of these words on page 9.

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED FORCE PROCEDURES. Cautioning of Adult Offenders (Simple Caution)

DRUGS Effective Date: May 9, 2005 Revised: September 11, 2006, September 8, 2009

Derbyshire Constabulary SIMPLE CAUTIONING OF ADULT OFFENDERS POLICY POLICY REFERENCE 06/122. This policy is suitable for Public Disclosure

LEVEL 6 - UNIT 18 CRIMINAL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2014

02504 PROCEDURE EVIDENTIAL BREATH SPECIMENS: STATIONS PROCEDURE. 2. Risk Assessments / Health & Safety Considerations

Use of Pre-Charge Bail

SENTENCES FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR (PRINCIPAL OFFENCE)

B e f o r e: LADY JUSTICE SHARP DBE MR JUSTICE HOLROYDE. HIS HONOUR JUDGE LAKIN (Sitting as a Judge of the CACD) R E G I N A DENNIS OBASI

THE NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES LAW (1993)

An automatic right to enhanced service will apply to all victims who are either:

Tim has been charged with criminal damage to the value of 10,000 at a children s playground

The Code. for Crown Prosecutors

I have today decided to disclose the located information to you in full, along with context for the statistics provided.

Key Facts and Figures from the Criminal Justice System 2009/2010. March 2011

Justices Clerk for West Yorkshire

THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES UNIT 18 CRIMINAL LITIGATION *

This policy document is to provide guidance for Police and Prosecutors in relation to Offences to be taken into Consideration.

Not Protectively Marked POLICY AND STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

ICCS: An Overview of the Integrated Criminal Court Survey

Introduction 2. Principle Commonwealth Drug Offences 2. Which Court Will Hear Commonwealth Drug Offences 5. Federal Police Investigative Powers 5

Update Questionnaire for Public Trust Positions And/or Childcare Positions

WITNESS CARE PROCEDURE

The learner can: 1.1 Explain the requirements of a lawful arrest.

SUBJECT: FIELD PHYSICAL EVIDENCE

PORTAGE la PRAIRIE RESOLUTION DOCKET PROTOCOL ADULT CHARGES

Quick Reference Guides to Out of Court Disposals

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE THE STATE BRIAN LUTCHMAN

The learner can: 1.1 Explain the requirements of a lawful arrest.

NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES (CONTROL) ACT

PRE-TRIAL COORDINATION PROTOCOL ADULT CHARGES

Part 11. Commitment and Shared Responsibility; Country and Region Recommendations, Communications, and Conduct

AN APPLICATION BY JULIAN ASSANGE TO CANCEL AN ARREST WARRANT RULING OF THE SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE (THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE) EMMA ARBUTHNOT,

Victoria Police Manual

The learner can: 1.1 Explain the requirements of a lawful arrest.

BERMUDA CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES 2013 BR 30 / 2013

AN BILLE UM CHEARTAS COIRIÚIL (SUBSTAINTÍ SÍCIGHNÍOMHACHA) 2010 CRIMINAL JUSTICE (PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES) BILL 2010

Practice Guidance Note (draft) Lewes and Chichester Crown Courts. Early Guilty Plea Protocol. Created on 21/08/ :52:00.

Notes and Observations to the questions relating to Criminal Legal Aid

Examinable excerpts of. Bail Act as at 10 April 2018 PART 1 PRELIMINARY

Information contained in this questionnaire is for official use only

Defence Forces (Forensic Evidence) Bill General Scheme

Simple Cautions for Adult Offenders

POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1984 (PACE) CODE F CODE OF PRACTICE ON VISUAL RECORDING WITH SOUND OF INTERVIEWS WITH SUSPECTS

FINAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT: FAILING TO SURRENDER TO BAIL

Criminal Procedure Act 2009

New Hampshire Supreme Court October 14, 2015 Oral Argument Case Summary

Area Inspection. Dumfries and Galloway

INDICTABLE OFFENCES (PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY) ACT

DETENTION PERIODS. This document is provided as general guidelines only.

Our Enforcement Policy

POLICE AMENDMENT ACT 2003 BERMUDA 2003 : 7 POLICE AMENDMENT ACT 2003

Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Harrison, Goddard and Andrews JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

CHILDREN COURT RULES, 2018

Poisons, Opium And Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act No 13 of 1984

Ed Cape Professor of Criminal Law and Practice

CHAPTER PESTICIDES AND TOXIC CHEMICAL CONTROL ACT

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

Revenue Protection Policy

LPG Models, Methods and Processes

Streamlined Forensic Reporting

Revision history (November 2007)

Criminal Law (High Risk Offenders) Act 2015

FACT SHEET. Juveniles (children aged 16 or under):

POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1984 (PACE) CODE E CODE OF PRACTICE ON AUDIO RECORDING INTERVIEWS WITH SUSPECTS

Identifying arrested, charged or convicted persons

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. Association of Chief Police Officers England & Wales

Bail Act 1977 Stage Two - to commence 1 July 2018

Criminal Justice Act 2003

Legal Studies. Total marks 100. Section I Pages marks Attempt Questions 1 20 Allow about 30 minutes for this section. Section II Pages 9 21

WHAT DO I DO IF I AM ARRESTED?

APPROPRIATE ADULT AT LUTON POLICE STATION

Lewisham Youth Offending Service

CHAPTER 44 CHILDREN AND YOUNG PERSONS ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1 PRELIMINARY PART 11 SPECIAL PROVISIONS AS TO PROCEDURE

OUTCOME REPORT OF THE

NOTICE OF APPEAL BY PERSON CONVICTED. Part 6, Criminal Procedure Act In the Court of Appeal of New Zealand. [Name] v [R or Police or prosecutor]

Vanuatu Extradition Act

NOTTINGHAMSHIRE POLICE JOB DESCRIPTION. Custody Clerical Administration Officer

APPEAL PURSUANT TO REGULATION 29 OF THE CRIMINAL LEGAL AID (REMUNERATION) REGULATIONS 2013

against Members of Staff

OBJECTS AND REASONS. Arrangement of Sections PART I PRELIMINARY PART II FORENSIC PROCEDURES BY CONSENT

SUMMARY OFFENCES ACT 1988 REGULATION

Young Offenders Act 1997 No 54

Number 27 of 2010 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2010 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. PART 1 Preliminary and General. PART 2 Impact of Crime on Victim

Criminal Justice: Working Together

Justice Committee. Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill. Written submission the Law Society of Scotland

CPS response to the Home Office s Consultation on Police Bail

Outcomes. Updates from Radian s in-house solicitor. Drug dealing and gang activity forces possession

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 92

1. How many people have been arrested under s144 LASPO (or offence code 125/86)?

Youth Out-of-Court Disposals. Guide for Police and Youth Offending Services

Statistics on Women and the Criminal Justice System A Home Office publication under Section 95 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991

Introduction to Code for Prosecutors

ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Standard Minimum Sentencing) Act 2002 No 90

THE STATUTES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE MISUSE OF DRUGS ACT (CHAPTER 185)

Derbyshire Constabulary VICTIM S RIGHT TO REVIEW POLICY POLICY REFERENCE 15/330. This policy is suitable for Public Disclosure

Transcription:

Drugs: evidence, testing and valuation Policy Policy summary West Yorkshire Police complies with Authorised Professional Practice (APP) which contains information to assist policing, and has established a local policy procedure to provide clear standards and guidelines. The Force has a duty to ensure drug related substances are subject of a recognised test prior to charge and has established a procedure concerning the evidential requirements and processes relating to drugs offences and the requirements for initial submission of case files. Aim The aim of the policy is to explain: which substances can be tested using EDIT; which substances must be tested out of force; when to charge; and why valuation statements are prepared. Scope All officers and police staff. Compliance Home Office circular 015/2012 APP Intelligence Management Chapter 1 Principles Key witness statement form Evidence, including evidence that the substance we are dealing with is or is strongly suspected to be a controlled drug, has to be included in the key witness statement. Standards of evidence The accepted standard of evidence to prove that a substance is a controlled drug varies depending on the: substance; offence charged; and anticipated plea. The rule is, investigate first, charge later, i.e. all substances must be subject of a recognised test prior to charge.

Chapter 2 Substances that can be tested in Force using EDIT General rule Generally, all drug related seizures must be sent to the Forensic Science Providers for examination. However, drug-testing kits can be used to test for certain seized drugs. For substances which must be tested out of Force see chapter three. EDIT The Force has adopted EDIT, which: allows trained staff to test for certain drugs in a controlled environment at a police station; removes the need to make submissions for forensic analysis; and enables a decision as to disposal, while the detainee is still in custody. The EDIT test must be: conducted within a controlled environment in a police station; overseen by the custody officer; and carried out prior to interview. Types of substances Testing for morphine, heroin and amphetamine A BDH Marquis trained officer can test for morphine, heroin and amphetamine. Testing for cocaine and crack cocaine A Cozart Cocaine trained officer, can test for cocaine and crack cocaine. MDMA There is no approved testing kit for MDMA so forensic submission is still required. Cannabis Most cannabis possession cases will be dealt with by a cannabis warning, however the EDIT reporting process applies where a warning is not appropriate. If the controlled drug is suspected to be cannabis, (for personal possession) the drug testing kit is replaced by sight and smell evidence from an officer experienced in investigating cannabis offences.

Home Office Circular 015/2012 allows for a law enforcement officer experienced in the recognition of the physical appearance, texture and smell of cannabis to identify the drug in cases: where the defendant is committed to Crown Court for sentence; dealt with in Crown Court where the identity of the substance is not in dispute and there is further corroborative evidence to support the identity of the substance; and in order to facilitate a remand either in custody or on conditional bail, however if the identification of the drug is in dispute, analysis at a forensic science laboratory will be required. Benefits Using the EDIT process has identified significant benefits including opportunities to: increase sanctioned detections of possession cases; reduce the number of bail to return and fail to return and make associated opportunity cost savings in custody and police officer time; significantly reduce time from arrest to disposal; and reduce forensic submission costs. Chapter 3 Substances which must be tested out of Force Introduction Where analysis of a substance is required, this should be arranged through Scientific Support Services. Substances requiring forensic analysis Substances should be submitted for forensic analysis via Scientific Support if the: case is to be tried at crown court; charge is a supply offence; or the identity of the drug is disputed at first appearance at court ( in agreement with CPS the court case will be adjourned to facilitate forensic testing). Chapter 4 When to charge Defendant can be charged In relation to: heroin; morphine; amphetamine; cocaine; and crack cocaine the defendant can be charged if the answer to all the following items is yes:

No Item 1 the offence is possession for personal use; 2 the quantity of substance is in keeping with personal use; 3 a suitably qualified police officer has: confirmed the identity of the substance using an approved drug test kit; and provided a statement. If the drug test kit cannot provide a positive reaction to the substance under test, a forensic analysis must be completed prior to charge. A statement from the officer carrying out the drug test will be accepted as a key witness statement for: initial file submission; remand in custody; or conditional bail applications. Chapter 5 Court issues Guilty plea If a guilty plea is entered and the case dealt with at Magistrates court, or committed to Crown court for sentence, no further analysis of the drugs will be required. Drugs tested prior to trial Providing the drug test indicates presence of heroin, morphine, amphetamine, cocaine or crack cocaine, the statement of the officer carrying out the test will be accepted as a key statement for initial file submission and for remand in custody applications. However, the drugs will have to be forensically analysed prior to the full trial if the: No Condition 1 quantity is too large for personal use; 2 defendant disputes the results of the test at first court appearance; 3 offence is possession with intent to supply; and the 4 case is to be tried at crown court. Drug test trained officers Drug test trained officers who test and provide a statement identifying cannabis or other drug will not be required to give evidence in court. Any statement submitted by them will only be used: Step Action 1 to remand on conditional bail;

2 to secure a remand at court; or 3 for guilty plea cases. In the event of a not guilty plea being entered, forensic analysis will be obtained and will form the basis of prosecution evidence. Full file required If an upgrade file is required, a complete forensic analysis must be obtained. The officer who carried out the field test would not be called to give evidence at court. Their original statement would remain on file as unused material. Admin Last revised: May 2013 Scheduled for review: May 2017